Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0043352 (xerostomia)
 4,250 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A hospital-based study reports the treatment with dothiepin hydrochloride (Prothiaden) of 237 depressed patients, some for over 2 years. Of the initial 237 patients a total of 84 patients had to be withdrawn from the study, over one third of these because of non-attendance. Only 26 (11.8%) of all patients failed to respond and 23 (9.7%) had to be withdrawn because of side effects, the commonest being dry mouth (6 patients) and drowsiness (4). The dosage required was between 75 and 225 mg/day with 75% of patients receiving between 125 and 150 mg/day. The majority of patients (75.2%) were well and off therapy by 9 months but a hard core of 30 patients (19.6%) required long-term therapy in excess of 2 years. The study showed dothiepin to be a well tolerated, safe and effective antidepressant with a special place in the treatment of chronic depressive states in inadequate personalities.
 ...
PMID:A retrospective assessment of the long-term effects of dothiepin. 81 5

Patients suffering from mixed anxiety/depressive states referred to a psychiatric out-patient clinic completed a four course of either a once-daily table of 30 mg nortriptyline with 1-5 mag fluphenazine, or a sustained release capsule of 50 mg amitriptyline once daily, on a double-blind basis. Depression improved satisfactorily on either treatment, but there was a greater reduction of anxiety on fluphenazine/nortriptyline, Drowsiness, however, occurred more frequently among the patients on amitriptyline, suggesting the sedative properties of this drug did not substitute adequately for a specific anxiolytic effect. Dry mouth was also noticeably more frequent with amitriptyline. As might be expected on pharmacokinetic and phsyological grounds, the results suggest that the sustained release characteristics of the amitriptyline preparation lead to a maximization of side-effects during the day without conferring any therapeutic advantage.
 ...
PMID:Once-daily treatment for mixed anxiety/depressive states: a comparison of slow release amitriptyline and fluphenazine with nortriptyline. 87 28

Patients were treated with protriptyline or nortriptyline (double-blind). They were assessed on the Zung Depression Scale and on the Hostility and Direction of Hostility Questionnaire (HDHQ). A good response was heralded by low ratings on criticism of self and others,and on projected (paranoid) hostility. The outcome was better with initial low scores on depressive symptoms, particularly unworthiness, restlessness and constipation. As to reported side effects, initial loss of interest augured badly for drowsiness, lack of clear mind for blurred vision, loss of libido for constipation and ideas of suicide for dry mouth.
 ...
PMID:Hostility, somatic symptoms and recovery with antidepressants. 115 28

The demonstration that long-term administration of relatively low doses of clonidine decreased the responsiveness of blood vessels to vasodilator and vasoconstrictor drugs in animals led to its investigation in the prevention of migraine in man. Results of placebo-controlled and open therapeutic trials have shown that clonidine in low dosages (75 to 150 mug daily) is useful in preventing migraine headaches in about 30%-50% of patients. A 50% or greater reduction in headache frequency or headache indices has been reported in 40% of patients in controlled and open studies. Thus clonidine, like other drugs used in the interval therapy of migraine, can be expected to be effective in only a proportion of patients. Although clonidine has not been compared directly with other drugs used in the prophylactic treatment of migraine, the general clinical impression is that it is less effective then pizotifen or methysergide. Because it is relatively well tolerated at dosages of 75 to 150 mug daily it is worthy of a trial, particularly in patients considered to need prophylactic migraine therapy for the first time, and when migraine occurs in association with hypertension. At the dosages used in migraine prophylaxis, which are almost invariably lower than used in hypertension, clonidine does not cause hypotension and can be used in patients with cardiovascular disease. The principal side-effects are drowsiness and dry mouth which tend to diminish as treatment continues.
 ...
PMID:Low-dose clonidine: a review of its therapeutic efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. 120 7

At their first visit to a hospital clinic 178 patients referred with a diagnosis of hypertension were given a self-administered questionnaire. They received a similar questionnaire 12 months later. Of the 178 patients 99 were not initially on treatment. Similarly 78 normotensive subjects were drawn randomly from the local population and sent a second questionnaire 10 months later. The symptoms at the first visit of the normotensive controls, the untreated hypertensive patients, and 477 patients on long-term treatment in the hypertension clinic were compared. Treated and untreated hypertensive patients complained more of nocturia and also of unsteadiness either on standing or in the morning. Treated hypertensives complained more of sleepiness, dry mouth, diarrhoea, and, in men, impotence and failure of ejaculation. Similarly, untreated hypertensives complained of excessive depression, blurred vision, and waking headache. Fifty-five of the normotensive subjects and 110 of the newly referred hypertensive patients responded to the second questionnaire. The proportions losing and gaining symptoms were calculated together with the proportions always complaining and never complaining of a symptom. Hypertensive patients tended to lose the complaints of unsteadiness and headache but to gain the symptoms of vivid dreams, a slow walking pace, and diarrhoea. The net improvement for a symptom was defined as the excess of patients who lost a symptom over those who gained the symptom, expressed as a percentage. Over the follow-up period the control subjects had a net improvement averaged over 14 symptoms of +2-4 per cent. A similar result was obtained for the hypertensive patients of +2-0 per cent, the symptoms lost being balanced by those gained. The changes in symptoms with time were related to the changes in blood pressure and it is suggested that only headache, 'unsteadiness, lightheadedness, or faintness' and nocturia can actually result from raised blood pressure and then only in a proportion of patients complaining of these symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Change in symptoms of hypertensive patients after referral to hospital clinic. 125 26

Rilmenidine is an oxazoline derivative with antihypertensive activity which was developed to enhance the dissociation between the hypotensive and adverse effect profile of centrally acting agents. Experimental studies have indicated that rilmenidine is selective for both alpha 2-adrenoceptors (v alpha 1) and newly discovered nonadrenergic imidazoline receptors in the brain and in the periphery. In experimental studies, rilmenidine differs from clonidine in that it is more selective for imidazoline receptors than for alpha 2-adrenoceptors; at equihypotensive doses, rilmenidine causes less bradycardia and reduction in cardiac output, less sedation, and little or no antinociceptive action compared to clonidine. The hypotensive effects of rilmenidine are antagonised by idazoxan and yohimbine, but idazoxan (imidazoline structure) is six times more potent than yohimbine (a selective alpha 2-antagonist). In isolated renal proximal tubule cells, where imidazoline binding has also been shown, rilmenidine inhibits reabsorption of sodium. Clinical studies comparing 1 mg rilmenidine with placebo demonstrated significant reductions in blood pressure (BP) (61% rilmenidine v 23% placebo normalized to 160/90 mm Hg). The reduction in BP was not associated with classical alpha 2 side effects such as dry mouth or daytime drowsiness. Compared with clonidine (0.15 to 0.3 mg), equihypotensive doses of rilmenidine (1 to 2 mg) induced two to three times less dry mouth, daytime drowsiness, and constipation; no orthostatic hypotension was reported. Methyldopa (0.5 to 1 mg) v rilmenidine (1 to 2 mg) indicated a comparable reduction of BP with significantly less weakness, drowsiness, orthostatic dizziness, and dry mouth on rilmenidine; there was no evidence of the "clonidine withdrawal syndrome" on drug withdrawal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Distinctive features of rilmenidine possibly related to its selectivity for imidazoline receptors. 135 Jul 32

Rilmenidine (RIL) is a novel antihypertensive drug selectively acting at the sites of imidazoline receptors. Compared with diuretics, beta-blockers, Ca2+ antagonists and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, the four major groups recommended by the US Joint National Committee as first-line antihypertensive drugs, RIL appears to meet the same criteria of efficacy, safety, and acceptability. Rilmenidine dose-dependently decreases blood pressure (BP), acting as a vasodilator by decreasing vascular resistance through inhibition of the adrenergic nervous system, even while the BP changes due to standing and exercise. In comparison with placebo, RIL significantly decreased BP. In double-blind comparative trials versus first-line diuretics and beta-blockers, RIL normalized BP in approximately 60% patients, showing a similar efficacy to other drugs. In contrast with hydrochlorothiazide, RIL decreased total cholesterol and did not change plasma potassium levels. No tachyphylaxis was observed during long-term treatment. Central side effects, which have contributed to the limitation of the use of alpha 2-agonists as second- or third-line therapy for hypertension, were significantly less frequent with RIL than with clonidine or methyldopa. Indeed, the incidence of dry mouth and drowsiness during double-blind comparative trials versus clonidine and methyldopa was significantly lower with RIL. This absence of central side-effects was confirmed in double-blind comparative trials versus hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol. In contrast with clonidine, no sodium retention or weight gain were observed during chronic treatment with RIL.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Rilmenidine: a novel approach to first-line treatment of hypertension. 135 Jul 33

The relationship between the occurrence of side effects (SEs) and drug factors, such as antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), daily dose, duration of treatment, drug combination pattern, total and free serum concentrations, metabolite per parent level ratio as an index of metabolism ability, and co-medicated drugs except AEDs were evaluated in 227 outpatients with epilepsy. The possible influences of certain physiological and/or the pathophysiological factors were also evaluated. SEs with 19 clinical signs were observed in 66.1% of all patients. There was no definite dose- or serum concentration-dependent increase in the incidence of SEs. Stepwise discriminant function analysis revealed that benzodiazepines (BZN) polytherapy with AEDs produced a higher incidence of somnolence and general fatigue than did any other AED or drug combination. The effects of various drug combination patterns on the incidence of SEs were also evaluated on the basis of observed frequencies. The incidence of somnolence was significantly higher in patients taking phenytoin (PHT) plus carbamazepine (CBZ) therapy, and in patients taking BZN plus either PHT, phenobarbital (PB) or CBZ therapy compared with patients taking either PHT, PB or CBZ therapy. Other responsible drug combination patterns were PHT plus valproic acid (VPA) therapy for mental function impairment, acetazolamide (AZM) polytherapy with PB or PHT for dry mouth, and CBZ plus BZN therapy for constipation. In this study, the stratifying points (occurrence limits) of SEs were detected in various variables such as the number of prescribed drugs, daily dose and serum concentrations. Interestingly, these limits are within the commonly accepted "therapeutic range" or "usual daily dose," and some of these limits shifted down when another AED was co-medicated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Pharmacoepidemiological study on adverse reactions of antiepileptic drugs. 139 49

The efficacy of tizanidine in chronic tension-type headache was compared with placebo in a randomized, double-blind and cross-over study in 37 women aged 20 to 59 years with a history of headache for 7 months to 30 years (median 5 years). The treatment periods were 6 weeks with an intervening 2 week wash-out period. The treatment was started with 6 mg/day divided into three doses, and the daily dose could be increased to 18 mg/day depending on the treatment response. The effect of the treatment was measured by visual analogue scale, verbal rating scale, number of days free of headache, number of analgesics needed, and the dose of trial medication needed. In all these measurements, tizanidine was statistically significantly more effective than placebo. The pre-trial Beck Depression Inventory score did not predict the response to treatment, neither did the level of electromyographic activity of the trapezius muscle. Side-effects, drowsiness and dry mouth were significantly more common during tizanidine treatment but they were usually mild. The results of the present trial suggest that tizanidine is effective in the treatment of chronic tension-type headache in women.
 ...
PMID:Tizanidine in chronic tension-type headache: a placebo controlled double-blind cross-over study. 146 11

Minaprine (200 mg daily, either once or divided b.d.) was compared with amitriptyline (25-50 mg t.d.s.) over six weeks in 144 patients with major depression. Significant reductions in HRSD scores at the end of six weeks' treatment were recorded with both dose regimes of minaprine and with amitriptyline, with no significant differences between them. There was a significantly greater incidence of drowsiness and dry mouth with amitriptyline than with minaprine.
 ...
PMID:Minaprine in depression. A controlled trial with amitriptyline. 163 6


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>