Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042109 (urticaria)
 6,569 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Previous studies show that oral antihistamines affect the weal and flare response to intradermal injections of the inflammatory mediators platelet-activating factor (PAF) and bradykinin (BK). The aim of this study was to compare the effects of terfenadine (an H1-antagonist) and cimetidine (an H2-antagonist) on weal and flare responses to PAF and BK in healthy non-atopic human volunteers. The effects of doxepin on PAF responses were investigated, as there is evidence that doxepin may have direct anti-PAF effects in addition to its known antihistaminic actions. Terfenadine significantly reduced weal and flare responses to PAF (mean reduction 53 and 73%, respectively) and flare responses to BK (mean reduction 78%) but had no effect on weal responses to BK. Doxepin significantly reduced both weal and flare responses to PAF (mean reduction 43 and 68%, respectively, at higher doses of PAF). Cimetidine had no effect on weal or flare responses to PAF or BK. These findings suggest that the flare response to intradermal BK is mediated via histamine release while the weal response is not. The effects of the various antagonists of PAF-induced responses suggest that its effects too may be mediated via histamine, the similarity of the effects of terfenadine and doxepin on these responses indicating that the effects of doxepin may be due to its known antihistamine activity rather than to any specific PAF-antagonistic properties. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is a phospholipid which is released from a wide range of cell types and also from vascular endothelium. PAF is formed by the conversion of ether-linked phospholipids initially to the biologically inactive lyso-PAF and then by acetylation to PAF. Intradermal injection of PAF in human skin causes vasodilatation and increased vascular permeability, producing a weal and flare response with accompanying pruritus. Bradykinin (BK) is a vasoactive polypeptide formed by the action of enzymes known as kallikreins on inactive precursors called kininogens. Its effects include an increase in blood flow and vascular permeability and stimulation of the release of prostaglandins and histamine. On intradermal injection in human skin it causes a weal and flare response with associated pain rather than pruritus. Previous studies have suggested that the weal and flare response to PAF may be mediated in part by histamine release. Given that BK is known to cause histamine release it appears possible that the responses to both compounds may be modified by conventional antihistamines. Experiments based on this premise have found that antihistamines have a pronounced effect on the flare response to PAF but a less marked effect on weal responses. The weal response to BK was unaffected by systemic antihistamines but studies have produced conflicting results with regard to effects on the flare response. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of terfenadine (an H1-antagonist) and cimetidine (an H2-antagonist) on PAF- and BK-induced weal and flare responses in healthy, non-atopic human volunteers. Based on the treatment of cold urticaria it has been suggested that doxepin, which has known H1- and H2-antagonistic effects, may in addition show specific anti-PAF activity. We compared the effects of doxepin on PAF-induced intradermal responses with those of terfenadine and cimetidine in this study.
 ...
PMID:Effects of H1- and H2-antihistamines on platelet-activating factor and bradykinin-induced inflammatory responses in human skin. 868 66

Mizolastine is a new, nonsedating antihistamine providing satisfactory symptom relief in allergic rhinitis and urticaria. The purpose of this study was to use the wheal and flare skin reactions model to assess the maintenance of the pharmacodynamic effect of mizolastine, administered for 2 months. This double-blind, parallel-group study involved 60 atopic patients randomly allocated, after a 1-week placebo run-in, to once-daily 10 mg mizolastine (n = 29) or placebo (n = 31) groups. Treatment continued for 8 weeks. Prick tests were performed in duplicate with histamine chlorhydrate (10 mg/ml), codeine phosphate (9%), and five increasing concentrations (1-500 reactivity index/ml) of standardized allergen extracts (grass pollen or mites) at days 0, 7, 28, 42, and 56. After 7 days of treatment, inhibition of histamine-induced wheal was -76% and +20%, respectively, with mizolastine and placebo (P = 0.0001), in comparison with baseline; inhibition of flare was -86% and +5%, respectively, with mizolastine and placebo (P = 0.0001). Suppression was maintained to a similar extent throughout the study. Results were consistent between histamine-, codeine-, and allergen-induced tests. Safety was satisfactory in both groups. The study confirms mizolastine as a potent antihistamine which does not induce subsensitivity when taken for 8 weeks, and which can be safely recommended in allergic conditions.
 ...
PMID:Lack of subsensitivity to mizolastine over 8-week treatment. 879 22

Heat contact urticaria is very rare and it is characterized by the development of wheal limited to the areas of heat contact. We report a case of heat contact urticaria in a 65-year-old women. The wheal was induced by hot bathing, washing in hot water or leaning on hot radiators. Symptoms started within 5 minutes of exposure and lasted 30 to 60 minutes. She had no systemic symptoms. The clinical diagnosis of localized heat urticaria was confirmed by experimental induction of localized wheals. Our investigation showed that the threshold temperature needed for induction of the heat urticaria was 39 degrees C. We tried to investigate the plasma levels of prostaglandin D2 and blood histamine before and after heat challenge. The patient showed marked improvement after a combination treatment of desensitizing by repeated exposure to heat and indomethacine.
 ...
PMID:Heat contact urticaria--a case report. 882 90

Mizolastine is a new, nonsedating antihistamine providing satisfactory symptomatic relief in allergic rhinitis and urticaria. The purpose of this study was to use inhibition of wheal and flare formation after 2-mu g intradermal histamine injections as a measure of the antihistamine effect of repeated doses of mizolastine. Eight volunteers were enrolled in this four-arm, double-blind, cross-over, randomized study. Three dose levels of once-daily mizolastine (5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg) were compared with placebo during 5-day dose periods. Histamine tests were performed before drug intake on days 1 and 5, and then 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 24 hours after drug intake on day 5. All 3 doses of mizolastine were more effective than placebo in suppressing wheal and flare reactions, and the antihistamine activity was highest at both the 10- and 15-mg dose levels. The effect on the flare reaction appeared within 1 hour, reached a maximum effect 4 hours after administration, and persisted for as long as 24 hours. The relative changes in wheal and flare areas were correlated with mizolastine trough plasma levels on day 5. Safety was satisfactory in all groups. This study confirms that mizolastine is a rapid and potent antihistamine; and its long-lasting effectiveness indicates that a once-daily regimen is acceptable for clinical use.
 ...
PMID:Inhibition of histamine-induced skin wheal and flare after 5 days of mizolastine. 893 46

Several immunological disorders including allergic rhinitis, bronchial asthma, atopic dermatitis, food allergies, urticaria, nonhereditary angioedema, systemic anaphylaxis, and allergic conjunctivitis are associated with a positive family history, and share a positive response in the Prausnitz-Kuster (wheal and flare) reaction. Studies have shown that 20-30% of the population has a strong genetic predisposition for this condition, termed atopy, whose hallmark is a greatly elevated serum IgE concentration. A great deal is known about the cellular interactions that mediate the sensitization, immediate and late-phase reactions that follow encounters with allergen, as well as about the cell surface and signaling events that result in mediator release from inflammatory cells. Less is known of the genes that confer genetic predisposition for atopy; however, a worldwide effort to identify atopy genes is making significant progress.
 ...
PMID:Biology and genetics of atopic disease. 899 58

Antihistaminic drugs have been used successfully for many years in the treatment of allergic diseases. Second-generation antihistamines have fewer sedating side effects than first-generation agents, and the number of newer drugs available for clinical use is growing. Various methods have been used to assess antihistaminic activity, the most popular of which is the epicutaneous histamine-induced wheal and flare. This test relies on the ability of epicutaneously injected histamine to bring about the wheal and flare, a neurovascular response that involves reflex vasodilation (flare) and local swelling caused by plasma extravasation (wheal). Antihistamines have been compared on the basis of their ability to block the histamine-induced wheal and flare in the skin. Results of these trials have been applied to predict the global antiallergic efficacy of various antihistamines. The review has examined the reliability of suppression of the histamine wheal and flare reaction in the skin to predict an antihistamine's clinical efficacy in two common allergic diseases seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. Although histamine is one mediator in the allergic response in the skin and nasal mucosa, many other agents are important modulators of the allergic response. In addition, the major structural and functional differences that exist between the nasal mucosa and the skin affect the type of local response. These manifest themselves as differences between the responses to antigen and histamine challenge in the skin and the nose. The allergic responses in these tissues are not simply the consequence of one chemical but are the result of a cascade of interactions among various cells and mediators. The clinical manifestations of these complex interactions obviously cannot be fully replicated by injection of one chemical mediator, histamine, into the outer layer of the skin. Studies with antihistamines have shown that certain drugs, such as cetirizine, are more suppressive than others (loratadine, terfenadine) in controlling the histamine-induced wheal and flare reaction in the skin. When the clinical efficacy of these medications is compared in clinical trials in seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria, all are equally efficacious in controlling symptoms. Although the histamine-induced wheal and flare reaction can serve as a useful clinical pharmacologic test to assess dose-response relations for an antihistamine, its lack of correlation with clinical responses among antihistamines indicates that this model should not be used to predict or compare clinical efficacies of antihistamines in seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria.
 ...
PMID:Appraisal of the validity of histamine-induced wheal and flare to predict the clinical efficacy of antihistamines. 972 86

The underlying pathophysiology of chronic urticaria is mast cell activation, with release of histamine and other mast cell mediators. A weal producing factor has been identified in the serum of 60% of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. In half of these patients there is evidence for functional autoantibodies against the high affinity IgE receptor or IgE, or both. These autoantibodies release histamine from basophils and mast cells. It is therefore likely that there is an autoimmune basis for up to 30% of patients with idiopathic urticaria. In the other half of patients whose serum causes weals, the factor releases histamine from mast cells only and is as yet unidentified. So far no clinical difference has been associated with presence/absence or type of weal producing factor. Exacerbating factors in chronic urticaria such as aspirin, food additives, febrile illness and psychological stress should be identified and avoided. Treatment is symptomatic with the low sedation antihistamines. In the most severe cases not responding to conventional therapy and which may have the weal producing factor, treatments with non specific immune therapy such as cyclosporin, and intravenous gammaglobulin and also plasmapheresis have been promising.
 ...
PMID:The pathogenesis of urticaria. 909 81

A 15-month-old boy was well except for asymptomatic, erythematous, wheal-like papuloplaques, macules, and nodules on his face and four extremities. It was misdiagnosed by a pediatrician and treated as urticaria for six months. Later, he was sent to our hospital for evaluation of prolonged fever. Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (M5) with leukemia cutis was diagnosed by results of hematologic examination and examination of a skin biopsy specimen. After one course of chemotherapy, all of the skin lesions completely resolved and had not recurred. Five months after acute nonlymphocytic leukemia was diagnosed, bone marrow relapse and central nervous system involvement were noted.
 ...
PMID:Leukemia cutis as the initial manifestation of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia in a young child. 940 47

Histamine releasing autoantibodies play a central role in the pathogenesis of chronic urticaria (CU) in approximately 30% of affected patients. We investigated the therapeutic effect of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) on disease activity in patients with severe CU of autoimmune aetiology. Autoimmune urticaria was diagnosed by the development of a weal-and-flare reaction to the intradermal injection of autologous serum and by serum-induced histamine release from the basophil leucocytes of healthy donors in vitro. Ten patients with severe, autoimmune CU, poorly responsive to conventional treatment, were treated with IVIG 0.4 g/kg per day for 5 days. The outcome on cutaneous wealing and itch was monitored using urticaria activity scores, visual analogue scales and autologous intradermal serum tests. Clinical benefit was noted in nine of 10 patients: three patients continue in prolonged complete remissions (3 years follow-up), two had temporary complete remissions, and symptoms in four patients improved subsequent to treatment. There was significant improvement in the urticaria activity scores and visual analogue scores at 2 (P < 0.01) and 6 weeks (P < 0.01) post-IVIG compared with the baseline values (Wilcoxon matched pairs). The diminution in urticarial activity in the majority of patients corresponded with a reduced weal-and-flare response to the intradermal injection of autologous post-treatment serum compared with the pretreatment serum. Minor side-effects were common, but there were no serious or long-term adverse effects. IVIG represents a novel therapeutic option in selected patients with recalcitrant CU associated with histamine releasing autoantibodies.
 ...
PMID:Intravenous immunoglobulin in autoimmune chronic urticaria. 953 30

Second-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) have been developed to reduce or eliminate the sedation and anticholinergic adverse effects that occur with older H1 receptor antagonists. This article evaluates second-generation antihistamines, including acrivastine, astemizole, azelastine, cetirizine, ebastine, fexofenadine, ketotifen, loratadine, mizolastine and terfenadine, for significant features that affect choice. In addition to their primary mechanism of antagonising histamine at the H1 receptor, these agents may act on other mediators of the allergic reaction. However, the clinical significance of activity beyond that mediated by histamine H1 receptor antagonism has yet to be demonstrated. Most of the agents reviewed are metabolised by the liver to active metabolites that play a significant role in their effect. Conditions that result in accumulation of astemizole, ebastine and terfenadine may prolong the QT interval and result in torsade de pointes. The remaining agents reviewed do not appear to have this risk. For allergic rhinitis, all agents are effective and the choice should be based on other factors. For urticaria, cetirizine and mizolastine demonstrate superior suppression of wheal and flare at the dosages recommended by the manufacturer. For atopic dermatitis, as adjunctive therapy to reduce pruritus, cetirizine, ketotifen and loratadine demonstrate efficacy. Although current evidence does not suggest a primary role for these agents in the management of asthma, it does support their use for asthmatic patients when there is coexisting allergic rhinitis, dermatitis or urticaria.
 ...
PMID:Second-generation antihistamines: a comparative review. 1040 Apr 11


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10