Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin were compared in an open, randomised prospective multicentre study in the treatment of acute exacerbations of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in hospitalised patients. One-hundred-and-seventy-three patients were enrolled; 164 were evaluable for clinical efficacy and 98 for bacteriological efficacy, with 144 pathogens isolated. The predominant pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae (n = 30), Streptococcus pneumoniae (18), Staphylococcus aureus (12), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11), Moraxella catarrhalis (8), other Gram-negative bacteria (Neisseria, Klebsiella, Proteus, and Enterobacter spp.) (53) and other Gram-positive bacteria (12). A single bacterial pathogen was identified in 61 patients, whereas two bacterial pathogens were isolated in 31 patients and three in six patients. The clinical response at the end of treatment was very high in both groups with a satisfactory outcome (cured or improved) in 97.6% of the meropenem patients and in 96.3% of the imipenem/cilastatin patients; at follow-up the rates were 89.1% and 89.8%, respectively. The bacterial success (eradication or presumed eradication) was 88.2% in the meropenem group and 89.4% in the comparator group. Nausea or vomiting were reported more frequently in patients treated with imipenem/cilastatin, whereas in the meropenem group an increase in aminotransferases was reported. One patient treated with imipenem/cilastatin was withdrawn from the study due to seizures. Meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin were highly effective for the treatment of severe bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis but meropenem was better tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in hospitalised patients--a comparison of meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin. COPD Study Group. 854 88

Meropenem is a parenteral carbapenem that has been used clinically since 1994. Since the first review of its safety profile in 1995, the patient database has increased substantially. This new safety analysis includes data from 46 clinical trials in hospitalized patients with serious bacterial infections. The additional data comprise patients with lower respiratory tract and intra-abdominal infections, septicaemia and meningitis, and cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, and represents a group of more severely ill patients compared with the earlier review. In total, 4872 patients with 5026 meropenem treatment exposures were compared with 4642 patients treated with comparator agents (4752 exposures). Meropenem was administered most often by intravenous injection at 1g or 500 mg every 8 h. Meropenem-related adverse events most frequently reported were diarrhoea (2.3%), rash (1.4%), nausea/vomiting (1.4%) and injection site inflammation (1.1%). The most commonly reported meropenem-related laboratory adverse events were thrombocytosis (1.6%) and increased hepatic enzymes (1.5-4.3%). In meropenem-treated patients with meningitis, the incidence of seizures was low and none were drug related. In patients with infections other than meningitis, the incidence of seizures considered by the investigators to be related to meropenem was 0.08%. In general, the safety profile of meropenem was similar to that of the comparator agents. Withdrawals and deaths were similarly infrequent in the meropenem, cephalosporin and imipenem-cilastatin groups. Increased doses of meropenem were not associated with an increased incidence of adverse events. Meropenem was well tolerated in all patients, including children and patients with neutropenia. This new analysis supports the previous findings that meropenem has a favourable and acceptable safety profile.
 ...
PMID:Safety profile of meropenem: a review of nearly 5,000 patients treated with meropenem. 1038 Dec 10

The tolerability of the 2 most frequently used carbapenems, imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem, is reviewed. Both of these drugs, but especially imipenem, are potentially neurotoxic and may cause seizures if overdosed relative to renal function and/or bodyweight. The therapeutic margin is considerably narrower with imipenem/cilastatin which cannot be given at doses required for treatment of bacterial meningitis. Meropenem on the other hand, is considerably less prone to cause seizures and its tolerability and efficacy are well documented in 3 relatively large, controlled studies in adults and children with meningitis. They showed that meropenem was as effective and well tolerated as cefotaxime or ceftriaxone. Another potential advantage of meropenem over imipenem/cilastatin is that it can be given intravenously at a high rate without increased risk of nausea or vomiting. An obvious reason for using a carbapenem instead of a cephalosporin for empirical treatment of life-threatening infections is that both imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem have a broader spectrum of activity. They are also more resistant to hydrolysis by the most common beta-lactamases, including the class I cephalosporinase frequently produced by Enterobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp. and the extended spectrum enzymes, now commonly found in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp.
 ...
PMID:Carbapenems in serious infections: a risk-benefit assessment. 1073 43

Recently, new broad spectrum carbapenem has been investigated on a world-wide scale for the treatment of moderate to severe infections. In the neonatal intensive care units the extensive use of third generation cephalosporins for therapy of neonatal sepsis may lead to rapid emergence of multiresistant gram-negative organisms. We report the use of meropenem in 35 infants with severe infections due to Acinetobacter baumanii and Klebsiella pneumoniae. All gram negative bacteria were resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin, ticarcilin, cefazoline, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone and aminoglycosides. Eighty two percent of the cases (29/35) were born prematurely. Assisted ventilation was needed in 85.7% (30/35). All infants deteriorated during their conventional treatment and were changed to meropenem monotherapy. Six percent (2/35) died. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (mostly a slight increase in liver enzymes) was 8.5%. No adverse effects such as diarrhea, vomiting, rash, glossitis, oral or diaper area moniliasis, thrombocytosis, thrombocytopenia, eosinophilia and seizures were observed. At the end of therapy, overall satisfactory clinical and bacterial response was obtained in 33/35 (94.3%) of the newborns treated with meropenem. Clinical and bacterial response rates for meropenem were 100% for sepsis and 87.5% for nosocomial pneumonia. This report suggests that meropenem may be a useful antimicrobial agent in neonatal infections caused by multiresistant gram negative bacilli. Further studies are needed to confirm these results: Meropenem, newborn, sepsis and nosocomial infection.
 ...
PMID:Meropenem in neonatal severe infections due to multiresistant gram-negative bacteria. 1123 30

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibacterial with potent antimicrobial activity against a broad range of Gram-negative, Gram-positive and anaerobic bacteria. The second parenteral carbapenem to be introduced worldwide, meropenem has been in clinical use since 1994. Two previous safety reviews have established that meropenem has a favourable and acceptable safety profile. This new review was conducted after the approval of meropenem in the US in 2005 for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections, in addition to the previously approved indications of intra-abdominal infections and paediatric bacterial meningitis. The analysis includes the clinical trial data from the previous safety reviews, updated with expanded experience across a number of serious bacterial infections, including a large international study in patients with skin or skin-structure infections and further experience in patients with intra-abdominal infections and bacterial meningitis. A total of 6154 patients with 6308 meropenem exposures were compared with 4483 patients treated with comparator agents (4593 exposures), and the paediatric population base for which safety data are available has doubled to over 1000 patients. The data presented reinforce the favourable safety profile of meropenem. In general, the incidence and pattern of adverse events occurring with meropenem were similar to those of the first carbapenem, imipenem/cilastatin, and to those of the cephalosporin- and clindamycin-based regimens to which it had been compared. The most common adverse events reported for meropenem were diarrhoea (2.5%), rash (1.4%) and nausea/vomiting (1.2%). No adverse event occurred in more than 3% of patient exposures to meropenem, indicating a low overall frequency of adverse events as well as excellent gastrointestinal tolerability. Furthermore, no unexpected adverse events were identified, and the very low incidence of seizures in patients with meningitis was not considered to be drug related. In infections other than meningitis, the incidence of seizures considered by investigators to be related to meropenem treatment was 0.07%. In the new studies that updated the earlier safety data, no new cases of drug-related seizure were reported for any treatment or patient group (meningitis/non-meningitis infections). In conclusion, meropenem is well tolerated and has good CNS and gastrointestinal tolerability when used for the treatment of serious bacterial infections in a wide range of adult and paediatric patient populations.
 ...
PMID:Safety profile of meropenem: an updated review of over 6,000 patients treated with meropenem. 1769 78

A 64-year-old woman with acute myeloid leukemia, headache, vomiting, and fever exceeding 38.5 degrees C on day 15 during severe neutropenia while undergoing second consolidation chemotherapy presented the next day, with an altered mental state. A space-occupying lesion with ring enhancement was detected in her right frontal lobe on CT, indicting a brain abscess. Treatment was started with 2g/day of meropenem and 2 g/day of vancomycin. Surgical drainage was conducted on day 22 after recovery of her neutrophil and platelet counts. Culture of aspirated pus showed Gram-positive rods subsequently identified as Bacillus licheniformis. Meropenem was administered for 87 days and vancomycin for 44 days. The patient's general condition improved without neurological complications, and her enhanced brain lesion disappeared on day 185. B. licheniformis is often encountered in diagnostic laboratory culture and usually dismissed as a contaminant, but must be considered as a causative agents for brain abscesses in immunocompromised hosts.
 ...
PMID:[Brain abscess induced by Bacillus licheniformis complications in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)]. 1796 43

We present a case of sigmoid volvulus in a young male patient with culture-proven Salmonella Typhi in the blood which was sensitive to Meropenem and Azithromycin only, presented with fever, vomiting, loose stools, hematochezia, abdominal distention and tenderness with no signs of perforation on erect chest x-ray. Further, radiological imaging showed signs of sigmoid volvulus. An urgent colonic decompression with untwisting of the mesentery was performed. In our case, it can be said that sigmoid volvulus was developed as a complication of multiple drug-resistant strains of Salmonella Typhi. The resistance is acquired by alteration in the genome sequence. Currently, it is important to control such an unknown outbreak of multiple drug-resistant strains of Salmonella Typhi as it is a serious health care issue of disease control and prevention in Pakistan.
 ...
PMID:Sigmoid volvulus: a rare but unique complication of enteric fever. 3212 58