Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Motion sickness, a multisymptom disorder characterized by abnormal gastrointestinal motility and emesis, can be induced by vestibular effects on the sympathetic portion of the autonomic nervous system. However, the vestibular-autonomic pathways are unknown. As a first step in the analysis, we identified the locus of preganglionic sympathetic neurons (PSNs) and dorsal root afferent ganglionic neurons (DRGs) which supply sympathetic innervation to major portions of the gastrointestinal tract in the rabbit. Retrograde labeling of neurons was obtained by application of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) to the cut end of the greater splanchnic nerve. Labeled PSNs were found, ipsilaterally, within the T1 to T11 spinal cord segments, with the highest density of neurons in T6. Most PSNs were located within the intermediolateral column (IML), but a significant portion also occurred within the lateral funiculus (LF), the intercalated region (IC) and the central autonomic area (CA). The proportion of labeling between the four regions depended on the spinal cord segment. In the midthoracic levels, the distribution of labeled neurons was denser in the IML and LF, and in the caudal thoracic segments, the majority were localized in the IC and CA. Labeled cells in these four areas varied morphologically from large fusiform neurons in the IC to small fusiform neurons in the LF, small stellate neurons in the CA, and medium-size stellate neurons in the IML. The DRGs were labeled in thoracic segments T1 to T12, with the majority between T5 and T11. These labeled DRG somata of the greater splanchnic nerve were smaller in comparison with unlabeled ones.
...
PMID:Sympathetic preganglionic efferent and afferent neurons mediated by the greater splanchnic nerve in rabbit. 396 18

In a randomized double-blind study the influence of morphine 0.5 mg on the development and regression of spinal anaesthesia, the postoperative analgesia and the side effects were investigated. Forty-two patients received an isobaric spinal anaesthesia with tetracaine 20 mg without morphine (n = 19) or with morphine 0.5 mg (n = 23). The sensory blockade was tested by pinprick; the patients evaluated their postoperative pain with an analogue scale. Arterial blood gases, respiratory rate, blood pressure and heart rate were measured and side effects determined. In the test group the cranial level of anaesthesia was during the development (p greater than 0.05) and regression (p less than 0.05) half to three segments higher than in the control group. The postoperative analgesia was more intense and longer lasting with morphine than without (p less than 0.05). Following morphine, P art CO2 was higher (p less than 0.05), the respiratory rate lower (p less than 0.05). Pruritus, nausea, vomiting and disturbances of micturition were more frequent. Following spinal anaesthesia with a deeper level of anaesthesia at T8-T11 the postoperative analgesia was superior than following spinal anaesthesia with a higher level of anaesthesia at T3-T4 (p less than 0.05). Only following higher levels of anaesthesia there was evidence of respiratory depression (p less than 0.05). This is why the level of spinal anaesthesia with the addition of morphine must not be higher than necessary for surgery.
...
PMID:[0.5 mg intrathecal morphine in spinal anesthesia. A double blind study on sensory block, postoperative analgesia and adverse effects]. 639 May 47

A 69-year-old woman (156 cm, 53 kg) underwent a Miles' operation, total hysterectomy, resection of vagina, and thigh flap to vulva for rectal cancer. Before general anesthesia, an epidural catheter was inserted at T11-12 interspace, and 1.5% mepivacaine 7ml was administered. Sensory block level spread from T4 to L1. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with sevoflurane in air oxygen mixture. Operation was performed uneventfully. After the operation, postoperative analgesia was achieved with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). The epidural solution of 0.06% ropivacaine with 4 microg x ml(-1) fentanyl and 20 microg x ml(-1) was connected to a PCA pump (i-Fuser, JMS, Japan) that was programmed as an 8 ml initial bolus, 4 ml x hr(-1) basal infusion, 2 ml bolus dose, and 10-min lockout interval. Although abdominal pain was well controlled by PCEA, intractable pain in the pelvic nerve region existed. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (IV-PCA) with fentanyl, ketamine, and lidocaine was added to PCEA. Then excellent pain relief was obtained without any side effects such as nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, and respiratory depression. It could be useful to use IV-PCA together with PCEA when wide spread postoperative analgesia is necessary.
...
PMID:[Patient-controlled epidural analgesia combined with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for postoperative analgesia after Miles' operation for rectal cancer]. 2186 22