Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0043352 (xerostomia)
4,250 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The aim of this double-blind randomized study was to compare the efficacy and the tolerability of moclobemide (300-600 mg daily) and pirlindole (150-300 mg daily), two reversible inhibitors of MAO-A (RIMAs), in the treatment of depression. In total 116 patients were included in the trial, 111 patients (52 patients on pirlindole and 59 patients on moclobemide) were evaluable for efficacy and safety, and 77 patients completed the whole study (42 days of administration). Both treatments produced highly significant improvements in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score, the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) score and the Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale (MADRS) score from day 7 to day 42. The pattern of development of the three scores in the two groups did not differ significantly. After 42 days of treatment, an improvement of > or = 50% in the HDRS score was noted in 80% and 67% of patients in the pirlindole and moclobemide groups, respectively. A total of 30 (58%) patients on pirlindole and 33 (56%) patients on moclobemide experienced side-effects that were considered to be possibly or probably related to the medication. The differences between the two drugs were non-significant for all types of side-effect, with the exception of dry mouth and tachycardia, which were significantly more frequent with moclobemide.
...
PMID:Double-blind randomized controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of two reversible monoamine oxidase A inhibitors, pirlindole and moclobemide, in the treatment of depression. 927 98

Moclobemide is a reversible selective inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A. It has proven efficacy in a wide range of depressive disorders, including agitated anxious depression. In an international, multicentre, double-blind parallel-group study, the tolerability and efficacy of moclobemide were compared with that of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine. The target dose of moclobemide was 450 mg/day in the dose range of 300-600 mg/day, while the target dose for fluoxetine was 20 mg/day in the dose range of 10-30 mg/day. There were two consecutive studies. The first was an 8-week short-term study of acute adverse events, tolerability and efficacy. The efficacy data showed no significant difference between moclobemide and fluoxetine. Evaluation of the tolerability in a long-term study of up to 1 year is still in progress. A review of the moclobemide safety database for panic disorder with 624 patients showed a marginal increase in events with moclobemide compared with placebo for insomnia (11.2%), dizziness (4.5%) and dry mouth (3.7%), with rates for headaches and nausea lower for moclobemide than placebo. These data suggest moclobemide is a well tolerated and effective treatment for panic disorder.
...
PMID:Moclobemide for anxiety disorders: a focus on moclobemide for panic disorder. 946 72

Social phobia (also known as social anxiety disorder) is still not clearly understood. It was not established as an authentic psychiatric entity until the diagnostic nomenclature of the American Psychiatric Association DSM III in 1980. In recent years, increasing attention among researchers has contributed to provide important information about the genetic, familial and temperamental bases of social phobia and its neurochemical, neuroendocrinological and neuroanatomical substrates, which remain to be further investigated. Up to date, there have been several findings about the possible influence of variables, including particularly genetic, socio-familial and early temperamental (eg behavioral inhibition) factors that represent risk for the later development of social phobia. Clinical neurobiological studies, based on the use of exogenous compounds such as lactate, CO2, caffeine, epinephrine, flumazenil or cholecystokinin/pentagastrin to reproduce naturally occurring phobic anxiety, have shown that patients with social phobia appear to exhibit an intermediate sensitivity between patients with panic disorder and control subjects. No difference in the rate of panic attacks in response to lactate, low concentrations of CO2 (5%), epinephrine or flumazenil was observed between patients with social phobia and normal healthy subjects, both being less reactive compared to patients with panic disorder. However, patients with social phobia had similar anxiety reactions to high concentrations of CO2 (35%), caffeine or cholecystokinin/pentagastrin than those seen in patients with panic disorder, both being more intensive than in controls. Several lines of evidence suggest specific neurotransmitter system alterations in social phobia, especially with regard to the serotoninergic, noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems. Although no abnormality in platelet serotonin transporter density has been found, patients with social phobia appear to show an enhanced sensitivity of both post-synaptic 5HT1A and 5HT2 serotonin receptor subtypes, as reflected by increased anxiety and hormonal responses to serotoninergic probes. Platelet 5HT2 receptor density has also been reported to be positively correlated to symptom severity in patients with social phobia. During anticipation of public speaking, heart rate was elevated in patients with social phobia compared to controls. Norepinephrine response to the orthostatic challenge test or to the Valsalva maneuver was also greater in patients with social phobia. While normal beta-adrenergic receptor number was observed in lymphocytes, a blunted response of growth hormone to clonidine, an a2-adrenergic agonist, was reported. This suggests reduced post-synaptic a2-adrenergic receptor functioning related to norepinephrine overactivity in social phobia. Decreased cerebrospinal fluid levels of the dopamine metabolite homovanillic acid have also been observed. There are relatively few reports of involvement of the adrenal and thyroid functions in social phobia, and all that has been noted is that patients with social phobia show an exaggerated adrenocortical response to a psychological stressor. Recent advances in neuro-imaging have contributed to find low striatal dopamine D2 receptor binding or low dopamine transporter site density in patients with social phobia. They have also demonstrated the involvement of the cortico-limbic pathways, including the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and amygdala, which show an increased activity in different experimental conditions. These brain regions have extensively been reported to play an important role in the cognitive appraisal in determining the significance of environmental stimuli, in the emotional and mnemonic integration of information, and in the expression of contextual fear-conditioned behaviors, which might be disrupted in the light of the phenomelogical aspects of social phobia. A substantial body of literature based on case reports, open and placebo-controlled trials, has now clearly examined the efficacy of major classes of psychotropic agents including monoamine oxidase inhibitors, beta-blockers, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and benzodiazepines in social phobia. Until recently, irreversible non-selective monoamine oxidase inhibitors, of which phenelzine was the most extensively evaluated, were considered as the most efficacious treatment in reducing the symptomatology associated with social phobia in 50-70% of cases after 4 to 6 weeks. However, side effects and dietary restrictions limit their use. This led to the development of reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase A, for which careful dietary monitoring is not required. Moclobemide has been the most widely studied but produced unconvincingly therapeutic effects on social phobic symptoms. To date, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be considered as a reasonable first-line pharmacotherapy for social phobia. There is growing evidence for the efficacy of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, citalopram, paroxetine and sertraline. They have beneficial effects with response rates ranging from 50 to 80% in social phobia. It has been recommended that the treatment period should be extended at least 6 months beyond the early improvement achieved within the first 4 to 6 weeks. The overall advantages include tolerability with a low risk of adverse events. The benzodiazepines clonazepam and alprazolam have also been proposed for the treatment of social phobia. Symptomatic relief occurred in 40 to 80% of the cases with a relatively rapid onset of action within the first two weeks. Untoward effects, discontinuation-related withdrawal symptoms and abuse or dependence liability constitute major concerns about the use of benzodiazepines, so they should be reserved for cases unresponsive to the safer medications cited above. Beta-blockers such as atenolol and propanolol have commonly been employed in performance anxiety, decreasing autonomic symptoms (eg, tachycardia, sweating and dry mouth). However, they are not effective in the generalized form of social phobia. Other pharmacologic alternatives seem helpful for the management of social phobia, including venlafaxine, gabapentin, bupropion, nefazodone or augmentation with buspirone. Preliminary studies point to promising effects of these agents. Larger controlled clinical trials are now needed to confirm their potential role in the treatment of social phobia.
...
PMID:[Neurobiology and pharmacotherapy of social phobia]. 1553 6