Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A randomized, prospective study was performed to evaluate the hemodynamic changes and recovery characteristics in 60 ASA physical status class I-II unpremedicated patients undergoing gynecological laparotomies with either isoflurane anesthesia only (ISO group) or isoflurane anesthesia followed by propofol infusion (ISO-PRO group). All patients received isoflurane 0.5-1.5% and nitrous oxide (N2O) 66% in oxygen after tracheal intubation. ISO-PRO group (n = 30) received 6 mg kg-1 hr-1 propofol infusion in substitution for isoflurane 25 minutes before the end of surgery. Propofol in ISO-PRO group and isoflurane in ISO group (n = 30) were discontinued 5 minutes before the end of surgery. In both groups, N2O was administered throughout the operation until skin was closed. Hemodynamic measurements were similar between the two groups except at extubation when heart rate and blood pressure were lower in ISO-PRO group. The maximal blood pressure was also lower in ISO-PRO group. In ISO-PRO group, the time required to responsiveness to verbal commands and to orientation were significantly shorter. ISO-PRO group had better Steward's score on arrival at the recovery room and was earlier to get a full score of six. The two groups experienced similar rates of emesis and excitement either two hours or 24 hours postoperatively. We conclude that in relatively long intra-abdominal operations, replacement of isoflurane by propofol infusion 25 minutes before the end of surgery may provide stable maintenance of anesthesia and a faster recovery.
 ...
PMID:Propofol modifies recovery from isoflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia. 803 80

Nausea and vomiting during the first 24 postoperative hours after breast surgery were studied. Ninety patients scheduled for elective breast surgery were randomly assigned to one of three anaesthetic methods: total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol, or propofol or thiopental for induction followed by isoflurane anaesthesia. All three groups received fentanyl for peroperative analgesia. A total of 46 (51%) patients experienced emetic sequelae: 19 (21%) complained about nausea and another 27 (30%) vomited once or more during the postoperative course. More than 50% of the patients with nausea and 70% with vomiting first suffered from these symptoms in the surgical wards after leaving the postoperative unit. Nausea and vomiting were seen in 18 (60%), 13 (43%) and 15 (50%) for the groups propofol-propofol, propofol-isoflurane and thiopental-isoflurane, respectively. In conclusion, every second patient experienced nausea or vomiting after breast surgery, the majority of these emetic symptoms occurring after leaving the postoperative unit. Propofol for induction or as a main anaesthetic did not make any major difference with regard to postoperative nausea or vomiting.
 ...
PMID:Postoperative nausea and vomiting. A comparison between intravenous and inhalation anaesthesia in breast surgery. 814 Aug 74

Propofol (n = 15) and isoflurane (n = 15), both administered by clinical and haemodynamic criteria, proved to be equally feasible as sole maintenance anaesthetics (combined with 0.5 mg alfentanil and suxamethonium) for gynaecologic laparoscopies. Two min postextubation, the number of patients awake and responsive to commands was higher in the group given propofol. Later recovery till 2 h postanaesthesia was similar for the groups, except that the propofol patients more frequently required oxycodone for pain relief, and that three of them (NS) were bradycardic. Emesis was rare in both groups. The rapid recovery without emesis qualifies these two anaesthetics for gynaecologic laparoscopies.
 ...
PMID:Propofol vs isoflurane for gynaecological laparoscopy. 817 44

Propofol anaesthesia may reduce postoperative emesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of emesis after propofol anaesthesia with and without nitrous oxide, compared with thiopentone and halothane anaesthesia, in hospital and up to 24 hr postoperatively, in outpatient paediatric patients after strabismus surgery. Seventy-five ASA class I or II, unpremedicated patients, aged 2-12 yr were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Thiopentone, 6.0 mg.kg-1 i.v. induction followed by halothane and N2O/O2 for maintenance (T/H); propofol for induction, followed by propofol and oxygen for maintenance (P/O2); and propofol for i.v. induction, followed by propofol infusion and N2O/O2 for maintenance (P/N2O). All received vecuronium, controlled ventilation, and acetaminophen pr. Morphine was given as needed for postoperative analgesia. There were no differences in age, weight, number of eye muscles operated upon, duration of anaesthesia or surgery. The P/N2O group (255 +/- 80 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1) received less propofol than the P/O2 group (344 +/- 60 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1) (P < or = 0.0001) and had shorter extubation (P < 0.001) and recovery (P < 0.01) times. Emesis in the hospital, in both the P/N2O (4.0%) and P/O2 group (4.0%) was less than in the T/H group (32%) (P < 0.01). Antiemetics were required in four patients in the T/H group (16.0%). Overall emesis after surgery was not different among the groups: T/H (48%), P/O2 (28%) and P/N2O (42%). The use of propofol anaesthesia with and without N2O decreased only early emesis. This supports the concept of a short-acting, specific antiemetic effect of propofol.
 ...
PMID:Propofol anaesthesia reduces early postoperative emesis after paediatric strabismus surgery. 822 31

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that there is a direct prophylactic antiemetic effect of small-dose propofol given by continuous infusion. Sixty female patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopy under general anesthesia were randomized to receive, in a double-blind fashion, either a bolus of 0.1 mg/kg followed by a constant infusion of 1 mg.kg-1.h-1 of propofol or an equivalent volume of 10% Intralipid (placebo) beginning 30 min before induction of anesthesia and continuing until discharge from Stage I postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Anesthesia was induced and maintained in a standard fashion in all patients. The number of emetic episodes before and after discharge from PACU, nausea scores (11-point numerical scale), and time to discharge were evaluated. No significant differences between Intralipid and propofol were found for any of the outcome variables tested. While small-dose propofol is an effective adjuvant in reducing chemotherapy-induced emesis, we were unable to demonstrate any beneficial effect of propofol in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting when used as the sole prophylactic medication in this patient population. Propofol may have a synergistic effect when administered with other antiemetics, or the specific antiemetic effect of propofol, if it exists, may be dose-dependent and the dose used in this study was below the efficacy threshold.
 ...
PMID:Small-dose propofol by continuous infusion does not prevent postoperative vomiting in females undergoing outpatient laparoscopy. 898 2

Data from two published and one new meta-analysis were reviewed to compare the antiemetic efficacy of three different anaesthetic regimens: (i) propofol anaesthesia compared with another anaesthetic (control); (ii) anaesthesia without nitrous oxide compared with the same anaesthetic with nitrous oxide (control); (iii) propofol anaesthesia without nitrous oxide (TIVA) compared with another anaesthetic with nitrous oxide (control). Efficacy (prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with control) was estimated using odds ratio and number-needed-to-treat methods, and compared within a range of 20-60% control event rates for early efficacy (0-6 h) and 40-80% for late efficacy (0-48 h). Propofol anaesthesia or omitting nitrous oxide had similar effects on vomiting, both early and late. Propofol (but not omitting nitrous oxide) decreased the incidence of nausea. TIVA studies were documented poorly; appropriate comparison with other interventions were not possible. Efficacy of treatments should be compared within a setting-specific range of control event rates. There is insufficient evidence that TIVA with propofol is an anaesthetic technique with a low emetogenic potency.
 ...
PMID:Meta-analytic comparison of prophylactic antiemetic efficacy for postoperative nausea and vomiting: propofol anaesthesia vs omitting nitrous oxide vs total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol. 913

Propofol has been reported to reduce emesis. This study was performed to evaluate the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in gynecologic abdominal surgery patients after propofol anesthesia and inhalational anesthesia. Sixty patients were evaluated for the incidence of PONV. Thirty patients received oxygen-propofol-epidural anesthesia (propofol group) and the others were maintained with nitrous oxide-oxygen-isoflurane/sevoflurane--epidural anesthesia (inhalational group). The incidence of PONV was 33.3% in propofol group and 60% in inhalational group (P < 0.05). The means of frequency of postoperative nausea were 0.63 and 1.97 in propofol-group and inhalational group, respectively (P < 0.05). Those of postoperative vomiting were 0.17 after propofol and 1.00 following inhalational anesthesia (P < 0.01). For the gynecologic abdominal surgery patients, PONV was significantly less following intravenous anesthesia with propofol than after isoflurane or sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia. This study indicated that propofol anesthesia was useful in reducing PONV after gynecologic abdominal surgery.
 ...
PMID:[Postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic abdominal surgery--a comparison of propofol versus inhalational technique]. 940 28

The anti-nauseant efficacy of low-dose propofol was investigated in a blinded, randomized trial. Patients who complained of nausea and/or vomiting following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery and who requested antiemetic were randomly assigned to receive placebo, propofol 3 mg, propofol 9 mg or propofol 27 mg by intravenous injection. Nausea, vomiting and sedation were recorded by a blinded observer for 90 minutes following administration of the test drug, prior to discharge, and 24 hours following surgery. Rescue antiemetic (droperidol 1.0 mg i.v.) was available from 10 minutes after administration of test drug. Propofol failed to reduce nausea scores and did not reduce the incidence of vomiting. Numbers of patients receiving rescue antiemetic were similar in the four treatment groups. In the first 10 minutes following test drug administration, sedation scores were increased by propofol in a dose-related manner. We conclude that, in the dose range studied, propofol is ineffective for the treatment of nausea and vomiting occurring soon after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.
 ...
PMID:Lack of efficacy of propofol in the treatment of early postoperative nausea and vomiting. 974 49

Total intravenous anesthesia has recently become available for ambulatory surgery. It has the advantages of decreased air contamination from volatile anesthetics and decreased exposure of operating room personnel to volatile anesthetics. The purpose of this study was to compare the anesthetic properties of propofol/ketamine (total intravenous) anesthesia and thiopentone/halothane (intravenous and gaseous) anesthesia for herniorrhaphy or hydrocelectomy in children. Sixty children aged 2 to 7 years scheduled for herniorrhaphy or hydrocelectomy were allocated to two groups. The propofol/ketamine group (group 1) received a loading dose of intravenous propofol 3 mg/kg followed by propofol infusion 200 micrograms/kg/minute; additional bolus doses of propofol 1 mg/kg were given as needed or the infusion dose was increased or decreased by 33 micrograms/kg/minute as needed. Ketamine 1 mg/kg was administered intravenously 2 to 3 minutes before herniorrhaphy or hydrocelectomy to reinforce the analgesic and anesthetic effects of propofol. The thiopentone/halothane group (group 2) received intravenous thiopentone 6 mg/kg followed by halothane with 40% oxygen using a mask. Group 2 patients maintained spontaneous breathing with intermittent assistance and group 1 patients maintained spontaneous natural airway breathing during anesthesia. The scores on the postoperative assessment scale were higher in group 2 patients, indicating poorer anesthesia recovery characteristics, but the differences were not significant. Pain on injection was more frequent in group 1 (12/32) than in group 2 (2/28). The incidence of vomiting in group 2 (6/28) was significantly higher than in group 1 (0/32). We conclude that propofol/ketamine allows patients to maintain spontaneous natural airway breathing during anesthesia, and its analgesic and anesthetic effects are comparable to those of thiopentone/halothane. Propofol/ketamine is appropriate for pediatric herniorrhaphy and hydrocelectomy. It can be recommended for pediatric ambulatory surgery.
 ...
PMID:Anesthesia for pediatric herniorrhaphy or hydrocelectomy: comparison of propofol/ketamine and thiopentone/halothane. 974 67

Rapid i.v. induction of general anaesthesia is indicated in infants at risk of vomiting or regurgitation to reduce the risk of aspiration of gastric contents. Propofol is an alternative to thiopental in infants, and we have compared cardiovascular changes when propofol or thiopental was used for induction of anaesthesia in infants. Twenty infants, ASA I or II, aged 1-11 months, undergoing elective surgery were allocated randomly to receive either thiopental or propofol for i.v. induction. Cardiovascular and echocardiographic data were recorded in both groups before, during and for 5 min after induction of anaesthesia. Doses required to induce anaesthesia in each group were mean 10.3 (SD 0.9) mg kg-1 of thiopental and 6.1 (0.6) mg kg-1 of propofol. Thiopental did not alter significantly systolic or mean arterial pressure, afterload indices, rate-corrected velocity of circumferential fibre shortening or cardiac index, but decreased shortening fraction at 1 and 5 min after induction compared with awake values. Propofol did not alter heart rate, shortening fraction, rate-corrected velocity of circumferential fibre shortening or cardiac index at 1 and 5 min after i.v. induction compared with awake values. After induction, systolic and mean arterial pressures and afterload indices decreased more after induction with both agents, but did not become abnormal. Thus propofol decreased arterial pressure more than thiopental because of an effect on afterload. Cardiac output remained unchanged with both agents.
 ...
PMID:Haemodynamic effects of propofol vs thiopental in infants: an echocardiographic study. 1047 14


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>