Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This comparative phase III trial of mitoxantrone+vinorelbine (MV) versus 5-fluorouracil+cyclophosphamide+either doxorubicin or epirubicin (FAC/FEC) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer was conducted to determine whether MV would produce equivalent efficacy, while resulting in an improved tolerance in relation to alopecia and nausea/vomiting. This multicentre study recruited and randomised 281 patients with metastatic breast cancer; 280 were evaluable for response survival and toxicity (138 received FAC/FEC, 142 received MV). Patient characteristics were matched in each arm and stratification for prior exposure to adjuvant therapy was made prospectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was equivalent in the two arms (33.3% for FAC/FEC versus 34.5% for MV), but MV was more effective in patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (13% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3-23) for FAC/FEC versus 33% (95% CI 20-47) for MV P=0.025) with a better progression-free survival (PFS) (5 months (range 1-18 months) versus 8 months (range 1-27 months); P=0.0007 for FAC/FEC versus MV, respectively) while FAC/FEC was more effective in previously untreated patients (ORR 43% (95% CI 33-53) versus 35% (95% CI 25-45), P=0.26; PFS 9 months (range 0-29 months) versus 6 months (range 0-26 months) P=0.014). Toxicity was monitored through the initial six cycles of therapy; febrile neutropenia and delayed haematological recovery was more frequent for MV (P=0.001), while nausea/vomiting of grades 3-4 was greater for FAC/FEC (P=0.031), as was alopecia (P=0.0001), cardiotoxicity was the same for the two regimens. MV represents a chemotherapy combination with equivalent efficacy to standard FAC/FEC and improved results for patients who have previously received adjuvant chemotherapy. Toxicity must be balanced to allow for increased haematological suppression and risk of febrile neutropenia with MV compared with a higher risk of subjectively unpleasant side-effects such as nausea/vomiting and alopecia with FAC/FEC.
 ...
PMID:Results of a phase III prospective, randomised trial, comparing mitoxantrone and vinorelbine (MV) in combination with standard FAC/FEC in front-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer. 1137 44

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the activity of pemetrexed in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. 38 patients, median age 52 years (range 36-71 years), were given pemetrexed 600 mg/m(2) as a 10-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 3 weeks. Median time from diagnosis to study entry was 48 months (range 14.7-310 months). 33 of 38 patients had prior chemotherapy; 16 adjuvant, 12 metastatic and 5 in both settings. Sites of disease included skin and soft tissue (19/38) nodes (18/38), lung (17/38), liver (13/38) and bone (3/38). An overall response rate of 28% (95% confidence interval (CI): 14.2-45.2%) in 10/36 evaluable patients (1 complete response (CR), 9 partial responses (PR)), included reductions in hepatic and pulmonary metastases. 5 of 10 responders had received taxoid or anthracycline therapy for metastatic disease; 3 of these 5 had also received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median duration of response was 8 months (range 1.6-14+ months), and median survival was 13 months (95% CI 9.56-17.38 months). 167 courses were given (median five per patient; range 1-9), with 37 reductions and 33 delays. Reasons for reduction included neutropenia (11%) and mucositis (5%), with delays due to raised LFTs (21%), neutropenia (12%) and other non-treatment related events. The major haematological toxicities (Common Toxicity Criteria) (CTC) were grade 3/4 neutropenia (47%) and thrombocytopenia (15.7%) of patients. There was one report of a grade 3 infection. Non-haematological toxicities (all grades 2/3) included elevated transaminases (92%), vomiting (34%), nausea (34%) and mucositis (32%). One episode of grade 4 diarrhoea was reported. Other toxicities included a skin rash, grade 2 (42%), 3 (5%) and 4 (13%), which was ameliorated by the use of prophylactic dexamethasone. These results suggest that pemetrexed has significant antitumour activity in advanced breast cancer with responses in patients who had previously received anthracyclines and taxoids.
 ...
PMID:A phase II study of pemetrexed disodium (LY231514) in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. 1143 66

Gossypol has demonstrated in vitro effects on cell cycle regulation and anti-tumor activity against mammary carcinoma cell lines. This Phase I/II study assesses both the effect of gossypol on cell cycle regulatory proteins in vivo and the clinical effect. Twenty women with refractory metastatic breast cancer received oral gossypol at daily doses between 30 and 50 mg per day. Gossypol plasma levels were measured (n = 8) and the modulation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) gene protein and Cyclin D1 was assessed by serial biopsies (n = 4). Grade I-II toxicities with gossypol treatment included nausea in 30% of patients, fatigue 15%, emesis 15%, altered taste sensation 15% and diarrhea in 10% of patients. Two of the three patients receiving 50 mg/day experienced dose limiting dermatologic toxicity (grade III). One patient had a minor response and two patients had stable disease with > 50% decline in serial assessments of the serum tumor markers. Immunohistochemical analysis of cyclin D1 and Rb expression in serial biopsies of four patients revealed both a concurrent decrease in cyclin D1 expression and an increase in nuclear Rb expression in three patients. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of gossypol was 40 mg/day. Gossypol appears to affect the expression of Rb protein and cyclin D1 in breast cancer metastases at doses achievable, yet had negligible antitumor activity against anthracycline and taxane refractory metastatic breast cancer. The cell cycle regulatory effects of gossypol suggest a potential role for gossypol as a modulating agent in conjunction with other cell cycle specific compounds.
 ...
PMID:Oral gossypol in the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial. 1151 Jun 95

Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, was designed to generate 5-fluorouracil preferentially at the tumour site. This randomised, phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of capecitabine or paclitaxel in patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Outpatients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer whose disease was unresponsive or resistant to anthracycline therapy were randomised to 3-week cycles of intermittent oral capecitabine (1255 mg m(-2) twice daily, days 1-14, (22 patients)) or a reference arm of i.v. paclitaxel (175 mg m(-2), (20 patients)). Two additional patients were initially randomised to continuous capecitabine 666 mg m(-2) twice daily, but this arm was closed following selection of the intermittent schedule for further development. Overall response rate was 36% (95% CI 17-59%) with capecitabine (including three complete responses) and 26% (95% CI 9-51%) with paclitaxel (no complete responses). Median time to disease progression was similar in the two treatment groups (3.0 months with capecitabine, 3.1 months with paclitaxel), as was overall survival (7.6 and 9.4 months, respectively). Paclitaxel was associated with more alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, myalgia and neutropenia, whereas typical capecitabine-related adverse events were diarrhoea, vomiting and hand-foot syndrome. Twenty-three per cent of capecitabine-treated patients and 16% of paclitaxel-treated patients achieved a > or =10% improvement in Karnofsky Performance Status. Oral capecitabine is active in anthracycline-pretreated advanced/metastatic breast cancer and has a favourable safety profile. Furthermore, capecitabine provides a convenient, patient-orientated therapy.
 ...
PMID:Randomised, phase II trial comparing oral capecitabine (Xeloda) with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines. 1198 65

Anthracyclines and taxanes are currently the most effective drugs in the treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and doxorubicin combination in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Forty-five women with metastatic breast cancer were recruited in the study. Median age was 49 years (range, 33-70). Treatment protocol: doxorubicin (50 mg/m2/day, 30-min infusion) followed by paclitaxel (200 mg/m2/day, 3-hr infusion) every 3 weeks. Response rates included complete response in 13 (28.9%) patients and partial response in 19 (42.2%) patients, with an overall response rate of 71%. Five (11%) patients had stable disease and 8 (18%) patients had progressive disease. At a median follow-up of 19.7 months, median time to progression for all patients was 19.9 months (95% confidence interval, 12.8 to 27 months). Median overall survival time was 28.4 months. Grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting and hematological toxicities were observed in 12 (26%) and 6 (13.3%) patients, respectively. Cardiac toxicity was observed in 2 (4.4%) patients. In this trial, paclitaxel and doxorubicin combination was demonstrated to be a favorable and active regimen in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Paclitaxel and doxorubicin combination in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. 1219 57

Patients with hormone-sensitive breast cancer who have responded to tamoxifen may receive additional benefit from a second endocrine agent following progression or relapse after tamoxifen therapy. Fulvestrant (Faslodex((R)), ICI 182780, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals; Wilmington, Delaware) is a selective antagonist of estrogen designed to have no estrogenic effects. Lack of aqueous solubility led to the development of a parenteral formulation for monthly intramuscular administration. Fulvestrant has been shown to inhibit the proliferative effects of estrogen on sensitive tissues in vitro and in vivo, and is without apparent measurable estrogenic activity. The data upon which marketing approval for fulvestrant was based are summarized below. Eight hundred fifty-one postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer were enrolled in two phase III studies, 400 in a North American double-blind study and 451 in a European open-label study, comparing the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant with anastrozole. Four hundred twenty-eight patients were randomized to receive fulvestrant 250 mg monthly by intramuscular injection and 423 patients were to receive anastrozole 1 mg daily. Patients were considered hormone sensitive either by receptor status or previous response to endocrine therapy. Over 96% of patients had previously received tamoxifen, either in the adjuvant setting or as treatment for metastatic disease. The primary study end points were response rate and time to progression. Response rates for patients treated with fulvestrant were 17% and 20% in the North American and European trials, respectively, compared with 17% and 15% in the anastrozole treatment arms. There were no statistically significant differences in response rates, time to progression, or survival between treatment arms in either study. The most common adverse events attributed to the treatment (>10%) were injection-site reactions and hot flashes. Common events (1%-10%) included asthenia, headache, and gastrointestinal disturbances (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea), as well as rash and urinary tract infections. A small increase in joint disorders was reported in the anastrozole-treated patients. On April 25, 2002, fulvestrant 250 mg by monthly intramuscular injection was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy. Approval was based on similarity of response rates and time to progression between fulvestrant and anastrozole.
 ...
PMID:FDA drug approval summaries: fulvestrant. 1249 Jul 35

Capecitabine is an orally administered prodrug of fluorouracil which is indicated in the US and Europe, in combination with docetaxel, for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer failing anthracycline therapy, and as monotherapy for metastatic breast cancer resistant to paclitaxel and anthracycline therapy (US) or failing intensive chemotherapy (Europe). Capecitabine is also approved for use in metastatic colorectal cancer. Capecitabine is metabolically activated preferentially at the tumour site, and shows antineoplastic activity and synergy with other cytotoxic agents including cyclophosphamide or docetaxel in animal models. Bioavailability after oral administration is close to 100%. In patients with pretreated advanced breast cancer, capecitabine is effective as monotherapy and also in combination with other agents. Combination therapy with capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 2 weeks of every 3-week cycle plus intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day one of each cycle was superior to intravenous monotherapy with docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day one of each cycle. Capecitabine plus docetaxel significantly reduced the risks of disease progression and death by 35% (p = 0.0001) and 23% (p < 0.05), respectively, and significantly increased median survival (p < 0.05) and objective response rates (p < 0.01). Efficacy has also been demonstrated with capecitabine monotherapy and combination therapy in previously untreated patients in preliminary trials. The most common adverse effects occurring in patients receiving capecitabine monotherapy include lymphopenia, anaemia, diarrhoea, hand-and-foot syndrome, nausea, fatigue, hyperbilirubinaemia, dermatitis and vomiting (all >25% incidence). While gastrointestinal events and hand-and-foot syndrome occurred more often with capecitabine than with paclitaxel or a regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF), neutropenic fever, arthralgia, pyrexia and myalgia were more common with paclitaxel, and nausea, stomatitis, alopecia and asthenia were more common with CMF. The incidence of adverse effects and hospitalisation was similar in patients receiving capecitabine plus docetaxel and those receiving docetaxel monotherapy. In conclusion, capecitabine, an oral prodrug of fluorouracil which is activated preferentially at the tumour site, is an effective and convenient addition to the intravenous polychemotherapeutic treatment of advanced breast cancer in pretreated patients, and also has potential as a component of first-line combination regimens. Combined capecitabine plus docetaxel therapy resulted in similar rates of treatment-related adverse effects and hospitalisation to those seen with docetaxel monotherapy. Capecitabine is also effective as monotherapy in pretreated patients and phase II data for capecitabine as first-line monotherapy are also promising. While gastrointestinal effects and hand-and-foot syndrome occur often with capecitabine, the tolerability profile was comparatively favourable for other adverse effects (notably, neutropenia and alopecia).
 ...
PMID:Capecitabine: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the management of advanced breast cancer. 1251 69

Measurement of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer has become common. In this review, we take stock of the contribution that HRQOL measurement in breast cancer clinical trials makes to clinical decision making regarding selection of optimal treatment. A series of MEDLINE searches was conducted to identify all randomized trials in breast cancer that included self-reported HRQOL or psychosocial outcomes. A total of 256 citations were identified that included HRQOL or psychosocial outcomes in breast cancer patients, and 66 of these involved randomized clinical trials of treatment. These 66 reports of breast cancer clinical trials of treatment are discussed in this review. Forty-six of the trials evaluated biomedical interventions, and 20 evaluated psychosocial interventions. Among the biomedical trials, eight trials evaluated HRQOL in primary management of breast cancer, seven trials evaluated HRQOL in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer patients, 20 trials involved metastatic breast cancer, eight trials involved symptom control/supportive care, and three trials evaluated different approaches to investigation or follow-up of breast cancer patients. Among the psychosocial trials, 13 trials evaluated HRQOL in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer patients, and their partners or spouses, six trials involved metastatic breast cancer, and one trial focused on symptom control. We found that the contribution of HRQOL measurement to clinical decision making depended on the clinical setting. In primary management of breast cancer, where medical outcomes of several treatment options are equivalent, HRQOL measurement provided added information for clinical decision making beyond that of traditional medical outcomes. In trials in the adjuvant setting, HRQOL measurement did not influence clinical decision making. In metastatic disease, HRQOL outcomes provided little information beyond that obtained from traditional medical outcomes, including toxicity. In the symptom control/supportive care setting, results of HRQOL questionnaires targeting specific symptoms (e.g., emesis) guided treatment decisions. In psychosocial intervention trials, psychosocial and/or HRQOL measurements often provided the only outcome information; therefore, selection of instruments that captured attributes likely to be altered by the intervention was essential. Until results of ongoing trials in breast cancer are available, caution is recommended in initiating new HRQOL studies unless treatment equivalency is expected, or unless the HRQOL questions target unique or specific issues that can only be addressed through patient self-report, including outcomes of psychosocial interventions.
 ...
PMID:Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer--taking stock. 1259 83

Docetaxel has consistently demonstrated its high activity as an antineoplastic agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. However, 90% of patients receiving the recommended dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks will develop grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Recent data suggest that the safety profile of a weekly docetaxel regimen compared favorably with the standard 3-week schedule. Thus, we initiated a phase II study to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly docetaxel in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Twenty patients with advanced, anthra-cycline-refractory breast cancer were included in this phase II trial. Docetaxel was administered at a starting dose of 40 mg/m2, repeated once a week for 3 consecutive weeks followed by a 1-week rest period (1 cycle). Patients were evaluated for tumor response every 8 weeks (after every other cycle). Therapy was continued for a maximum of six courses in patients showing tumor response or stable disease. Twenty patients received a total of 204 weekly infusions of docetaxel. The mean number of treatments was 10.2 (range 1-18). Eighteen patients were assessable for response. Five patients achieved a partial response and six patients showed either stable disease or a minor response. Seven patients had disease progression. The median survival was 7.8 months. Grade 3/4 leukopenia occurred in two patients. No other grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities were observed. The following grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were seen: nausea/vomiting (one patient), infection (one patient), mucositis (two patients) and diarrhea (one patient). Three patients withdrew from the study due to dose-limiting toxicities (one due to severe neutropenia and two due to mucositis). We conclude that administration of docetaxel at a dose of 40 mg/m2 was effective and well tolerated even in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. This regimen is associated with only mild myelosuppression.
 ...
PMID:Weekly docetaxel in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial. 1263 18

The recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody Herceptin is administered as an initial 4 mg/kg i.v. infusion over 90 min, followed by weekly 2 mg/kg i.v. infusions over 30 min. In pivotal clinical trials Herceptin, both as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy, was found to produce a significant survival benefit in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. Importantly, Herceptin was well tolerated and was not associated with a poor side-effect profile, producing mainly mild to moderate side-effects. These were generally associated with the initial infusion. The incidence of adverse events was low with Herceptin therapy and severe vomiting and alopecia, typical of many chemotherapy treatment regimens, were not experienced by patients in the trials. Cardiac dysfunction was the most significant Herceptin-related adverse event but could, in most cases, be managed using standard therapy. The favourable adverse event profile seen with Herceptin is reflected in the quality of life (QoL) data. The health-related QoL of patients receiving Herceptin therapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy was found to be maintained. Previous studies have noted a deterioration of health-related QoL in patients treated with chemotherapy only. Thus, as well as providing significant survival benefit, Herceptin therapy improves patient well being.
 ...
PMID:Anti-HER2 therapy: how to use Herceptin in clinical practice. 1284 15


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>