Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Laboratory and clinical investigations were carried out to determine the effectiveness of bismuth subsalicylate in allaying nausea by preventing the physical symptom of emesis. In normal conscious dogs, a bismuth subsalicylate formulation caused a dose-related reduction in the incidence of vomiting in response to an emetic dose of ipecac syrup. In normal human subjects, a bismuth subsalicylate suspension, unlike the placebo formulation, successfully subdued nausea and vomiting in 66.7 and 80% of the subjects, respectively, in response to ipecac syrup. Both findings demonstrate that bismuth subsalicylate can provide antiemetic action and that the decreases in the occurrence of emesis in humans and dogs parallels the decrease in nausea found in humans and the nausea suspected to occur prior to emesis in dogs.
...
PMID:Antinauseant and antiemetic properties of bismuth subsalicylate in dogs and humans. 78 91

The aim of our study was to explore the possible relationship between patient satisfaction with antiemetic treatment and quality of life (QoL). The study sample consisted of 136 chemotherapy-naive patients with breast cancer, with Karnofsky index 90% to 100%, scheduled to receive their first cycle of, mainly adjuvant, 5-fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Two antiemetic regimens were used for the prevention of acute emesis. No antiemetic prophylaxis was given for delayed emesis. QoL was assessed using the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL). The RSCL was completed before chemotherapy (day 1) and on day 5. Statement of satisfaction was given on day 5. The change in RSCL scores between day 5 and day 1 was calculated and compared in three subgroups of patients: those very satisfied (n = 55), satisfied (n = 65), and unsatisfied with antiemetic treatment (n = 16). Patient statement of satisfaction was related to psychological distress (p = 0.002), physical symptom distress (p = 0.002), and activity level (p = 0.002). It was also related to the control of nausea (p < 0.01) and vomiting (p < 0.0001). We suggest that patient statement of satisfaction with antiemetic treatment could be an outcome measure for response assessment in antiemetic trials.
...
PMID:Patient statement of satisfaction with antiemetic treatment is related to quality of life. 1120 99

Depression and symptom severity are predictive of survival in cancer patients, but are often correlated with each other. This paper compares the physical symptom profiles of depressed and nondepressed cancer patients and further examines the predictive ability of multiple symptoms on depressive status. Data were collected from 121 hospitalized patients with breast, oesophageal and head and neck cancer. Patients were categorized as depressed (n = 30) or nondepressed (n = 91) using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Occurrence of symptoms was evaluated with the Patient Disease Symptom/Sign Assessment Scale. The most prevalent symptom in the total sample was insomnia (occurrence rate = 67%). Insomnia, pain, anorexia, fatigue, and wound or pressure sore occurred significantly more often in depressed patients, with no difference in occurrence rates of nausea/vomiting and dyspnoea. Significantly more symptoms were observed in depressed than in nondepressed patients (mean = 3.77 versus 2.52). Both groups showed similar rankings of symptom occurrence rates. Patients simultaneously experiencing insomnia, pain, anorexia and fatigue had a higher risk of depression (odds ratio = 5.03).
...
PMID:Physical symptom profiles of depressed and nondepressed patients with cancer. 1562 68