Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0085437 (
bacterial meningitis
)
4,038
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Meropenem
(
MEPM
) was evaluated for its efficacy and safety. The following results were obtained.
MEPM
was given to 12 patients with infections: 5 with pneumonia, 1 with
bacterial meningitis
, 2 with pharyngitis, 4 with skin and soft tissue infections. Therapeutic responses were "excellent" in 5, "good" in 4 and "fair" in 3, with an efficacy rate of 75%. Adverse reactions were not noted. No abnormalities were shown in laboratory data. It has been concluded that
MEPM
is a useful drug for the treatment of bacterial infections in children.
...
PMID:[Clinical evaluation of meropenem in children]. 150 4
Meropenem
and imipenem are carbapenems which are distinguishable from all other currently available beta-lactam antibiotics by breadth of antibacterial spectrum and stability to beta-lactamases, but can be differentiated one from another.
Meropenem
is relatively stable to human renal dehydropeptidase-I (DHP-I); it does not require to be co-administered with cilastatin and consequently, unlike imipenem, will be administered as a single agent. In vitro both meropenem and imipenem are active against almost all clinically important aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Differences in potency are seen but few may be of clinical significance: imipenem is more active against enterococci and meropenem is more active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas cepacia, Haemophilus influenzae and Proteus, Morganella and Providencia species. The primary target of imipenem is PBP2 in P. aeruginosa whilst meropenem has high affinity for both PBP2 and 3; this may contribute to greater potency against this organism. Laboratory evaluations predict that meropenem will not be seizurogenic, which combined with activity against likely pathogens, identified its potential for the treatment of
bacterial meningitis
. This has been investigated in a guinea-pig model in which meropenem exhibited potent activity against the common meningeal pathogens and also infections caused by penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae or Listeria monocytogenes. Clinical experience will determine the significance of these differences.
...
PMID:Laboratory data which differentiate meropenem and imipenem. 765 4
Meropenem
and comparator antibiotics, including ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, benzyl penicillin and a combination of ampicillin plus gentamicin, were evaluated in a model of
bacterial meningitis
in the guinea-pig. The model is an acute infection in which challenge with each organism, if untreated, causes an increase in numbers of white blood cells, elevation of protein concentrations and 6-8 log10 cfu/mL of bacteria in the CSF. Infections caused by Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, three strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae (two penicillin-resistant), Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Listeria monocytogenes all responded to meropenem, which was as active as the comparator agents in all studies, and was more active in most. Of particular note were the results seen against S. pneumoniae (penicillin-resistant) infections, in which meropenem was significantly more effective than ceftriaxone. Also notable were results from the P. aeruginosa infection where meropenem, at low doses, was more effective than ceftazidime. Activity against L. monocytogenes was equivalent to that produced by treatment with the combination of ampicillin plus gentamicin, even when treatment was delayed. These results show that, in an animal model, meropenem penetrates into CSF in concentrations sufficient to produce significant reductions in the numbers of common and less common pathogens.
...
PMID:Efficacy of meropenem in experimental meningitis. 854 1
Third-generation cephalosporins are presently the agents of choice for the empirical antimicrobial therapy of
bacterial meningitis
. However, a number of factors associated with these agents, namely the development of resistance by pneumococci, limited activity against some Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp., and the possible adverse effects of their bacteriolytic mode of action, indicate that newer classes of antimicrobial agents be evaluated for the treatment of
bacterial meningitis
.
Meropenem
is a carbapenem antibiotic which is highly active against the major bacterial pathogens causing meningitis, and penetrates well into the cerebrospinal fluid. Two prospective randomised studies in 56 adult
bacterial meningitis
patients have compared meropenem 40 mg/kg 8-hourly, up to a maximum of 6 g/day (n = 28) with cephalosporin treatment, i.e. cefotaxime (n = 17) or ceftriaxone (n = 11). Patients were assessed by neurological examination, Glasgow Coma Score and Herson-Todd score. Clinical cure was observed in all 23 evaluable patients treated with meropenem (100%) and with 17 of the 22 evaluable cephalosporin-treated patients (77%). All pre-treatment isolates were eradicated except one isolate of Staphylococcus aureus in a cefotaxime-treated patient. Neurological sequelae were noted in three meropenem and four cephalosporin-treated patients. No patients in either treatment group experienced seizures after the start of therapy. This was despite the fact that a patient in each group had experienced seizures before therapy, several had underlying CNS disorders, and that doses of 6 g/day of meropenem were given. Hearing impairment was recorded in 11 meropenem and nine cephalosporin treated patients. Three patients in the meropenem group and one in the cephalosporin group died during treatment for reasons unrelated to study therapy. Overall, the results of this study indicate that meropenem is an effective and well-tolerated antibiotic for the treatment of
bacterial meningitis
in adults.
...
PMID:A randomised comparison of meropenem with cefotaxime or ceftriaxone for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in adults. Meropenem Meningitis Study Group. 854 2
This paper on
bacterial meningitis
looks at aspects inherent in the aetiology and mechanisms underlying neurological damage and pharmacological treatment. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae type b and Neisseria meningitidis are the pathogens most commonly responsible and are able to colonise the host's respiratory mucosae, invade the vascular space, cross the haematoliquoral barrier and survive in the cerebrospinal fluid. The presence of germs in the subarachnoid spaces leads to the onset of inflammation and neurological damage. The most often used pharmacological treatments include, apart from antibiotics, anti-inflammatory drugs (although we have clinical data for corticosteroids only), pentoxyphillin and monoclonal antibodies. Initially empiric, antibiotic therapy is based on the use of drugs that act against the probable pathogenic agents, are capable of surmounting the haematoliquoral barrier and are well tolerated. Prior to the Eighties, the antibiotic of choice was ampicillin associated or otherwise with aminoglycosides. Subsequently, the availability of new drugs (cefotaxime and ceftriaxone) and the appearance of resistance led to changes in therapeutic protocols. Of the carbapenemics, wide spectrum antibiotics with high resistance to beta lactamase, imipenem /cilastatin proved effective although there was a high risk of inducing convulsions in patients with previous neurological damage or kidney failure.
Meropenem
was able to surmount the haematoliquoral barrier in sufficient concentrations and was well tolerated in patients with prior neurological changes. It has proved effective in clinical studies carried out up to the present.
...
PMID:[Current problems in the treatment of bacterial meningitis]. 909 74
Meropenem
is a new beta-lactam carbapenem antibiotic that appears to be promising in the treatment of hospitalized infants and children with serious infections. It has broad-spectrum activity against microorganisms, including most of the major aerobic (gram-negative and gram-positive) and anaerobic pathogens that cause serious bacterial infections in neonates and children. In addition, its pharmacokinetic profile makes possible parenteral administration every 8 hours. Several studies have demonstrated that meropenem is an effective and safe treatment for infants and children with serious pediatric infections (e.g., urinary tract infections, pneumonia, sepsis, intraabdominal infections, and skin and soft-tissue infections),
bacterial meningitis
, and cystic fibrosis. The results of further studies of the use of meropenem in the treatment of high-risk seriously ill infants and children are awaited with interest.
...
PMID:Use of meropenem in the treatment of serious infections in children: review of the current literature. 912 95
The choice of an antibiotic for the treatment of a serious paediatric infection is generally a difficult problem. The arrival of Carbapenem resulted an important advance in the field of medicine due to its broad-spectrum, low incidence of resistances and good safety profile. Among Carbapenems,
Meropenem
introduction represents a progress because of its pharmacokinetics characteristics and blood-brain barrier penetration.
Meropenem
dosage depends on the patient weight, and the way of administration is potentially easier.
Meropenem
has been compared with the most used paediatric antimicrobial in controlled and randomised clinical trials, showing a high efficacy in the treatment of several infections (respiratory, urinary, intraabdominal, dermatological, septicemia) and in neutropenic and cystic fibrosis patients aged between one month and twelve years old.
Meropenem
is specially useful in the
bacterial meningitis
treatment because it penetrates into the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with inflamed meninges and reaches therapeutic concentrations, and because appearance of seizures is low. Adverse reactions produced by
Meropenem
show a poor incidence and its severity is usually mild. With regard to this characteristics, it can be concluded that
Meropenem
is an antimicrobial which efficacy and safety profiles guarantee its use in the treatment of severe paediatric infections.
...
PMID:[Clinical pharmacology and indications of meropenem in severe pediatric infection]. 941 68
Meropenem
is a new carbapenem antibiotic of with an antibacterian spectrum similar to that of imipenem, but from which it may mainly be differentiated by the possibility of its administration at high doses and it has no demonstrated proconvulsive effect, properties which make it applicable in the treatment of
bacterial meningitis
. The clinical and experimental experience in the treatment of
bacterial meningitis
with this antibiotic is herein reviewed. It has been observed that the efficacy and safety of meropenem in meningitis caused by N. meningitidis, H. influenzae and pneumococci sensitive to penicillin may be similar to that of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone in both the pediatric and adult population. There are very few reports on the treatment of meningitis caused by pneumococci resistant to penicillin. However, given that the activity of meropenem on these pneumococci is similar to that of cefotaxime and that the doses administered are much lower, it does not appear to be recommendable in the treatment of this indication, although it should be tested in all meningeal strain to these characteristics isolated. It may currently be considered that the main indication of meropenem in the infections of the central nervous system is in nosocomial meningitis by multiresistant gram negative bacilli such as those of the Klebsiella-Serratia-Enterobacter and Acinetobacter sp. group. Therefore a limited, albeit favorable, report on the clinical experience with meropenem is herein presented.
Meropenem
may also be useful in the treatment of meningitis by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in which other treatments have failed.
...
PMID:[The role of meropenem in bacterial meningitis]. 941 71
Carbapenems are active beta-lactam antibiotics versus most of the gram positive and gram negative microorganisms and anaerobes although their activity is lacking in the case of Staphylococcus sp. resistant to methicillin, Enterococcus faecium and Streptococcus pneumoniae with high resistance to penicillin and some gram negative bacilli which naturally produce an methaloenzyme able to hydrolyze them such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Imipenem, the first synthetized carbapenem requires administration with cilastatin to avoid inactivation by renal dehydropeptidase 1.
Meropenem
does not require being taken with the renal enzyme inhibitor, with its activity being similar to that of imipenem. In abdominal infection the carbapenems have shown to be the authentic monotherapy in this type of infections being as effective as the different schedules of antibiotic associations normally used. Treatment with carbapenems in
bacterial meningitis
should be currently limited to the cases produced by gram negative bacilli producers of wide spectrum beta-lactamases (WSBL), cases of meningitis by Pseudomonas aeruginosa or gram negative bacilli producers of inducible cephalosporinase.
Meropenem
is the carbapenem of choice probably in these cases because the carbapenems are often the only active antibiotics and meropenem, specifically, does not have the risk of convulsions observed with imipenem-cilastatin. The carbapenems have shown to be useful in skin and soft tissue infections as well as in obstetric and gynecologic infections as monotherapy similar to the schedules of the currently used antibiotic associations. In the case of nosocomial pneumonias, all the studies have evaluated the carbapenems in monotherapy as useful and effective, specially in the case of pneumonia by gram negative bacilli. Finally, in non filiated nosocomial sepsis and specially in the case of neutropenic patients, the use of carbapenems is particularly attractive in gram negative sepsis in intensive care units. The appearance in the last few years of strains of gram negative bacilli, producers of wide spectrum beta-lactamase or stable repressed hyperproducers of class I chromosomic cephalosporinase, as well as other multiresistant gram negative bacilli, such as Acinetobacter baumanii make the carbapenems, in many cases, the only effective antibiotic in this type of infections.
...
PMID:[The role of carbapenems in the treatment of nosocomial infection]. 941 75
The tolerability of the 2 most frequently used carbapenems, imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem, is reviewed. Both of these drugs, but especially imipenem, are potentially neurotoxic and may cause seizures if overdosed relative to renal function and/or bodyweight. The therapeutic margin is considerably narrower with imipenem/cilastatin which cannot be given at doses required for treatment of
bacterial meningitis
.
Meropenem
on the other hand, is considerably less prone to cause seizures and its tolerability and efficacy are well documented in 3 relatively large, controlled studies in adults and children with meningitis. They showed that meropenem was as effective and well tolerated as cefotaxime or ceftriaxone. Another potential advantage of meropenem over imipenem/cilastatin is that it can be given intravenously at a high rate without increased risk of nausea or vomiting. An obvious reason for using a carbapenem instead of a cephalosporin for empirical treatment of life-threatening infections is that both imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem have a broader spectrum of activity. They are also more resistant to hydrolysis by the most common beta-lactamases, including the class I cephalosporinase frequently produced by Enterobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp. and the extended spectrum enzymes, now commonly found in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp.
...
PMID:Carbapenems in serious infections: a risk-benefit assessment. 1073 43
1
2
Next >>