Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The effect of two conventional high-osmolality and two new low-osmolality contrast media on plasma histamine levels has been examined. The study population included 25 patients undergoing intravenous urography with Urovison 58% (sodium and meglumine diatrizoate), 24 patients receiving intravenous Hexabrix 320 (sodium and meglumine ioxaglate) for urography, 16 patients receiving intravenous Iopamiro 370 (iopamidol) for urography and 12 patients receiving Urografin 76% (sodium and meglumine diatrizoate) for coronary angiography. Seventy-four percent of the 77 patients studied suffered adverse reactions ranging from a feeling of warmth and nausea to laryngeal oedema and bronchospasm. Hexabrix 320 and Iopamiro 370 were associated with the least patient discomfort. All contrast agents usually produced a rise in plasma histamine following injection (Iopamiro 370 causing the least change) and the histamine levels then fell towards preinjection values over a space of about 10 minutes. No relationship was observed between the magnitude of the increase in histamine and the severity of the reaction that occurred. However, a relationship was suggested between the mean peak plasma histamine level achieved and the occurrence of a Grade II reaction (i.e., dry retching/vomiting, mild urticaria or rash). These findings raise the probability that histamine contributes to the more severe grades of reaction to radiographic contrast media.
 ...
PMID:Plasma histamine levels following administration of radiographic contrast media. 384 11

We compared Hexabrix 320 (580 mOsm kg-1) with Conray 420 (2500 mOsm kg-1) for left ventriculography using a prospective randomised double-blind protocol. One hundred consecutive patients with suspected coronary disease were assigned to Hexabrix (52) or Conray (48) for left ventriculography (dose 10 ml m-2 BSA; flow rate 12 ml s-1). Thirteen patients found Hexabrix unpleasant compared with 24 receiving Conray; overall the feelings of warmth and discomfort were less with Hexabrix than Conray (p less than 0.01 and p less than 0.02 respectively). The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and hypersensitivity was similar. Angiographic quality was better with Conray than with Hexabrix (p less than 0.05). Average changes in heart rate and systolic pressure were similar, though there was greater variation in systolic pressure change after Conray (p less than 0.025). End diastolic pressure increased more after Conray than after Hexabrix (p less than 0.05). These slight advantages of Hexabrix over Conray may be valuable in patients requiring multiple angiograms or in those with impaired cardiac function, but do not justify its use for routine angiography.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of Hexabrix 320 and Conray 420 for left ventriculography in patients with coronary artery disease. 636 33