Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (
vomiting
)
31,883
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Dolasetron mesilate (
Anzemet
) ((2 alpha, 6 alpha, 8 alpha, 9a beta)-octahydro-3-oxo-2,6-methano-2H-quinolizin-8-yl-1 H-indole-3-carboxylate monomethane-sulfonate) is a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, which is in development for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced
emesis
. The ketone moiety of dolasetron is rapidly reduced by carbonyl reductase to form an alcohol, reduced dolasetron (red-dolasetron), which is the major pharmacologically active metabolite in humans. The pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and red-dolasetron were compared in dog, after single intravenous (i.v.) (2 mg/kg) and oral (p.o.) (5 mg/kg) administration of [14C]dolasetron or [14C]red-dolasetron. Pharmacokinetic parameters of dolasetron showed a terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of 0.1 h, total body plasma clearance (Cltot) of around 109 mL/min/kg, apparent volume of distribution (aVd beta) of 0.83 L/kg, and bioavailability (F) of 7%. Pharmacokinetic parameters of red-dolasetron, calculated after dolasetron or red-dolasetron administration, were very similar. The t1/2 was around 4.0 h, Cltot 25 mL/min/kg, aVd beta 8.5 L/kg, and F around 100%. The apparent first-order formation rate constant (ki) of red-dolasetron was 7 h-1, which was similar to the first-order elimination rate constant (kel) of dolasetron. Cmax of red-dolasetron was similar, after po administration of either compound, but the median Tmax was 0.33 h after dolasetron, compared with 1.5 h after red-dolasetron. The first-order absorption rate constants (ka) of dolasetron and red-dolasetron were 14 h-1 and 2 h-1, respectively. Dolasetron transport across Caco-2 cell monolayers was also higher than that of red-dolasetron. Thus dolasetron was more quickly absorbed than red-dolasetron, and its administration led to the more rapid appearance of red-dolasetron in plasma. There appears to be no advantage in the direct administration of the metabolite, especially as in humans oral administration of dolasetron, 30 min before chemotherapy, has been shown to be effective in preventing
emesis
.
...
PMID:Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and its major active metabolite, reduced dolasetron, in dog. 881 90
Anzemet
(dolasetron mesylate) is being developed for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced
emesis
and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Twenty-four healthy male subjects were orally dosed with dolasetron mesylate, 200 mg, after either an overnight fast or a high-fat breakfast. The ratio of the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the reduced active metabolite (MDL 74,156) to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) values in fed compared to fasting subjects was 86.3% with a 90% confidence interval for the ratio within (80, 125)%, indicating bioequivalence. The ratio of the mean MDL 74,156 maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) values was 70.6% in fed versus fasted subjects. The time to Cmax was statistically significantly longer after the high-fat breakfast (mean values, 1.11 h fasting and 1.80 h fed), probably due to delayed gastric emptying. It may be concluded that, although the rate of absorption was somewhat delayed, the extent of absorption did not change significantly when dolasetron mesylate was given with food.
...
PMID:The effect of food on the bioavailability of dolasetron mesylate tablets. 951 Sep 81
Nausea and vomiting continue to rank as important side effects for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The class of drugs known as the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have become widely used for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and are considered a standard part of care for moderately- and highly-emetogenic chemotherapy in combination with corticosteroids. Ondansetron (Zofran, Glaxo Wellcome), granisetron (Kytril, SmithKline Beecham) and dolasetron (
Anzemet
, Hoechst Marion Roussel) are commercially available in the US. Intravenous forms of all three drugs have demonstrated efficacy in preventing acute (< or = 24 h following chemotherapy) nausea and
emesis
due to moderately- and highly-emetogenic chemotherapy. Oral forms of the drugs have been shown to be effective in prevention of nausea and
emesis
due to moderately-emetogenic chemotherapy. More recently, oral 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have demonstrated efficacy in the prevention of nausea and vomiting due to highly-emetogenic chemotherapy as well. Comparative trials between the three agents have shown no clinically important differences in outcome and they should be considered clinically equivalent. Optimal oral anti-emetic regimens for high-dose chemotherapy with bone marrow or stem cell transplantation remain to be determined and future oral studies should target this population. In general, the decision of which 5-HT3 receptor antagonist to select for formulary inclusion should be based on the dose of anti-emetic used and the acquisition cost of the agents being compared. The oral route should be used whenever possible.
...
PMID:Advances in use of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. 1124 43
Emesis
is a major obstacle to cancer chemotherapy. Patients indicate that nausea and vomiting are a substantial concern when receiving chemotherapy. In recent years, newer antiemetics, serotonin antagonists, have been commercialized. Other agents, particularly the neurokin-1 antagonists, are in clinical development and should be available in the near future. Treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting has recently been reviewed by Gralla and Hesketh. The serotonin antagonists currently available are dolasetron (
Anzemet
), Ben Venue Laboratories, OH, USA), granisetron, ondansetron and tropisetron. They are characterized by an improved efficacy when compared with traditional metoclopramide-based antiemetic regimens. They are particularly effective for the control of acute
emesis
(within the first 24-h following chemotherapy). Their efficacy for the control of delayed
emesis
is less impressive and has been shown to be comparable with conventional antiemetics, such as dexamethasone. The serotonin antagonists are also associated with a higher acquisition cost than traditional antiemetics. This has aroused an interest in studying the economic impact of
emesis
and its treatment. Many economic evaluations have been undertaken since the introduction of the serotonin antagonists.
...
PMID:Cost-effectiveness of antiemetics use during cancer chemotherapy. 1980 74