Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042384 (vasculitis)
 20,525 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Rheumatoid factors (RF) may participate in both synovial and extraarticular (EA) inflammation in rheumatoid disease (RD). The relative roles of serum IgG RF and IgM RF in extraarticular rheumatoid disease (EARD) are unclear, as is the importance of complement (C) activation by these proteins. To investigate the relation of C activating properties of IgM RF (RF CAP) and total IgG RF and IgM RF to EARD we compared 18 patients with only articular disease to 27 patients with various EA manifestations (nodules, cutaneous vasculitis, neuropathy, Felty's syndrome) using radioimmunoassays for IgG and IgM RF and an established hemolytic assay for C activation by IgM RF. We calculated RF CAP by determining the mean hemolysis of sensitized SRBC/ml of RF serum (MH/ml). Normal volunteers and patients with other inflammatory arthritides served as controls. Controls had negligible amounts of IgG RF, IgM RF, and RF CAP. Mean IgG and IgM RF levels and RF CAP values were significantly higher in patients with EARD than those in the arthritis-only (AO) group. Mean IgM RF concentrations and IgM RF CAP correlated with each other and EARD. IgG RF also correlated with IgM RF and EARD, but did not contribute to RF CAP or EARD when adjusted for IgM RF. Further, some patients had high RF CAP values despite modest IgM RF levels. These data suggest that quantitative differences in IgM RF CAP and total IgM RF may be more important than IgG RF as determinants of EARD.
 ...
PMID:Serum IgG and IgM rheumatoid factors and complement activation in extraarticular rheumatoid disease. 387 18

The major subtypes of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) are P-ANCA and C-ANCA. In patients with vasculitis, myeloperoxidase (MPO) is the major P-ANCA antigen and proteinase 3 (PR3) is the major C-ANCA antigen. BPI and azurocidin, which are also called 57-kD cationic antimicrobial protein (CAP 57) and 37-kD cationic antimicrobial protein (CAP 37), respectively, have been proposed as less frequent target antigens for C-ANCA and P-ANCA. In patients with renal disease, we determined the frequency of antibodies against BPI and azurocidin. By IFA on alcohol-fixed neutrophils, monoclonal and polyclonal anti-BPI antibodies produced a C-ANCA pattern, whereas rabbit anti-azurocidin antibody produced a P-ANCA pattern. By ELISA, sera from 229 P-ANCA-positive patients, 99 C-ANCA-positive patients and 48 ANCA-negative (by IFA) patients with renal biopsies were tested for reactivity with recombinant human BPI and purified human azurocidin. Of these sera, 17.5% of P-ANCA, 30.3% of C-ANCA and 20.8% of IFA-ANCA-negative sera were positive for anti-BPI; and 8.3% of P-ANCA, 3.0% of C-ANCA and 8.3% of IFA-ANCA-negative sera were positive for anti-azurocidin. There was no statistical difference in frequency of anti-BPI between pauci-immune necrotizing and crescentic glomerulonephritis (NCGN) and other glomerular disease (OGD), and there was a lower frequency of anti-azurocidin in NCGN samples than in OGD samples. By Western blot, anti-BPI-positive sera reacted with a 57-kD BPI band and anti-azurocidin-positive sera with a 29-kD azurocidin band. In conclusion, there is a low frequency of anti-BPI and anti-azurocidin antibodies in ANCA-positive patient sera; however, this does not correlate with NCGN, which is a marker for ANCA-associated small vessel vasculitis, and a similar positivity is found in IFA-ANCA-negative patients with renal disease. Therefore, serologic detection of anti-BPI and anti-azurocidin is not diagnostically specific in patients with renal disease.
 ...
PMID:Frequency of anti-bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) and anti-azurocidin in patients with renal disease. 869 20

Given the variability in rate of radiographic resolution, it remains controversial to decide when to initiate an invasive diagnostic work-up for nonresolving or slowly resolving pulmonary infiltrates. In immunocompetent patients who present with classical features of CAP (i.e., fever, chills, productive cough, new pulmonary infiltrate), clinical response to therapy is the most important determinant for further diagnostic studies. Within the first few days, persistence or even progression of infiltrates on chest radiographs is not unusual. Defervescence, diminished symptoms, and resolution of leukocytosis strongly support a response to antibiotic therapy, even when chest radiographic abnormalities persist. In this context, observation alone is reasonable, and invasive procedures can be deferred. Serial radiographs and clinical examinations dictate subsequent evaluation. In contrast, when clinical improvement has not occurred and chest radiographs are unchanged or worse, a more aggressive approach is warranted. In this setting, we advise fiberoptic bronchoscopy with BAL and appropriate cultures for bacteria, legionella, fungi, and mycobacteria. When endobronchial anatomy is normal and there is no purulence to suggest infection, TBBs should be done to exclude noninfectious causes (discussed earlier) or infections attributable to mycobacteria or fungi. An aggressive approach is also warranted in patients who are clinically stable or improving when the rate of radiographic resolution is delayed. As discussed earlier, what constitutes excessive delay is controversial, and depends upon the acuity of illness, specific pathogen, extent of involvement (i.e., lobar versus multilobar), comorbidities, and diverse host factors. Stable infiltrates even 2 to 4 weeks after institution of antibiotic therapy does not mandate intervention provided patients are improving clinically. Invasive techniques can also be deferred when unequivocal, albeit incomplete, radiographic resolution can be demonstrated. Lack of at least partial radiographic resolution by 6 weeks, even in asymptomatic patients, however, deserves consideration of alternative causes (e.g., endobronchial obstructing lesions, or noninfectious causes). Fiberoptic bronchoscopy with BAL and TBBs has minimal morbidity and is the preferred initial invasive procedure for detecting endobronchial lesions or substantiating noninfectious causes. The yield of bronchoscopy depends on demographics, radiographic features, and pre-test likelihood. In the absence of specific risk factors, the incidence of obstructing lesions (e.g., bronchogenic carcinomas, bronchial adenomas, obstructive foreign body) is low. Bronchogenic carcinoma is rare in nonsmoking, young (< 50 years) patients but is a legitimate consideration in older patients with a history of tobacco abuse. Non-neoplastic causes (e.g., pulmonary vasculitis, hypersensitivity pneumonia, etc.) should be considered when specific features are present (e.g., hematuria, appropriate epidemiologic exposures). Ancillary serologic tests or biopsies of extrapulmonary sites are invaluable in some cases. In rare instances, surgical (open or VATS) biopsy is necessary to diagnose refractory or non-resolving "pneumonias."
 ...
PMID:Nonresolving or slowly resolving pneumonia. 1051 9