Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042571 (vertigo)
 7,148 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A total of 555 hypertensive patients took part in a 2-year multicenter, open-label study to determine the efficacy, tolerance, and safety of long-term therapy with ramipril. In the beginning, all patients were to receive 5 mg of ramipril/day. The dosage was then adjusted in accordance with response to treatment and ranged from 1.25-20 mg of ramipril daily. Of these patients, 129 also received 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide daily at some point during the trial. To evaluate whether tolerance to ramipril developed during long-term treatment, a subgroup of 202 patients was analyzed for efficacy maintenance. Prior to enrolling in the 2-year study, these patients had received ramipril monotherapy in a short-term, double-blind study and had been classified as responders, i.e., their diastolic blood pressure had been maintained at less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. At the end of 104 weeks of treatment, 45.9% of patients were on 2.5 mg of ramipril alone and 43.6% were on 5 mg of ramipril alone. Only four patients required the addition of 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide. No clinically important changes occurred, and kidney function was well maintained. The most frequently reported adverse events excluding intercurrent illnesses were dizziness/vertigo (6%), asthenia (4%), nausea (3%), headache (2%), and abdominal pain, gastrointestinal disorder, rash, and increased cough (1% each). Ramipril was safe, effective, and well tolerated in the long-term treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Antihypertensive efficacy, tolerance, and safety of long-term treatment with ramipril in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. 172 24

This study was designed to assess the efficacy and tolerance of doxazosin in patients with mild, moderate, or severe essential hypertension in a general practice setting. Ninety-six adults of a mean age of 55 1/2 years took part in the 14-week study, consisting of a placebo phase (2 weeks), a dose-adjustment phase with doxazosin (8 weeks), and a maintenance phase (4 weeks). Doxazosin, at a final mean daily dose of 3.4 mg, produced a significant (p less than 0.05) reduction in blood pressure at all points of measurement during the study. The mean change in sitting blood pressure at the end of treatment was -15.4/-15.8 mm Hg. Of the 85 patients who could be categorized as a success or failure, 78 (92%) were considered a therapeutic success; 78 (89%) of the 88 efficacy-evaluable patients demonstrated an improvement in the severity category of their hypertension. Treatment with doxazosin produced a reduction in serum cholesterol (-3.1%) and triglyceride (-3.8%) levels, although these changes did not attain statistical significance. The calculated probability of developing coronary heart disease in 10 years (according to the Framingham equation) was significantly (p less than 0.001) reduced by 22%, from 16.7 chances per 100 (baseline) to 14.3 chances per 100 (final visit). Twenty-six patients (27.1%) reported side effects that were possibly related to treatment, the most prevalent of which were vertigo (7.3%) and headache (6.3%). In four (4.2%) patients the dose of doxazosin was reduced and two (2.1%) were withdrawn prematurely. The investigator's assessments of tolerance was reduced and two (2.1%) were considered to be excellent or good in 85 (88%) patients.
 ...
PMID:A multicenter study of doxazosin in the treatment of essential hypertension in France. 182 57

Converting enzyme inhibitors (CEIs) are widely used in treatment of essential hypertension. Large-scale clinical studies have shown that CEIs are well tolerated and cause fewer side effects than most other antihypertensive agents. The latter observation is fundamental for compliance with long-term treatment. There do exist, however, some side effects which although rare are not negligible. It is necessary though to distinguish between side effects linked to the class of therapeutic agents and those associated with particular structural features. Three types of side effects have been seen: 1) manifestations linked to inhibition of angiotensin II with systemic vasodilation (hypotension, vertigo) and decreased glomerular pressure (functional renal impairment) with preferred onset in renovascular hypertension; 2) potentiation of the bradykinin-prostaglandin system which causes cutaneous eruptions and for reasons still poorly understood a cough which may justify discontinuance of treatment: 3) side effects for which the sulfydryl group is essentially responsible (rash, dysgeusia, neutropenia, proteinuria) and which basically appear to be linked to the use of high doses of captopril. In general terms, and bearing in mind the frequently dose-dependent character of the side effects, it is advisable to prescribe low doses of CEIs, and this therapeutic approach is strengthened by the possibility of concomitant use of a thiazide diuretic allowing improved antihypertensive effects, coupled to better reciprocal tolerance of the drugs. The end result is a better quality of life for the hypertensive subject, and hence improved compliance with long-term treatment.
 ...
PMID:[Quality of life of patients with hypertension treated with converting enzyme inhibitors]. 218 15

The authors tested in an open, uncontrolled trial in a group of 23 patients with essential hypertension grade I-II (WHO classification) the effect of Metoprolol OROS. The OROS system is a new form of Metoprolol administration which makes it possible to maintain by a single dose per day a steady plasma concentration, while preserving the cardioselectivity and total 24-hour effectiveness during treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris. After eight weeks of Metoprolol OROS administration, in doses gradually adjusted to the therapeutic action, gradually a significant decrease of the heart rate (HR) occurred, of the systolic blood pressure (BPs) and diastolic blood pressure (BPd) (p less than 0.01 for all values) in a recumbent as well as upright position. A reduction of the BPd in an upright position by greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg was achieved in 85% of the patients, in 73.9% of the patients the BPd in an upright position dropped below 95 mm Hg. Four patients developed side-effects which were mild to medium severe (vertigo, palpitations, fatigue, sensation of tremor, tension in the lower extremities). Two patients discontinued treatment early, the main reason in both being palpitations which were under better conversely, in two patients palpitations which were not adequately controlled by previous metoprolol treatment, disappeared completely during Metoprolol OROS treatment. During the trial no significant changes in the investigated laboratory values incl. total cholesterol were recorded, Metoprolol OROS administered once per day is an effective, safe and well tolerated preparation in treatment of mild to medium severe essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:[The effect of OROS metoprolol in mild and moderately severe essential hypertension]. 239 74

Enalapril maleate is a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor marketed in the U.S. by Merck Sharp and Dohme. It has been demonstrated to actively interfere with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. This is reflected by both hemodynamic (decreased blood pressure) and humoral (increased plasma renin, angiotensin I, and decreased angiotensin II) responses to enalapril therapy. Activity in the kallikrein-bradykinin system is still controversial. Enalapril maleate is a prodrug which is quickly absorbed, hydrolyzed by the liver to the active metabolite enalaprilic acid, and excreted 33 percent in the bile and 61 percent in the urine. The therapeutic dosage range is 10-40 mg/d, maximum of 40 mg, given once or twice daily. The onset and duration of action are dose related. Vertigo and headache have been the most commonly reported side effects. Clinical comparison of enalapril to hydrochlorothiazide, beta-adrenergic blockers, and captopril find it efficacious in the treatment of essential hypertension. Efficacy in treating congestive heart failure and hypertension secondary to renal artery stenosis has also been demonstrated for both angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. The overall efficacy and safety of enalapril and captopril appear equivalent when used at low doses in patients with uncomplicated hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Enalapril: a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. 300 62

Etiological factors and clinical course of transient disorders of the cerebral circulation developing at various terms of gestation and in the immediate postpartum period were studied in 132 women. Early symptoms of a cerebral crisis included headache, vertigo, palpitation, dyspnea, darkness in the eyes, noise in the ears or head, paresthesia, and numbness of the legs. Occasionally, it had to be differentiated from a cerebral stroke. The most important etiological factors of this cerebrovascular pathology included toxemia of pregnancy, exacerbation of the rheumatic process, essential hypertension, vegetovascular dystonia, intracranial aneurysm, etc. Various combinations of a number of etiological factors of transient disorders of the cerebral circulation are possible. Recommendations about the management of pregnancy and parturition are offered.
 ...
PMID:[Transient cerebral circulatory disorder in pregnant women]. 342 70

1 Captopril, an orally active angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, was compared with hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) in the treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension. 2 Twenty outpatients received no antihypertensive therapy for 2 weeks, after which they were given placebo for 8 weeks. Since their diastolic blood pressure remained above 100 mm Hg, they were then randomized to receive either captopril (twelve patients) or HCT (eight patients) for a 4-week titration period. If the supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) was normalized, (less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) by the end of titration period, the established regimen was continued for an 8-week maintenance period; if not, the alternate drug was added in increasing doses for up to 4 weeks and the combined therapy was maintained for the remaining 4 weeks. 3 After the first 4 weeks of therapy, both groups showed a statistically significant decrease in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Normalization of SDBP occurred in 75% of patients treated with captopril alone, and the addition of HCT produced normalization in the remainder. HCT alone resulted in normalization of SDBP in 50% of patients and the blood pressure of the remaining patients was normalized after the addition of captopril. 4 Captopril given orally, either alone or in conjunction with HCT, is an effective agent for the control of mild and moderate essential hypertension. 5 In our series the main side effects encountered were vertigo and dizziness, transient eosinophilia, a rise of BUN and or/a rise of SGPT or SGOT.
 ...
PMID:Control of essential hypertension with captopril, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. 702 22

Carvedilol is a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist which also causes peripheral vasodilation primarily via alpha 1-adrenergic blockade. Carvedilol produces its antihypertensive effect partly by reducing total peripheral resistance by blocking alpha 1-adrenoceptors and by preventing beta-adrenoceptor-mediated compensatory mechanisms. This combined action avoids many of the unwanted effects associated with traditional beta-blocker or vasodilator therapy. In clinical trials published to date, most of which enrolled small numbers of patients, the antihypertensive efficacy of carvedilol administered once daily was similar to that of atenolol, labetalol, pindolol, propranolol, metoprolol, nitrendipine (in elderly patients), slow release nifedipine or captopril in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Combined therapy with carvedilol 25 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, nicardipine 60 mg or slow release nifedipine 20 mg has an additive antihypertensive effect. Carvedilol and atenolol at similar doses were equally effective at reducing blood pressure in patients who had previously not responded adequately to hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy. As a result of its multiple mechanisms of action, carvedilol is suited for the management of specific groups of hypertensive patients, such as those with renal impairment. In patients with non-insulin-dependent or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus carvedilol does not appear to affect glucose tolerance or carbohydrate metabolism. Initial studies have demonstrated that carvedilol and slow release nifedipine have similar efficacy in patients with stable angina pectoris and there is evidence that carvedilol has a beneficial haemodynamic effect in patients with congestive heart failure (NYHA class II or III) secondary to ischaemic heart disease. A postmarketing surveillance study has shown that carvedilol is generally well tolerated with only 7% (164/2226) of patients (83% of the total number received 25mg daily for 12 weeks) withdrawing from treatment because of adverse events. Vertigo, headache, bronchospasm, fatigue and skin reactions were the most common events causing withdrawal. Thus, clinical experience to date suggests that carvedilol is likely to be a valuable addition to the options currently available for treating patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, and may offer particular benefit in specific populations of hypertensive patients.
 ...
PMID:Carvedilol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy. 768 74

In an open multicenter study, 2,012 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were treated for 8 weeks with the beta1-selective blocker bisoprolol. A total of 570 general practitioners participated in this study. A total of 1,597 patients whose resting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ranged from 95 to 115 mm Hg were considered eligible for this study. Patients received one tablet of bisoprolol (5 mg) o.d. for the first 4 weeks. In patients not responding satisfactorily to treatment, the dose could be increased to 10 mg o.d. for the following 4 weeks. A total of 1,201 patients were evaluated for efficacy and all 2,012 patients were evaluated for tolerability. After 4 weeks of therapy, mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was lowered significantly from 170+/-15 to 151+/-14 mm Hg, and mean DBP was lowered from 104+/-5 to 92+/-7 mm Hg. A further 4-week treatment lowered the blood pressure even more: mean SBP from 151+/-14 to 144+/-13 mm Hg and mean DBP from 92+/-7 to 88+/-7 mm Hg. The total extent of both SBP and DBP reduction was equal in all age groups and showed no dependency of the initial blood pressure value. At the end of the study. the responder rate was 94.9% in patients aged under 60 years, and 90.6% in patients aged over 60 years. The age group 31-40 years showed the highest responder rate (97.5%). After 8 weeks of treatment, 69.5% of the patients were still on 5 mg of bisoprolol and 27.6% on 10 mg of bisoprolol. Of all 2,012 patients, 11.6% reported side effects such as vertigo, fatigue. gastrointestinal disturbances, and headache. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was highest in the age group 31-40 years. Bisoprolol proved in this study to be an effective and safe antihypertensive agent when given to patients with mild to moderate hypertension for 8 weeks.
 ...
PMID:Age dependence of therapy result and risk in the treatment of arterial hypertension? 1152 25

In a survey including 2224 patients with essential hypertension we investigated efficacy and tolerability of the new ACE-inhibitor Imidapril. Mean blood pressure at baseline was 172 +/- 19/98 +/- 10 mmHg. Treatment with Imidapril 5-20 mg once daily caused a decrease in BP by 21 +/- 17/11 +/- 10 mmHg (p < 0.01/0.01). Systolic BP was reduced by > 15 mmHg in 71% diastolic BP by > 10 mmHg in 64% of patients. 29% of patients achieved the treatment goal of a blood pressure < or = 140/90 within an average of 26 days. Imidapril decreased pulse-pressure (one of the most important risk markers in hypertension) by 18% (74 +/- 17 to 61 +/- 11 mmHg, p < 0.01). ACE-inhibitor related adverse effects (cough, vertigo, headache, pruritus, tachycardia, orthostatic dysregulation or nausea) were observed in 38 patients (< 2%). Efficacy of treatment was graded by the physician in charge of the patient care by means of a questionnaire. Gradings were excellent or good in 96% of patients, moderate in 3% and poor in < 1%. In summary, the effects of Imidapril on blood pressure were comparable to those of other ACE-inhibitors. However, the frequency of adverse effects was low and similar to that of angiotensin-II-antagonists.
 ...
PMID:[Efficiency and safety of ACE-inhibiting imidapril in patients with essential hypertension]. 1205 Sep 50


1 2 Next >>