Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We have compared the efficacy of ondansetron with droperidol and saline in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in 120 ASA I and II patients undergoing hip and knee replacements and femoral resections. They received a standardized combined extradural and general anaesthetic and at the end of surgery were allocated randomly to receive droperidol 1.25 mg, ondansetron 4 mg or 0.9% saline in a 25-ml bag. An extradural mixture containing 0.5% plain bupivacaine 10 ml, fentanyl 500 micrograms and saline 30 ml was infused and PONV assessed for 24 h. Both ondansetron and droperidol were superior to saline in preventing vomiting (P < 0.01) although there was no significant difference between them. The incidence of vomiting was 17% for ondansetron, 18% for droperidol and 45% for saline. There was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea between the groups. Metoclopramide, the rescue antiemetric, was demanded by 38%, 34% and 17% of patients receiving saline, droperidol and ondansetron, respectively (ondansetron vs droperidol P < 0.05).
 ...
PMID:Double-blind comparison of ondansetron, droperidol and saline in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. 819 6

Phase II and III studies are tightly controlled trials investigating adverse effects before government approval of a new drug. However, because postapproval Phase IV studies involve a much larger and more complex population, the true nature of adverse effects can be seen. We analyzed Phase IV data for the new drug propofol with regard to the incidence of adverse events, and evaluations of such events by anesthesiologists versus postanesthesia care unit (PACU) nurses. Data pertained to 25,981 patients, 1722 institutions, and 1819 anesthesiologists giving propofol in three anesthetic regimens. Inclusion criteria were liberal: age, 18-80 yr; ASA physical status I-III; no continuing pregnancy; and no prior adverse anesthetic experience. Anesthesiologists and PACU nurses used data collection forms to record demographic, perioperative, and outcome variables; to evaluate recovery (excellent, good, or poor); and to describe adverse events. Adverse events were reported for 2813 patients (10.8%); the most common events were pain on injection (5.2%), hypotension (1.1%), nausea/vomiting (1.9%), and excitement (1.3%). The incidences of pain on injection and nausea/vomiting were approximately one-half and one-fifth, respectively, the values reported in earlier studies. Six hundred thirty-three patients (2.4%) had a "poor" recovery according to one or both of the evaluators (the anesthesiologist or PACU nurse). The PACU nurse was more influenced by nausea, vomiting, or postoperative pain; and the anesthesiologist was more influenced by postoperative confusion or delayed emergence from anesthesia. For only 0.6% of patients did both evaluators rate recovery as poor. Anesthesiologists gave more weight to intraoperative adverse events, and nurses to postoperative events.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Adverse events in a multicenter phase IV study of propofol: evaluation by anesthesiologists and postanesthesia care unit nurses. 821 94

Propofol anaesthesia may reduce postoperative emesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of emesis after propofol anaesthesia with and without nitrous oxide, compared with thiopentone and halothane anaesthesia, in hospital and up to 24 hr postoperatively, in outpatient paediatric patients after strabismus surgery. Seventy-five ASA class I or II, unpremedicated patients, aged 2-12 yr were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Thiopentone, 6.0 mg.kg-1 i.v. induction followed by halothane and N2O/O2 for maintenance (T/H); propofol for induction, followed by propofol and oxygen for maintenance (P/O2); and propofol for i.v. induction, followed by propofol infusion and N2O/O2 for maintenance (P/N2O). All received vecuronium, controlled ventilation, and acetaminophen pr. Morphine was given as needed for postoperative analgesia. There were no differences in age, weight, number of eye muscles operated upon, duration of anaesthesia or surgery. The P/N2O group (255 +/- 80 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1) received less propofol than the P/O2 group (344 +/- 60 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1) (P < or = 0.0001) and had shorter extubation (P < 0.001) and recovery (P < 0.01) times. Emesis in the hospital, in both the P/N2O (4.0%) and P/O2 group (4.0%) was less than in the T/H group (32%) (P < 0.01). Antiemetics were required in four patients in the T/H group (16.0%). Overall emesis after surgery was not different among the groups: T/H (48%), P/O2 (28%) and P/N2O (42%). The use of propofol anaesthesia with and without N2O decreased only early emesis. This supports the concept of a short-acting, specific antiemetic effect of propofol.
 ...
PMID:Propofol anaesthesia reduces early postoperative emesis after paediatric strabismus surgery. 822 31

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is rarely used on surgical wards despite described advantages of this method as compared to conventional techniques. Uncertainties in patient selection and insufficient evaluation of this technique may explain these circumstances. The aim of our study was to evaluate PCA on general surgery and traumatology wards by means of standardized criteria for technology assessment (i.e. safety, practicability, benefit for patients and medical staff) and the efficacy of pain relief. In a prospective study we investigated 120 patients. In phase I, we performed analgesic therapy with tramadol/metamizol (50 ASA status I-IV patients). In phase II, piritramid had been applied to 70 ASA status I-II patients after an intermediate analysis of phase I. In 7% of the patients technical problems led to an early interruption even at the end of the study period. There were, however, no incidents which caused vital problems for the patients. A mean postoperative pain level of 55 visual analogue scale points (0-100 point scale) was achieved with tramadol/metamizol. PCA was stopped in 16% of the patients due to the occurrence of nausea or vomiting and in two patients due to insufficient pain relief. The use of piritramid in phase II led to lower pain levels and no interruptions of PCA because of ineffectivity or nausea/vomiting.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative pain relief. A prospective observational study for evaluating the technology in a ward routine]. 826 45

The effect of a single intravenous dose of ondansetron in preventing postoperative nausea and emesis (retching and vomiting) (PONV) was investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, international study. Women of ASA class I-III, requiring gynaecological laparotomy, vaginal hysterectomy, or major vaginal surgery were selected for study. Two hundred and thirty-five received placebo, 231 received 1 mg ondansetron, 228 received 8 mg ondansetron and 229 received 16 mg ondansetron, as an infusion over five minutes before the induction of anaesthesia. A standardized balanced anaesthetic technique was employed. This consisted of premedication with either diazepam or temazepam, thiopentone induction, maintenance with nitrous oxide in oxygen supplemented with enflurane or isoflurane, intraoperative analgesia with fentanyl, neuromuscular blockade with any choice of agent and reversal with neostigmine and atropine. Postoperative analgesia was achieved with morphine, and prochlorperazine or metoclopramide were given if a rescue antiemetic was required. A greater percentage of patients in the 8 mg and 16 mg ondansetron groups experienced no postoperative emesis (44% and 39% respectively) than in the placebo and 1 mg ondansetron groups (29% and 28% respectively) for the first 24 hr postoperative period (8 mg vs placebo and 1 mg: P < or = 0.001; 16 mg vs placebo: P < 0.05; 16 mg vs 1 mg: P < 0.05). Similarly, the percentage of patients who did not experience postoperative nausea were 20%, 26%, 31% and 28% for the placebo, 1 mg, 8 mg and 16 mg ondansetron treatment groups, respectively (8 mg and 16 mg vs placebo P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A single i.v. dose of ondansetron 8 mg prior to induction of anaesthesia reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynaecological patients. 828 92

The influence of the addition of epinephrine to epidural morphine on postoperative analgesia were investigated in 60 ASA physical status I or II patients aged average 45 yr. The treatments were given following lower extremity operation under epidural anesthesia with 2% Xylocaine solution in 20 mL. The subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A (n = 30) received 2 mg epidural morphine in 10 mL normal saline without epinephrine. Group B (n = 30) received 2 mg epidural morphine in 10 mL normal saline with epinephrine 0.1 mg (1:100,000, 10 micrograms/mL). Patients were assessed for quality and duration of postoperative analgesia, as well as the incidence and severity of side effects after epidural morphine administration. The addition of epinephrine to epidural morphine had significantly increased the quality and duration of analgesia. The side effects of pruritus, nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention were more intense after epinephrine-morphine administration. However, respiratory depression was not observed in both groups.
 ...
PMID:Influence of epinephrine as an adjuvant to epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia. 830 50

The authors critically examine the preoperative management, the various anaesthetic techniques, the perioperative undesired effects in eighty six ASA I-II paediatric patients (age 6 months-11 years) submitted to ambulatorial anaesthesia for minor surgery or endoscopy. The importance of the psychological approach to patients and parents is enhanced. The preoperative screening included physical examination, ECG and simple laboratory tests. Various anaesthetic techniques (tracheal intubation and muscle relaxation with mechanical ventilation or spontaneous breathing) and many variously combined anaesthetic drugs (propofol 2 mg/kg, ketamine 1.5 mg/kg, diazepam 0.15 mg/kg, thiopental 3-4 mg/kg, halothane 1-2 MAC, fentanyl 1 microgram/kg) were employed depending on the quality of the surgical procedure and the conditions and the age of the patient. The results show that arousal was always rapid and smooth. The residual analgesia was sufficient in 74 cases; the other patients received rectal paracetamol 250 mg. No major complication was observed and only 6 patients were discharged 1 day later on account of vomiting or low Steward score. In conclusion outpatient paediatric anaesthesia has no contraindication for ASA I-II patients, shows no major complication and is well accepted by the patients and their patients.
 ...
PMID:[Ambulatory pediatric anesthesia. Personal experience]. 830 47

Despite modern anaesthetic procedures, postoperative nausea and vomiting are still the side-effects most often mentioned: acupressure is reported to be an additional method of preventing these effects in minor gynaecological surgery. We investigated the effectiveness of acupressure in patients undergoing gynaecological operations of longer duration (6-8 h) in a verum acupressure group compared to a placebo group. Before beginning the study we investigated a control group to find out the frequency of emesis. In the worst case of nausea that we encountered, 80% in the 0-6 h postoperative period, the number of random samples for the acupressure and placebo groups was calculated (30 patients in each group). The error for alpha was established at 5% and the reduction of nausea was 50%. METHODS. The female patients were 18 to 65 years old (ASA group I and II). Acupressure was carried out by fastening small metal bullets at the point P 6 to each forearm by means of an elastic bandage. The bullets were left there for 24 h. The premedication anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia, and antiemetic treatment were standardized. During a 24-h period we investigated the incidence of nausea and vomiting. RESULTS. The anthropometric data, the duration of surgery and the amount of postoperative analgesia were comparable between the three groups. Verum acupressure obtained a statistically significant and relevant reduction in nausea up to the 6th postoperative hour in comparison with the placebo group (P = 0.03). Nausea was reduced from 53% in the placebo group to 23% in the acupressure group. CONCLUSION. As demonstrated in this group of longer gynaecological surgery patients as well as in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, we were able to demonstrate that acupressure is an effective method of preventing nausea and vomiting without any side-effects. It is a valuable addition to the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Further studies should be conducted to investigate this possibility further.
 ...
PMID:[Acupressure in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting]. 848 93

In a randomised, placebo-controlled trial we have compared the efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting associated with patient-controlled analgesia after orthopaedic surgery. One hundred and forty five patients, ASA 1 and 2, undergoing major orthopaedic surgery were anaesthetised using a standardised technique. They were randomly allocated to receive patient-controlled analgesia as morphine 1 mg.ml-1 alone; morphine as before plus a single dose of 1.25 mg droperidol together with 0.083 mg.ml-1 in the infusion syringe; or morphine as before plus 4 mg ondansetron and 0.13 mg.ml-1 in the syringe. The patient-controlled analgesia bolus dose was set at 1 ml with a 5 min lockout and a 4 h maximum dose of 30 mg morphine. There was no background infusion. The occurrence of nausea, vomiting and sedation was assessed every 4 h. The incidence of vomiting decreased from 59% in the morphine-only group to 35% and 14% in the droperidol (p < 0.05) and ondansetron groups (p < 0.001) respectively. The number of patients suffering from nausea alone was not significantly different between the three groups, although those in the ondansetron group experienced less severe nausea (p < 0.05) when using a two point scale. The droperidol group had significantly higher sedation scores than the other two groups (p < 0.005). We conclude that ondansetron is superior to droperidol when used with patient-controlled analgesia and causes less sedation.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of ondansetron and droperidol in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting associated with patient-controlled analgesia. 879 34

We report the case of a 41-year-old ASA I patient who experienced during endometrial resection a transient idioventricular cardiac rhythm with hypotension related to a major glycine intoxication. The total volume of absorbed irrigating fluid was over six liters when these clinical signs occurred. The biological data were as following: Na = 89 mmol.L-1, Cl = 60 mmol.L-1 and osmolarity = 215 mOsm.L-1. Simultaneously, the glycine concentration in the plasma was 54.6 mmol.L-1, i.e 160 times higher than the normal value. The clinical course was unremarkable except vomiting. The treatment included only the administration of a diuretic agent, as the correction of the disorder took place spontaneously. The paucity of clinical symptoms when compared to the severity of the biological disorders explain why preventive measures are essential in this type of surgery.
 ...
PMID:[Transient arrhythmia disclosing major glycine poisoning during hysteroscopy]. 873 51


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>