Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study evaluated the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron and metoclopramide in 90 ASA physical status I or II children, 2-17 yr of age, undergoing strabismus repair. After anesthetic induction and prior to eye muscle manipulation, subjects received normal saline 0.3 mL/kg (Group 1), metoclopramide 0.25 mg/kg (Group 2), or ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg (Group 3), intravenously. There were no differences between groups with respect to age, weight, gender, fluids received, number of eye muscles repaired, anesthetic technique, or time in the operating room. The incidence of vomiting in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 50%, 27%, and 10% prior to discharge, and 67%, 53%, and 30% during the 24 h after surgery, respectively. The number of children vomiting prior to discharge and within 24 h of surgery was significantly reduced in Group 3 compared with Group 1 (P < 0.003 and P < 0.015, respectively). The number of vomiting episodes per patient in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 1.1, 0.5, and 0.1 prior to discharge, and 4.5, 2.6, and 1.2 during the 24 h after surgery (P < 0.0005 and P < 0.004, respectively). Ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg intravenously after the induction of anesthesia reduces the incidence and severity of vomiting after strabismus repair both prior to discharge from the hospital and during the 24 h after surgery.
 ...
PMID:Ondansetron reduces the incidence and severity of poststrabismus repair vomiting in children. 806 52

Emesis and nausea are common toxicities seen during high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy (720,000 IU/kg i.v. every 8 h). A growing list of randomized studies have documented the efficacy of ondansetron, a potent antagonist of the 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor, in preventing acute chemotherapy-induced emesis and nausea. However, no study has evaluated the efficacy of ondansetron in preventing IL-2-induced emesis and nausea. This double-blinded, randomized trial was performed to compare the antiemetic and antinausea efficacy of ondansetron with that of droperidol, a butyrophenone, in patients receiving high-dose IL-2 on protocols at the National Cancer Institute. Ondansetron or droperidol was given intravenously, 30 min prior to the first dose of IL-2 and then every 8 h for the duration of IL-2 treatment. No significant differences were seen between the two agents in complete freedom from emesis (p2 = 0.51), level of nausea (p2 = 0.17), antiemetic treatment failure (p2 = 0.89), and time to first emetic episode (p2 = 0.44). Equivalent doses of IL-2 were administered on each arm of the study, with a similar incidence of liver dysfunction (p2 = 0.15) and diarrhea (p2 = 0.64). Finally, there was no significant difference in the response rates to metastatic disease in either arm of the antiemetic study (p2 = 0.67), and these response rates were similar to those in other patients treated under immunotherapy protocols in the Surgery Branch of the National Cancer Institute with high-dose IL-2. We conclude that droperidol is equally effective in preventing emesis and controlling nausea when compared with ondansetron for patients receiving high-dose IL-2.
 ...
PMID:A randomized double-blinded comparison of the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol in patients receiving high-dose interleukin-2. 808 60

Ondansetron is a selective serotonin antagonist which has been shown to be an effective antiemetic agent for patients undergoing radiation or chemotherapy treatment. The Canadian Forces together with other NATO Countries have an interest in selecting an antiemetic agent that not only is effective in the prevention of emesis induced by chemical agents or radiation exposure, but also has minimal, if any, side effects. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of a single 8-mg oral dose of the drug on thermoregulation during exercise in a hot (40 degrees C, 30% relative humidity) environment. Ten unacclimatized males performed a drug and placebo trial in single-blind random order. The sessions involved walking on a treadmill at 4.8 km.h-1 with a 2% elevation for a maximum of 3 h. Subjects wore combat clothing during the trials. Total exposure time was similar for the placebo (177 +/- 6 min) and drug (172 +/- 11 min) trials. Also, the rate of sweat production (0.64 +/- 0.1 and 0.66 +/- 0.1 kg.h-1 for placebo and drug, respectively) and body heat gain (303 +/- 112 and 305 +/- 110 kj for the placebo and drug, respectively) were not different between trials. Rectal temperature increased 1.48 +/- 0.40 degrees C for the placebo and 1.47 +/- 0.37 degrees C for the ondansetron trial. Finally, there was no difference in the mean skin temperature response which increased in both conditions to 37.1 +/- 0.5 degrees C. Under the conditions of this experiment, there is no evidence to suggest that the ingestion of ondansetron influences thermoregulation in a hot environment.
 ...
PMID:Influence of ondansetron on thermoregulation during exercise in the heat wearing combat clothing. 811 24

In two placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre studies, the efficacy and safety of single oral doses of ondansetron 4 mg, 8 mg and 16 mg were evaluated for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in female inpatients. For the total study populations, 26% (European study) and 32% (US study) of placebo-treated patients experienced no emesis compared with 54% (European study) and 52% (US study) of patients treated with ondansetron 16 mg, the most effective dose. Similarly, 22% (European study) and 19% (US study) of placebo-treated patients experienced no nausea compared with 42% (European study) and 34% (US study) of ondansetron 16 mg-treated patients. All ondansetron doses in both studies were statistically superior to placebo (emesis p < or = 0.007; nausea p < or = 0.033). Slightly lower percentage differences in complete response between placebo and ondansetron for both nausea and emesis were observed for patients with a previous history of postoperative nausea and emesis compared with patients with no previous history, with ondansetron 16 mg being the most effective dose for both patient groups. In the US study, a slightly greater percentage of patients undergoing non-gynaecological surgery had no nausea and no emesis compared with patients undergoing gynaecological surgery in both the placebo and ondansetron treatment groups. Again, ondansetron 16 mg was the most effective dose in both surgery types. Ondansetron was well tolerated, with only headache being reported as a significant problem in both studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Single oral dose ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and emesis. The European and US Study Groups. 812 57

Postoperative nausea and vomiting is a major concern for patients undergoing outpatient surgery under general anaesthesia, and may complicate and delay discharge from hospital. This paper evaluates the safety and efficacy of ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, in the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. One thousand patients in 30 centres in the United States who received general anaesthesia and developed postoperative nausea and vomiting were studied. In a randomised, double-blind, stratified and parallel designed protocol, patients received either ondansetron 1, 4, 8 mg or placebo for nausea or vomiting occurring within 2 h of entry into the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit. Subsequent episodes of vomiting, nausea scores, laboratory and clinical safety data and adverse events were evaluated during the 24-h study period. In a separate study, pharmacokinetic data were compared for intramuscularly and intravenously administered ondansetron. Each dose of ondansetron was significantly better than placebo in reducing nausea from control values during the initial 2-h study period, and in preventing further emesis over 24 h. There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events, changes in laboratory values or measures of vital signs in the ondansetron groups compared to the placebo group. Dose comparisons between the three treatment groups showed that ondansetron 4 mg is the optimal dose to treat postoperative nausea and vomiting. Ondansetron is a well tolerated, efficacious antiemetic which has a similar side effect profile to placebo. Intramuscular administration has the same systemic availability as intravenous administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Single dose intravenous ondansetron for the 24-hour treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. 812 59

Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3 antagonist, has been shown to be effective in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. From July and August 1991, 25 patients were accrued in a phase II study to assess the efficacy of ondansetron in patients receiving cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Patients received intravenous cisplatin 100 mg/m2, given either as a 24-hour infusion on day 1 or in divided doses as eight-hour infusions daily on days 1 to 3. Each patient received 24 mg of ondansetron per day for six days. Intravenous dexamethasone 24 mg was given daily on the days of cisplatin infusion. The emetic episodes and degree of nausea were evaluated daily. "Good" control of emesis (0-2 episodes of vomiting) and nausea (mild or no nausea) ranged from 64-100% and 88-100% respectively. Failure in emesis control occurred most frequently on days 3 and 4. Ondansetron was generally well tolerated with only minimal side-effects. One patient developed unexplained encephalopathy which resolved completely. Our results suggest that ondansetron is an effective anti-emetic agent with minimal toxicities. Randomised studies comparing ondansetron against "standard" anti-emetics should be conducted.
 ...
PMID:Use of oral and intravenous ondansetron in patients treated with cisplatin. 812 53

One-hundred and forty-five chemotherapy patients receiving cisplatin- and non-cisplatin-containing regimens participated in an open evaluation of ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, in the prophylaxis of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting. The study had two groups of patients, one receiving cisplatin-containing regimens (Group A) and the other, non-cisplatin-containing regimens (Group B). There were 51 patients recruited to Group A. Ondansetron was given to these patients at a dose of 8 mg intravenously 15 min before chemotherapy, followed by an intravenous infusion for 24 h (1 mg/h), or 8 mg intravenously 4 and 8 h after the start of cisplatin, followed by 8 mg orally three times/day for 5 days. Ninety-four patients were recruited to Group B: these patients received ondansetron at a dose of 8 mg intravenously immediately before chemotherapy or 8 mg orally 1-2 h prior to it, and 8 mg orally three times/day for 3-5 days. For acute emesis (first 24 h), complete control was achieved in 79.5% of Group A patients and in 78.1% of Group B. For delayed emesis (days 2-5), 79.7% of Group A patients and 84.6% of Group B were completely protected during the entire study period. Nausea was also well controlled with ondansetron; 83.2% (Group A) and 86.5% (Group B) reported only mild nausea or no nausea at all. Ondansetron was effective in the control of both cisplatin- and non-cisplatin-induced emesis and well tolerated without any serious drug-related adverse events.
 ...
PMID:Ondansetron in the treatment of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy. Portuguese Ondansetron Study Group. 813 12

Ondansetron, an antagonist of the serotonin type 3 (5-HT3) receptor, is indicated for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis. This study compares the pharmacokinetics, especially the bioavailability, of an ondansetron 8-mg solution when administered intravenously, orally, to the colon via nasogastric intubation, and to the rectum using a retention enema. Six healthy, male volunteers received ondansetron infused into the colon during the first treatment period. These subjects then received the remaining three treatments in random order, with a minimum 1-week washout period between treatments. Serial plasma samples were obtained for up to 24 hr after dosing in each treatment period. Absolute bioavailability after the oral dosing, colonic infusion, and rectal administration averaged 71 +/- 14, 74 +/- 26, and 58 +/- 18%, respectively. These values were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Values of Tmax and Cmax were also not significantly different among the nonparenteral routes. Mean absorption half-lives were 0.66, 1.1, and 0.75 hr after the oral, colonic, and rectal administrations, respectively. These results indicate that ondansetron is well absorbed in the intestinal segments studied including the upper small intestine, the colon, and the rectum and that sustained-release and suppository formulations of ondansetron are feasible.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of an ondansetron solution (8 mg) when administered intravenously, orally, to the colon, and to the rectum. 814 47

Ondansetron controls cisplatin-induced emesis when given in three 0.15 mg/kg doses, and preliminary data suggest that control may be maintained when fewer doses are employed. Prior trials have further shown improved antiemetic effects and fewer adverse effects of cisplatin treatment when neurotransmitter receptor blockers are combined with dexamethasone. This trial was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of the combination of dexamethasone and ondansetron and to see if equivalent results could be obtained with only two doses of ondansetron. There were 44 patients receiving initial cisplatin at a dose > or = 100 mg/m2, each given dexamethasone 20 mg and randomized to receive either two or three 0.15 mg/kg doses of ondansetron. Vomiting prevention was identical (35%) whether two or three doses were given. No new adverse effects were noted and cisplatin-induced diarrhea, usually seen in up to 60% of patients given this dose of cisplatin, was noted in only 5%. Although this trial did not demonstrate enhanced antiemetic effects with the combination, other investigators have done so and all agree that the regimen is safe and reduces adverse effects. Further exploration and use of the combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone, and studies testing fewer doses of ondansetron in this regimen are warranted.
 ...
PMID:Randomized phase II trial comparing two versus three doses of ondansetron when used in combination with dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin > or = 100 mg/m2. 819 16

Ondansetron is a 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist which has shown activity in the prevention of emesis following cytotoxic and radiation therapy for cancer. We describe our experience using ondansetron in 25 patients undergoing fractionated total body irradiation (TBI) 12 Gy/3 days as conditioning for bone marrow transplantation. Antiemetic efficiency was investigated during the 3 days of TBI prior to high-dose cytotoxic chemotherapy. Twenty-two of the 25 patients (88%) achieved sufficient emesis control with less than three emetic episodes whereas the remaining 12% experienced three to five emetic events during their worst 24-h period. Eleven patients (44%) had complete control with no vomiting at all. Of 75 'patient days', 52 (69%) were without any emesis, 20 (27%) were associated with one to two and only three (4%) with three to five emetic episodes. Headache occurred in four patients (16%). No other significant adverse effects were seen, in particular no extrapyramidal reactions due to ondansetron. Our data confirm that ondansetron plays a major role in the antiemetic management of patients undergoing TBI.
 ...
PMID:Ondansetron for efficient emesis control during total body irradiation. 820 86


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10