Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The aim of the randomized multicentre double-blind study was to establish whether nonionic contrast media differ in tolerability. The controlled comparison was conducted at 4 centres on a total of 798 patients with indication for i.v. DSA and computed tomography. The nonionic contrast media Iopamidol and Iopromide with an iodine content of 300 mg/ml each were studied. The osmolality of both contrast media is virtually identical. Both groups of patients were largely homogeneous in terms of demographic data and case history. The history of allergies was positive in 32.4% of the Iopamidol group and in 32.3% of the Iopromide group. The arithmetic mean of the doses administered to each patients was 148.3 and 149.3 ml, respectively. At all 4 centres there was a higher incidence of adverse events with Iopromide than with Iopamidol. The main differences with regard to pseudo-allergic reactions was the incidence of urticarial reactions, pruritus, nausea, vomiting and coughing. 89 of the 399 patients (22.3%) receiving Iopamidol and 120 of the 399 patients (30.1%) receiving Iopromide experienced pseudo-allergic reactions. The difference between both contrast media is statistically significant (p less than 0.05). There is a 95% certainty that less pseudo-allergic reactions will occur after an Iopamidol injection than after Iopromide. Possible explanations for the differences in tolerability between the two nonionic contrast media with identical osmolality are discussed.
 ...
PMID:[Tolerability of nonionic contrast media--results of a multicenter double blind study]. 161 Sep 29

Low osmolar contrast media (CM) cause less hemodynamic and electrical changes than conventional CM, and many cardiologist have switched to the newer agents. Recently, concerns about a possible increased frequency of thromboembolic complications with low osmolar CM have been raised. This study compared two low osmolar heparinized CM, one ionic (Hexabrix) and the other nonionic (Isovue), in 500 consecutive patients undergoing either diagnostic catheterization (417) or coronary angioplasty (83). Adverse effects were uncommon (37 patients), but were more frequent with Hexabrix (12%) than Isovue (3%); p less than 0.05. The most common adverse effects were nausea or vomiting. Death, related to abrupt occlusion of a severe left main stenosis occurred in one patient who received Hexabrix, and acute pulmonary edema occurred in one patient who received Isovue. No apparent thromboembolic complication occurred. In conclusion, both low osmolar CM were well tolerated, but Hexabrix caused more transient nausea or vomiting. Both CM were safe and the incidence of thromboembolic complications when prospectively looked for was very low.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of heparinized low osmolality ionic and nonionic contrast media in 500 patients undergoing cardiac angiography. 227 36

A randomised blind trial comparing Iopamidol (Niopam) and Metrizamide (Amipaque) for lumbar radiculography was performed in 100 patients. Significantly more patients receiving Metrizamide complained of having severe headaches (P less than 0.05) and vomiting (P less than 0.05). There was no difference in quality of the radiculograms.
 ...
PMID:A randomized blind trial of iopamidol (Niopam) and Metrizamide (Amipaque) in lumber radiculography. 633 15

Iopamidol, a new non-ionic contrast medium with low osmolality, was compared with Isopaque Coronar during selective coronary angiography in 16 patients. Iopamidol caused significantly less bradycardia, less ECG changes and less fall in blood pressure than Isopaque Coronar. No subjective adverse effects such as chest pain, vomiting, nausea or sensation of heat occurred. The results indicate that Iopamidol has advantages as a contrast medium for coronary angiography.
 ...
PMID:Coronary angiography with Iopamidol. 676 55

A review of immediate and delayed side effects noted in a consecutive series of 1,138 myelograms made with Iopamidol in the Services of Neuroradiology of various hospitals and university clinics at Pavia, Perugia, Vicenza, and Parma (all in Italy). The contrast was administered by lumbar spinal route at iodine concentrations of 200, 300 and 370 mg/ml, in amounts varying from 5 to 20 ml depending on segments being examined and extant clinical indications. The incidence and characteristics of complications (headache, nausea, vomiting, evidence of radicular irritation, etc.) were assessed in relation to examination technics, segments of spine being explored, iodine concentrations, and amounts of contrast injected.
 ...
PMID:Myelography with iopamidol, a nonionic water-soluble contrast medium: incidence of complications. 717 75