Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Tumoricidal responses and tumor regressions have been observed after plasma perfusion over Staphylococcus aureus Cowan I (SAC), or purified protein A immobilized on solid supports. This system was initially studied in a single human patient and then extended to dogs with spontaneous mammary carcinoma, an excellent model of human breast cancer. In the single patient and dogs with mammary tumors, perfusion of plasma over protein A bearing staphylococcus resulted in tumor necrosis and tumor regression. Tumor reduction or growth retardation with similar perfusion systems has been noted in various feline and rodent tumor models. Tumoricidal responses were also observed in canine tumors after perfusion over commercial protein A which was immobilized in a collodion charcoal matrix (PACC). These responses were amplified when a subtherapeutic and nontoxic dose of cytarabine was given after perfusion. Similar tumor reduction in murine and feline tumor models has been noted after perfusion of autologous serum over protein A immobilized on various other solid supports. The PACC perfusion system was extended to five consecutive patients with advanced breast adenocarcinoma. Four of five patients showed tumor regression after perfusion of small volumes of autologous or homologous plasma over PACC. Patients also experienced pyrexia, nausea, vomiting, and significant cardiopulmonary toxicity. Detailed hemodynamic studies of these effects showed that the major pathophysiology involved a decline in total peripheral resistance associated with an increase in cardiac output. With reduction of immobilized protein A quantity and diminution in plasma perfusion rate, the cardiopulmonary toxicity associated with treatments was diminished. Chemotherapy given as FAC to a single patient shortly after concluding perfusion therapy resulted in rapid regression of residual large tumor masses. Studies focusing on the mechanism of the tumoricidal responses have examined changes in sera after incubation or perfusion over immobilized SAC or PACC. Major findings include (1) the identification of protein A leaching from PACC and SAC after serum perfusion and appearing in the effluent as Clq binding oligomers composed predominantly of IgG and protein A but also containing IgA, IgM and C3 with a molecular weight range of 600,000 to 2,000,000; (2) the identification of C3a anaphylatoxins in serum perfused over PACC or SAC; (3) the recognition that several enterotoxins, in particular enterotoxin B are present in commercial protein A preparation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Protein A and staphylococcal products in neoplastic disease. 390 35

Since November 1981, 90 cancer patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy (CMF, FAC, FAM) have been studied to evaluate whether the administration of Synchrodyn 1-17, 100 micrograms i.m. a day for 15 consecutive days, could reduce some side effects caused by the cytotoxic drugs. Nausea, vomiting and weakness which are the most frequent side effects generally found to be very upsetting to patients, were less pronounced in the treated patients than in patients treated with a placebo. The performance status was not modified by the treatment. Skin pigmentation was noted in the majority of cases and it appeared to be related to the sustained treatment with high dosages of the peptide. Some side effects were observed in the treated patients such as sodium retention and hypertension, hyperglycemia. Successively we have begun to study the circadian rhythm of the cortisol, which often changes during the advanced stages of the illness and which chemotherapy does not seem to alter.
 ...
PMID:ACTH 1-17 effects in oncology. 609 Dec 45

In a pilot study a combination of metoclopramide and dexamethasone was administered to 29 patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy. Metoclopramide was given intravenously (IV) at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg one-half hour before the start of chemotherapy, and then given at the same dose orally two, five, and eight hours after chemotherapy. Dexamethasone was given at a dose of 10 mg IV immediately following the first dose of metoclopramide, then given at a dose of 8 mg orally six, 12, and 18 hours after chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimens most commonly used were standard FAC, FAM, and BACOD regimens. Twenty-six of 29 patients received outpatient treatment. Complete protection against both nausea and vomiting was seen in 69% (20/29) patients; six others (21%) experienced mild nausea but no vomiting, resulting in 90% (26/29) of the patients having total emetic protection with combination metoclopramide and dexamethasone. Eighty-eight percent (15/17) of the patients with no prior chemotherapy had no nausea or vomiting, one (6%) had only mild nausea, and the remaining patient (6%) had one emesis. Forty-two percent (5/12) of the patients with prior chemotherapy had complete antinausea and emetic protection, five (42%) had nausea without vomiting, and the remaining two patients experienced one or two emesis. Side effects were minimal when present and included mild drowsiness (five patients), akathisia (three patients), diarrhea (one patient), and hot flashes (one patient). Combination metoclopramide and dexamethasone therapy can effectively prevent emesis in 94% of patients receiving potentially emetogenic chemotherapy and can prevent nausea and emesis in 88% of untreated patients. Studies defining the optimal dose and scheduling needed to maintain such antinausea and antiemetic protection are necessary.
 ...
PMID:Combination metoclopramide and dexamethasone: an effective antiemetic regimen in outpatients receiving non-cisplatin chemotherapy. 647 Jul 55

The antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron and dexamethasone (Ondex) was randomly compared to that of high-dose metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and orphenadrine (Control) in the prevention of emesis induced by cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin chemotherapy in 64 chemotherapy-naive breast cancer patients. For the control of acute emesis (day 1), patients were randomized to receive either ondasetron 8 mg p.o. 1 hour prior to chemotherapy (CT) and repeated after 6 and 12 hours plus dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. 40 minutes prior to CT (Ondex) or dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. 40 minutes prior to CT, orphenadrine 40 mg i.m. 35 minutes prior to CT and metoclopramide 3 mg/kg i.v. 30 minutes prior to CT and repeated after 90 minutes followed by 40 mg p.o. every 3 hours for 4 times (Control). To control delayed emesis, patients on Ondex received ondansetron 8 mg PO t.i.d. days 2 and 3 and patients in the Control arm received metoclopramide 0.5 mg/kg p.o. q.i.d. and dexamethasone 8 mg i.m. b.i.d. days 2 and 3. Complete and major control of acute emesis was observed in 74%/94% and 44%/67% of patients treated with Ondex and Control, respectively (p < .01/p < .005). Acute nausea was absent in 38% and 34% of patients treated with Ondex and Control, respectively (p = NS). Complete and major control of delayed emesis (days 2-5) was observed in 65%/91% versus 44%/66% of patients in the Ondex and Control arms, respectively (p = NS/p < .01). In patients receiving 6 courses of FEC/FAC, control of acute emesis was significantly superior with Ondex at all treatment courses.
 ...
PMID:Ondansetron and dexamethasone versus standard combination antiemetic therapy. A randomized trial for the prevention of acute and delayed emesis induced by cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin chemotherapy and maintenance of antiemetic effect at subsequent courses. 797 74

The aim of our single-center, prospective, randomized, open study was to evaluate the antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of a regimen based on a single oral dose of ondansetron 8 mg in comparison with a metoclopramide-based regimen, for prevention of acute FAC (fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy-induced emesis. A total of 149 chemotherapy-naive, female outpatients, under 50 years of age and with no history of alcohol consumption, scheduled to receive their first cycle of FAC chemotherapy, were included. The patients received either oral ondansetron (8 mg) or metoclopramide (1.5 mg/kg, i.v.), both combined with dexamethasone (16 mg, i.v.) and alprazolam (0.5 mg t.i.d. orally). No antiemetic prophylaxis was given for delayed emesis. Complete control of acute vomiting was obtained in 69/74 (93%) of patients receiving ondansetron, and in 49/75 (65%) of those receiving metoclopramide (p=0.00003). Complete control of acute nausea was obtained in 58% of patients receiving ondansetron and in 36% of those receiving metoclopramide (p=0.007). Complete prevention of delayed vomiting/nausea was achieved in 73%/20% and 60%/16% of patients, respectively. Sedation was more frequent in the metoclopramide arm (p=0.04). As far as we know this is the first study that supports the efficacy of a regimen based on a single oral dose of ondansetron 8 mg in the prevention of acute FAC chemotherapy-induced emesis. The ondansetron regimen was highly effective in female patients and was superior to the metoclopramide based regimen.
 ...
PMID:High efficacy of a single oral dose of ondansetron 8 mg versus a metoclopramide regimen in the prevention of acute emesis induced by fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC) chemotherapy for breast cancer. 1112 67

This comparative phase III trial of mitoxantrone+vinorelbine (MV) versus 5-fluorouracil+cyclophosphamide+either doxorubicin or epirubicin (FAC/FEC) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer was conducted to determine whether MV would produce equivalent efficacy, while resulting in an improved tolerance in relation to alopecia and nausea/vomiting. This multicentre study recruited and randomised 281 patients with metastatic breast cancer; 280 were evaluable for response survival and toxicity (138 received FAC/FEC, 142 received MV). Patient characteristics were matched in each arm and stratification for prior exposure to adjuvant therapy was made prospectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was equivalent in the two arms (33.3% for FAC/FEC versus 34.5% for MV), but MV was more effective in patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (13% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3-23) for FAC/FEC versus 33% (95% CI 20-47) for MV P=0.025) with a better progression-free survival (PFS) (5 months (range 1-18 months) versus 8 months (range 1-27 months); P=0.0007 for FAC/FEC versus MV, respectively) while FAC/FEC was more effective in previously untreated patients (ORR 43% (95% CI 33-53) versus 35% (95% CI 25-45), P=0.26; PFS 9 months (range 0-29 months) versus 6 months (range 0-26 months) P=0.014). Toxicity was monitored through the initial six cycles of therapy; febrile neutropenia and delayed haematological recovery was more frequent for MV (P=0.001), while nausea/vomiting of grades 3-4 was greater for FAC/FEC (P=0.031), as was alopecia (P=0.0001), cardiotoxicity was the same for the two regimens. MV represents a chemotherapy combination with equivalent efficacy to standard FAC/FEC and improved results for patients who have previously received adjuvant chemotherapy. Toxicity must be balanced to allow for increased haematological suppression and risk of febrile neutropenia with MV compared with a higher risk of subjectively unpleasant side-effects such as nausea/vomiting and alopecia with FAC/FEC.
 ...
PMID:Results of a phase III prospective, randomised trial, comparing mitoxantrone and vinorelbine (MV) in combination with standard FAC/FEC in front-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer. 1137 44


<< Previous 1 2