Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Postoperative nausea and vomiting are common after recovery from anesthesia. We examined the prophylactic effect of granisetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting in 120 female patients (ASA physical status I) undergoing gynecologic surgery. They were randomly allocated to one of three groups (n = 40 for each): saline (as a control), granisetron 20 micrograms/kg, and granisetron 40 micrograms/kg. Saline or granisetron was given intravenously (IV) over 5 min approximately 30 min before the end of anesthesia. Nausea, vomiting, and safety assessments were performed during the 24-h recovery period. For the 24-h period after surgery, the number of emesis-free patients was significantly larger in the granisetron groups than in the control group (83%, 78%, and 20% of patients receiving granisetron 20 micrograms/kg and 40 micrograms/kg, and saline, respectively). Granisetron at both doses also was superior to the control for the prevention of nausea over the 24-h study period (nausea visual analog scales at 24-h postsurgery: 49 mm, 17 mm, and 18 mm in the control, granisetron 20 micrograms/kg, and granisetron 40 micrograms/kg groups, respectively). Fewer patients received "rescue" antiemetics in the granisetron groups than in the control group (10%, 10%, and 43% of patients in granisetron 20 micrograms/kg and 40 micrograms/kg, and the control groups, respectively). The adverse events in the granisetron groups were similar to those in the control group. The administration of granisetron had no significant effect on vital signs or clinical laboratory test profiles. Granisetron given at 20 or 40 micrograms/kg i.v. during anesthesia appears to be a simple, effective, and safe method for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting.
...
PMID:The antiemetic efficacy of prophylactic granisetron in gynecologic surgery. 772 41

Fifty-four ASA I and II children 1 to 10 yr of age undergoing strabismus surgery were randomized to receive in a double-blind fashion intravenous ketorolac (0.9 mg/kg), fentanyl (1 microgram/kg), or saline placebo (2 mL) during a standardized general anesthetic. Patients received no analgesic or antiemetics intraoperatively except for the study drug. Patients receiving ketorolac or placebo compared to fentanyl had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative vomiting in the day surgery unit (DSU) (P = 0.03) and overall (DSU plus home) (P = 0.005). The severity (number of episodes) of post-operative vomiting was significantly lower in the DSU, at home (first 24 h after hospital discharge), and overall for patients receiving ketorolac or placebo compared to fentanyl (P < 0.01). Postoperative pain scores and frequency of acetaminophen administration did not differ among the study groups, suggesting that the intraoperative use of ketorolac or fentanyl during pediatric strabismus surgery is unnecessary. No patients required fentanyl postoperatively, indicating that rectal acetaminophen administered in the postanesthesia recovery room provides sufficient analgesia for pediatric strabismus surgery. In conclusion, neither ketorolac nor fentanyl was associated with less postoperative vomiting or analgesic requirements compared to saline placebo administered during pediatric strabismus surgery. Fentanyl should be avoided, as it was associated with a significantly greater incidence of postoperative vomiting compared to ketorolac or placebo.
...
PMID:The effects of ketorolac and fentanyl on postoperative vomiting and analgesic requirements in children undergoing strabismus surgery. 861 27

In a pilot survey, 11 female patients of ASA grade I, undergoing short elective surgery, received midazolam 0.5 to 0.2 mg/kg for induction of anaesthesia. Indication for surgery was therapeutic or diagnostic evacuations. No narcotic premedication was given, however atropine 0.5 mg i.v. was given at induction just before pre-oxygenation. Anaesthesia was maintained with N20/O2 and halothane 1-3% and ventilation was spontaneous. The study showed that although midazolam did not produce narcosis as rapidly as thiopentone it was devoid of any marked respiratory or cardiovascular depressant effect. Narcosis was however induced within 81 seconds of injection. Midazolam also exhibited an additional anxiolytic effect. No local or system adverse reaction were observed on the day of surgery. There was no incidence of apnoea and no case of post operative vomiting. There was marked anterograde amnesia, only 20% of the patients had some recall of events preceeding induction (just about 30% of events could be remembered). It was therefore concluded that in view of the foregoing, combined with the fact that midazolam injection was painless, recovery rapid and amnesic properties good, midazolam is a drug of choice for day stay surgery.
...
PMID:Midazolam in gynaecology: the Nigerian experience. 780 30

The efficacy and safety of prophylactic intravenous ondansetron on prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting were investigated in 65 ASA grades I-III patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery and receiving general anesthesia. Patients received ondansetron 4mg i.v. prior to a standardized technique for induction and intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with N2O-O2 and enflurane. The results showed that, by ondansetron 4mg, nausea and emesis could be significantly decreased. The effect lasted around 24h postoperatively without sedation. No one developed vomiting and only 9 patients developed nausea. No changes on laboratory parameters as well as vital signs were observed. No side-effects related to ondansetron were found. In prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting, ondansetron is effective and safe.
...
PMID:[Ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting]. 784 86

Pulsed dye laser is a new treatment for port-wine stains, congenital lesions in the cutaneous vascular plexus. We report our anesthetic experience with paediatric outpatients treated in the dermatology clinic. From April to November 1993, 48 ASA 1 children were anaesthetised for a total of 105 consecutive laser treatments. The youngest was eight months old, the oldest was 12 yrs old and most of the sessions (43%) were done for children aged from two to four years. Each received acetaminophen (10 mg.kg-1 p.o.) before treatment. A propofol infusion was chosen for anaesthesia to achieve early discharge and to reduce the incidence of postoperative emesis. The infusion was adjusted to maintain blood pressure within 20% of baseline and to keep the child immobile. The dose was progressively reduced during the procedure from 400 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 to 100 micrograms.kg-1.min-1. Fentanyl (2 micrograms.kg-1 i.v.) was added for analgesia. Respiration was spontaneous through a nasopharyngeal airway (air in oxygen 40%). Anaesthesia proceeded uneventfully in all cases and lasted for 15-30 min (63% of treatments), 30-45 min (28%) or 45-60 min (9%) according to the size of the lesion. The mean stay in the recovery room was 25.1 min and none of the patients experienced emesis. Our experience shows that general anaesthesia with propofol supplemented with fentanyl offers a rapid onset and awakening, a painless treatment and an immobile child. It is a safe solution to alleviate pain from repeated painful procedures even in small children under two years of age.
...
PMID:Propofol for pulsed dye laser treatments in paediatric outpatients. 792 22

To investigate the effects of different types of anticholinesterase on the incidence of the postoperative nausea and vomiting, 100 ASA class I-II adult premenopausal female patients undergoing elective lower abdominal surgery were randomized into two groups. In both groups, anesthesia was induced with thiopental and fentanyl and 50% nitrous oxide and 0.5-1.5% of isoflurane were used for anesthetic maintenance with succinylcholine 1 approximately 1.5 mg/kg for intubation and atracurium 0.3 mg/kg/hr for maintenance of muscle relaxation. Patients received reversal agents for neuromuscular blockade after operation when the evoked train-of-four (TOF) count returned to four visual responses. A mixture of atropine 8 micrograms/kg and edrophonium 0.75 mg/kg was given to the first group of patients while atropine 15 micrograms/kg and neostigmine 40 micrograms/kg was given to another group of patients. All the patients were observed for the occurrence of nausea or vomiting for 2 hours after the operation in the recovery room. The incidence of nausea was not statistically significantly different in both groups (20% in neostigmine group and 26% in edrophonium group). The occurrence of vomiting was also similar in both groups (8% in neostigmine group and 6% in edrophonium group). We concluded that there were no difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting with the use of either neostigmine or edrophonium with atropine for antagonizing neuromuscular blockade after the lower abdominal surgery.
...
PMID:Comparison of the combined effects of atropine and neostigmine with atropine and edrophonium on the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. 793 82

30 cases receiving epidural anesthesia for lower extremities and abdominal surgery were selected in this study. Their physical status and average age were ASA I or II and 41 +/- 10.0 years old. Premedication included intramuscular injection of pethidine, atropine and promethazine. Epidural anesthesia was accomplished with 15 ml 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000). After the stabilization of vital signs, the patients were put asleep by 0.1 mg/kg of midazolam intravenously. They were then evaluated by the sedative, cardiovascular, respiratory and recovery effects of intravenous midazolam in epidural anesthesia. The results were as follows: The patients receiving IV midazolam averagely fell asleep in 61.6 +/- 20.5 seconds and maintained asleep for 55.4 +/- 12.7 minutes. Pain on injection was not noted in these cases. Cardiovascular parameters revealed midazolam with general depression on systolic pressure (17.4 +/- 7.3%), diastolic pressure (13.4 +/- 8.4%), mean arterial pressure (12.7 +/- 7.0%), heart rate (10.9 +/- 7.2%), stroke volume (13.7 +/- 8.9%) and cardiac output (18.4 +/- 7.0%) respectively. The peak depression reached around 10 minutes after drug administration. Respiratory parameters dropped with SaO2 (1.1 +/- 1.6%) and respiratory rate (9.7 +/- 5.7%) and fell into trough after 5 minutes of drug administration. Although all the above parameters measured were statistically significant, they were of no clinical importance that required further management. No case had delirium, anxiety and vomiting in the recovery period. Conclusively, patients receiving epidural anesthesia with supplement of intravenous midazolam provides a good sedative effect. Clinically, there was less severe untowards reaction either in cardiovascular or respiratory systems. Smooth and stable recovery was also noted.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:[Intravenous midazolam for sedation in epidural anesthesia]. 796 37

Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, has recently been shown, in a dose of 8 mg, to be superior to 1.25 mg droperidol in preventing postoperative vomiting. There are indications that a dose of 4 mg of ondansetron may be just as effective in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting as a dose of 8 mg. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and the adverse effects of 4 mg ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to droperidol in patients undergoing surgery with inhalation anaesthesia supplemented with alfentanil. METHODS. Following institutional approval, 40 ASA physical status I and II women scheduled for minor gynaecological surgery gave informed consent to participate in this randomized, double-blind comparative study. Five minutes before induction of general anaesthesia, 20 patients received a single intravenous (i.v.) dose of 4 mg of ondansetron and the remaining 20 received 1.25 mg droperidol i.v. Anaesthesia was induced with 2.1-4 mg/kg of thiopental and 0.1 mg of alfentanil i.v. and maintained with 65% nitrous oxide and 1.5%-3% enflurane in oxygen. On pain stimuli another 0.2-0.4 mg of alfentanil was given. Total effective antiemetic response was defined as the absence of nausea and vomiting for 24 h postoperatively. The incidence of nausea, vomiting and the number of patients showing total antiemetic response as well as the incidence of adverse effects were compared with the chi 2 test and P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS. Patients were similar with respect to age, height, body weight and total anaesthetic agents received. Duration of anaesthesia and the time until awakening was not significantly different among groups. Postoperatively 7 out of 20 patients given 4 mg of ondansetron and 3 out of 20 patients with droperidol vomited (n.s.). The incidence of nausea was 11 out of 20 in the ondansetron group, and 4 out of 20 in the droperidol group (P < 0.05). Sixteen patients in the droperidol group and 8 patients in the ondansetron group showed a total effective antiemetic response (P < 0.05). Postoperative sedation and well-being scores did not differ significantly among groups. CONCLUSION. Our results show that for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting 4 mg of Ondansetron was inferior to 1.25 mg of droperidol. The drugs were given intravenously prior to general anaesthesia for minor gynaecological surgery with nitrous oxide and enflurane in oxygen supplemented with small boluses of alfentanil.
...
PMID:[Ondansetron as prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting. A prospective randomized double-blind comparative study with droperidol]. 797 72

Sevoflurane is a "new" volatile inhaled anaesthetic that is currently undergoing phase III clinical trial in Europe and the United States. Owing to the low blood solubility, rapid induction of anaesthesia and emergence from anaesthesia would be expected. In this study, we compared emergence times and haemodynamics in patients receiving either sevoflurane or isoflurane. Furthermore, all adverse effects were recorded and the relationship to the drug administered was rated. METHODS. Fifty ASA physical status I and II patients were studied in an open, prospective, randomised clinical trial. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl, thiopentone, and vecuronium for facilitating endotracheal intubation and maintained with sevoflurane or isoflurane, 60% nitrous oxide (N2O) in oxygen (O2), and additional doses of fentanyl (1-2 micrograms/kg.h). The electrocardiogram, blood pressure (non-invasive), O2 saturation, temperature, and end-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane or isoflurane, N2O, and carbon dioxide were monitored continuously. At the end of surgery, administration of sevoflurane or isoflurane and N2O was discontinued without tapering and emergence times were recorded. All adverse events that occurred until the 3rd postoperative day were recorded and the relationship to the inhaled anaesthetic was rated as "none", "unlikely", "possible", "probable", or "highly probable". RESULTS. With the exception of gender, the two patient groups were comparable (Tables 1 and 2). Due to the higher MAC value, mean end-tidal concentrations were higher for sevoflurane (0.82% vs. 0.59% for isoflurane). The duration of anaesthetic exposure was 1.3 MAC h (calculation with FIO2 = 1.0 MAC value) and 3.1 MAC h (calculation with FIO2 = 0.4 in N2O MAC value), respectively, for both inhaled anaesthetics. Pulmonary elimination was faster (Fig. 1) and emergence time shorter (7 min vs. 11.5 min, Table 3) with sevoflurane. There was no difference in the time courses of heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure (Figs. 2 and 3). No adverse effects with a "probable" or "highly probable" relationship to the inhaled anaesthetic were observed. Table 4 shows the adverse events with a possible relationship to the drug administered. Further evaluations of nausea, vomiting, and dizziness are shown in Table 5. DISCUSSION. Emergence time after inhalation anaesthesia depends on pulmonary elimination and MACawake, that is, the end-tidal concentration that would allow opening of the eyes on verbal command. Pulmonary elimination depends on dose applied (MAC h), alveolar ventilation, and blood-gas solubility coefficient. Due to the lower blood-gas solubility coefficient (0.6-0.7 for sevoflurane vs. 1.3-1.4 for isoflurane) and in accordance with the investigations of Frink et al. [4] and Smith et al. [16], emergence time was significantly shorter with sevoflurane. Gender, the only difference between the two patient groups, does not influence pulmonary elimination and MACawake [8]. Supplementing inhalation anaesthesia with fentanyl, there was no difference in the time courses of heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure between sevoflurane and isoflurane. Adverse events with a possible relationship to the inhaled anaesthetic occurred in both groups.
...
PMID:[Emergence times, hemodynamics and adverse effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane: an open, randomized, comparative phase iii study]. 797 85

To evaluate unwanted side effects expressed in hemodynamic parameters, postanesthetic recovery and quality of intravenous total anesthesia (IVTA) with propofol, fentanyl and atracurium. A prospective study in 292 patients undergoing general surgery. Fifty-three percent of the patients were ASA I, 32.2% were ASA II and 14.8% were ASA II, representing a wide range of ages, weights and heights. Mean time of anesthesia was 108.25 +/- 56.96 min. Anesthesia was achieved with propofol 0.108 +/- 0.027 mg/kg/min, fentanyl 0.093 +/- 0.035 microgram/kg/min and atracurium 0.011 +/- 0.0034 mg/kg/min. Slight pain was evident at injection in 1.7% of the patients. Greater hemodynamic instability was recorded at induction, with mean decreases in systolic and diastolic arterial pressures of 16% and 10%, respectively, with scarcely any response to intubation and extubation. Anesthetic recovery was recorded at 5.95 +/- 4.97 min, with surgical amnesia in 100% of the patients. Nausea was seen in 3.42% and vomiting in 1.7%. Patient evaluation of anesthetic technique was "good" in 60.3% and "excellent" in 39.7%. Propofol dose was significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with age (r = -0.33) and time of anesthesia (r = -0.4). IVTA with propofol and fentanyl in general surgery provides adequate maintenance of anesthesia for surgery and recovery, with good hemodynamic stability. In older patients and longer times of anesthesia, the total dose of propofol administered decreases, with negative effect on time and quality of recovery. Total dose of propofol administered is not significantly correlated with either time or quality of recovery.
...
PMID:[Total intravenous anesthesia in general surgery]. 799 10


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>