Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Few controlled clinical trials have tested the efficacy of psychological techniques for reducing cancer pain or post-chemotherapy nausea and emesis. In this study, 67 bone marrow transplant patients with hematological malignancies were randomly assigned to one of four groups prior to beginning transplantation conditioning: (1) hypnosis training (HYP); (2) cognitive behavioral coping skills training (CB); (3) therapist contact control (TC); or (4) treatment as usual (TAU; no treatment control). Patients completed measures of physical functioning (Sickness Impact Profile; SIP) and psychological functioning (Brief Symptom Inventory; BSI), which were used as covariates in the analyses. Biodemographic variables included gender, age and a risk variable based on diagnosis and number of remissions or relapses. Patients in the HYP, CB and TC groups met with a clinical psychologist for two pre-transplant training sessions and ten in-hospital "booster" sessions during the course of transplantation. Forty-five patients completed the study and provided all covariate data, and 80% of the time series outcome data. Analyses of the principal study variables indicated that hypnosis was effective in reducing reported oral pain for patients undergoing marrow transplantation. Risk, SIP, and BSI pre-transplant were found to be effective predictors of inpatient physical symptoms. Nausea, emesis and opioid use did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. The cognitive behavioral intervention, as applied in this study, was not effective in reducing the symptoms measured.
 ...
PMID:Hypnosis or cognitive behavioral training for the reduction of pain and nausea during cancer treatment: a controlled clinical trial. 140 23

Persistent severe cancer pain should be treated with opioid drugs, principally morphine. It can be administered orally, rectally and parenterally. Morphine is metabolised in the liver mainly to glucuronides, of which morphine-6-glucuronide is a powerful analgesic. Oral morphine should be administered regularly and in individualized doses. The use of morphine is frequently accompanied by adverse effects such as constipation, nausea, vomiting and sedation. Management of these is critical for successful pain treatment. Although alternatives are available none has any clear advantage over morphine in cancer pain, and should be reserved for special situations. Oral morphine is successful in more than 90% of cancer pain patients. Slow release morphine sulphate tablets (MS Contin) are often the best choice. For the few patients who need parenteral medication, continuous subcutaneous morphine sulphate infusion is generally the most suitable. Some pains are morphine resistant, especially those due to nerve injury. In these cases pain is best treated with tricyclic antidepressants and/or anticonvulsants.
 ...
PMID:Oral opioids in the treatment of cancer pain. 166 Jan 7

This report is a prospective study of 223 patients with intractable cancer pain who were offered continuing care during the year 1988 at the Pain Relief Unit, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, India, with a minimum follow-up of 4 months and a maximum follow-up of 16 months. A high percentage of pain relief was attained within a mean duration of 4 days, which on follow-up was maintained at a steady level in most patients (91.1%). Oral morphine could not be continued in three patients because of vomiting. The main side effects noticed were nausea and vomiting, itching, and constipation. At any time during the first 140 days, only 30% of patients had side effects and appropriate medication successfully managed these side effects. During the rest of the study period, the side effects were minimal. Oral morphine used with proper adjuncts offers the best pain palliation in most patients, with minimal side effects.
 ...
PMID:Continuing care for cancer pain relief with oral morphine solution. One-year experience in a regional cancer center. 169 28

Seventy-six cancer patients were studied on the use of controlled-release morphine sulphate (MS Contin) for cancer pain relief in the hospice of Yodogama Christian Hospital in Japan. The mean initial and maximum dosages were 81.4 mg and 178.6 mg respectively. While 46 patients (61%) did not need an increase in the initial dosage, 26 patients (34%) needed an increase ranging between 8 and 125%. Four patients (5%) required an increment of more than 500% of the initial dosage, because of apparent nerve involvement. This clinical survey showed that the total effectiveness was 92% and that 90% of the patients could experience control of pain with a daily dosage of 240 mg or less of MS Contin. Side effects observed were as follows: drowsiness 21%, nausea 11%, vomiting 8%, constipation 8%, confusion 7%, hallucination 3%. In conclusion, MS Contin offers effective cancer pain relief with minimal side effects in the majority of patients.
 ...
PMID:A clinical survey of controlled-release morphine sulphate for cancer pain relief in a Japanese hospice. 175 22

An open pilot study was performed to assess the analgesic efficacy and acceptability of a controlled-release oral morphine preparation. Between March 1989 and August 1990, 50 patients were treated with MS Contin (morphine sulphate tablets-MS Continus) for the pain caused by advanced cancer. The participants consisted of 28 males and 22 females ranging in age from 8 to 78 years (median 52 years). Twenty-two patients were actively receiving either cancer chemotherapy (15 patients), radiotherapy (2 patients), combined chemoradiotherapy (3 patients) or hormonal treatment (2 patients). Most of the subjects had pain caused by visceral disease and bone metastasis. A combination of causes was also present in 19 patients. The patients had a wide variety of cancers the most common being stomach cancer. In 24 patients, concomitant non-opioid or non-morphine opioid analgesics were combined with MS Contin. The median duration between cancer diagnosis and MS Contin initiation was 11.0 months. MS Contin was given on average for 1.5 months. The median survival after study enrollment was 1.8 months. Of the 50 enrolled patients, three left the study in the early phase due to drug-related adverse effects. In almost all the patients the effective dose was 60 mg/day with 45 days of response duration. The required duration for dose adjustment was nine days. The most common side effects were constipation and vomiting, which were controlled with conservative care. Two patients withdrew because of intractable vomiting and one because of mental drowsiness. In conclusion, twice-a-day moderate dose oral MS Contin therapy for cancer pain offers effective pain relief with minimal, tolerable side effects in the majority of patients in Korea.
 ...
PMID:Experience with a controlled-release oral morphine for cancer pain management. 175 23

One hundred and three patients with moderate and severe cancer pain were given a sublingual analgesic agent--dihydroetorphine hydrochloride (DHE). Relief of cancer pain was moderate or complete in 89.3% (92/103). The average relief time (ART) was 3.9 hours and the average time before effectiveness was 20 minutes. In patients with acute or chronic cancer pain, moderate and complete pain-relief rates were 91.3% and 82.2% (P = 0.237). Difference of ART between them was insignificant (P = 0.299). The main clinical side-effects were somnolence (60%), dizziness (72%), nausea (30%), vomiting (16.5%), constipation (5%) and shortness of breath (8%). In two of the patients, the administration of DHE had to be stopped due to its side-effects. Age, sex and site of cancer pain were not related to the analgesic effects of DHE, but the pain-relief in patients with bladder cancer was poor (P less than 0.001). Within certain range, increase in dose was able to enhance its analgesic effect (P less than 0.001) and reduce drug resistance (P less than 0.001).
 ...
PMID:[Dihydroetorphine hydrochloride for moderate and severe cancer pain]. 188 41

Physician education in cancer pain management is seriously deficient. Many problems occur with opioids simply because of therapeutic ignorance. Opioid side effects are best prevented by using morphine as the drug of first choice for severe pain. Anticipation and prevention of opioid side effects avoids most problems. Physicians need to be aware of how to transfer patients from one opioid to another or from one route of administration to another. Side effects common in clinical practice are constipation, nausea/vomiting, dry mouth, and sedation. The importance of the issues of tolerance, dependence, and respiratory depression have been exaggerated.
 ...
PMID:Prevention of opioid side effects. 198 Jan 27

Although nurses are in a strategic position to use hypnosis to manage a child's cancer pain, many lack the knowledge, the skill, or the exposure to the clinical effectiveness of hypnosis. Hypnosis has been a potent analgesic and anesthetic agent for more than 100 years; it reduces a child's cancer pain and the pain associated with painful procedures. Nurses can use hypnosis to help children diminish pain and cope with lumbar punctures (LPs), bone marrow aspirations (BMAs), and nausea or vomiting from chemotherapy. This article's purpose is to discuss myths, contraindications, research, processes, and effectiveness of hypnosis as a strategy for managing the cancer pain of school-age children. Vignettes from the author's clinical practice illustrate concepts and procedures.
 ...
PMID:Using hypnosis with children for pain management. 206 59

A high percentage of adults and children with advanced cancer suffer from pain. Strong opioids for pain control, e.g. morphine, slow-released morphine or buprenorphine, should be administered early according to the intensity of pain. The analgesics should be given orally whenever possible. They must be given at fixed intervals based on the duration of their action. The dose must be titrated to the needs of the patient. Sometimes more than 1000 mg morphine orally per day is necessary. Correctly used strong opioids produce only a few side-effects, especially constipation and vomiting. Many studies in adult cancer patients all over the world demonstrate the effectiveness of strong opioids for pain control. Children should be treated in the same way and comparable data in children with cancer pain must be collected.
 ...
PMID:[Use of strong opioids in the treatment of cancer pain in adults and children]. 257 Aug 83

The authors report a prospective survey of 88 patients with cancer pain who were treated with oral morphine solution during a period of 140 days at the Pain Relief Unit, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore. A high percentage of pain relief was achieved at the end of the first week of titrated therapy; relief was maintained at satisfactory levels throughout the study period in a majority of patients (86%). Interruption of oral morphine administration was necessitated by intractable vomiting in two patients. The majority of patients (65%) did not manifest any side effects, and appropriate medication successfully managed those who did. Oral morphine therapy for cancer pain offers effective pain relief with minimal side effects in the majority of patients.
 ...
PMID:Experience with oral morphine for cancer pain relief. 277 61


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>