Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Fractionated radiotherapy of malignancies in the abdomen induces nausea and vomiting in approximately 50% of the patients. During abdominal irradiation the damaged gastrointestinal mucosa releases 5-HT with ensuing activation of 5-HT3 receptors which may explain the nausea and vomiting. Ondansetron is a new 5-HT3-antagonist with antiemetic properties. In this consecutive study, 33 patients receiving fractionated upper abdominal irradiation (> or = 100 cm2, 1,8-4 Gy daily dose for a mean of 13 days) were treated with ondansetron (8 mg t.d.s. p.o.). Emesis was completely controlled in 26/33 (79%) patients throughout their radiation course, which embraced 628 (94%) treatment days. Ondansetron was well tolerated. Eleven patients developed mild constipation. No patients experienced diarrhoea (a common distressing side-effect of abdominal irradiation). It is suggested that ondansetron can be of value in preventing emesis in patients receiving fractionated radiotherapy. The possible beneficial effect in preventing diarrhoea must be further evaluated.
 ...
PMID:The effect of ondansetron on radiation-induced emesis and diarrhoea. 147 56

In a phase II study including 80 patients treated with highly emetic drugs such as cisplatin, carboplatin or cyclophosphamide > 600 mg/day) we confirmed the potential of ondansetron to prevent cancer chemotherapy- related acute nausea and vomiting. With a total dose of 19.0-37.3 mg ondansetron we achieved 82%-100% acute (0-24 hours) vomiting free patients. Using ondansetron for the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting increases the total chemotherapy costs by 6%. The real cost-benefit ratio for the treatment of acute nausea and vomiting shows better values for ondansetron than for all other recommended regimens.
 ...
PMID:The antiemetic efficacy and the cost-benefit ratio of ondansetron calculated with a new approach to health technology assessment (real cost-benefit index). 147 24

This study reports the effectiveness and side effects of intravenous ondansetron as a single-agent antiemetic therapy for patients receiving emetogenic cancer chemotherapy under a compassionate-use program for patients not enrolled in controlled clinical trials. Patients were > or = 7 years old and had uncontrolled nausea and vomiting or intolerable side effects with standard antiemetics administered with previous cancer chemotherapy. All patients received ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg every 4 hours x 3 daily doses beginning 30 minutes prior to emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients could receive ondansetron for up to 5 consecutive days of chemotherapy. One hundred ninety patients received ondansetron during chemotherapy treatments that were similar to previous cycles of chemotherapy during which the patients had received standard antiemetics (identical chemotherapy or differing only by addition/deletion of chemotherapy agents of low emetogenicity). Chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin (n = 99; 52%), doxorubicin (without cisplatin, n = 52; 27%), and other drugs (n = 39; 21%). Patient experiences with nausea and vomiting and side effects with ondansetron and with previous standard antiemetics were rated on a scale of 1 to 10 (1, did not experience; 10, as bad as could be). On the nausea and vomiting scale, 74% of patients improved on ondansetron relative to standard antiemetics. Mean nausea and vomiting scales were 3.9 for ondansetron and 7.7 for standard antiemetics (P < .001). On the side effects scale, 62% of patients improved with ondansetron. Mean side effect scores were 1.8 for ondansetron and 4.5 for standard antiemetics (P < .001). One hundred nine patients assessed the effect of nausea and vomiting on their quality of life by means of the Functional Living Index-Emesis. On a 100-point scale (100=best quality of life), quality of life scores were 65.5 for ondansetron and 39.5 for standard antiemetics (P < .01). Functional Living Index-Emesis scores were higher for 76% of patients during ondansetron treatment as compared with previous chemotherapy with standard antiemetic regimens. Twenty-eight patients (15%) were withdrawn from the study because of nausea and vomiting. Forty-four patients (23%) experienced other adverse effects (headache, 17 patients; diarrhea, eight patients; all other events occurred in two or fewer patients). Only six patients were withdrawn due to adverse effects. In conclusion, ondansetron therapy resulted in significantly improved control of nausea and vomiting, fewer side effects, and better quality of life than standard antiemetic therapy in the same patients receiving similar chemotherapy regimens.
 ...
PMID:Results of a compassionate-use program using intravenous ondansetron to prevent nausea and vomiting in patients receiving emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. 148 80

The most promising anti-emetic drugs are identified during preclinical testing. Phase I and II clinical studies are used to optimize doses and schedules for the various routes of administration. Most methodological issues arise in relation to phase III studies. A prospective, randomised, double-blind, parallel-subjects design is recommended. Stratification helps balance the factors influencing emesis between the 2 arms of a randomised study. The most important of these are the strength of the emetic stimulus, prior exposure to chemotherapy, age, sex and a history of chronic alcohol consumption. The evaluation of efficacy of an anti-emetic should include its efficacy in controlling acute post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting as well as anticipatory and delayed emesis. The side effects of an anti-emetic must also be considered since they may negate any anti-emetic advantage. Patients and observers have reported successfully evaluating these parameters using both categorical and linear-analogue scales.
 ...
PMID:Methodology in anti-emetic trials. 152 83

Patients with cancer undergoing treatment with chemotherapy or radiation therapy may experience a range of treatment-related side effects. One of the most common and most distressing side effects is treatment-induced emesis. The severity of the symptom is great enough to cause some patients to refuse treatments, delay appointments or discontinue therapy entirely. Experiencing treatment-induced nausea and vomiting can create a spectrum of issues for patients and their families and seriously influence their quality of life. Managing nausea and vomiting induced by cancer therapy is of critical importance. A team approach, inclusive of the patient, can be most effective. Nurses play a pivotal role in assessing patterns of nausea and vomiting and the usefulness of anti-emetic therapy, evaluating and updating treatment/care plans and helping the patient and family to cope with the disease and its treatment.
 ...
PMID:Managing treatment-induced emesis: a nursing perspective. 152 85

The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and requirements for anti-emetic medication were assessed in 80 female patients undergoing day-case anaesthesia during assisted conception therapy. Anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil 50 micrograms.kg-1 and propofol 1 mg.kg-1; atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1 was given to facilitate tracheal intubation. The patients were allocated to receive either total intravenous maintenance of anaesthesia with an infusion of propofol and increments of alfentanil (Group P) or inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia with nitrous oxide and enflurane (Group E). Postoperative nausea, retching, vomiting, requirements for anti-emetic therapy, and unplanned admission for overnight stay in hospital were recorded. Overall incidence of nausea was 64% in group E and 39% in Group P (P less than 0.05). Incidence of vomiting was 67% in Group E and 34% in Group P (P less than 0.05). Metoclopramide was requested by 62% of patients in Group E, and 32% of those in Group P (P less than 0.05); 21% of the patients in Group E were admitted to hospital overnight, while only 5% of the patients in Group P required unscheduled admission to hospital (P less than 0.05). We conclude that total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil is superior to inhalational maintenance with nitrous oxide and enflurane in that it is associated with less nausea and vomiting, less requirement for anti-emetic medication, and a lower probability of unplanned admission to hospital after day-care gynaecological surgery.
 ...
PMID:Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil protects against postoperative nausea and vomiting. 153 Nov 18

Ondansetron hydrochloride dihydrate is a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonist that was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis. The mechanism of action is thought to be due to competitive inhibition of specific serotonin receptors in the central nervous system and gastrointestinal tract. In clinical trials with cisplatin-induced emesis, ondansetron resulted in complete control of vomiting (0-2 episodes) in 55-87% of patients during the first 24 hours of chemotherapy administration. It was significantly more effective than metoclopramide in comparative trials. Ondansetron is also being investigated for the treatment of radiation- and anesthesia-associated nausea and vomiting. Studies in animals demonstrate potential efficacy in the treatment of anxiety, drug withdrawal, and schizophrenia. The drug is generally well tolerated, with no reported extrapyramidal reactions.
 ...
PMID:Parenteral ondansetron for the treatment of chemotherapy- and radiation-induced nausea and vomiting. 153 80

The intraoperative use of opioid analgesics decreases the volatile anesthetic requirement and provides for pain relief in the early postoperative period. In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 95 ASA physical status 1 or 2 children (ages 5-15 yr) undergoing general anesthesia for elective operations, we compared postoperative analgesia following the intraoperative intravenous (iv) administration of ketorolac, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug or morphine, an opioid analgesic. After induction of general anesthesia and before the start of the surgical procedure, children received equal volumes of saline, morphine (0.1 mg.kg-1, iv) or ketorolac (0.9 mg.kg-1, iv). Postoperative pain was evaluated by the child using a 10-cm linear visual analog scale (VAS) and by a blinded observer using both a VAS and an objective pain scale (OPS) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). There were no statistically significant differences in the VAS and OPS scores in the PACU or in the postoperative analgesic requirements in children receiving morphine or ketorolac. The placebo group had a significantly higher VAS and OPS score and required earlier and more frequent analgesic therapy in the PACU compared to the two analgesic groups. Patients receiving ketorolac had less postoperative emesis than those receiving morphine. We conclude that ketorolac (0.9 mg.kg-1) is an effective alternative to morphine (0.1 mg.kg-1) as an iv adjuvant during general anesthesia, and in the dose used in this study, is associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting in children.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of ketorolac and morphine as adjuvants during pediatric surgery. 151 1

Nausea and vomiting induced by anticancer agents are common problems associated with chemotherapy for cancer. Recent trials have examined a variety of antiemetics, representing several different classes of drugs. High dose metoclopramide provided the impetus for many of the current studies because of its effect against cisplatin induced vomiting. However, current regimens are not yet entirely effective in many patients receiving cisplatin or other highly emetogenic anticancer agents. A promising new class of antiemetics, 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists are undergoing clinical evaluations. Members of this class are easily and safely administered to patients receiving cisplatin or other emetogenic anticancer agents. These are highly active antiemetics, both prophylactic and interventional treatment. Lack of extrapyramidal reaction and other adverse effects associated with its use makes the drug a very attractive one. However, studies of antiemetics require consideration of methodologic issues that may not be of concern in trials of anticancer agents. The results of these studies can be affected by the patient population, the sample size, pharmacologic variables, the trial design, the method of analysis, etc. Recently, developments both in new-antiemetics and better ways of using the existing ones, lead us to cautious thought that nausea and vomiting due to cancer chemotherapy can be controlled substantially with benefit to the patients.
 ...
PMID:[Antiemetics and its clinical evaluations]. 154 57

Nausea and vomiting associated with antineoplastic chemotherapy are distressing and may keep patients from complying with chemotherapy protocols. No drug has emerged among many as an effective antiemetic. It has been speculated that propofol may have intrinsic antiemetic properties. We report the use of low-dose continuous infusion propofol in three oncology patients to treat chemotherapy-associated nausea and vomiting. A bolus of 0.1 mg.kg-1 followed by a continuous infusion of 1 mg.kg-1.hr-1 was effective in both prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting. All three patients were alert, reported low nausea scores by visual analogue scale, and had no episodes of vomiting. When the infusion was discontinued, nausea and vomiting were noted in two patients. Propofol, given in a subanaesthetic infusion, was safe and effective as an antiemetic in these three patients.
 ...
PMID:Use of propofol for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis in oncology patients. 840 27


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>