Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0043352 (xerostomia)
 4,250 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Astemizole, a new histamine H1 receptor antagonist, was tested in a double-blind cross-over comparison study with chlorpheniramine maleate, a very effective conventional H1 antagonist, in patients with chronic allergic rhinitis. Astemizole was found to be equally effective, yet there was a significant decrease in the side effects of sleepiness (P less than .01) and dry mouth (P less than .05). Astemizole has a completely different structure and binding curves from terfenadine. It is approved for clinical use in the United Kingdom, Canada, and many European countries.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of an H1 antagonist, astemizole, for chronic allergic rhinitis. 288 23

Choice of an antidepressant medication is, in part, based on the side effects produced by a drug and the desire to avoid certain reactions in a particular patient. The clinician needs a reliable method of predicting which medications are most likely to produce specific untoward effects. Understanding the synaptic pharmacology of the most commonly used agents could serve as a tool for predicting possible side effects and drug-drug interactions. Antidepressant drugs alter neurotransmitter effects at nerve synapses, probably by blocking norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake, and blockade of neurotransmitter receptor sites - primarily the histamine H1 receptor, the muscarinic receptor, and the alpha-1-adrenoceptor. Possible clinical side effects related to some of these interactions include tachycardia, tremor, and (possibly) male sexual dysfunction (associated with norepinephrine reuptake blockade); sedation (associated with histamine H1 blockade); orthostatic hypotension, dizziness, and reflex tachycardia (associated with alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade), and blurred vision, dry mouth, and memory dysfunction (associated with muscarinic receptor blockade). Pharmacologic data that demonstrate the potencies and selectivities of the antidepressant drugs for reuptake blockade and receptor site antagonism might allow the clinician to make an informed, rational choice of antidepressant therapy. This paper presents data on drug potencies and selectivities, and attempts to relate these data to anticipated side effects and drug-drug interactions.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacology of antidepressants. 289 25

Ebastine is a long-acting nonsedating second generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist which binds preferentially to peripheral H1 receptors in vivo. It has shown antihistamine and antiallergic activity in healthy volunteers and patients with allergies, and protected against histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma. Significant symptom improvement is observed in patients with seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis or chronic idiopathic urticaria following administration of ebastine 10 mg/day, or 20 mg/day in severe rhinitis. In clinical trials, the efficacy of ebastine 10 or 20 mg/day was generally similar to standard dosages of terfenadine, cetirizine, astemizole and loratadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, astemizole, terfenadine and ketotifen in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria, and ketotifen, terfenadine, chlorpheniramine and mequitazine in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. The most frequent adverse events reported during ebastine therapy are drowsiness, headache and dry mouth, the incidence being similar to that reported in placebo recipients. Serious adverse cardiac events, observed on rare occasions with some other histamine H1 receptor antagonists, have not been reported with ebastine, and there has been no evidence of QTc interval prolongation related to ebastine therapy. Thus, once-daily ebastine offers an effective and well-tolerated alternative to other second generation antihistamines in current use for the first-line treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria.
 ...
PMID:Ebastine. a review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the treatment of allergic disorders. 880 67

Ebastine is a new second generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist that has shown clinical efficacy in the treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria after once-daily administration. This double-blind multicentre randomised placebo-controlled study has investigated the long term efficacy of ebastine 10mg once daily in the treatment of chronic urticaria compared with that of terfenadine 60mg twice daily. At the end of a 3-month treatment period, ebastine was significantly superior to placebo in improving symptoms of chronic urticaria (including severity of itching, number of wheals per day), and its efficacy was similar to that of terfenadine. In a global assessment of efficacy, investigators considered chronic urticaria to have improved in 73% of ebastine recipients compared with 68% and 52% of patients treated with terfenadine or placebo, respectively. The patients' assessments of efficacy were similar to those of the investigators. Ebastine was well tolerated, the incidence and nature of adverse events with this agent being similar to those reported in patients treated with terfenadine or placebo. The most common adverse events were headache and dry mouth. Thus, these results, which show ebastine to be an effective and well tolerated agent, indicated that the drug should be considered for the first-line therapy of chronic urticaria.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind multicentre comparative study of ebastine, terfenadine and placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria in adults. 882 24

Most of the modern non-sedating H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) penetrate the brain poorly, allowing the use of doses large enough to counteract allergic processes in peripheral tissues without important central effects. The antihistamines reviewed here are acrivastine, astemizole, cetirizine, ebastine, fexofenadine, loratadine, mizolastine, and terfenadine. However, these drugs are not entirely free from central effects, and there are at least quantitative differences between them. Although psychomotor and sleep studies in healthy subjects in the laboratory may predict that an antihistamine does not cause drowsiness, the safety margin can be narrow enough to cause a central sedating effect during actual treatment. This might result from a patient's individual sensitivity, disease-induced sedation, or drug dosages that are for various reasons relatively or absolutely larger (patient's weight, poor response, reduced drug clearance, interactions). Mild to even moderate sedation is not necessarily a major nuisance, particularly if stimulants need be added to the regimen (e.g. in perennial rhinitis). Furthermore, patients can adjust doses themselves if needed. Sedating antihistamines are not needed for long-term itching, because glucocorticoids are indicated and more effective. It is wise to restrict or avoid using antihistamines (astemizole, terfenadine) that can cause cardiac dysrhythmias, because even severe cardiotoxicity can occur in certain pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Histamine H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) are used in the treatment of allergic disorders. The therapeutic effects of most of the older antihistamines were associated with sedating effects on the central nervous system (CNS) and antimuscarinic effects causing dry mouth and blurred vision. Non-specific "quinidine-like" or local anaesthetic actions often led to cardiotoxicity in animals and man. Although such adverse effects varied from drug to drug, there was some degree of sedation with all old antihistamines. Non-sedating antihistamines have become available during the past 15 years. Some of them also have antiserotonin or other actions that oppose allergic inflammation, and they are not entirely free from sedative effects either. In small to moderate "clinical" concentrations they are competitive H1 receptor antagonists, although large concentrations of some of them exert non-competitive blockade. Daytime drowsiness and weakness are seldom really important, and they restrict patients' activities less than the old antihistamines. Some new antihistamines share with old antihistamines quinidine-like effects on the cardiac conducting tissues, and clinically significant interactions have raised the question of drug safety. This prodysrhythmic effect has also been briefly mentioned in comparisons of non-sedative H1 antihistamines.
 ...
PMID:Variations among non-sedating antihistamines: are there real differences? 1033 1

Ebastine and its active metabolite carebastine show potent antagonism of histamine H1-mediated phenomena in a wide variety of in vitro and in vivo non-clinical experimental models. By contrast, activity is not seen against histamine H2- or H3-mediated, nor acetylcholine- or serotonin-mediated phenomena, and both compounds are virtually without effect in models measuring pharmacological effects on the central nervous system (CNS). Explanation of these observations is found in their high selectivity for the histamine H1 receptor and in their low in vivo potency in displacing [3H]-mepyramine from central histamine H1 receptors, indicating that they do not readily pass the blood-brain barrier. These findings have been mirrored in clinical experimental models where oral doses of ebastine (1-30 mg) showed clear dose-related inhibition of intradermal histamine-induced weal and flare responses, whereas doses of 90 mg were without anticholinergic effects on salivary flow, cardiovascular reflexes or pilocarpine-induced miosis. Furthermore, in an extensive series of controlled studies in specific clinical models for measuring objective effects on the CNS, ebastine in single doses of 10-90 mg and repeated doses of 10-30 mg once daily, had no clinically relevant effects on cognitive performance and visual co-ordination tests, nor on simulated car-tracking tests and real car-driving tests. Nor was their any interaction with ethanol or diazepam. On subjective test parameters (questionnaires and visual analogue scales) there were only a few isolated and random incidences of minor increases in some indices of sedation at the highest doses. Not surprisingly, therefore, the clear therapeutic benefit seen during the extensive and international use of ebastine (5-20 mg once daily) in the treatment of seasonal and perennial rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria, has not been accompanied by signs of drug-induced anticholinergic effects (dry mouth, disturbances of visual accommodation) or sedation, making it an effective and well-tolerated first-line treatment alternative to other second-generation antihistamines.
 ...
PMID:The non-cardiac systemic side-effects of antihistamines: ebastine. 1044 30

One of the common side effects of antihistamine medicines is xerostomia (dry mouth). The current consensus is that antihistamine-induced xerostomia comes from an antimuscarinic effect. Although the effect of antihistamines on salivary secretion is both obvious and significant, the cellular mechanism whereby this happens is still unclear because of the lack of knowledge of histamine signaling in human salivary glands. Here, we have studied histamine receptors and the effect of antihistamines on human submandibular acinar cells. In primary cultured human submandibular gland and a HSG cell line, histamine increased the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration. The histamine-induced cytosolic free Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) increase was inhibited by histamine H1 receptor-specific antagonists, and the expression of the functional histamine H1 receptor was confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Interestingly, histamine pretreatment did not inhibit a subsequent carbachol-induced [Ca(2+)](i) rise without "heterologous desensitization." Chlorpheniramine inhibited a carbachol-induced [Ca(2+)](i) increase at a 100-fold greater concentration than histamine receptor antagonism, whereas astemizole and cetrizine showed more than 1000-fold difference, which in part explains the xerostomia-inducing potency among the antihistamines. Notably, histamine resulted in translocation of aquaporin-5 to the plasma membrane in human submandibular gland cells and green fluorescent protein-tagged aquaporin-5 expressing HSG cells. We found that histidine decarboxylase and the histamine H1 receptor are broadly distributed in submandibular gland cells, whereas choline acetyltransferase is localized only at the parasympathetic terminals. Our results suggest that human salivary gland cells express histamine H1 receptors and histamine-synthesizing enzymes, revealing the cellular mechanism of antihistamine-induced xerostomia.
 ...
PMID:Histamine H1 receptor induces cytosolic calcium increase and aquaporin translocation in human salivary gland cells. 1944 31