Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a randomized double-blind study, the effects of clonidine premedication as a sedative, anxiolytic, analgesic and oculohypotensive agent were studied in 100 elderly patients (62 to 65 +/- 10 years, ASA grade I-II) undergoing elective intraocular surgery under local anaesthesia. The control group (Group A, n = 50) received oral diazepam 0.15 mg/kg 120 min before surgery and Group B (n = 50) received oral clonidine 300 micrograms 120 min before surgery. Two hours after the premedication, there was significantly more sedation (P less than 0.05) and less subjective anxiety (P less than 0.05) in the clonidine group than in the control group. There was a significant fall in intraocular pressure (IOP) from 20 +/- 0.5 to 13 +/- 0.5 mmHg (P less than 0.05) and significant reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) (P less than 0.05) in the clonidine group as compared to the control group. Perioperatively, significantly more supplementation with i.v. diazepam was given in the control group than in the clonidine group (P less than 0.01). The incidence of intra-operative hypertension (P less than 0.01) and tachycardia (P less than 0.05) was significantly greater in the control group than in the clonidine group. A significantly larger number of patients in the clonidine group scored a Post-Anaesthesia Recovery (PAR) score of 10 as compared to the control group (P less than 0.01). There was no statistical difference in the postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for pain, number of analgesic requests and emesis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Oral clonidine premedication for elderly patients undergoing intraocular surgery. 154 37

Forty-four children, ASA physical status I or II, aged 1.5-14 years and admitted for strabismus surgery, were studied. The study compared the postoperative condition after two different anesthesia methods. All children were premedicated with midazolam rectally, received glycopyrrolate i.v. and were then randomised to one of two anesthetic methods: 1) induction with thiopental, maintenance with halothane or 2) induction with propofol supplemented with fentanyl, maintenance with propofol infusion. In both groups, tracheal intubation was performed after vecuronium i.v. and the children were ventilated manually. Peroperatively, patients receiving propofol/fentanyl had more episodes of bradycardia (P less than 0.001). Times to spontaneous breathing and extubation were shorter in the propofol/fentanyl group (P less than 0.05) and there was also a lesser degree of sedation during the first 2 h postoperatively (P less than 0.01). Fewer children in the propofol/fentanyl group vomited postoperatively (P less than 0.05). The apprehension score was higher in the propofol/fentanyl group compared to the thiopental/halothane group (P less than 0.05). We conclude that children undergoing strabismus surgery anesthetized with propofol/fentanyl had more episodes of peroperative bradycardia, a lower incidence of postoperative vomiting and a shorter recovery time, and were more apprehensive during the initial postoperative period than children anesthetized with thiopental/halothane.
 ...
PMID:Propofol-fentanyl anesthesia compared to thiopental-halothane with special reference to recovery and vomiting after pediatric strabismus surgery. 154 40

We prospectively studied 952 patients to identify the incidence of hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg), bradycardia (heart rate less than 50 beats/min), nausea, vomiting, and dysrhythmia during spinal anesthesia. Historical, clinical, and physiologic data were correlated with the incidence of these side effects by univariate and multivariate analysis. Hypotension developed in 314 patients (33%), bradycardia in 125 (13%), nausea in 175 (18%), vomiting in 65 (7%), and dysrhythmia in 20 (2%). Variables conferring increased odds of developing hypotension include peak block height greater than or equal to T5 (odds ratio 3.8, P less than 0.001), age greater than or equal to 40 yr (2.5, P less than 0.001), baseline systolic blood pressure less than 120 mmHg (2.4, P less than 0.001), combination of spinal and general anesthesia (1.9, P = 0.01), spinal puncture at or above the L2-L3 interspace (1.8, P less than 0.001), and addition of phenylephrine to the local anesthetic (1.6, P = 0.02). Variables conferring increased odds of developing bradycardia include a baseline heart rate less than 60 beats/min (odds ratio 4.9, P less than 0.001), ASA physical status classification of 1 versus 3 or 4 (3.5, P less than 0.001), current therapy with beta-adrenergic blocking drugs (2.9, P less than 0.001), and peak block height greater than or equal to T5 (1.7, P = 0.02). Variables conferring increased odds of developing nausea or vomiting include addition of phenylephrine or epinephrine to the local anesthetic (3.0-6.3, P less than or equal to 0.003), peak block height greater than or equal to T5 (odds ratio 3.9, P less than 0.001), use of procaine (2.6-4.4, P less than or equal to 0.003), baseline heart rate greater than or equal to 60 beats/min (2.3, P = 0.03), history of carsickness (2.0, P = 0.01), and development of hypotension during spinal anesthesia (1.7, P = 0.009). Our results indicate that the incidence of side effects during spinal anesthesia may be reduced by 1) minimizing peak block height; 2) using plain solutions of local anesthetics; 3) performing the spinal puncture at or below the L3-L4 interspace; and 4) avoiding the use of procaine in the subarachnoid space.
 ...
PMID:Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. 843 44

Vomiting after strabismus surgery is a major problem that remains as yet unsolved, especially in children. Droperidol and metoclopramide, both known as powerful antiemetic drugs, were compared in this study. METHODS. One hundred ASA class I and II children ranging from 3 to 10 years of age were studied in a double-blind, randomised fashion. They were assigned to three groups: group D (n = 33) received 0.075 mg/kg droperidol, group M (n = 33) 0.15 mg/kg metoclopramide, and group N (n = 34) 0.1 ml/kg NaCl i.v. upon arrival in the post-anaesthesia recovery room (PARR). After oral premedication with 0.4 mg/kg midazolam, anaesthesia was induced via a face mask by inhalation of halothane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen. Barbiturates, atropine, and succinylcholine were not used; 0.05 mg/kg vecuronium was given to facilitate intubation. Gastric contents were aspirated by a gastric tube at the end of the operation. Vomiting and retching were recorded for 24 h; recovery from anaesthesia was assessed by a modified Steward score. RESULTS. The three groups were comparable regarding age, body weight, duration of anaesthesia, number of repaired eye muscles, and occurrence of the oculocardiac reflex (OCR). During the first 24 h postoperatively 21/33 (64%) patients of group D vomited, 24/33 (73%) of group M, and 33/34 (97%) of group N. The differences between groups D and N and between M and N were significant (P less than 0.01); comparison of groups D and M showed no statistical significance. Droperidol was more effective in reducing severe vomiting. Of the group N children, 47% vomited more than 6 times in 24 h compared to 18% of group M and 0% of group D. Age, sex, duration of anaesthesia, number of repaired eye muscles, and occurrence of the OCR had no influence on postoperative vomiting. Despite being administered at the end of the operation, droperidol did not prolong the patients' stay in the PARR. The post-anaesthetic scores for group D children were only slightly lower compared to groups M and N. CONCLUSIONS. Droperidol (0.075 mg/kg) and metoclopramide (0.15 mg/kg) both reduce postoperative vomiting after strabismus surgery. Droperidol seems to be more effective in reducing severe vomiting. Postoperative sedation after droperidol was not a major problem in our experience.
 ...
PMID:[Droperidol versus metoclopramide. Prevention of emesis following strabismus surgery in children]. 161 15

In order to establish if anticholinergic drugs might influence postoperative nausea and vomiting, 100 ASA I-II adult patients scheduled for minor orthopaedic procedures, varicose vein stripping or inguinal herniorraphy were randomised to receive, in a double-blind fashion, either a premedicant and a reversal dose of 0.003 and 0.0075 mg/kg of glycopyrrolate or 0.006 and 0.015 mg/kg of atropine, respectively. Nitrous oxide, after thiopentone induction was used for anaesthesia with fentanyl and diazepam as supplements and pancuronium for relaxation. In the recovery room, up to 2 h after surgery, 28% of the patients in the glycopyrrolate group and 8% in the atropine group experienced nausea (P = 0.017). Thereafter, the patients complained of nausea at decreased and equal frequencies in both groups. The incidence of vomiting was not statistically significantly different. Droperidol was needed, to control persistent emesis, three times more often in the glycopyrrolate than in the atropine group. It is concluded that substitution of glycopyrrolate for atropine increases the likelihood of postoperative nausea, and continued use of atropine should be considered in patients at risk of postoperative emesis.
 ...
PMID:Do anticholinergic agents affect the occurrence of postanaesthetic nausea? 163 67

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric (IG/IH) nerve block and intravenous fentanyl for pain control following inguinal herniorrhaphy in pediatric outpatients. Seventy-five ASA physical status I and II children (aged 1 to 10 yr) with unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy under general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups. Group A received IG/IH nerve block, using 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mg/kg) immediately after induction. Group B received intravenous fentanyl (1 microgram/kg) immediately after induction. Group C received only general anesthesia as control. At postanesthetic care unit (PACU), we recorded the degree of pain/or discomfort at 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min using modified Hannallah's scoring system after the patient was fully awake. The degree of recovery was also evaluated using Steward's scoring system. After discharge, the parents were interrogated about the condition of child within 24 h by telephone. Follow-up items raised included vomiting, drowsiness, pain and shivering. Our results showed that children in both study groups had lower pain score than those in the control group, and in the fentanyl group children had lower pain score than in the nerve block group during the first 30 min at PACU. The recovery time was also longer in the fentanyl group. There was no significant difference among the three groups regarding the raised items over telephone interrogation. In sum, inguinal nerve block was effective for postoperative pain relief in children undergoing inguinal herniorraphy. We also suggested that small dose of intravenous fentanyl would serve as an easy, simple and effective means for relieving postinguinal herniorrhaphy pain during the first 30 min of the initial postoperative period.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of inguinal nerve block and intravenous fentanyl in relieving postinguinal herniorrhaphy pain for pediatric outpatients. 175 50

Vomiting is a common problem after strabismus surgery in pediatric outpatients. We compared the effects of propofol with and without N2O and droperidol to the effects of a conventional regimen consisting of halothane-N2O-droperidol on the recovery characteristics and the incidence of postoperative emesis after strabismus surgery in 120 ASA physical status 1 or 2 children. After induction of anesthesia with halothane-N2O, patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Group A (control) received halothane, 66% N2O, and droperidol 75 micrograms.kg-1; group B, propofol 2 mg.kg-1 bolus followed by infusion of 160 microgram.kg-1.min-1; group C, propofol (as in group B) and 66% N2O; and group D, propofol (as in group B), 66% N2O (as in group C), and droperidol 75 micrograms.kg-1. Patients in group B had more episodes of intraoperative oculocardiac reflex responses than patients in group A, but had shorter times to extubation, oral intake, ambulation, and discharge, as well as a lower incidence of postoperative emesis (P less than 0.05). The addition of N2O to the propofol anesthetic regimen (group C) was associated with an increased incidence of emesis (P less than 0.05), whereas the addition of droperidol to the propofol-N2O regimen (group D) did not affect the incidence of emesis compared to the other three groups. We conclude that maintenance of anesthesia with a total intravenous regimen using propofol results in a more rapid recovery and less postoperative emesis than with a halothane-N2O-droperidol regimen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Effect of propofol on the incidence of postoperative vomiting after strabismus surgery in pediatric outpatients. 185 8

This randomized, double-blind study evaluated the antiemetic efficacy and the side-effects of promethazine pretreatment (0.5 mg.kg-1 IV + 0.5 mg.kg-1 IM) versus droperidol + placebo pretreatment (droperidol, 0.075 mg.kg-1 IV + physiological saline, 0.02 ml.kg-1 IM). One hundred unpremedicated ASA physical status I children ranging from two to ten years, and undergoing outpatient strabismus surgery were studied. All children received inhalational anaesthesia with halothane, nitrous oxide and oxygen. Neither opioids nor muscle relaxants were used. The incidence of vomiting and/or retching and the incidence of side-effects were determined in the post-anaesthesia recovery room (PARR), in the short-stay surgical unit (SSSU), and after discharge from the hospital (including the journey and the stay at home during the first postoperative day). Promethazine and droperidol were equally effective in reducing the incidence of vomiting before discharge to two and eight per cent respectively. On the contrary, the incidence of vomiting after discharge and overall were significantly less with promethazine (ten and ten per cent) than with droperidol pretreatment (54 and 56 per cent) (P less than 0.0001). Promethazine permitted the time to discharge from the hospital to be reduced to an average of three hours, without increasing the incidence of vomiting postdischarge. Promethazine pretreatment is much less expensive than droperidol pretreatment. The incidence of restlessness was significantly less with droperidol (eight per cent) than with promethazine (36 per cent) (P less than 0.001). Promethazine pretreatment demands the use of an analgesic like acetaminophen in order to reduce the incidence of postoperative pain and restlessness.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Antiemetic prophylaxis with promethazine or droperidol in paediatric outpatient strabismus surgery. 198 40

One hundred unpremedicated female patients of ASA grade 1 or 2 who underwent laparoscopy as outpatients were allocated randomly to one of four groups. All patients received general anaesthesia with fentanyl, thiopentone, halothane, nitrous oxide and oxygen; suxamethonium was given to facilitate tracheal intubation. In the recovery room, group 1 (control) received no treatment; group 2 received electro-acupuncture at the P6 point (Neiguan) on the right side for 15 minutes, group 3 received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at the P6 point on the right side for 15 minutes and group 4 received prochlorperazine 5 mg intravenously. Any act of vomiting, including dry retching, during the first 3 postoperative hours was regarded as postoperative emesis. The incidence of postoperative emesis was 11/25 (44%) in group 1, 3/25 (12%, p less than 0.05) in group 2, 9/25 (36%) in group 3, and 3/25 (12%, p less than 0.05) in group 4. Our results suggest that electro-acupuncture is as effective as prochlorperazine, and may be better than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, in reducing postoperative emesis.
 ...
PMID:Electro-acupuncture and postoperative emesis. 224 May 53

Women undergoing ambulatory laparoscopy are known to experience a variety of minor postoperative morbidity which prolongs recovery time and delays discharge. The purpose of this study was to investigate general anesthetic recovery of ambulatory laparoscopy patients receiving two rapid-acting, but disparate, anesthetic techniques. Thirty-one ASA I and II patients between 19 and 44 years of age were randomly divided into two groups. Group I received an isoflurane-based anesthetic, and Group II received an alfentanil continuous infusion. Through analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), Group II recovery scores were found to be significantly higher at T0 (p less than .0001), (p less than .0001), T15 (p less than .001), T30 (p less than .01) and T45 (p less than .02). There was no difference between groups at T60, at which time all patients received the maximum score of 10. No other factor besides anesthetic technique significantly affected recovery scores. Group II patients spent an average of 166 minutes (+/- 59 standard deviation) in the recovery room in comparison with 192 minutes (+/- 32 standard deviation) for Group I patients. Despite this finding, an ANCOVA determined that only presence of postoperative vomiting significantly affected recovery room time (p less than .03). Further research is indicated in the endeavor to reduce postoperative morbidity of this patient population.
 ...
PMID:Anesthetic recovery after ambulatory laparoscopy: a comparison of isoflurane and alfentanil infusion. 214 Apr 88


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>