Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (
vomiting
)
31,883
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
This review discusses the development and use of 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) antagonists, especially granisetron, for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced
emesis
. Following recent evidence suggesting that high-dose chemotherapy is more effective in increasing tumor response rate and median survival time, more effective antiemetic control is essential. Granisetron, a new 5-
HT3
, is approximately 400 times more potent than metoclopramide and, unlike metoclopramide, does not produce extrapyramidal side effects. Granisetron has been shown to be effective as a single prophylactic dose, over 5 days and in patients receiving repeated cycles of chemotherapy. Patients with nausea and vomiting within the first 24 h after chemotherapy are more likely to experience delayed symptoms; however, episodes of breakthrough nausea and vomiting can be controlled by intervention with one, and in some cases more, doses of granisetron. The development of granisetron represents an important advance in the control of chemotherapy induced
emesis
.
...
PMID:Clinical experience with intravenous granisetron. 791 51
A greater understanding of the various serotonin receptor subtypes has led to a clearer appreciation of the role of serotonin in gastrointestinal motility, sensation and secretion. Serotonin is definitely involved in the aetiopathogenesis of cisplatin-induced
emesis
and carcinoid diarrhoea. The application of serotonergic drugs in clinical therapeutics for gut disturbances is presently dominated by the use of 5-
HT3
antagonists for acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and the use of substituted benzamides which are 5-HT4 agonists stimulating gut motor function through 5-HT4 neuronal receptors. The best-studied 5-HT4 agonist is cisapride, which has been shown to stimulate motility at several levels of the gut. Cisapride is approved for healing and maintenance treatment of reflux oesophagitis and is used in several countries for the alleviation of symptoms consistent with regional stasis, from dyspepsia to constipation. Carcinoid diarrhoea is a prototypic disease associated with deranged serotonin metabolism, and a rationale for using 5-
HT3
or 5-HT4 antagonists is based on the recent appreciation of the important role of impaired gut motor function in carcinoid diarrhoea. In the future, greater understanding of the serotonin receptor subtypes and their role in gut disorders may lead to novel approaches to alleviate increased visceral perception of functional gastrointestinal disorders, to correct changes in colonic capacitance, or to alter gastrointestinal motility that contributes to diarrhoea or constipation. However, at the present time, it must be stressed that these uses are still at an experimental stage and that careful validation and proper controlled studies are still required.
...
PMID:Drugs affecting serotonin receptors. 794 60
The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of alprazolam (APZ) as an adjuvant drug to ondansentron against cisplatin-induced
emesis
. All patients received CDDP 100 mg/m2, and had previously received chemotherapy. We established two groups of patients randomly: Group A patients received 5-
HT3
alone, and Group B received 5-
HT3
and APZ. The drugs were administered as follows: 5-
HT3
was given at a dose of 1 ampule 8 mg in 100 ml N/S in 10 minutes i.v. infusion before the infusion of CDDP. We continued with 1 tablet 8 mg in the afternoon and 1 before sleeping the first day; for the next two days, patients received 3 tablets 8 mg/day. APZ was given in tablets of 0.25 mg 60 minutes before CDDP infusion and then with the second and third dose of 5-
HT3
. We did not find significant differences in clinical parameters and factors, especially anxiety, that influenced
vomiting
between the examined groups. The mean number of
vomiting
episodes without gastric content (4.76 episodes) and the mean duration of nausea (195 minutes), were greater in Group A than in Group B (1.39 episodes, p < .0001; 91 minutes, p < .049). Differences also were found in the mean number of
vomiting
episodes with gastric content between the examined groups (A: 1.97; B: 1.09; p < .135). The intense of nausea and vomiting according to WHO classification was greater in Group A (grade 0, p < .004; grade 2, p < .020) than in Group B. Patients of Group B had fewer problems with appetite (p < .027), and more intense sedative effect (grade 0 [p < .001], 1 [0.027], 2 [0.022]) than patients of Group A. In conclusion APZ improved the antiemetic efficacy of ondansentron in cisplatin-induced
emesis
.
...
PMID:Comparison of ondansentron (GR 38032F) versus ondansentron plus alprazolam as antiemetic prophylaxis during cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. 797 73
The effect of cisplatin on plasma peptide YY (PYY) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) concentrations was determined in conscious dogs (n = 6 per group) pretreated with either saline, or the 5-
HT3
-receptor antagonists ondansetron or granisetron. Cisplatin (3.0 mg kg-1, i.v.) caused
emesis
(18.8 +/- 2.9 episodes; 75-284 min) and significantly increased the mean area under the curve (AUC) over a 6-h period of plasma PYY concentrations (7.4 +/- 1.8 to 11.5 +/- 3.7 ng) in all saline-pretreated dogs, whereas the mean AUC of plasma 5-HT concentrations did not significantly increase (34.7 +/- 7.4 vs 35.6 +/- 12.3 pM h). The concentrations of PYY correlated closely with the incidence of
emesis
(r = 0.99). In animals pretreated (36 min) with ondansetron (0.316 mg kg-1, i.v.) or granisetron (0.316 mg kg-1, i.v.), the number of cisplatin-induced emetic episodes was significantly (P < 0.005) decreased compared with control. In animals receiving cisplatin and pretreated with ondansetron, PYY concentrations were not significantly altered, whereas the mean AUC of plasma concentrations of 5-HT over 6 h increased (35.6 +/- 12.3 to 82.3 +/- 34.6 pM h; P < 0.05). In animals receiving cisplatin and pretreated with granisetron, plasma concentrations of 5-HT were not significantly altered, whereas the mean AUC of plasma PYY concentrations were significantly reduced compared with control (6.2 +/- 1.7 vs 11.5 +/- 3.7 ng h).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Plasma levels of peptide YY correlate with cisplatin-induced emesis in dogs. 799 81
Considerable progress has been made in the development of means to limit nausea and vomiting arising from cancer chemotherapy. A number of key conceptual advances in the last decade have been critically important. these include recognition of the value of combination antiemetic therapy, identification of important patient- and treatment-related factors predictive of
emesis
, and appreciation of the importance of serotonin (5-HT) in the pathophysiology of
emesis
and the value of selective antagonists of the type-3 serotonin receptor. Comparative trials of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and classic antiemetic agents have helped define optimal antiemetic approaches in a number of settings. A combination of a 5-
HT3
antagonist and dexamethasone is the treatment of choice for patients receiving single- and multiple-day cisplatin. The 5-
HT3
antagonists are also effective agents with noncisplatin chemotherapy. Clear-cut superiority to classic antiemetics such as dexamethasone has not been consistently demonstrated, however. Results with the 5-
HT3
antagonists in cisplatin-induced delayed
emesis
have been disappointing to date. The results of ongoing prospective trials should define their role more clearly. At present a combination of metoclopramide and dexamethasone is the treatment of choice in this setting. Results of trials comparing 5-
HT3
antagonists are beginning to emerge. Available information suggests no clinically relevant differences in antiemetic efficacy between these agents. Many questions regarding the optimal use of the 5-
HT3
antagonists and their integration into clinical practice remain unanswered and are the appropriate focus for additional study.
...
PMID:Treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis in the 1990s: impact of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. 800 Jul 24
The serotonin-receptor (5-
HT3
) antagonists combined with dexamethasone are considered the antiemetic therapy of choice in the prevention of cisplatin-induced
emesis
. As there are now several compounds on the market, the dilemma of preference is particularly relevant. In preclinical studies some differences among the three marketed drugs (ondansetron, granisetron and tropisetron) have emerged. In particular, tropisetron and granisetron have a greater potency and duration of action and seem to have a greater selectivity toward the 5-HT3 receptor with respect to ondansetron. Furthermore, while with tropisetron and granisetron there is a linear dose/response relationship, this does not seem to be the case for ondansetron. These preclinical differences, however, do not seem to correlate with the clinical antiemetic activity of these compounds. In fact, although the number of comparative studies is small, with all of them presenting several shortcomings (small number of patients, not blinded studies, no association with steroids, sponsored trials), it seems that the antiemetic activity and tolerability of ondansetron, granisetron and tropisetron is very similar. If these data are confirmed, the least expensive of the 5-
HT3
antagonists should be the drug of choice. We feel, however, that the answer to this rather difficult question of choice will come from very large, independent, methodologically correct studies designed to show small but clinically significant differences (i.e., less than 10% in complete protection from
emesis
). These trials, which require about 1000-1500 patients, are ongoing and the one carried out as a multicenter study by the Italian Group for Antiemetic Research is close to conclusion.
...
PMID:Are there differences among the serotonin antagonists? 800 Jul 25
As the control of acute chemotherapy-induced
emesis
has improved, delayed
emesis
(occurring 24 h or more after treatment) has become the most bothersome
vomiting
problem. Delayed
vomiting
occurs after treatment with many anticancer drugs, but has been most often studied following cisplatin or combinations of cyclophosphamide and anthracyclines. The mechanism of this phenomenon is unknown. Empirical trials of antiemetic agents effective in controlling acute
emesis
identified the combination of metoclopramide and dexamethasone as useful in lessening delayed
emesis
after displatin in a randomized, placebo-controlled study. The specific serotonin receptor (5-
HT3
) antagonist ondansetron yielded results equivalent to the prior placebo results in a phase II trial using identical methodology in similar patients given cisplatin. Following anthracycline and cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy, the delayed
vomiting
prevention observed with dexamethasone alone exceeds that of ondansetron. These observations suggest that delayed
emesis
is primarily mediated by neurotransmitters other than serotonin. Since delayed
emesis
occurs more frequently in patients who experience nausea and vomiting on the day they receive chemotherapy, tested combination antiemetic regimens, employing a 5-
HT3
antagonist (either granisetron, metoclopramide, ondansetron or tropisetron), dexamethasone, and a benzodiazepine (lorazepam and alprazolam) should be routinely employed. This approach provides the best protection for acute and delayed
emesis
. Further research, looking beyond the specific 5-
HT3
antagonists, provides the best strategy to improve the control of delayed symptoms.
...
PMID:Delayed emesis following anticancer chemotherapy. 800 Jul 26
To address the economic issues posed by the introduction of 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonist (5-
HT3
RA), we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis based on clinical trial data published in the recent literature. Cost calculations include initial treatment and a second-line salvage treatment. The average cost and incremental cost were established. Incremental cost corresponds to the extra cost involved in achieving total control of
emesis
in 1% extra patients. If 5-
HT3
RA is not part of the initial treatment, salvage treatment with ondansetron is not cost-effective. Moreover, starting with the combination of ondansetron plus dexamethasone saves more money than starting with ondansetron alone. However, if the difference in
emesis
control is only minimal, treatment with the 5-
HT3
RA remains more expensive.
...
PMID:Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiemetic treatment. 803 96
Chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting can today be controlled with available antiemetics in a high percentage of patients but
emesis
remains a problem for some patients, with certain drugs and with repeated cycles of chemotherapy. The fundamental steps of clinical research in antiemetics towards the improvement of the control of nausea and vomiting with new drugs or combinations are presented. Special emphasis is given to cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting because of the frequency and relevance of this phenomenon. The use of high-dose metoclopramide, its combination with steroids, and later the addition of lorazepam or diphenhydramine represented the evolving standard of the 1980s, with the level of complete protection from
vomiting
improving from 30%-40% to 60%-70% with the three-drug combination. The introduction of new agents such as the 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists has recently offered new possibilities because of their activity and lack of toxicity. In particular, the combination of ondansetron plus dexamethasone is today the most efficacious and least toxic antiemetic treatment for prevention of
emesis
in patients treated with a single high dose or low repeated doses of cisplatin. A comparison of different 5-
HT3
antagonists, always in combination with steroids, is now considered necessary. For patients treated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy the use of steroids can still be considered the standard treatment. In this setting, the role of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, alone or in combination with steroids, has to be better defined through large, well-planned clinical trials, which should have a cost-effectiveness analysis as one of their goals.
...
PMID:Antiemetics in cancer chemotherapy: historical perspective and current state of the art. 803 96
Granisetron, a potent and selective 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor (5-
HT3
) antagonist was reported to be an effective antiemetic agent both in animal studies and in patients given highly emetogenic chemotherapy. A sample of 43 patients with breast cancer was accrued from September to November 1992 in a phase II study to assess the efficacy of granisetron in patients receiving FEC (5-FU, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide). Each patient received 3 mg intravenous granisetron as a single dose just prior to chemotherapy. Oral metoclopromide was prescribed to each patient as a rescue anti-emetic. The emetic episodes and degree of nausea were evaluated on a daily basis. Good control of
emesis
(0-2 episodes of
vomiting
) and nausea (mild or no nausea) was in the range 77%-98% and 77%-93% respectively. There was a complete response (no emetic episodes throughout the 6-day period) in 16 patients (37.2%). Onset of
emesis
tends to occur on day 1 and tend to subside after day 3; 85% of patients had onset of
emesis
in the first 2 days after chemotherapy. Control of
emesis
and nausea tends to improve after day 3, which could be the result of the reduced emetogenicity of the combination FEC with time. Altogether, 77% had good control of acute
emesis
; control of delayed
emesis
was better with 84% achieving a major response on day 2 after chemotherapy, which improved to more than 90% after day 4. Granisetron was generally tolerated with headache being the most common side-effect followed by constipation and flushing. This study suggests that granisetron is an effective and well-tolerated anti-emetic agent, which deserves randomised trials to elucidate its efficacy further.
...
PMID:Control of emesis by intravenous granisetron in breast cancer patients treated with 5-FU, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. 803 7
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10