Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

As adverse reactions to the combination treatment by the digestive system, we observed the occurrence of nausea and vomiting in 15% of the cases who received FTP treatment consisting of 5-FU, toyomicin and prednisone, 25% of the cases who received MFU treatment consisting of MMC, 5-FU and ACNU, and in 64% of the cases who received PPQ treatment consisting of CDDP, Carboquone (CQ) and prednisone. The antiemetics usually used are metoclopramide and droperidol, and we preadminister valproate preparation when persistent and delayed emesis is predicted. Several randomized trials have been made, and good efficacies with drugs such as metoclopramide, domperidone and steroid have been reported. Efficacy was good with acute emesis, but nonexistent with delayed emesis. As to the liver injury, in our combination treatment, only one case showed elevation of GPT by more than 500 units in the cases treated with MFU, while, increase in liver enzymes in the blood was observed in 10-20% of the cases. Similarly, there were not so many cases of liver injury during PPQ treatment. Thus, liver injury due to carcinostatic would be less frequent. Moreover, autopsy revealed hepatocellular-type of liver injury, cholestatic type liver injury and fatty metamorphosis at reasonable incidence. There were no typical cases of veno-occlusive disease which are noticed recently. The most important point for prevention and countermeasures against liver injury is to be careful not to use the previously mentioned drugs exhibiting toxicity in the liver if hepatic disease exists.
 ...
PMID:[Adverse reactions to carcinostatics and countermeasures]. 249 62

A 52-year-old woman with bilateral liver metastasis originating from rectal cancer was treated with transarterial infusion of cisplatin, MMC, 5-FU and ADM after abdomino-peritoneal resection of the rectum. Cisplatin was infused continuously for 72 hours up to a 150 mg of dose through a Port-A-Cath which was inserted via gastro-duodenal artery at operation. The side effects observed were nausea, vomiting and leukopenia, but renal dysfunction was not encountered. Histology of the rectal lesion revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The liver lesions were followed up by Echo, CT and angiography after chemotherapy, which demonstrated remarkable reduction in size or disappearance of the tumors.
 ...
PMID:[A case report of bilateral liver metastasis from rectal cancer effectively treated with continuous infusion of anti-cancer drugs through hepatic artery]. 250 76

It is very common for intraarterial infusion therapy of some anticancer agent to be effective against hepatocellular carcinoma. In this case, the patient was a 74-year-old man who suffered from very advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombus of the intrahepatic portal vein and IVC. He was treated with intraarterial infusion of CDDP, Etoposide, 5-FU, through a catheter placed in the proper hepatic artery. CDDP (30 mg/day) and Etoposide (60 mg/day) were given once every 5 days, and then 5-FU(250 mg/day) was infused daily for 26 days. The patient underwent this protocol study twice in 3 months. After the intraarterial infusion, transarterial embolization using CDDP (100 mg) powder added to lipiodol and aluminum stearate as suspension was done a month later. The tumor regression rate was 84% after intraarterial infusion of CDDP, Etoposide and 5-FU. The tumor thrombus in the intrahepatic portal vein and IVC had completely disappeared. We could not find lipiodol accumulated in the tumor after TAE. Thus, we assumed that the remaining tumor was a necrotic scar and that a complete response was obtained in the patient. There were some side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, pancytopenia and gastritis but no severe complication occurred.
 ...
PMID:[A case of hepatocellular carcinoma effectively treated by intraarterial infusion of CDDP and other agents]. 255 Dec 53

Twenty patients with primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC) treated by hepatic arterial embolization in our department from Dec. 1986 to Mar. 1987 are reported. There were 15 males and 5 females. The ages ranged from 34 to 75 years with an average of 50.7. Preoperative diagnosis and localization of the tumor were done by AFP, B-us, CT and angiography (right lobe 15 cases, left lobe 1 case, both lobes 4 cases). Celiac and superior mesenteric angiography was carried out by femoral artery approach and then highly selective hepatic catheterization was utilized for hepatic arterial embolization. Antitumor agent (5-Fu, adriamycin), iophendylate and foamy gel sponge were used for peripheral and proximal embolization. Manifestations were improved in most of the patients after embolization, such as relief of abdominal pain, improvement of appetite, decrease of tumor size. Total necrosis of the tumor was found in 2 patients who underwent surgery 1 month after embolization. The side effects of the posthepatic embolization such as, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and fever could be relieved by symptomatic treatment. No severe complications, such as gangrene of the gall bladder, hepatic failure, liver abscess, intestinal necrosis or pulmonary embolization were found except 3 patients who died of renal failure after the procedure. The liver dys-function returned to normal within 2 weeks. Hepatic arterial embolization provides an alternative treatment for the patients with PHC who has compensated liver function without severe systemic diseases, especially renal endocrine problems and severe portal hypertension. They should have patent portal system as proved by angiography. The authors considered that this therapeutic embolization with hepatic chemotherapy infusion is safe and effective in the management of PHC. It may increase the resectability and provide palliative means for the advanced and terminal cases.
 ...
PMID:[Hepatic artery embolization for primary hepatic carcinoma]. 255 66

Three hundred five patients with advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma were randomly assigned to treatment with fluorouracil, fluorouracil plus doxorubicin (Adriamycin) (FA), or fluorouracil plus doxorubicin plus mitomycin (mitomycin C) (FAM). All regimens were equivalent with regard to patient survival. There is no reasonable likelihood that either the FA or FAM regimen could produce a meaningful survival advantage over fluorouracil alone. Interval to disease progression, objective response rates, and palliative effects (improved performance, body weight, or symptoms) were essentially equivalent among the three regimens. With regard to toxicity, the FAM regimen produced more anorexia, nausea, vomiting, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and cumulative bone marrow suppression. Fluorouracil alone produced more stomatitis and diarrhea. Because of a failure to produce improved survival or palliation, unrewarded toxicity, and excessive cost, neither the FA nor FAM regimen can be recommended for the treatment of advanced pancreatic or gastric cancer.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of three chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma. Fluorouracil vs fluorouracil and doxorubicin vs fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin. 257 57

Despite numerous reports of findings obtained following the use of doxorubicin (Adriamycin [A]; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) for the postoperative treatment of patients with primary breast cancer and positive axillary nodes, no clear consensus exists regarding its worth when used in that setting. In June 1981, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) implemented two randomized clinical trials aimed at evaluating the worth of doxorubicin when administered in conjunction with melphalan (L-PAM) and fluorouracil (5-FU) (PF). A prior NSABP study identified cohorts of patients who did or did not benefit from tamoxifen (TAM, T) when used with chemotherapy. That information was employed in the design of the present studies. Women considered responsive to TAM (1,106) were randomized between PFT and PAFT, and those nonresponsive to TAM (707) were randomized between PF and PAF. Findings through 6 years of follow-up (mean duration of potential time on study, 64 months and 63 months, respectively) indicate that non-TAM-responsive patients who received PAF had a significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .003) and survival (P = .05) than did those receiving PF. By contrast, there was no significant difference in DFS (P = .6) or survival (P = .7) between PFT- and PAFT-treated patients. No disparity in the amount of drug received, whether related to the median amount or to dose-intensity, is present to account for the difference in findings between the studies. Aside from alopecia and emesis, the toxicity from the doxorubicin-containing regimens was similar to those in which doxorubicin was omitted. Cardiomyopathy was not a significant finding; there were no deaths from cardiac toxicity. The incidence of arterial and venous complications in patients receiving TAM was less than reported by others.
 ...
PMID:Doxorubicin-containing regimens for the treatment of stage II breast cancer: The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience. 261 Jul 46

We study 50 patients with advanced bladder carcinoma, divided into two protocols of 25 patients, treated with polychemotherapy. Protocol I (PAF) formed by DDP at 20 mgrs/m2 day 1 to 5, ADM at 50 mgrs./m2 day 1 and 5-FU at 500 mgrs./m2 day 1, and Protocol II (CISCA) made up of the combination of DDP at 75 mgrs./m2 day 1, ADM at 50 mgrs./2 day 1 and CPM at 600 mgrs./m2 I.V. day 1. In Protocol I the overall response was 60% (RC = 28%, RP = 32%), with amean response duration of 12.24 months, after receiving an average of 4.8 cycles. In Protocol II the results were 60% (RC = 16%, RP = 44%), 7.04 months and 5 cycles per patient, respectively. Both protocols were tolerated well, although Protcol I proved more toxic. Nauseas, vomiting and alopecia were the most common symptoms. There was no significant difference between the survival of responders and non-responders with Protocol I, but there was with Protocol II with (p less than 0.01).
 ...
PMID:[Polychemotherapy treatment with cisplatin, adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil (FAP) and cisplatin, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (CISCA) in advanced transitional carcinoma of the bladder]. 267 34

Based on favorable results we reported earlier with the CAP regimen in breast cancer (CAP vs CMFVP), the present study compared the CAP with the FAC regimen, which is so far one of the most active adriamycin containing chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer. The aim of the study was to find the optimal first line treatment and possibly evaluate the role of cis platinum in breast cancer chemotherapy. The CAP schedule consisted of cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 3 and 5, adriamycin 40 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, and platinum 30 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, 3 and 5. The FAC schedule included 5-FU 500 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, adriamycin 50 mg/m2 day 1, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 day 1. One hundred and twenty-six previously untreated patients received greater than 2 cycles and were evaluated. In the CAP arm 15 complete (26%) and 24 partial remissions were observed, resulting in a 67% overall response rate (39/58). The response in soft tissue and visceral organs was notable (78% - 22/28, 71% - 15/21) with an important complete response rate (32%). In the FAC arm there was an overall response in 41% (28/68) of patients, with 8 complete (12%) and 20 partial responses. The difference in overall response, complete response, and response in soft tissue and visceral organs, was statistically significant in favor of the CAP arm (P less than 0.005). Concerning bone metastases there was no difference between the two schedules in response rate, nor in the median remission duration (CAP 11, FAC 10 months). In spite of a somewhat longer median survival in the CAP group, the difference (13 months vs 9 months) was not statistically significant (P = 0.10). Toxicity was moderate and tolerable in both regimens with more pronounced myelosuppression and vomiting in the CAP group. Compared with the FAC schedule the platinum containing combination chemotherapy (CAP) showed higher antitumor activity with no reflection on remission duration and survival.
 ...
PMID:Combination of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and platinum (CAP) versus 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as primary treatment in metastatic breast cancer: results of a prospective randomized study. 274 Dec 18

Continuous arterial infusion chemotherapy is associated with a significantly greater tumor response rate, though patients must be hospitalized for a long time. This paper describes techniques and our experience with arterial continuous infusion chemotherapy for outpatients using implantable port and ambulatory pump. Eleven patients (liver metastasis of colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and local recurrence of rectal cancer) were treated with continuous arterial infusion chemotherapy at our outpatient clinic. The chemotherapy infusions were carried out repeatedly for 5.7 months on average (10-2 months) with 5-FU or CDDP. Total periods of infusions were 64.8 days on the average (136-24 days). The infusion dose and frequency of drug refilling were limited by pump quality. A major complication occurred only in one patient who developed arterial thrombosis. Minor complications were mainly gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting) and abdominal pain, which were easily corrected with drugs. The tumor responses were as follows: PR 1 case, MR 1 case, NC 7 cases and PD 2 cases. Home arterial continuous infusion chemotherapy reduced the hospitalized period and helped patients return to work. Therefore it may well contribute to improve the quality of life of cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:[Continuous arterial infusion chemotherapy in cancer cases followed as outpatients]. 278 3

More than 1/3 of all non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients present with locally advanced non-metastatic disease. Despite radiation therapy and surgery the survival of these patients remains poor. In an effort to improve upon these results 33 clinical Stage III M0 patients from April 1985 through September 1986 were entered into a Phase II study at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center. Treatment included 5-FU by continuous infusion, VP-16, cisplatin and concurrent split course radiation therapy followed by surgical resection when possible. The overall clinical response rate is 74%. Fifty-seven percent of the preoperative group of patients went to surgery with a 100% resectability rate. These patients had a 50% pathologic complete response with no tumor found in the resected specimen. All surgical margins were free of disease and there were no operative deaths. This concurrent combined modality therapy is feasible with the major toxicities being leukopenia, nausea, and vomiting. With an overall median follow-up of 15 months, 36% of the patients remain alive. Overall local control is 71%. Actuarial observed 2 yr. survival is 33% and the median survival is 15 months. Histologic complete response appears to be an early indicator of the efficacy of this treatment regime. With 83% of the resected pathologic complete responders alive without evidence of disease, this preoperative combined modality therapy offers an appealing approach.
 ...
PMID:Preoperative combined modality therapy for stage III M0 non-small cell lung carcinoma. 283 40


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>