Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042963 (vomiting)
 31,883 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Ftorafur, a furanyl analog of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), is reported to be five to six times less toxic and possibly more effective in cancer of the breast and colon than 5-FU. The drug was synthesized, formulated, and utilized in toxicologic studies, and then in 24 patients with advanced incurable malignancies. When Ftorafur is given by intravenous push, it results in immediate flushing, dizziness, nausea, retching, and in some cases transient hypotension. These immediate side effects are largely eliminated by administering the drug slowly by infusion. In patients, 60 mg/kg of Ftorafur given i.v. daily for up to 10 days resulted in mild toxicity. However, 80 mg/kg given i.v. daily for 7 days resulted in severe toxicity, with nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. These studies confirm those of the Russian investigators as to toxicity and dosage, even with a different method of administration more convenient for therapy. Phase II studies are presently being carried out to compare the effectiveness of Ftorafur and 5-FU.
Cancer 1975 Jul
PMID:Phase I study of ftorafur, an analog of 5-fluorouracil. 120 38

This paper presents in detail the symptomatology and findings on examination of 642 patients suffering from a variety of lower gastrointestinal disorders, such as colonic and rectal cancer, diverticular disease, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. Location of precise sites of abdominal pain and tenderness was shown to carry a high level of diagnostic discrimination between the various disorders. Some surprising features emerged: almost half of patients with lower gastrointestinal tract disease complained of symptoms referable to the upper gastrointestinal tract, such as nausea/vomiting or anorexia. It is suggested that the provision on demand of such data to junior staff may benefit both diagnostic ability and decision making. As an incidental finding, just under 40% of patients with large bowel cancer had undergone previous (unrelated) abdominal surgery. The significance of this is unclear.
 ...
PMID:Clinical presentation of diseases of the large bowel. A detailed study of 642 patients. 124 82

Three-hundred and twelve episodes of fever in 234 neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies were treated empirically with either imipenem or a combination of piperacillin and gentamicin. There were no significant differences in the percentages of patients responding to therapy at either 72 h (59% and 56% of assessable episodes in the imipenem and combination groups respectively) or at the end of treatment (55% and 53% of assessable episodes in the imipenem and combination groups respectively). Patients in the piperacillin plus gentamicin group experienced significantly more renal tubular damage whereas those who received imipenem suffered more nausea or vomiting. We conclude that imipenem monotherapy represents an acceptable alternative to piperacillin plus gentamicin as empirical therapy of the febrile neutropenic patient.
 ...
PMID:A comparative study of imipenem versus piperacillin plus gentamicin in the initial management of febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies. 128 59

Shi-Quan-Da-Bu-Tang (Ten Significant Tonic Decoction), or SQT (Juzentaihoto, TJ-48) was formulated by Taiping Hui-Min Ju (Public Welfare Pharmacy Bureau) in Chinese Song Dynasty in AD 1200. It is prepared by extracting a mixture of ten medical herbs (Rehmannia glutinosa, Paeonia lactiflora, Liqusticum wallichii, Angelica sinesis, Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Poria cocos, Atractylodes macrocephala, Panax ginseng. Astragalus membranaceus and Cinnamomum cassia) that tone the blood and vital energy, and strengthen health and immunity. This potent and popular prescription has traditionally been used against anemia, anorexia, extreme exhaustion, fatigue, kidney and spleen insufficiency and general weakness, particularly after illness. In order to restore immunity in cancer patients, potentiate the therapeutic effect and ameliorate adverse toxicity of anticancer agents, 116 Chinese herbal formularies (Kampo) have been screened and evaluated. Fifteen compounds were found to have such actions. Among these, SQT was selected as the most effective as a potent biological response modifier. During the last eight years, animal models and clinical studies have revealed that SQT demonstrates extremely low toxicity (LD50 > 15 g/kg op murine), self-regulatory and synergistic actions of its components in immunomodulatory and immunopotentiating effects (by stimulating hemopoietic factors and interleukins production in association with NK cells, etc.), potentiates therapeutic activity in chemotherapy (mitomycin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil) and radiotherapy, inhibits the recurrence of malignancies, prolongs survival, as well as ameliorate and/or prevents adverse toxicities (GI disturbances such as anorexia, nausea, vomiting, hematotoxicity, immunosuppression, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia and nephropathy, etc.) of many anticancer drugs. The application and mechanistic studies of SQT in future development have potential importance in basic and clinical research of the traditional Chinese therapeutic approach of "toning the blood and strengthening Qi (vital energy)" in cancer immunotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Shi-quan-da-bu-tang (ten significant tonic decoction), SQT. A potent Chinese biological response modifier in cancer immunotherapy, potentiation and detoxification of anticancer drugs. 129 61

Nausea and vomiting following chemotherapy administration are common and often overlooked causes of impairment in cancer patients. The goal of this study was to explore the broad range of consequences associated with this specific acute toxicity of chemotherapy. Specific objectives were: (1) create and test scales specifically designed to assess the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting or patients' daily function; (2) examine changes in quality of life of cancer patients 3 days following chemotherapy administration; (3) assess the impact of chemotherapy-induced emesis on quality of life and patients' daily function; (4) identify medical and non-medical cost-related consequences associated with chemotherapy-induced emesis. Patients receiving intermittent bolus chemotherapy regimens on an outpatient basis were eligible for this survey. Four instruments were used: a patient maintained diary, the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC), a newly created Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) and an Item Check list for cost-related consequences. On Day 1, before chemotherapy, patients completed the FLIC and FLIE. Patients recorded episodes on vomiting, severity of nausea, anxiety, sedation, antiemetics self-administered, and adverse effects in diaries for 3 days following chemotherapy. The FLIC and FLIE were completed at the end of Day 3. The Item Check list of cost-related consequences was administered as a telephone survey on Day 5. Approximately 56% of 122 patients reported chemotherapy-induced emesis (CIE). A change in mean FLIC score indicating a decline in quality of life was observed for the CIE group (119 to 101) but not in the group who did not report emesis (124 to 122). Decline in FLIC and FLIE from before to after chemotherapy administration was greater for CIE patients (p = 0.001). FLIE scores indicated that CIE patients perceived that vomiting, and to a slightly lesser extent, nausea substantively influenced their ability to complete household tasks, enjoy meals, spend time with family and friends, and maintain daily function and recreation. Effect size calculations supported a significant negative relationship between occurrence of CIE and the direction and magnitude of functional living index change. An exploratory analysis (principal component followed by regression analysis) supported the hypothesis that side-effects produced by chemotherapy and antiemetic therapy significantly contributed to changes in quality of life observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Quality of life consequences of chemotherapy-induced emesis. 129 65

The radiolabelled opioid receptor binding affinities of morphine and its active metabolite morphine 6-glucuronide at the total mu, mu 1, mu 2 and delta receptors were determined. Morphine 6-glucuronide was found to have a 4-fold lower affinity for the mu 2 receptor (IC50 17 nM and 82 nM for morphine and morphine 6-glucuronide respectively, P = 0.01), the receptor postulated to be responsible for mediating the respiratory depression and gastrointestinal effects after morphine. This provides a possible explanation for the reduced respiratory depression and vomiting seen following morphine 6-glucuronide in man. A similar reduction in affinity of morphine 6-glucuronide was seen at the total mu receptor whilst there was no significant difference seen at the mu 1 or delta receptor. Hence the increased analgesic potency of morphine 6-glucuronide over morphine remains unexplained.
Br J Cancer 1992 Jan
PMID:Explanation at the opioid receptor level for differing toxicity of morphine and morphine 6-glucuronide. 131 Feb 49

In a multicentre study patients with liver metastases stratified to the histology of the primary tumour were investigated. A total of 102 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, primary liver carcinoma and malignant melanoma were treated with the thioether lipid ilmofosine. The drug was administered orally as a tablet at a dosage of 150-300 mg/day (75 mg/tablet). The tolerability of ilmofosine was poor. There was a dose-limiting gastrointestinal toxicity with nausea, vomiting and loss of appetite (WHO grade II-IV) in 67% of patients. During the period of therapy (1-29 weeks, 8.5 weeks mean) no complete remission and no partial response were observed. We thus conclude that treatment with oral ilmofosine is not effective in patients with liver metastases due to various malignancies.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1992
PMID:Treatment results of the thioether lipid ilmofosine in patients with malignant tumours. 132 33

The safety and efficacy of intravenous granisetron were compared with combinations of conventional antiemetics in two single-blind, parallel-group studies which have been reported previously. In this review updated data from both studies is presented. In both studies granisetron (40 micrograms/kg) was given as a single 5-min infusion before chemotherapy with two additional doses allowed to control subsequent nausea and vomiting. All patients were naive to chemotherapy. Patients due to receive cisplatin (greater than 49 mg/m2) were randomly assigned to receive either granisetron alone or metoclopramide (3 mg/kg) plus dexamethasone (12 mg) given prophylactically followed by an 8-h infusion of metoclopramide (4 mg/kg). In the 24 h after the start of chemotherapy 70% of granisetron-treated patients and 67% of comparator group were complete responders. In patients due to receive moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, granisetron was compared with chlorpromazine (up to 200 mg/24 h) plus dexamethasone (12 mg). Twenty-four hour efficacy was significantly higher in the granisetron group with complete response in 68% of patients compared to 47% in the comparator group (P less than 0.001). A subset of 40 patients in this study were crossed over to receive the alternative antiemetic on their next cycle of chemotherapy. A significant majority of patients (32/34; 94%) preferred granisetron (P less than 0.001). Around 80% of the granisetron-treated patients in both groups required only a single prophylactic dose of granisetron. Following the first additional dose of granisetron, around 87% of patients reported symptoms to be improved or resolved. Adverse experience reporting was higher in the comparator groups with somnolence and extrapyramidal reactions representing the most common events. Headache was the most commonly reported adverse experience in granisetron-treated patients. Granisetron has proved safe and effective in controlling chemotherapy-induced emesis and is more convenient to administer than conventional antiemetics.
Eur J Cancer 1992
PMID:A comparison of granisetron as a single agent with conventional combination antiemetic therapies in the treatment of cytostatic-induced emesis. The Granisetron Study Group. 132 Sep 13

A number of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are currently in clinical development as antiemetics. In this paper we focus on two of these antagonists, granisetron and ondansetron, and compare their antimetic activity against cisplatin (10 mg/kg i.v.)- or whole body X-irradiation (200 rads)-induced emesis in the conscious ferret. The results presented here have been discussed in the light of the recently published literature. Our data suggest that in comparison to ondansetron, granisetron is a more potent, longer acting and pharmacologically "cleaner" compound with a more conventional dose-response profile. The possible impact of these features upon the performance of these compounds in the clinic is discussed particularly with respect to dosing regimens and clinical efficacy. Differences appear to be emerging between granisetron and ondansetron in both these respects, although a direct head-to-head clinical comparison has yet to be carried out. This would involve studies monitoring a sufficiently high number of patients receiving severely emetogenic regimes to allow real clinical differences to be detected with the appropriate statistical power.
Eur J Cancer 1992
PMID:Are all 5-HT3 receptor antagonists the same? 132 Sep 15

Two randomised single-blind comparative studies were carried out in patients receiving 5-day fractionated chemotherapy. The first which has been reported previously [1] compared granisetron (40 micrograms/kg) (n = 103) with alizapride (12 mg/kg) plus dexamethasone (8 mg) (n = 94) while the second compared granisetron (40 micrograms/kg) (n = 143) with metoclopramide (7 mg/kg) plus dexamethasone (12 mg) (n = 141). Granisetron, unlike alizapride or metoclopramide is a specific 5-HT3 antagonist. The percentage of complete responders (patients with no vomiting and no worse than mild nausea) over the 5-day treatment period was higher for granisetron than for alizapride/dexamethasone (54% vs. 42.7%) (P = 0.121) or for metoclopramide/dexamethasone (46.8% vs. 43.9%). The percentage of complete responders in the first 24 h was significantly higher for granisetron (90.3%) than for alizapride/dexamethasone (65.9%) (P less than 0.001) or for metoclopramide/dexamethasone (87.4% vs. 67.9% P less than 0.0001). Granisetron was also superior to both comparators in terms of the time to the first episode of moderate/severe nausea and to less than a complete response. Significantly fewer granisetron patients were withdrawn than in the alizapride/dexamethasone group (P = 0.017) or the metoclopramide/dexamethasone group (P less than 0.0001). In both studies more comparator patients were withdrawn due to lack of efficacy and adverse events. Significantly fewer granisetron patients experienced adverse events than in either the alizapride/dexamethasone group (47.6% vs. 61.7%, P = 0.047) or the metoclopramide/dexamethasone group (60.8% vs. 77.3% P = 0.003). Granisetron patients experienced a significantly higher occurrence of constipation in both studies (10.7% vs. 3.2% and 12.6% vs. 2.8%). Headache and fever were also more frequent in the granisetron group, while extrapyramidal effects, reported by 5.3% of the alizapride/dexamethsone group and 20.6% of the metoclopramide/dexamethasone group, were not reported in any granisetron patients.
Eur J Cancer 1992
PMID:Fractionated chemotherapy--granisetron or conventional antiemetics? The Granisetron Study Group. 132 Sep 16


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>