Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Fludarabine is an antineoplastic agent which has been studied in patients with a variety of lymphoproliferative malignancies. Clinical evidence from comparative studies in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) suggests that fludarabine is at least as effective as CAP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone) or CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone) in previously treated or chemotherapy-naive patients and significantly more effective than chlorambucil in terms of response rate and duration and survival in chemotherapy-naive patients. Promising results have also been reported with fludarabine-based combination therapy in the treatment of patients with CLL. In addition, sequential therapy with fludarabine and cytarabine has demonstrated good efficacy in the treatment of acute leukaemias, as has fludarabine monotherapy and combination therapy in low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A favourable cytoreductive response has been reported in patients with lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma and in a smaller number of patients with cutaneous T cell lymphomas, CLL of T cell origin or prolymphocytic leukaemia. Recent data also support the use of fludarabine, either as a component of a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen or in the attainment of minimal residual disease, in patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplantation. The tolerability profile of fludarabine is similar to that of CAP, with the most common adverse events being granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and infection. Alopecia and nausea/vomiting appear to be less frequent with fludarabine therapy than with CAP although the development of immune cytopenias is more frequent with fludarabine. Severe neurotoxicity has been reported with fludarabine but this is mostly confined to the use of high doses. Clinical experience therefore indicates that fludarabine is an effective and generally well-tolerated antineoplastic agent for the second-line treatment of advanced CLL. Recent data from comparative studies also support the earlier use of fludarabine in the treatment of chemotherapy-naive patients with CLL. Furthermore, results of available studies are increasingly highlighting an important future role for fludarabine in the treatment of acute leukaemias and low grade NHL and possibly other lymphoproliferative disorders, particularly when used as a component of combination chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Fludarabine. An update of its pharmacology and use in the treatment of haematological malignancies. 917 29

Antiemetic effect and safety of concurrent administration of ondansetron and other antiemetics (dexamethasone, domperidone and ethyl loflazepate), given for complete suppression of nausea/vomiting, were examined in 46 patients (109 courses) with gynecological cancer receiving single high-dose of cisplatin or carboplatin. As for the delayed emesis, antiemetic effect depending on the steroid treatment duration, given concurrently to ondansetron, was compared. The results were as follows; 1. In 78 courses, anticancer drugs were given concurrently to cisplatin or carboplatin only on Day 1. In the remaining 31 courses, those drugs were concurrently administered up to Day 6 at the longest. 2. Complete suppression (i.e., no onsets) rate of acute emesis was 64.2% (70/109 courses) for nausea, and 84.4% (92/109 courses) for vomiting. 3. When the complete suppression depending on duration of concomitant steroid was examined mainly in patients receiving CAP (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and cisplatin), higher antiemetic effect, especially in nausea, was observed in those on concomitant steroids for 3 days compared to that for 1 day. 4. The food intake rate improved along with nausea symptoms. 5. No adverse event or laboratory abnormality due to the multi-antiemetic treatment was observed. Based on the above, the efficacy of the antiemetic treatment in this study was confirmed. In delayed emesis, concurrent steroids given for 3 days after chemotherapy were considered effective and were also regarded to improve food intake.
 ...
PMID:[Multi-drug antiemetic treatment and effect of treatment duration of concurrent steroids--for complete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting in gynecological cancer]. 942 69

Efficacy of combination of ondansetron injection and tablet on CAF (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil) induced emesis were investigated in 10 breast cancer patients (33 courses). Complete suppression rate of nausea or vomiting were approximately 75%, approximately 90% respectively for every treatment day. According to judgement criteria, antiemetic rate of approximately 100% was achieved during the study period. As to food intake of each treatment day, in approximately 70% of treatment courses was assessed as '(patient was) able to eat most of the meal'. Trend in emetic episodes and food intake in each patient receiving several courses of CAF therapy were evaluated. As a result, those patients experiencing nausea or vomiting or had effect on their food intake, were found to be in the similar condition in the following course (s) of CAF. No adverse drug reaction nor clinical laboratory test abnormalities due to ondansetron was observed. In this investigation, combination of ondansetron injection and tablet was shown to sufficiently suppress CAF-induced nausea and vomiting, and their efficacy was confirmed. Still, the study suggested that number of emetic episodes or degree of anorexia differs according to each individual. Therefore we regard additional administration of ondansetron or concomitant use of steroids should be considered when necessary.
 ...
PMID:[Efficacy of combination of ondansetron injection and tablet in CAF-induced emesis in breast cancer patients]. 949 34

Granisetron (G) is an effective antiemetic drug that is used to prevent cisplatin-induced emesis, although it is less effective for delayed emesis. To enhance the antiemetic effects of granisetron, corticosteroid analogues such as methylprednisolone (M) and dexamethasone (D) were employed in a study of patients treated with cisplatin (CDDP). We investigated the clinical response and urinary excretion of 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA), the main metabolite of serotonin, in 31 patients with ovarian cancer or uterine endometrial cancer who received CAP therapy (CDDP 75 mg/m2) in a 3-day cross-over trial comparing G + M and G + D treated patients. Both regimens were and delayed emesis than G + D. We conclude that G + D is a more efficacious combination than G + D in protecting patients from CDDP-induced acute and delayed emesis.
 ...
PMID:[Combination effect of granisetron plus corticosteroid for prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis: a cross-over study comparing methylprednisolone and dexamethasone]. 961 30

There have been reports of increased prevalence of certain food allergies in patients with Type I latex allergy (LA). A detailed food allergy history was obtained from 137 patients with LA. Latex allergy was defined by positive history of IgE mediated reactions to contact with latex and positive skin prick test to latex and/or positive in vitro test (AlaSTAT and/or Pharmacia CAP). Food allergy was diagnosed by a convincing history of possible IgE mediated symptoms occurring within 60 minutes of ingestion. We identified 49 potential allergic reactions to foods in 29 (21.1%) patients. Foods responsible for these reactions include banana 9 (18.3%), avocado 8 (16.3%), shellfish 6 (12.2%), fish 4 (8.1%), kiwi 6 (12.2%), tomato 3 (6.1%), watermelon, peach, carrot 2 (4.1%) each, and apple, chestnut, cherry, coconut, apricot, strawberry, loquat, one (2.0%) each. Reactions to foods included local mouth irritation, angioedema, urticaria, asthma, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, rhinitis, or anaphylaxis. Our study confirms the earlier reports of increased prevalence of food allergies in patients with LA. We also report increased prevalence of shellfish and fish allergy not previously reported. The nature of cross reacting epitopes or independent sensitization between latex and these foods is not clear.
 ...
PMID:Prevalence of food allergy in 137 latex-allergic patients. 1020 85

The efficacy of an intravenous 5-HT3 antagonist (granisetron) and four oral 5-HT3 antagonists (granisetron, ondansetron, tropisetron and ramosetron) on chemotherapy-induced emesis were investigated in 21 gynecologic cancer patients (63 courses). The severity of emesis after chemotherapy was classified in 4 grades (0: none, 1: slight loss of appetite, 2: severe loss of appetite, but tolerable, and 3: untolerable). The effect of 5-HT3 antagonists was judged by both the score for the severity of the emesis and the frequency of vomiting. The four oral 5-HT3 antagonists were almost the same in efficacy for 5 days after chemotherapy. Oral 5-HT3 antagonists were almost equipotent to intravenous granisetron for JT (paclitaxel + carboplatin) therapy or T (paclitaxel) therapy for 5 days after chemotherapy. However, they were ineffective for CAP (cisplatin + adriamycin + cyclophosphamide) therapy. From these results, oral 5-HT3 antagonists were proved to have a sufficient anti emetic effect after chemotherapy in cases of JT or T therapy. However, in cases of CAP therapy, intravenous 5-HT3 antagonists were thought to be preferable for the control of emesis due to chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:[Effects of oral 5-HT3 antagonists on chemotherapy-induced emesis in patients with gynecologic cancers]. 1079 Oct 2

A multi-center, randomized controlled collaborative study was conducted in 310 institutions located thruoughout Japan for 3 years and 9 months from February 1985 until October 1988 to evaluate the efficacy of post-operative adjuvant therapy for patients who had previously undergone curative surgery for treatment of Stage III a breast cancer. Patients with estrogen receptor-positive [ ER(+)] breast cancer were treated with two types of regimens, ie, cyclophosphamide+adriamycin+fluorouracil (CAF; 2 cycles) +Futraful(FT) or CAF (2 cycles+FT+tamoxifen (TAM), and the clinical benefit of additional use of TAM was evaluated. Of the 509 ER(+) patients registered for the trial, 473 patients (92.9%) were eligible for evaluation.The 5-year survival rate was 77.2% for the CAF+FT group and 74.6% for the CAF+FT+TAM group, and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 56.7% for the CAF+FT group and 59.2% for the CAF+FT+TAM group. Neither the survival rate nor the disease-free survival rate differed significantly between the groups. Analyses by factor revealed that the 5-year disease-free rate for lymph node-negative patients in the CAF+FT+TAM group was significantly higher than that for the corresponding patients in the CAF+FT group. No differences were noted in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two treatment groups, other than an increase in LDH (the frequency of which was higher in the CAF+FT+TAM group than in the CAF+FT group). Patients with estrogen receptor-negative [ ER(-)]breast cancer were treated with two types of regimens, ie, CAF+FT or CAF+FT+adriamycin(ADR), and the clinical benefit of the combined use of intermittent doses of ADR was evaluated. Of the 514 ER(-) patients registered in the trial, 478(93.0%) were eligible for evaluation. The 5-year survival rate was 64.9% for the CAF+FT group and 63.0% for the CAF+FT+ADR group, and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 59.2% for both CAF+FT and CAF+FT+ADR groups. Neither the survival rate nor the disease-free survival rate differed significantly between the groups. There were no significant differences between these groups in analyses by nodal or menopausal status. The incidences of adverse reactions including anorexia, nausea/vomiting and alopecia were higher in the CAF+FT+ADR group than in the CAF+FT group.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of Post-operative Adjuvant Therapy for Stage IIIa Berast Cancer: Futraful vs Futraful+Tamoxifen for ER-positive Patients and Futraful vs Futraful+Adriamycin for ER-negative Breast Cancer. 1109 84

We experienced a hospital outbreak of salmonella food poisoning after ingestion of omelet which was the hospital evening meal on August 8, 1999. Total number of patients was sixty-two (Male 25: female 37) and the mean age was 52.1 years old. Salmonella Enteritidis was isolated from the stool in 59 cases. Twenty-one of them were associated with the immunosuppression (12 with malignancy, 6 with DM, one with nephrotic syndrome, one with chronic nephritis and one with allergic purpura). Clinical symptoms of the patients were composed of watery diarrhea (100%), fever (88.7%), abdominal pain (82.3%), nausea (45.2%) and vomiting (25.8%). The laboratory data revealed leukocytosis (15/47 = 31.9%), increased CRP (44/46 = 95.7%), elevated creatinin (1/37 = 2.7%) and hypokalemia (5/42 = 11.9%). MICs of 20 strains isolated in our laboratory almost coincided with each other indicating that the source of bacteria was probably the same. In vitro, S. Enteritidis were sensitive to OFLX, TFLX, FOM, most of PCs, CEPs, AGs but resistant to MPIPC, CAM, CLDM, VCM. Therefore we administered LVFX to 59 cases (alone in 45cases, combination with FOM in 6 cases), NFLX to two children and FMOX to one pregnant woman. Lactobacillus was administered to 28 cases (45.2%) and antidiarrhetics were given to 6 cases (9.7%). Finally all patients improved within two weeks. We suspect that the salmonella food poisoning was due to infected egg. The partially cooked omelet would permit the growth of a sufficient inoculum to cause disease. To prevent food poisoning, we have to be consistent in cooking the food well (at 75 degrees C, for more than 1 minute) and should not have omelets during the hot summer season.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical and bacteriological studies on hospital outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis food poisoning]. 1126 Aug 76

This paper reviews the safety data for levofloxacin utilizing reports from clinical and post-marketing surveillance trials. The side effect incidence rates are 1.3% for nausea, 0.1% for anxiety, 0.3% for insomnia, and 0.1% for headache. No levofloxacin-related adverse events were reported at a rate higher than 1.3%, and most were lower. Four clinical trials were reported. Levofloxacin achieved superior clinical and microbiological results compared to ceftriaxone/macrolide combination, and was better tolerated. Results comparing IV azithromycin plus ceftriaxone versus 500 mg levofloxacin in hospitalised CAP demonstrated that levofloxacin performed better, with more adverse events associated with the comparators (levofloxacin 5.3%, comparators 9.3%). High-dose levofloxacin (750 mg) was also evaluated and found to be well tolerated. Surveillance data reported low ADR rates for levofloxacin: nausea 0.8%, rash 0.5%, abdominal pain 0.4%, and diarrhoea, dizziness, and vomiting 0.3%. Worldwide and US surveillance data confirmed that tendon rupture occurred in less than 4 per million prescriptions, taste perversion in less than 3 per million, convulsions in 2 per million, and photosensitivity, hepatitis, hepatic failure, QT prolongation, torsade de pointes or empyema all in less than 1 per million.
 ...
PMID:Latest industry information on the safety profile of levofloxacin in the US. 1154 87

To comparatively assess first-line treatment with fludarabine and 2 anthracycline-containing regimens, namely CAP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin plus prednisone) and ChOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone plus doxorubicin), in advanced stages of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), previously untreated patients with stage B or C CLL were randomly allocated to receive 6 monthly courses of either ChOP, CAP, or fludarabine (FAMP), stratified based on the Binet stages. End points were overall survival, treatment response, and tolerance. From June 1, 1990 to April 15, 1998, 938 patients (651 stage B and 287 stage C) were randomized in 73 centers. Compared to ChOP and FAMP, CAP induced lower overall remission rates (58.2%; ChOP, 71.5%; FAMP; 71.1%; P <.0001 for each), including lower clinical remission rates (CAP, 15.2%; ChOP, 29.6%; FAMP, 40.1%; P =.003). By contrast, median survival time did not differ significantly according to randomization (67, 70, and 69 months in the ChOP, CAP, and FAMP groups, respectively). Incidences of infections (< 5%) and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (< 2%) during the 6 courses were similar in the randomized groups, whereas fludarabine induced, compared to ChOP and CAP, more frequent protracted thrombocytopenia (P =.003) and less frequent nausea-vomiting (P =.003) and hair loss (P <.0001). For patients with stage B and C CLL first-line fludarabine and ChOP regimens both provided similar overall survival and close response rates, and better results than CAP. However, there was an increase in clinical remission rate and a trend toward a better tolerance of fludarabine over ChOP that may influence the choice between these regimens as front-line treatments in patients with CLL.
 ...
PMID:Randomized comparison of fludarabine, CAP, and ChOP in 938 previously untreated stage B and C chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. 1158 25


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>