Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF regimen) are currently applied as an effective combination treatment for various human malignancies; however, the efficacy of this regimen is impaired by severe adverse events associated with it. Therefore, better-tolerated regimens with comparable efficiency are required for patients with gastric cancer. To explore such possibilities, a phase-I clinical trial was performed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a modified regimen replacing cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with oxaliplatin and capecitabine, respectively (DOX program). The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limited toxicity (DLT) of capecitabine in this regimen were determined and a dose for subsequent phase-II clinical trials was identified. A total of 24 patients with advanced gastric cancer were sequentially enrolled in the present capecitabine dose-escalation trial. The patients were treated with docetaxel and oxaliplatin at fixed doses [75 and 100 mg/m2, respectively, intravenously, on day 1 (d1)], and with capecitabine at increasing doses (1,500, 2,000 and 2,500 mg/m2, per os, d1-7). The MTD of capecitabine was 2,000 mg/m2 (d1-7), repeated every 21 days for at least two cycles. The most frequent DLTs for this regimen were leukopenia (15/24, 62.5%, all at grade-III/IV) and neutropenia (13/24, 54.2%, all at grade-III/IV), nausea (14/24, 58.3%, all at grade-III) and vomiting (13/24, 54.2%, all at grade-III). The effective rate of the DOX regimen was 75.0% (18/24). Based on the results, the combination of docetaxel (75 mg/m2, d1), oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2, d1) and capecitabine (2,000 mg/m2, d1-7) is recommended for a future phase-II trial. While these doses for the DOX regimen were generally well tolerated, the efficacy of this modified regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer remains to be further evaluated in subsequent phase-II trials.
...
PMID:Seven-day capecitabine plus docetaxel and oxaliplatin regimen for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: A phase-I clinical trial. 2841 80

Gastric cancer is the fourth common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Due to lack of adequate information on the side effects of chemotherapy regimens in treatment of gastric cancer, this study was aimed to determine the side effects of two common chemotherapy regimens of gastric cancer. This prospective study was conducted in Emam Khomeini Educational Hospital and Touba Polyclinic; both are affiliated to Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. The frequency and severity of side effects of chemotherapy were recorded based on the National Cancer Institution (NCI) Toxicity Criteria (version 2). DCF (Docetaxel, Cisplatin, 5FU) and FOLFOX (Folinic acid, 5FU, Oxaliplatin) adverse reactions were compared using SPSS 16 software. One hundred twenty five chemotherapy cycles administered to seventy four patients were assessed. The most common used regimens were DCF (70%) and FOLFOX (16%). The incidence of vomiting was higher with DCF compared to FOLFOX (P = 0.049). In more than 50% of cycles, DCF regimen caused diarrhea, while in FOLFOX regimen it was less than 9% (P = 0.002). Stomatitis, visual changes, nausea, skin reactions, and constipation were not significantly different between the two regimens. It seems that the adverse drug reactions of FOLFOX regimen were more favorable than DCF regimen. The results of this study may help clinicians choosing a more favorable chemotherapy regimen especially in patients with a low performance status who have difficulties in tolerating a chemotherapy regimen with a more severe adverse effect profile.
...
PMID:Comparison the Incidence and Severity of Side Effects Profile Of FOLFOX and DCF Regimens in Gastric Cancer Patients. 3153 Oct 83

Case 1, a man in his 70s, was admitted because of a bleeding gastric ulcer during DCF therapy for esophageal cancer(EC). Three days after endoscopic hemostasis, abdominal pain and vomiting occurred.CT revealed hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG).No intestinal necrosis was observed on contrast-enhanced CT.Therefore, we selected a conservative treatment and found improvement.Case 2, a man in his 70s, developed frequent diarrhea during DCF therapy for EC.Case 3, a man in his 80s, developed hematochezie during DCF therapy for EC.Both cases 2 and 3 were diagnosed as HPVG using abdominal ultrasonography.The symptoms were mild, so we selected a conservative treatment and found improvement.Case 4, a man in his 60s, noticed sudden severe abdominal pain during DGS therapy for EC.Plain CT detected HPVG and gas in the small intestinal wall.We suspected intestinal necrosis due to HPVG with peritoneal irritation and performed emergency small intestine resection.We encountered 4 patients who developed HPVG during chemotherapy.The presence of HPVG is a poor prognostic sign, suggestive of intestinal necrosis, but some patients show improvement with conservative treatments.We also discuss previous reviews and reports.
...
PMID:[Hepatic Portal Vein Gas during Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer-A Report of Four Cases]. 3240 28