Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042109 (urticaria)
 6,569 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A multicenter study was performed to determine the incidence of adverse reactions to two contrast media with similar low osmolality during cardiac angiography. The study was of a randomized double-blind design comparing ioxaglate (an ionic dimer) and iopamidol (a nonionic compound) and included 500 patients; 250 patients received ioxaglate and 250 iopamidol. There were 58 adverse reactions attributed to the contrast media in the ioxaglate group and 29 in the iopamidol group (p less than 0.001). Chest pain occurred in 11 patients in the ioxaglate group compared with 5 in the iopamidol group (p = 0.123). Nausea or vomiting was present in 20 and 2 patients, respectively (p less than 0.0003). Allergic adverse reactions, such as bronchospasm, urticaria and itching, occurred in 15 of the ioxaglate group and only 1 of the patients receiving iopamidol (p less than 0.0007). Fifty-two patients in the ioxaglate group had a known allergic history (not to contrast medium) or asthma, whereas 77 receiving iopamidol had a similar history. Seven of the 52 ioxaglate-treated patients developed an allergic adverse reaction compared with none of the 77 in the iopamidol group (p = 0.001). Of 41 patients receiving ioxaglate who were premedicated with diphenhydramine, 4 had an allergic adverse event. In the iopamidol group 45 patients received similar premedication and none had an allergic adverse reaction (p less than 0.03). Thus, this multicenter study shows that adverse reactions occur more often with ioxaglate than with iopamidol and that patients with an allergic history have a greater risk with ioxaglate therapy compared with iopamidol.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1992 Apr
PMID:Adverse reactions of low osmolality contrast media during cardiac angiography: a prospective randomized multicenter study. 155 9

Unexpected occurrence of coronary artery spasm is sometimes observed during cardiac catheterization. We report here two cases of coronary artery spasm with hypotension and urticaria subsequent to administration of contrast material. The etiology of coronary artery spasm is discussed.
Clin Cardiol 1990 Jan
PMID:Coronary artery spasm during cardiac angiography. 229 58

Fifteen patients with coronary artery spasm completed a double-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing diltiazem and nifedipine. Increasingly, higher daily doses (diltiazem, 90 to 360 mg; nifedipine, 30 to 120 mg) were administered to achieve optimal clinical effects. Daily diaries and ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings were used to assess efficacy and side effects. Both drugs significantly decreased angina frequency compared with that in the preceding placebo period (diltiazem 1.4 +/- 0.4 [mean +/- SEM] to 0.4 +/- 0.2 episodes per day; nifedipine 1.4 +/- 0.3 to 0.4 +/- 0.1 episodes per day; both p less than 0.05). Ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings showed fewer ST shifts than were expected during all treatment periods (0.02/h recorded during placebo, none during diltiazem and 0.02/h during nifedipine therapy). Although some patients responded better to one drug than the other, neither drug resulted in a clearly superior clinical response. Diltiazem was discontinued in one patient because of urticaria, but the total number of side effects was higher with nifedipine (12 of 15 patients) than with diltiazem (5 of 15, p less than 0.01). Nine patients remained symptomatic on single drug treatment and entered open label treatment with the combination of diltiazem and nifedipine. Three patients did not tolerate the combination because of important side effects; the other six also had side effects, but these were relatively minor. Four patients received no more benefit from the combination than from a single agent; the condition of two patients improved. Both diltiazem and nifedipine provide effective antianginal therapy for coronary spasm, but diltiazem has fewer side effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
J Am Coll Cardiol 1987 Feb
PMID:Comparison of diltiazem and nifedipine alone and in combination in patients with coronary artery spasm. 354 92

In a small preliminary clinical trial of guanabenz in 16 hypertensives also under treatment with diuretics (hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride), blood pressure was safely and completely controlled in 10 (64%), the criterion for "control" being a reduction to the strict level specified by the Society of Actuaries (130/85 m lambda Hg). The dosage of guanabenz was adjusted upward from 16 mg/day until blood pressure normalized or side effects intervened. The 16 patients accumulated 97 months of guanabenz treatment. The 6 unsuccessful cases included only 2 outright therapeutic failures; the other 4 patients discontinued treatment for various reasons: dry mouth and nausea (with good blood pressure reduction); aggravation of existing depression; or generalized urticaria. The fourth patient discontinued for reasons unknown.
Acta Cardiol 1980
PMID:Preliminary clinical trial with a new hypotensive, guanabenz, in a group of hypertensive patients. 697 Apr 85

Recent investigations suggest that the vasoactive substances, histamine, prostaglandin E2, and thromboxane A2 are mediators of coronary artery spasm. These substances may be released during a episode of urticaria. We report here a case of coronary artery spasm associated with an episode of acute urticaria. The coronary spasm may have been mediated by the vasoactive substances released from basophils and secondary platelet aggregation, known to occur with urticaria.
Clin Cardiol 1982 Mar
PMID:Coronary spasm associated with urticaria: report of a case mimicking anaphylaxis. 708 49

We report two cases of vasospastic angina associated with anaphylactic reaction caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Both patients exhibited anaphylactic manifestations, such as general rash and urticaria, along with angina pectoris with electrocardiographic ST-segment elevations after suppository administration of diclofenac sodium or indomethacin, the most commonly used NSAIDs. Although these patients had normal coronary arteriograms, intracoronary administration of ergonovine or acetylcholine provoked diffuse coronary artery spasms accompanied by chest pain and ischemic ST-segment changes. It is therefore suggested that an allergic mechanism may be involved as a causative factor of the coronary artery spasm induced by NSAIDs.
Clin Cardiol 1997 Jul
PMID:Vasospastic angina induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. 922 Jan 83

Myocardial infarction (MI) occurring during the course of an allergic urticarial reaction in the absence of systemic hypotension has been rarely reported. This paper reports the case of a 28-year-old woman with no significant risk factors for coronary artery disease who presented with generalized urticaria associated with chest pain and had electrocardiographic and enzymatic evidence of an acute MI. Review of the literature suggests that local histamine release may induce spasm of the coronary vasculature, thus leading to myocardial ischemia and infarction.
Clin Cardiol 2001 Mar
PMID:Histamine--can it cause an acute coronary event? 1128 75

Kounis syndrome is the concurrence of acute coronary syndromes with conditions associated with activation of interacting inflammatory cells including allergic or hypersensitivity and anaphylactic or anaphylactoid insults. It is caused via inflammatory mediators released during inflammatory cell activation. A variety of conditions, drugs, and environmental exposures can induce Kounis syndrome. A patient suffering from coronary artery disease and taking metoprolol and aspirin was stung by wasps and developed cutaneous allergic signs including rash, urticaria and orbital oedema. This was followed by retrosternal pain, chest discomfort and electrocardiographic changes compatible with acute myocardial ischemia. Cardiac enzymes, troponins and blood pressure remained normal but serum tryptase was raised. The clinical implications and pathophysiology of this rare association are discussed.
Int J Cardiol 2007 Sep 14
PMID:Hymenoptera sting-induced Kounis syndrome: effects of aspirin and beta-blocker administration. 1709 68

Based on a case of a patient with angiosarcoma (AS) of the right atrium with superior vena cava syndrome associated with urticaria and polyarthralgias, who died soon after surgery, the authors present a brief review of the subject of cardiac AS, an extremely rare pathology, usually diagnosed late due to its non-specific symptomatology. Several topics are discussed, including mechanisms of clinical manifestations caused by blood flow obstruction and valve dysfunction, local invasion with arrhythmias and pericardial effusion, embolic phenomena and constitutional symptoms. Imaging and histopathologic methods of diagnosis are considered, as well as references to cytogenetic analysis. Surgery is the first treatment choice, but heart AS are frequently not completely resectable and concomitant metastases at the time of surgery are common, both usually leading to a dismal prognosis. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy and even heart transplantation do not substantially improve the survival of these patients. Urticaria is not generally assumed by most authors to be associated with malignancy, but there are rare reports of its association with some malignant tumors.
Rev Port Cardiol 2007 May
PMID:Cardiac angiosarcoma--a review. 1769 Dec 82

Aspirin is the most commonly used antiplatelet agent in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). It continues to play a key role as an antiplatelet agent given its long-term safety, efficacy and low cost. Aspirin or NSAID hypersensitivity is not an uncommon occurrence and can vary from generalized urticaria and angioedema to exacerbation of upper and lower respiratory tract reactions. It is not uncommon for clinicians to avoid using aspirin and alternative agents when encountering aspirin hypersensitivity among CAD patients. However, given the critical role of aspirin in CAD patients, particularly among those who receive the drug-eluting stents, aspirin desensitization can be useful. This article highlights the importance of aspirin desensitization, the mechanism and the process involved. We draw attention to recently described rapid desensitization protocols and how they can be more useful than the old procedure.
Future Cardiol 2012 Jul
PMID:Aspirin sensitivity and coronary artery disease: implications for the practicing cardiologist. 2287 Nov 95


1 2 Next >>