Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042373 (vascular disease)
 17,070 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death among whites with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Several risk factors--dyslipidemia induced by NIDDM, obesity, hypertension and hyperglycemia--likely contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis. The dyslipidemia in NIDDM is characterized by abnormalities in composition and metabolism of very low density lipoproteins, low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and high-density lipoproteins (HDL). However, because of the lack of long-term prospective epidemiologic studies, the relative importance of lipoprotein risk factors in the causation of CAD in diabetic patients is not clear. The World Health Organization Multinational Study of vascular disease in diabetics observed increased prevalence of CAD in diabetic populations with relatively high levels of plasma cholesterol and supports the concept that lowering cholesterol levels may significantly reduce coronary risk in NIDDM. To determine the effectiveness of lovastatin, an inhibitor of HMG CoA reductase, for lowering cholesterol levels, 16 patients with NIDDM and mild to moderate increases in plasma cholesterol were given lovastatin (20 mg twice daily) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled manner for 4 weeks. Compared with the placebo, lovastatin reduced concentrations of total cholesterol (233 +/- 10 vs 172 +/- 7 mg/dl [standard error of the mean], p less than 0.001), LDL cholesterol (140 +/- 9 vs 101 +/- 6 mg/dl, p less than 0.001), and LDL apolipoprotein-B (108 +/- 16 vs 80 +/- 16 mg/dl, p less than 0.001). Plasma triglycerides and very low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels also decreased by 31 and 42%, respectively. Although HDL cholesterol levels did not increase, the total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio decreased significantly with lovastatin therapy. No adverse effects were noted and glycemic control was well-maintained.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Treatment of dyslipidemia in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with lovastatin. 305 23

Atherosclerosis is the principal cause of diabetic morbidity and mortality. Diabetic dyslipidemia, obesity, and hypertension are significant contributing factors in the acceleration of the atherosclerotic process. Regardless of the type of diabetes, increased levels of very-low-density lipoprotein triglyceride, modified levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and decreased levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol are the main lipoprotein abnormalities in diabetic patients. These abnormalities can be improved in part by glycemic control, but additional intervention may be needed. Diet and exercise are important elements in the management of dyslipidemia, but lipid-lowering drugs (especially fibrates and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) also may be necessary for the control of diabetic dyslipidemia. Based on these findings, the American Diabetes Association Consensus Panel and the revised treatment guidelines of the National Cholesterol Education Program recommend treatment of hypertriglyceridemia/low HDL cholesterol as a risk factor of coronary heart disease in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals alike. Aggressive treatment is recommended, therefore, particularly in diabetic patients and in all patients with existing vascular disease.
 ...
PMID:Prevention of atherosclerosis in diabetes: emphasis on treatment for the abnormal lipoprotein metabolism of diabetes. 826 43

1. Recent outcome trials suggest that lipid-lowering with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors is justifiable on risk-benefit grounds in subjects with serum cholesterol > 5.5 mmol/l who have coronary heart disease, other forms of atherosclerotic vascular disease, or who are free of vascular disease but have a risk of major coronary events > or = 1.5% per year. Choice of an appropriate treatment policy will require (i) knowledge of the proportion of the population who will need treatment for secondary prevention, and (ii) targeting of treatment for primary prevention at a specified absolute risk of coronary heart disease events. Selection of an appropriate coronary heart disease risk for primary prevention requires consideration of the number needed to be treated to prevent one coronary heart disease event, the proportion of the population requiring treatment, the cost-effectiveness of treatment and the total cost of treatment. 2. In a random stratified sample of subjects aged 35-69 years from the Health Survey for England 1993 we first examined the prevalence of subjects with cardiovascular disease and serum cholesterol > 5.5 mmol/l who may be candidates for secondary prevention. In those free of cardiovascular disease we then examined the prevalence of subjects with serum cholesterol > 5.5 mmol/l who had three different levels of coronary heart disease risk: coronary heart disease event rates of 4.5% per year, 3.0% per year and 1.5% per year. These subjects may be candidates for primary prevention depending on the treatment policy selected. 3. For secondary prevention, 4.8% (95% confidence interval 4.3-5.3) of the U.K. population aged 35-69 years might be candidates for 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor treatment, comprising 2.4% (2.0 to 2.7) with a history of myocardial infarction, 1.9% (1.6 to 2.2) with angina and 0.5% (0.3-0.7) with a history of stroke--all with total cholesterol > 5.5 mmol/l. The prevalence of these diagnoses with total cholesterol > 5.5 mmol/l increased with age, from 1.5% at age 35-39 years to 16.2% at age 65-69 years in men, and from 0.2% at age 35-39 years to 10.0% at age 65-69 years in women. Approximately 13 people would need treatment for 5 years to prevent one coronary event, at a cost of 36,000 pounds per event prevented. The number needing treatment for secondary prevention would increase substantially if treatment was extended to patients above 70 years of age or to those with serum cholesterol < or = 5.5 mmol/l. 4. Primary prevention aimed at a coronary event risk of 4.5% per year would lead to treatment of only 0.3% (0.2-0.4) of those aged 35-69 years, and those treated would be predominantly older men with additional risk factors for coronary heart disease. The number needed to be treated and cost per coronary event prevented would be similar to those for secondary prevention. 5. Primary prevention targeted at subjects with a coronary event rate of 3.0% per year would entail treating 3.4% (3.0-3.9) of all those aged 35-69 years. At this level of risk, 20 people would need treatment for 5 years to prevent one coronary event, at a cost of 55,000 pounds per event prevented. 6. Primary prevention aimed at a coronary event rate of 1.5% per year would entail treating 19.6% (18.7-20.6) of all subjects aged 35-69 years, and about 80% of men aged 60-69 years for primary or secondary prevention. At this level of risk, 40 people would need treatment for 5 years to prevent one event, at a cost of 111,000 pounds per event saved. 7. Guidelines for 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor treatment should take into account the considerable workload and financial resources needed to implement secondary prevention of coronary heart disease, the accepted first priority. For primary prevention they need to consider the number needed to be treated to prevent one event, the number of subjects needing treatment, the cost-effectiveness of treatment and
 ...
PMID:Lipid-lowering for prevention of coronary heart disease: what policy now? 917 44

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors ameliorate atherosclerotic diseases in several models of vascular disease. This is largely due to their ability to reduce plasma cholesterol levels in vivo. Proliferation of cellular components is one of the major events in the development and progression of atherosclerotic lesions. We recently demonstrated that oxidized low density lipoprotein (Ox-LDL), a likely atherogenic lipoprotein present in vivo, is capable of inducing macrophage growth in vitro. In the present study, we investigated the effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, simvastatin and pravastatin, on Ox-LDL-induced macrophage growth. Our results demonstrated that these inhibitors effectively suppressed Ox-LDL-induced macrophage growth with concentrations required for 50% inhibition by simvastatin and pravastatin being 0.1 and 80 microM, respectively, and that this inhibitory effect was reversed by mevalonate but not by squalene. Under these conditions, simvastatin did not affect the endocytic degradation of Ox-LDL, nor subsequent accumulation of intracellular cholesteryl esters. Our results suggest that a non-cholesterol metabolites(s) of mevalonate pathway may play an important role in Ox-LDL-induced macrophage growth. Since it is well known that macrophage-derived foam cells are the key cellular element in the early stage of atherosclerosis, a significant inhibition of Ox-LDL-induced macrophage growth by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in vitro, particularly simvastatin, may also explain, at least in part, their anti-atherogenic action in vivo.
 ...
PMID:HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors suppress macrophage growth induced by oxidized low density lipoprotein. 925 7

Coronary heart disease and other vascular diseases account for approximately half of all deaths in women. Although the underlying pathophysiological processes (atherosclerosis and thrombosis) are similar, deaths and other clinical end-points are significantly delayed compared to men. The reason for this sex-related delay in the expression of vascular disease remains a matter of debate but may be largely attributable to the actions of endogenous oestrogens: coronary heart disease manifestations are extremely rare in premenopausal women but increase after the menopause. These observations have lead to speculation that oestrogen-replacement therapy might continue to retard the development of cardiovascular disease in the post-menopausal years (primary prevention). The cardioprotective benefits of oestrogens include a favourable impact on plasma lipids, anti-platelet effects, preservation of endothelium-mediated vasodilatation and antioxidant effects. Several observational studies support this thesis but the results of prospective randomised controlled trials are still awaited. Secondary preventative measures such as aspirin, beta-blockade, ACE inhibition and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors seem to be equally effective for women as men. However, there remains evidence that physicians are less likely to use such interventions in women at high risk.
 ...
PMID:Women and heart disease. 983 68

The results of recently published studies on primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors--statins--support their use in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed hyperlipidaemia, with or without atherosclerotic vascular disease. From a pharmacological point of view, statins inhibit HMG-CoA reductase, reduce the endogenous synthesis of cholesterol and increase the apoB/apoE lipoprotein clearance from plasma. Recent studies confirm that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors may also decrease hepatic production of VLDL and LDL-cholesterol. However, they have different pharmacokinetic properties and variable effectiveness with potential clinical implications. These drugs are generally well tolerated with a similar profile of adverse effects (gastrointestinal effects, hepatic dysfunction and myopathy). The knowledge of their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties can lead to a rational use and greater understanding of their potential benefits.
 ...
PMID:[HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: a brief review of their pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in cardiovascular disease]. 1009 28

The evidence that lipid disorders in patients following renal transplantation play a major role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and chronic renal allograft rejection is circumstantial. The absolute rate of clinical vascular disease and cardiovascular complications in transplant patients, the high prevalence of an atherogenic lipid profile and the evidence from the large HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) regression trials in the general population suggest that lipid lowering treatment is necessary in most patients after renal transplantation. Furthermore, animal models and observational studies in patients have found correlations between plasma lipid levels and both acute and chronic rejection. Animal transplant models and clinical trials in heart transplant patients also suggest that statin treatment decrease the incidence of chronic rejection in a manner that may also be independent of lipid lowering. Although the mechanisms behind this protective effect remains unclear, statins may be the first agents to be effective in preventing chronic rejection and in reducing the rate of cardiovascular complication in renal transplant recipients.
 ...
PMID:Impact of dyslipidaemia in renal transplant recipients. 1078 46

The new therapeutic options available to clinicians treating dyslipidaemia in the last decade have enabled effective treatment for many patients. The development of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have been a major advance in that they possess multiple pharmacological effects (pleiotropic effects) resulting in potent reductions of low density lipoproteins (LDL) and prevention of the atherosclerotic process. More recently, the newer fibric acid derivatives have also reduced LDL to levels comparable to those achieved with statins, have reduced triglycerides, and gemfibrozil has been shown to increase high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. Nicotinic acid has been made tolerable with sustained-release formulations, and is still considered an excellent choice in elevating HDL cholesterol and is potentially effective in reducing lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels, an emerging risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). Furthermore, recent studies have reported positive lipid-lowering effects from estrogen and/or progestogen in postmenopausal women but there are still conflicting reports on the use of these agents in dyslipidaemia and in females at risk for CHD. In addition to lowering lipid levels, these antihyperlipidaemic agents may have directly or indirectly targeted thrombogenic, fibrinolytic and atherosclerotic processes which may have been unaccounted for in their overall success in clinical trials. Although LDL cholesterol is still the major target for therapy, it is likely that over the next several years other lipid/lipoprotein and nonlipid parameters will become more generally accepted targets for specific therapeutic interventions. Some important emerging lipid/lipoprotein parameters that have been associated with CHD include elevated triglyceride, oxidised LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) levels, and low HDL levels. The nonlipid parameters include elevated homocysteine and fibrinogen, and decreased endothelial-derived nitric oxide production. Among the new investigational agents are inhibitors of squalene synthetase, acylCoA: cholesterol acyltransferase, cholesteryl ester transfer protein, monocyte-macrophages and LDL cholesterol oxidation. Future applications may include thyromimetic therapy, cholesterol vaccination, somatic gene therapy, and recombinant proteins, in particular, apolipoproteins A-I and E. Non-LDL-related targets such as peroxisome proliferator-activating receptors, matrix metalloproteinases and scavenger receptor class B type I may also have clinical significance in the treatment of atherosclerosis in the near future. Before lipid-lowering therapy, dietary and lifestyle modification is and should be the first therapeutic intervention in the management of dyslipidaemia. Although current recommendations from the US and Europe are slightly different, adherence to these recommendations is essential to lower the risk of atherosclerotic vascular disease, more specifically CHD. New guidelines that are expected in the near future will encompass global opinions from the expert scientific community addressing the issue of target LDL goal (aggressive versus moderate lowering) and the application of therapy for newer emerging CHD risk factors.
 ...
PMID:Current, new and future treatments in dyslipidaemia and atherosclerosis. 1092 30

As renal function declines, the prevalence of both malnutrition and cardiovascular disease increase. Both malnutrition and vascular disease correlate with the levels of markers of inflammation both in patients treated with dialysis and in those not yet on dialysis. While it is possible that the markers of inflammation (increased levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) or interleukin-6 (IL-6)) are a result of inflammation arising from the atherosclerotic process, changes in endothelial cell gene expression, in plasma protein composition and in lipoprotein structure that arise from inflammation are likely to be atherogenic. The causes of inflammation are likely to be multifactorial. CRP levels are associated with cardiovascular risk in the general population and decrease following treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. It is speculated that use of these agents or directly suppressing inflammation may have use in treating the inflammatory-malnutrition syndrome in dialysis patients.
 ...
PMID:Role of inflammation and its treatment in ESRD patients. 1180 62

Statins block de novo synthesis of cholesterol by inhibiting the enzyme, HMG CoA reductase. The product of this reaction, mevalonic acid, is also a precursor of isoprenoids, molecules required for the activation of signalling G-proteins, such as Ras. Signal transduction pathways involving Ras are important for cell survival and this may be why statins induce apoptotic death of several cell types. Given that statins are used to treat vascular disease, it is surprising that no studies have been conducted on vascular endothelial cells. For this reason, we have tested the effect of fluvastatin (FS) on the endothelial cell line EA.hy 926. Here we show that FS, at concentrations from 1 to 2 microM, blocks growth and induces apoptosis of the endothelial cell line, EA.hy 926. As considerable redundancy exists in cell signalling pathways for cell survival, toxicity of FS under more physiological conditions might be prevented by pathways that do not require Ras, such as those activated by adrenal or sex steroids. To test this hypothesis, first RT-PCR analysis was performed for nuclear receptor mRNA expression. This revealed the presence of mRNA for the androgen receptor (AR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR). The effect of the AR agonist, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and the GR agonist, dexamethasone (Dex), was then tested. Whilst DHT (100 nM) had no effect on FS-induced cell death, Dex (1 microM) blocked FS-induced apoptosis. Cell cycle analysis revealed that 24 h exposure to FS prevented cells from leaving G(1) and 24-48 h later a marked sub-G(1) peak was observed. Dex was able to reduce the sub-G(1) peak, but it failed to reduce accumulation of cells in G(1). Further studies revealed that, in addition to blocking FS-induced apoptosis, Dex was able to block apoptosis of EA.hy 926 cells induced by serum deprivation, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, oxidants, DNA damage and mitochondrial disruption. This study strongly suggests that glucocorticoids have a role to play in preventing vascular injury and they may provide a reason why statins are apparently not toxic to vascular endothelial cells in vivo.
 ...
PMID:Statin-induced apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells is blocked by dexamethasone. 1621 52


1 2 3 4 Next >>