Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042109 (urticaria)
 6,569 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Six patients who developed urticaria, dyspnea, and anaphylactic shock due to topical application of chlorhexidine gluconate solution are described. Chlorhexidine gluconate was confirmed as the causative agent of type I hypersensitivity by intradermal, scratch, and epicutaneous tests. To prevent life-threatening adverse reactions, it seems important to use chlorhexidine gluconate on wound surfaces at a concentration of 0.05%, as recommended by the manufacturer; chlorhexidine gluconate may not be suitable for application to mucous membranes.
 ...
PMID:Anaphylactic symptoms due to chlorhexidine gluconate. 291 Feb 7

Possible allergic sensitivity to local anesthetic agents remains problematic for some patients who could benefit from their use. We retrospectively reviewed all our consultations for evaluation of local anesthetic allergy from 1965 to 1985 to assess the safety and efficacy of skin testing and provocative test dosing with a variety of local anesthetic agents. Fifty-nine patients reported 70 reactions from the administration of six different local anesthetics. Fifty-four patients could name one or more local anesthetic agents they believed were responsible, and five patients named only "caine" drugs. Multiple reactions of the same type to the same agent were considered as one reaction. On the basis of their history of reaction, the patients were categorized as follows: anaphylactoid reactions (urticaria, angioedema, wheezing, or hypotension within 1 to 2 hours of exposure), possible anaphylactoid reactions (tachycardia, dizziness, syncope, breathlessness, or pruritus occurring within 1 to 2 hours of exposure), contact dermatitis (a typical eczematous skin eruption after appropriate cutaneous sensitization), and other reactions (nonanaphylactoid reactions other than those already described or those occurring more than 2 hours after exposure). Fifty-nine patients were administered local anesthetics after skin testing and provocative test dosing, including two patients who required intravenous lidocaine (Xylocaine; Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., Westboro, Mass.) acutely to control cardiac arrhythmias. These two patients had reported anaphylactoid reactions to oral antiarrhythmic drugs of the local anesthetic class. Despite the history of previous reactions, there were no positive skin tests or positive provocative drug challenges in any patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Provocative challenge with local anesthetics in patients with a prior history of reaction. 358 43

We have previously demonstrated that peanut oil is not allergenic to peanut-sensitive individuals. Seven soybean-sensitive patients were enrolled in a double-blind crossover study to determine whether ingestion of soybean oil can induce adverse reactions in such patients. All subjects had histories of systemic allergic reactions (urticaria, angioedema, wheezing, dyspnea, and/or vomiting) after soybean ingestion and had positive puncture skin tests with a 1:20 w/v glycerinated-saline whole soybean extract. Sera from six of the seven subjects were tested by RAST assay for the presence of specific IgE antibodies to soybean allergens. All patients had elevated levels of serum IgE antibodies to the crude soybean extract; binding values ranged from 2.3 to 28.1 times that of a negative control serum. Before the oral challenges, all patients demonstrated negative puncture skin tests to three commercially available soybean oils and to olive oil (control). On four separate days, patients were challenged with the individual soybean oils and olive oil in random sequence. At 30-minute intervals, under constant observation, patients ingested 2, 5, and 8 ml of one of the soybean oils or olive oil contained in 1 ml capsules. No untoward reactions were observed with either the commercially available soybean oils or olive oil. Soybean oil ingestion does not appear to pose a risk to soybean-sensitive individuals.
 ...
PMID:Soybean oil is not allergenic to soybean-sensitive individuals. 389 82

Avoidance is the key treatment of anaphylaxis if an allergen exists; thus, we have evaluated 102 patients with the initial diagnosis of idiopathic anaphylaxis with a battery of 79 food-antigen skin prick tests selected to include foods reported or suspected of provoking anaphylaxis. Only those patients whose episodes consisted of at least two of the following were included in the study: angioedema with or without hives, laryngeal edema leading to severe dyspnea, hypotension, or loss of consciousness. Detailed history, physical examination, and conventional laboratory tests ruled out known causes of anaphylaxis. Thirty-two patients (31%) had positive tests to one or more food antigens. In five of these patients, subsequently eating a food that elicited a positive test provoked an anaphylactic reaction. Two patients eliminated the foods completely, stopped having reactions, and refused challenge. In these seven patients, 10 different antigens provoked anaphylaxis: aniseed, cashew nut, celery, flaxseed, hops, mustard, mushroom, shrimp, sunflower, and walnut. We conclude that a battery of selected food-antigen skin prick tests provided a useful method for identifying an offending antigen in these patients and that some (7% in our series) cases of "idiopathic" anaphylaxis by history are not truly idiopathic.
 ...
PMID:Food skin testing in patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis. 395 Feb 55

Three cases of apparent anaphylactoid reactions to zomepirac sodium (Zomax) are reported. One patient initially appeared to have a dissecting abdominal aortic aneurysm with vascular collapse. The second patient experienced conjunctival pruritus after each of several doses of zomepirac before emergency department presentation with acute dyspnea and urticaria. The third patient had been admitted previously with a diagnosis of rule out myocardial infarction, which in retrospect was probably a zomepirac reaction. All three recovered uneventfully.
 ...
PMID:Anaphylactic reactions to zomepirac. 397 Apr 5

During the school year 1980-81 a survey questionnaire was carried out among schoolchildren aged 7 to 15 years in Oslo. The survey population comprised 39,162 children attending compulsory primary school. The questionnaire was distributed to a random sample of 1772 children in 81 classes, forms 1 to 9, and the response rate was 95%. The prevalence of physician-diagnosis of current and cumulative asthma was 1.6% and 3.1%, respectively. Of those with current asthma 68% used asthma drugs regularly. Occasional wheezing and attacks of breathlessness were reported by 9% and 4%, respectively. Wheezing and breathlessness on exposure to pollen (4.5%), animals (3.1%) and exercise (5.5%) was reported more frequently than physician-diagnosis of asthma. The cumulative prevalence of either hay fever, eczema, urticaria or asthma was 17%. More boys than girls under the age of 12 had a physician-diagnosis of asthma.
 ...
PMID:Prevalence of bronchial asthma and respiratory symptoms in schoolchildren in Oslo. 400 27

According to the United States Food and Drug Administration, untoward reactions to capillary hemodialyzers occur at a rate of 3.5 of every 100,000 dialyzers sold. Allergic symptoms immediately after initiation of dialysis consist of burning retrosternal pain, sensation of diffuse heat, cold perspiration, periorbital and facial edema, flushing, laryngeal stridor, bronchial hypersecretion, hypotension, bradycardia, and loss of consciousness. In 1982 Popli et al. reported four patients suffering from such allergic manifestations; three were successfully managed after being taken off dialysis. These investigators thought that inadequate rinsing of cuprammonium cellulose capillary dialyzers was responsible for the reactions, and recommended rinsing the blood compartment with 2 liters of normal saline, and the dialysate compartment with 10 liters of dialysate, both in a single-pass fashion over 20 minutes. Nichols and Platts (1982) (3) reported 15 patients with urticaria, severe bronchospasm, and shock occurring immediately after the blood had been returned from the dialyzer. These authors suggested that the sterilizing agent, ethylene oxide (ETO), was responsible. Poothullil et al. (1975) (4) described a patient with pruritus, severe dyspnea, and hypotension during dialysis. On the basis of a positive skin prick test (dermal reaction to ETO-exposed human albumin) and of antigen-induced histamine release from peripheral leucocytes, these workers suggested that ETO was responsible for the allergic reactions. Marshall et al. (1984) (5) reported that 8.9% of hemodialysis patients had positive skin tests to ETO and that 12.1% were ETO-radioallergosorbent test (RAST) positive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Three cases of hemodialysis-associated hypersensitivity reactions. 405 93

Contrast media reactions may be classified as anaphylactoid, vasomotor, severe or life threatening, and fatal. Anaphylactoid reactions mimic immunoglobulin E-mediated hypersensitivity in that signs may consist of urticaria, angioedema, wheezing, dyspnea, hypotension, or shock. These reactions occur in 2% to 8% of all contrast media infusions. Vasomotor reactions occur in 5% to 8% of patients and consist of nausea, vomiting, flushing, and warmth. Severe reactions during which there is a concern for life occur about once per 1000 procedures. Fatalities have occurred in from 1:3000 procedures for intravenous cholangiography to between 1:10,000 to 1:100,000 procedures for intravenous urography. The pathogenesis of contrast media reactions is unknown, and various mechanisms may be associated with different clinical features. Radiocontrast media infusions can cause rises in plasma histamine and complement activation by either classic or alternate pathways or nonsequentially, yet adverse reactions may or may not occur. Abnormalities in the complement system or an increased conversion of prekallikrein to kallikrein has been demonstrated in some patients who have had anaphylactoid reactions. It is unknown if these mechanisms can explain the pathogenesis of anaphylactoid contrast media reactions. When patients who have had definite anaphylactoid reactions require a repeat procedure, the incidence of reactions ranges from 35% to 60% for intravascular infusion. Pretreatment with prednisone and diphenhydramine has been demonstrated to reduce this reaction rate to 9% in 465 procedures. Prednisone-diphenhydramine and ephedrine have further reduced the reaction rate to 3.1% in 192 procedures. These results are statistically significant (X2 = 5.4996, p = 0.019). Emergency equipment should be available should a severe reaction occur.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Contrast media reactions. 649 Nov 7

This report describes an extremely rare case of occupational allergy that developed in a frog handler. A 31-year-old female laboratory technician developed itching and urticaria one year after she began handling frogs and extracting their brains in the laboratory. Nine years later she noticed swelling of the right hand, stridor and dyspnea when she mistakenly injected her finger with a needle contaminated with extracts of frog brain. Specific IgE antibody to frog extracts was demonstrated by RAST and by P-K testing. However, no specific IgG antibody was found by agar gel diffusion or in heterologous PCA testing using guinea pigs. We suggest that allergic symptoms in this case were due to the development of Type I allergic reactivity to frog antigens.
 ...
PMID:A new occupational allergy due to frogs. 660 74

From a representative group from the adult population (34.958) of a town of 77.384 inhabitants, 99 persons were selected who: a) claimed to be periodically dyspneic independently with respect to respiratory tract infections. b) had normal chest x-rays and normal PE flow values. Approximately one year later, a history of atopic diseases was taken from 79 of them, and intradermal skin tests were performed with some inhalants and food allergens. At this time, 15 persons failed to report their previous complaints of dyspnea. Only 5 persons reported that various vegetables and pickles were responsible for their urticaria or eczema. Only 2 persons admitted various gastrointestinal symptoms, but non mentioned milk, eggs or cereals as possible causative agents of their bronchial, nasal, skin or circulatory symptoms. Distinctly positive immediate type skin reactions to the mixed milk and egg allergen were recorded in 19 patients (24%), and to cereals in 11 persons (14%). They all reacted strongly also to the house dust allergen, but they did not differ from all the remaining subjects in the intensity of their skin response to the control solution of histamine. People with positive skin reactions to cereals or dairy products complained of chronic or recurrent rhinitis much more often than the others (73% and 63% compared with 35%). Forty-five (47%) of them had a positive personal history of urticaria or eczema. These "food reactors" did not differ from "non reactors" in the frequency of the elevated serum IgE level which was raised in 66% of the whole group (of 79). The results suggest that allergy to cereals and dairy products may often be underestimated in adult asthmatics especially when positive reactions to inhalants are also present. The problems of reliability of the skin tests and history taking in food allergy are briefly discussed.
 ...
PMID:Allergy to cereals and dairy products in adult, uncomplicated asthma: an epidemiological survey. 721 28


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>