Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (
vomiting
)
31,883
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Ondansetron is a novel 5-HT3 receptor antagonist used for the treatment of cytotoxic-induced
emesis
and postoperative
nausea and vomiting
. Safety data from volunteer studies, non-
emesis
development studies, studies in the treatment of cytotoxic-induced
emesis
and postoperative
nausea and vomiting
, and spontaneous case reports, all indicate that ondansetron is well tolerated and has an excellent safety profile. There are no known interactions of ondansetron with other drugs, and no interference with postoperative recovery.
...
PMID:Safety of ondansetron. 142 27
A military tank driving simulator has recently been introduced as a training aid for tank drivers in the Israel Defense Forces. Reports of
nausea and vomiting
among the first users of the simulator launched our investigation of the possible existence of a motion sickness-like syndrome among simulator drivers. Although the 59 subjects drove the simulator without any report of
vomiting
, other motion sickness-like symptoms were frequently reported. A comparison of symptoms reported after simulator and real tank driving show that dizziness, nausea, disorientation and hypersalivation were more frequently reported by simulator drivers and were of greater intensity. However, sweating and drowsiness were more prevalent among real tank drivers. The objective effect of driving the simulator was evaluated by instability and performance tests that were conducted before, during and after driving the simulator. A greater decrement in test results was observed among subjects reporting higher frequency of motion sickness-like symptoms.
...
PMID:Motion sickness-like syndrome among tank simulator drivers. 142 18
The high incidence of postoperative
emesis
after strabismus surgery in pediatric outpatients can be reduced by the prophylactic administration of droperidol 75 micrograms/kg intravenously. However, this may be associated with profound sedation, delayed discharge, dysphoria, agitation, and extrapyramidal symptoms in this population. Because lorazepam used as an antiemetic in children during chemotherapy decreased the incidence of
nausea and vomiting
, we compared the antiemetic effects of lorazepam and droperidol in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 129 healthy children undergoing surgical correction of strabismus. The children, aged 1-13 yr, were randomly allocated into three groups. The children in group 1 received droperidol 75 micrograms/kg intravenously; those in group 2 received lorazepam 10 micrograms/kg intravenously; and those in group 3 received placebo. Anesthesia consisted of halothane, nitrous oxide in oxygen, and atracurium. Study drugs were administered intravenously after induction of anesthesia but before surgery. In children 3-13 yr old, administration of either lorazepam or droperidol was associated with a lower (P < 0.024) incidence of postoperative
vomiting
. There was no difference between the antiemetic effect of lorazepam and that of droperidol. The incidence of postoperative agitation was greater in the droperidol group (P < 0.001) than in the lorazepam and placebo groups. Postdischarge
vomiting
was less (P < 0.009) in children younger than 3 yr of age. Lorazepam, similar to droperidol, has an antiemetic effect in outpatient children 3-13 yr old undergoing strabismus correction, but it is associated with less postoperative agitation than is droperidol.
...
PMID:The antiemetic effect of lorazepam after outpatient strabismus surgery in children. 144 46
A 9-year-old child was admitted to the hospital with congenital left ureteropelvic junction obstruction with massive left pyelocaliectasis and underwent dismembered pyeloplasty of the left kidney under general anesthesia without complications. Postoperatively, the child was placed on patient-controlled analgesia, with morphine as the drug of choice. The patient was discharged to the ward with adequate pain control and no complaints of nausea or
vomiting
. Once on the ward, a transdermal scopolamine patch was placed for
nausea and vomiting
. More than 24 hours after patch placement, the child experienced central anticholinergic syndrome (CAS) with hallucinations and incontinence. The scopolamine patch was promptly removed, and all symptoms of CAS rapidly ceased. A transdermal scopolamine patch should not be used in the pediatric population, and with extreme caution in the elderly. Treatment of CAS includes prompt removal of the patch, cleansing of the area, and possible physostigmine administration.
...
PMID:Central anticholinergic syndrome in a pediatric patient following transdermal scopolamine patch placement. 144 54
It is evident from the data presented above that
nausea and vomiting
are frequent side effects which are often persistent and distressing to patients. Evidence suggests, and intuitively it appears that avoidance of
nausea and vomiting
is important to the patients' ability to maintain their quality of life during the treatment period. It is of particular interest to note that in the literature reviewed in this paper standard antiemetic prescribing and practice were followed. It would, therefore, appear that available antiemetic agents are not always effective or may not be adequately employed. The toxicities associated with dopamine receptor antagonists, the current standard of antiemetic regimens, limit their usefulness in the clinical setting. In fact, the contribution of antiemetic therapy toxicities to the incidence of anxiety, fatigue, and restlessness which were commonly reported by patients in the studies reviewed should be considered. Additional effort to characterise the impact of
nausea and vomiting
on cancer patients' quality of life is needed. Clearly, the data available suggest that these symptoms should be included as part of the physical domain component of quality of life instruments used in cancer patients. Ideally, the instrument used should contain separate items for
nausea and vomiting
. Major side effects of antiemetic therapy should also be assessed since these may be as debilitating as the effects of
nausea and vomiting
. Increased awareness of total patient impact of
emesis
and antiemetic therapy will serve as an impetus for improvements in antiemetic therapy strategies and practices.
...
PMID:Nausea and vomiting and cancer patients' quality of life: a discussion of Professor Selby's paper. 146 95
There have been major clinical advances in the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and
emesis
. These advances were achieved partly by the introduction of new anti-emetic agents but important improvement came from the use of existing agents in ways developed from the results of studies based on new approaches and methods in anti-emetic research. By developing basic research tools, improving methodology and applying psychometrically sound assessments better management or chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting
has been achieved. The goals of anti-emetic assessment are discussed here along with data and examples of assessment techniques for
emesis
and nausea. Examination of 153 separate anti-emetic studies between the years of 1975 and 1988 showed that
emesis
was the most common outcome measure used and that approximately 1 out of five studies measured some other type of outcome usually in the context of nausea and
emesis
. The frequency of outcome events was most commonly the dimension assessed. Examination of size of the effect of an anti-emetic regimen for these anti-emetic studies showed it to be independent of the type of outcome measured, but to be quite dependent on how the outcome was quantified. For instance, differences in the frequency or incidence of either nausea or
emesis
were generally larger than measurements made of the duration of either of these.
...
PMID:Methodology and assessment in clinical anti-emetic research: a meta-analysis of outcome parameters. 146
Certain autonomic variables have been shown to be responsive to motion induced
nausea and vomiting
. Here we report preliminary data on changes in heart rate, blood volume pulse, pallor and skin temperature assessed during a one hour period at baseline, a one hour period of peak nausea, and a one hour period of
emesis
in five female patients receiving identical cancer chemotherapy and antiemetic drugs according to a common protocol. Examination of coefficients of variation showed that heart rate and face temperature were more stable measures across each of the three time periods than blood volume pulse and pallor. Furthermore, the four measures were found to be more variable during times of
emesis
than times of nausea. The four measures were shown to be responsive to patient reported
nausea and vomiting
. Temperature and pallor showed a linear change from baseline to nausea to
vomiting
. Heart rate and blood volume pulse significantly decreased from baseline time during nausea and then significantly increased from a time of nausea to during
emesis
. Variations in the time course of each variable change during nausea supported a view that nausea may be more related to a rebound of parasympathetic activity than a slow decrease of sympathetic activity. Replication with larger samples is needed. Examination of the
nausea and vomiting
of pregnancy, general anaesthesia or different chemotherapeutic agents could help explore whether results reported here are singular or representative of a more generalisable autonomic response associated with patient reported nausea.
...
PMID:Autonomic changes during cancer chemotherapy induced nausea and emesis. 146 1
Aversive side effects are commonly associated with potentially curative chemotherapy treatments. Despite the advances in the development and testing of antiemetic medication,
nausea and vomiting
remain prevalent and troublesome side effects of chemotherapy. Four studies (from 1978-1990) of 2,499 consecutive cancer patients being treated with a variety of chemotherapy agents showed that 62-72% were experiencing posttreatment nausea/
vomiting
despite the use of available antiemetic medication. In addition to occurring during, or up until days following, treatment with cytotoxic drugs,
nausea and vomiting
may begin to occur in anticipation of chemotherapy treatments. This phenomenon is called anticipatory
nausea and vomiting
(ANV) and it occurs in at least one in four patients. Randomised clinical trials have shown that antiemetic drugs do not control ANV once it has developed. No single clinical or patient variable has been found to be as significantly associated with the development of ANV as several in concert. We have examined the predictive value of eight clinical characteristics in a series of three clinical trials. The first of these trials was developmental; the other two have been longitudinal prospective trials. The eight clinical characteristics appear stronger in predicting those patients who will not subsequently develop ANV rather than those who will. Anxiety has been proposed as a mechanism in the development and expression of anticipatory side effects. Here we show an association (P < .05) between patient self-report of anxiety on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) assessed at the first chemotherapy treatment, and subsequent development of anticipatory side effects within the first five treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Behavioural factors influencing the development and expression of chemotherapy induced side effects. 146 3
This study combines secondary analysis of efficacy and side-effect data from a randomised controlled trial with estimates of resource use to evaluate the likely economic effects of the new antiemetic agent ondansetron. Costs, effects and cost-effectiveness of ondansetron in the prophylaxis of acute
nausea and vomiting
induced by chemotherapy are assessed relative to antiemetic therapy with metoclopramide. Superior efficacy of ondansetron is quantified both in terms of significant
emesis
avoided and
emesis
management costs avoided. A simple cost analysis, with the metoclopramide dosage priced at 10 pounds, indicates that therapy with ondansetron would give equivalent net treatment costs, at a price ratio (ondansetron/metoclopramide) of 2.3 to 1. If therapeutic success is defined as the avoidance of
emesis
and antiemetic side-effects, then the two therapies would be equally cost-effective at a drug price ratio of 5 to 1. We conclude that, (i) economic evaluation prior to price setting is feasible and informative; (ii) such models can indicate prospective data collection priorities.
...
PMID:Economic evaluation of ondansetron: preliminary analysis using clinical trial data prior to price setting. 146 4
This study was carried out to assess the efficacy of oral ondansetron, a new 5HT3 receptor antagonist, in patients undergoing thyroid surgery. It included 60 patients, randomly assigned to two groups, and receiving orally, 1 h before induction of anaesthesia, either 8 mg of ondansetron (n = 29) or a placebo (n = 30). One patient was excluded. The same anaesthetic protocol, consisting of 3 to 5 micrograms.kg-1 of fentanyl, 4 to 6 mg.kg-1 of thiopentone, and 0.5 mg.kg-1 of atracurium, was used in all. Anaesthesia was maintained with 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen with 0.8 to 1% endtidal concentration of isoflurane and additional boluses of 0.1 mg of fentanyl as required. The incidence and intensity of nausea, graded mild, moderate or severe, and the incidence of
vomiting
were recorded postoperatively. During the first twelve hours after surgery, 40% of patients in the placebo group had nausea (16.7% mild, 20% moderate and 6.7% severe), and 50% vomited. In the ondansetron group,
nausea and vomiting
occurred in 13.8% and 20.4% of patients respectively. The 4 patients in the latter group complained of major nausea. The differences between the groups were statistically significant: p = 0.025 for nausea and p = 0.042 for
vomiting
. It is concluded that oral ondansetron, 8 mg taken orally 1 h before surgery, significantly reduces the incidence of
nausea and vomiting
during the first twelve postoperative hours. As it is easy to use and has no side-effects, it might be of interest in day-case surgery patients, despite its high cost.
...
PMID:[Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting by ondansetron]. 147 80
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>