Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (
vomiting
)
31,883
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Although 50%-80% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer demonstrate an objective response after platinum-based chemotherapy, a majority of these patients will ultimately experience a relapse of their disease. Effective second-line treatment for these patients is of the most importance. We performed a phase II study with cisplatin and pirarubicin (each drug 50 mg/m2 i.v. every 28 days) in 17 patients with relapsed or persistent
ovarian carcinoma
. All patients had received platinum-containing primary chemotherapy. Overall survival from the time of diagnosis was 38.3 months (45.3 months in relapsed
ovarian carcinoma
and 28.3 months in
ovarian carcinoma
persisting after primary chemotherapy). Survival from entrance into the study was 13.0 months (14.2 months in relapsed disease and 11.2 months in refractory disease). Time to progression was 10.3 months. An objective response was observed in 4 patients and another 3 patients had stable disease. Major toxicity consisted of
emesis
(grade III/IV in 60/64 courses) and myelosuppression WHO grade III/IV in 15 courses. Neurotoxicity occurred in 3 patients and nephrotoxicity in 1 patient. Alopecia occurred in 12 patients. Tachycardia and other low-grade heart toxicities were observed after 5 courses. Dose reduction was necessary because of severe myelosuppression in 4 courses and because of nephrotoxicity in 1 course. Delay of subsequent chemotherapy courses for more than 7 days was necessary after 13 courses and was always due to myelosuppression. The dose-limiting toxicity of combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and pirarubicin is myelosuppression. Response and survival rates are superior in patients with relapsed disease compared to patients with resistant
ovarian carcinoma
.
...
PMID:Phase II study of pirarubicin combined with cisplatin in recurrent ovarian cancer. 826 15
From 1985 to 1989 70 patients with high-risk FIGO Stage I-II
ovarian carcinoma
entered a randomized trial comparing chemotherapy (CT: cisplatin 50 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 day 1 every 28 days for 6 courses) versus whole abdominal radiotherapy (WAR) given according to the open-field technique (43.2 Gy/24 fractions to the pelvis and 30.2 Gy to the upper abdomen). Protocol violations occurred in 8 patients randomized to WAR who received CT because of their own and/or physician's decision. Since protocol compliance was poor and accrual low the study was prematurely closed. Treatment-related toxicity for patients receiving CT was mild and tolerable, consisting chiefly of controllable grade 3
emesis
(71%). Grade 3-4 diarrhea was experienced by 28% of patients treated with WAR; severe enteritis requiring hospitalization was observed in 2 patients. Late bowel obstruction requiring surgery was observed in 1 patient. At a median follow-up of 60 months, 21 patients died and 23 relapsed. Five-year survival was 71% and 53% (p = .16), while relapse-free survival was 74% and 50% (p = .07) for CT and WAR, respectively. Although no firm conclusion can be drawn from the present study, a short-term CT, including cisplatin, appears a safe treatment in comparison to WAR.
...
PMID:High-risk early-stage ovarian cancer. Randomized clinical trial comparing cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus whole abdominal radiotherapy. 831 Oct 13
In past years prevention of
emesis
and nausea induced by antiblastics has been based on extremely heterogeneous protocols with little efficacy. However, by the use of selective antagonists of serotonin S3 receptors there has been a remarkable improvement in the control of side effects. Among these antagonists ondansetron has been till now the most studied. The dosage protocols with which it has usually been employed establish an i.v. administration of the drug of 1 mg/h for 24 hours or the repetition of ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg x 2 every 2-4 hours after the end of chemotherapy. In our study, carried out from September 1991 till September 1992, 21 patients affected by
ovarian carcinoma
and treated by cisplatin chemotherapy protocols were evaluated (for a total of 63 cycles). Ten patients were under first line adjuvant chemotherapy treatment, whereas 11 patients were in relapse and had already undergone previous antiblastic treatments with serious side effects. In 18 out of 21 patients cyclophosphamide which has a strong emetic factor was associated with cisplatin. According to the total quantity of cisplatin contained in each cycle (in all < or =/> 100 mg) we used ondansetron in two different dosages simplified and shortened in time. They have been illustrated with particular details in the text. The control of nausea and vomiting during the first 24 hours was similar to the controls obtained in other studies in which ondansetron was administered according to the "traditional schemes".(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Simplified ondansetron regimens for antiemetic prophylaxis in cisplatin-based chemotherapy of ovarian cancer. 834 24
Forty-two patients affected by either stage III and IV ovarian cancer with residual tumor after surgery or recurrent ovarian cancer entered a phase II study of the combination carboplatin 300 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 28 days. Thirty-eight patients were evaluable for response and of these 27 obtained complete or partial remission with a 71% overall remission (clinical complete remission 45%; partial remission 26%). Treatment tolerability was on the whole good. The most frequent side effects were leukopenia (76%), anemia (67%) and nausea/
vomiting
(60%). Thrombocytopenia was present in 31% of the patients, but nearly always to a mild degree except for one grade 4 case. No other grade 4 side effect was observed. We did not observe any cases of nephrotoxicity and only two patients complained of paresthesia. This carboplatin-cyclophosphamide combination in advanced
ovarian carcinoma
produces comparable results, in terms of objective responses, to those obtained with standard cisplatin-based regimens, with suggestion of a better toxicological profile.
...
PMID:A phase II study of carboplatin and cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian carcinoma. 845 65
A large study of tumors of low malignant potential confirmed the favorable survival in this group of patients compared to invasive epithelial ovarian tumors. Only 8% of patients died with recurrent disease after surgery. Patients with stage IA borderline tumors with mucinous histology tended to recur later and carried a poorer prognosis than patients with serous histology and similar stage. The group at highest risk for relapse were age greater than 70, stage II or III tumors, and histology other than serous. Long-term survival in this group was less than 75%. This high-risk group of patients should be targeted for innovative adjuvant treatment strategies. This year several well-designed studies with large sample sizes showed DNA ploidy to be an important new independent prognostic factor in stage I ovarian carcinoma. In patients with well-differentiated early stage ovarian cancer, DNA flow cytometric analysis may indicate subgroups with less favorable prognostic characteristics. This method of analysis may be beneficial in determining the need for additional treatments after surgery for early stage
ovarian carcinoma
. Recommendations for the definitive management of early stage ovarian cancer awaits completion of current GOG and European randomized prospective studies. Paclitaxel given in combination with platinum-containing agents is an intense area of research for treatment of advanced stage disease. Early data from a prospective randomized trial of patients with advanced ovarian cancer showed a higher response rate and longer disease-free survival in patients treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin compared to a standard regimen of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin. The impact of this treatment on long-term survival awaits maturation of data. Preliminary results evaluating G-CSF in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin for dose escalation was reported. Paclitaxel, 250 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 75 mg/m2, were the maximally tolerated doses, with peripheral neuropathy or myalgias the dose limiting toxicities. Further studies are now underway to test the effect of dose-response with escalation therapies and to determine the optimal dose and schedule for the management of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. IL-3 significantly ameliorated neutropenia but did not prevent cumulative platelet toxicity in a regimen utilizing high-dose carboplatin. This mild improvement in myelosuppression was obtained at the cost of significant toxicity. Nausea,
vomiting
, malaise, bone pain, headache, fever, chills and facial flushing were frequent. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy was tested as a means of consolidation treatment for patients after having a negative second-look laparotomy. These treatments were shown to be feasible; however, prospective randomized trials will be necessary to determine a benefit over operative therapy alone. Several studies addressed to problem of residual disease after primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. A large phase II study conducted by the GOG confirmed the activity of salvage cisplatin-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with small-volume residual ovarian cancer with favorable pretreatment characteristics. Whether intraperitoneal platinum-based therapy represents an advantage over systemic platinum therapy is being addressed in a prospective SWOG study. The use of six additional cycles of CAP for treatment of residual disease after primary treatment of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve complete pathological response and survival. Prolonged duration of chemotherapy above six cycles is not likely to impact treatment for residual disease. A regimen of high dose carboplatin was compared to whole abdominal radiotherapy for treatment of residual disease after initial chemotherapy. There was no difference in survival or disease-free survival between treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
...
PMID:Gynecological malignancies. 863 1
Forty chemotherapy-naive patients receiving high-dose cisplatin were included in a pilot study of a combination of ondansetron plus metoclopramide as antiemetic therapy. Patients received ondansetron 16 mg plus metoclopramide 0.5 mg/kg in 250 cm3 of normal saline i.v. 15 min before cisplatin administration on day 1; then ondansetron 8 mg was given orally b.i.d. and metoclopramide 0.5 mg/kg was given intramuscularly t.i.d. for 4 days. This combination was given to all patients receiving the first cycle of chemotherapy. At the second cycle of chemotherapy all patients received the same antiemetic treatment as above plus methylprednisolone 125 mg i.v. on day 1 and the intramuscularly once a day for 4 days. There were 20 females and 20 males with a mean performance status of 1 (range 0-2) and a mean age of 58 years (range 36-68). Ten patients had
ovarian carcinoma
, eight patients had uterine adenocarcinoma and 22 and non-small cell lung carcinoma. The mean cisplatin dose was 96 mg/m2. All patients denied significant alcohol consumption. At cycle 1, complete protection against acute
emesis
was achieved in 22 patients (55%), major protection in 12 cases (30%), minor protection in four patients (10%) and failure in two cases (5%). On the other hand, the efficacy of this combination on delayed
vomiting
was not striking. For delayed
vomiting
, complete protection was observed in nine patients (23%), major protection in 13 cases (33%), minor protection in 10 patients (25%) and failure in eight cases (20%). At cycle 2, patients also received methylprednisolone showing complete protection from
vomiting
in 19 cases (47%) and major protection on 12 cases (30%). Results achieved with ondansetron plus metoclopramide are in the range reported for ondansetron alone in the medical literature. Although this study was not prospectively carried out in a randomized fashion, the results are not suggestive of a possible positive effect of metoclopramide addition to ondansetron. On the other hand, these results stress the role that corticosteroids may play in the control of delayed
emesis
. Toxicity was predictable and the frequency of side-effects was in the range reported in other studies with ondansetron.
...
PMID:Treatment of cisplatin-related nausea and vomiting with a combination of ondansetron and metoclopramide: a pilot study. 894 83
Recently, a randomized study conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG 111) demonstrated that, given by a 24-hour infusion, the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is superior to combination cisplatin/cyclophosphamide in previously untreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer. This combination, however, necessitates hospitalization. Combination paclitaxel/carboplatin would be expected to induce fewer nonhematologic side effects but may be more myelotoxic. Thus, we started a phase I dose-escalation study to determine the maximal tolerated dose of paclitaxel given as a 3-hour infusion in combination with carboplatin, both drugs administered every 21 days. The paclitaxel dose was escalated by increments of 25 mg/m2, starting at 135 mg/m2 (level 1), 160 mg/m2 (level 2), 185 mg/m2 (level 3), and 210 mg/m2 (level 4). Carboplatin was administered to achieve an area under the concentration-time curve of 5, using the Calvert formula For study levels 5 and 6, the carboplatin dose was targeted at area under the concentration-time curves of 6 and 7.5, respectively, and was combined with a fixed paclitaxel dose of 185 mg/m2. Thirty previously untreated patients with stage IIC to IV ovarian cancer were enrolled. Nonhematologic toxicity, including nausea/
vomiting
and arthralgia/myalgia, was mild. Across all dose levels, a total of 16 patients developed peripheral neurotoxicity (World Health Organization grades 1 and 2). At dose level 5, one patient experienced reversible grade 4 neurotoxicity. Neutropenia was the principal dose-limiting hematologic toxicity. During 33 (31%) of 106 courses, World Health Organization grade 4 neutropenia was observed. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was required in only 7.6% of courses. Thrombocytopenia was less than that expected when carboplatin is given alone. Clinical responses were observed in eight of 14 patients, for an overall response rate of 57%. The combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel was found to be an active regimen. This trial demonstrates that carboplatin dosed by the Calvert equation and 3-hour paclitaxel can be combined safely at full therapeutic doses for six or more courses in patients with advanced
epithelial ovarian cancer
.
...
PMID:Paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a phase I trial. 904 30
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 21 patients with advanced
epithelial ovarian carcinoma
treated with intravenous chemotherapy in an attempt to restore intestinal function following small-bowel obstruction. All patients had a drainage gastrostomy tube placed for palliation of
vomiting
, and 11 patients received concomitant total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Eight (38%) patients were treated with single-agent paclitaxel, 7 (33%) received platinum-based regimens, and 6 (29%) received other second-line chemotherapy. The median survival for all patients post-gastrostomy tube placement was 84 days. The median survival for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who received salvage chemotherapy and TPN was 89 days, longer than for patients who received salvage chemotherapy alone (71 days) (P = 0.031). Two of three patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer and concomitant bowel obstruction had sufficient temporary response from chemotherapy with resolution of obstruction and removal of the gastrostomy tube. Chemotherapy was ineffective in restoring bowel function in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent disease.
...
PMID:Chemotherapy and total parenteral nutrition for advanced ovarian cancer with bowel obstruction. 906 58
The French Groupe des Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO) conducted a multicenter phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of this combination in pretreated advanced ovarian cancer. Patients with progressive
ovarian carcinoma
during or after platinum-based chemotherapy received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours followed by intravenous carboplatin over 30 minutes every 4 weeks. The dose of carboplatin was calculated using a projected area under the concentration-time curve of 5 mg/mL x min. Of the 50 patients entered, 50 were evaluable for toxicity and 42 for response. There were eight complete and 10 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 43% (95% confidence interval, 28% to 56%). Overall response rates in platinum refractory patients and in those with early (> or = 3 and < 12 months) and late (> or = 12 months) relapse was 28%, 33%, and 71%, respectively. Median response duration, progression-free survival, and overall survivals were 8, 6, and 14 months, respectively. The most frequent and severe toxicity was myelosuppression. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 30% and 23% of cycles, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered in 6%. Only one case of neutropenic fever was observed. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 3% and 1% of cycles, respectively. Alopecia and moderate nausea or
vomiting
were frequent. Transitory peripheral neuropathy was present in 45% of patients but was severe in only one patient. One early death was observed due to progressive disease and possibly to therapy. The combination of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion and carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 5 is an effective therapy in patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and may be administered safely to outpatients who relapse after one or two lines of chemotherapy.
...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of the combination paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with previously treated advanced ovarian carcinoma: a multicenter French Groupe des Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens phase II study. 934 19
The side effects of cisplatin (75 mg/m2) in combination with paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (175 mg/m2 over 3 hours) are expected to be more severe and frequent than those of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 5) in combination with the same dose of paclitaxel, but the combinations are expected to be equally effective. A disadvantage of the cisplatin-based regimen is that patients need to be admitted to the hospital. The carboplatin regimen can be administered to outpatients. We tested both combinations administered every 3 weeks in a randomized phase III study in patients with previously untreated
epithelial ovarian cancer
. An interim analysis for toxicity was performed in 145 patients shortly after study closure. We observed a difference in the incidence of nausea,
vomiting
, and neurotoxicity favoring the women treated with the carboplatin regimen, but this regimen caused more myelotoxicity. Maturation of the study is awaited before survival data can be analyzed and final conclusions can be drawn.
...
PMID:Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 over 3 hours) with cisplatin or carboplatin in previously untreated ovarian cancer: an interim analysis. 934 20
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Next >>