Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0043352 (xerostomia)
 4,250 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, drug interactions, efficacy, and dosage and administration of the new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors paroxetine, sertraline, and fluvoxamine are reviewed. Paroxetine, sertraline, and fluvoxamine all have large volumes of distribution and are highly bound to plasma proteins. In contrast to fluoxetine, these three drugs possess shorter elimination half-lives of approximately one day and are metabolized to clinically inactive compounds. Nausea was the most commonly reported adverse effect for all three agents. Other reported adverse effects are headache, sedation, dry mouth, insomnia, sexual dysfunction, and constipation. Because of their favorable pharmacokinetic profiles, paroxetine, sertraline, and fluvoxaetine are less likely than fluoxamine to interact with other drugs. Paroxetine has been found to be superior to placebo and equivalent to amitriptyline, imipramine, clomipramine, and doxepin in treatment of depression. Sertraline has been found to be superior to placebo and equivalent to amitriptyline in treatment of depression. Fluvoxamine has been found to be superior to placebo and equivalent to imipramine, clomipramine, desipramine, mianserin, and maprotiline in the treatment of depression. Fluvoxamine and sertraline have been shown to be superior to placebo in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical experience has demonstrated all three drugs to be effective in treatment of depression. They may be especially useful in elderly patients, in those who cannot tolerate alternative treatments, and in those who do not respond to adequate trials of other antidepressant therapies.
 ...
PMID:Paroxetine, sertraline, and fluvoxamine: new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. 146 19

Fluvoxamine was given in placebo-controlled trials to 33 severely depressed patients of between 60 and 71 years, 29 received imipramine and 14 placebo. At week 4 of treatment fluvoxamine and imipramine were superior to placebo on the HAMD and CGI scales (P less than 0.05). There was indication of an earlier onset of antidepressant activity in the fluvoxamine group. There was no evidence of systematic changes in laboratory variables in any treatment group. Fluvoxamine and placebo had similar effects on heart rate and blood pressure. Imipramine was associated with significant postural falls in mean systolic pressure. The most frequent unwanted symptom with fluvoxamine was mild nausea, with imipramine, dry mouth. Toxic confusion was the major reason for dropout in the imipramine (n = 4) and nausea (n = 3) in the fluvoxamine-treated group.
 ...
PMID:Fluvoxamine in the treatment of the older depressed patient; double-blind, placebo-controlled data. 310 46

1 The effects of fluvoxamine to a maximum of 300 mg daily were compared with those of imipramine to a maximum of 200 mg daily, in 151 patients with primary major depression. 2 Four weeks of treatment with fluvoxamine resulted in 67.2% improvement (+/- s.d. 21.6) on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (26 items). Treatment with imipramine showed 62.1% improvement (+/- s.d. 29.5) on this scale. 3 Fluvoxamine had no untoward effects on the cardiovascular system, while imipramine produced systematic increases in the postural fall in blood pressure. Dry mouth, nausea, daytime somnolence and tremor were seen with fluvoxamine treatment, while imipramine was associated with dry mouth, daytime somnolence, dizziness and tremor. 4 We conclude that fluvoxamine seems to have the same general antidepressant efficacy as imipramine. It was not associated with any safety problems and was generally well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind controlled clinical trial comparing fluvoxamine with imipramine. 640 1

In this investigation, the antidepressant efficacy of fluvoxamine and imipramine was compared in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study lasting 4 weeks; 338 depressed patients were recruited at five North American centres. For the efficacy analyses an intent-to-treat sample was defined. The global efficacy of the two drugs was assessed by the Hamilton Depression scale (HAM-D) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores. Antidepressant activity was also assessed using the percentage of responders on the CGI "improvement" scale. In addition the time of onset of antidepressant effect was evaluated by weekly analysis of individual HAM-D items. The intent-to-treat sample was stratified retrospectively according to the severity of the depression (mild, moderate or severe). Regarding global efficacy, compared with placebo, only fluvoxamine significantly improved the HAM-D total scores at Week 4 (p < 0.05). There was a suggestion from individual HAM-D item scores (depressed mood, suicide, psychic anxiety) that fluvoxamine had an earlier effect than imipramine. Overall, compared with placebo, more HAM-D items were improved by fluvoxamine than imipramine. Fluvoxamine but not imipramine was significantly superior to placebo in severely depressed patients as shown by improvements in the HAM-D score (p < 0.01) and the CGI "improvement" score (p < 0.05). Side effect profiles for the active agents were typical for their pharmacological category:imipramine was associated with anticholinergic effects, particularly dry mouth, and fluvoxamine was associated with nausea and vomiting.
 ...
PMID:Antidepressant efficacy in relation to item analysis and severity of depression: a placebo-controlled trial of fluvoxamine versus imipramine. 762 21

The efficacy and safety of fluvoxamine maleate, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, was compared with placebo and imipramine in patients with major depressive disorder. Previous literature has cited a dose range of 100 to 300 mg/day of fluvoxamine maleate for the treatment of major depression; however, this study demonstrates that a dose range of 50 to 150 mg/day is as effective as imipramine (80-240 mg/day). After a 1- to 2-week, single-blind, placebo washout phase, 150 depressed outpatients were randomized to double-blind treatment with fluvoxamine maleate (50-150 mg/day), imipramine (80-240 mg/day), or placebo for 6 weeks. Fluvoxamine produced a significant therapeutic benefit over placebo (p < or = 0.05) as assessed by the total score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; imipramine (80-240 mg/day) produced similar results. The secondary outcome variables (i.e., Clinical Global Impression severity of illness item and 56-Item Hopkins Symptom Checklist depression factor) also showed significant differences between fluvoxamine maleate and placebo during three of the four final weeks of the study. Both fluvoxamine maleate and imipramine appeared to be safe and well tolerated by the majority of patients. As expected from the pharmacology of these agents, the imipramine groups reported more anticholinergic effects (dry mouth, dizziness, and urinary retention) and electrocardiographic effects, whereas the fluvoxamine group reported more nausea, somnolence, and abnormal ejaculation. The majority of these adverse events were mild to moderate and, with the exception of dry mouth (imipramine) and abnormal ejaculation (fluvoxamine), were transient. The data clearly demonstrate the antidepressant activity and tolerability of fluvoxamine maleate (50-150 mg/day) as compared with placebo; it is also as effective as the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine (80-240 mg/day) in patients with major depressive disorder.
 ...
PMID:Fluvoxamine maleate in the treatment of depression: a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with imipramine in outpatients. 869 Aug 26

Some meta-analyses have suggested that the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are less effective than clomipramine in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The aim of this double-blind, randomised, multicentre study was to directly compare the efficacy and safety of fluvoxamine and clomipramine in patients with OCD. A total of 227 patients were randomised to flexible doses of fluvoxamine or clomipramine (both 150-300 mg/day) for 10 weeks. Fluvoxamine and clomipramine were both clinically effective and there were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups, at any visit, on the National Institute of Mental Health Obsessive-Compulsive global rating scale, the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive scale (total score and obsession and compulsion subscores), the Clinical Global Impression severity of illness and global improvement subscales, the Clinical Anxiety Scale and the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. However, there were differences in safety between the two treatments. Compared with fluvoxamine-treated patients, those treated with clomipramine had more anticholinergic side effects (dry mouth, constipation and tremor) and premature withdrawals due to adverse events (18 versus 9). The results from this controlled study indicate that fluvoxamine is as effective as clomipramine in the treatment of OCD but has a better tolerability profile. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
 ...
PMID:Fluvoxamine in obsessive-compulsive disorder: similar efficacy but superior tolerability in comparison with clomipramine. 1240 54