Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0043352 (xerostomia)
 4,250 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of paroxetine with imipramine and placebo in depressed outpatients. Following a 4- to 14-day placebo washout, patients were randomized into treatment groups and received study compound for up to 42 days. At Day 42, paroxetine was significantly more effective than placebo (p less than .05) in several observer- and patient-rated scales: the Retardation and Anxiety/Somatization factors of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Raskin Depression Scale, the Covi Anxiety Scale, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Improvement Scale, the Symptom Checklist-56 (SCL-56) Total, and the Patient's Global Evaluation (PGE). There were no significant differences between paroxetine and imipramine. Significantly more imipramine (75%) than paroxetine (35%) or placebo (23%) patients reported anticholinergic side effects, including blurred vision (5%, 0%, and 0%, respectively), constipation (35%, 8%, and 15%, respectively), and dry mouth (63%, 25%, and 15%, respectively). The data from this study indicated that paroxetine is a safe, well-tolerated, effective treatment for major depressive disorder.
 ...
PMID:A placebo- and imipramine-controlled study of paroxetine. 214 97

This 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine as first-line therapy for the treatment of major depression and major depression associated with anxiety in 384 adult outpatients. Fixed total daily dosages of 75, 150, and 200 mg of venlafaxine were administered in a twice-a-day regimen. Primary efficacy parameters were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total score, the HAM-D Depressed Mood Item, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score, and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale. Overall, a higher percentage of patients responded to venlafaxine than to placebo. Efficacy data indicated a dose-related response, most evident in the onset of clinical improvement; statistically significant improvements in some primary parameters were seen as early as 1 to 2 weeks after initiation of treatment, especially in the 150-and 200-mg/day groups. These dose-related clinical improvements continued through week 12. Venlafaxine-treated patients who had depression associated with anxiety showed significant dose-related improvements compared with placebo-treated patients; improvement was noted by scores on the HAM-D Anxiety-Psychic Item and Anxiety-Somatization Factor. Few clinically significant changes were observed in laboratory values, vital signs, or electrocardiogram tracings. Venlafaxine was generally well tolerated at all dosages. The most common study events included nausea, dizziness, somnolence, insomnia, dry mouth, and asthenia, which are consistent with findings of previous studies. The current study demonstrated that 75 to 200 mg/day of venlafaxine twice daily produced a dose-related improvement in the primary efficacy parameters and in the onset of significant antidepressant effects, which was noted at weeks 1 to 2 with the highest dosage tested (200 mg/day). The study also demonstrated that these dosages of venlafaxine were safe and effective as first-line therapy for major depression and depression associated with anxiety.
 ...
PMID:The use of venlafaxine in the treatment of major depression and major depression associated with anxiety: a dose-response study. Venlafaxine Investigator Study Group. 947 38