Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0042109 (urticaria)
 6,569 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

To investigate whether there are differences in the frequency of ADRs (adverse drug reactions) to parenteral iron preparations, we compared the results of 4 different data collections which contain observations in particular on i.m. or i.v. iron dextran and i.v. iron hydroxide sucrose complex, primarily in relation to anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions and common exanthemas. 1. In 206 patients of the department of general internal medicine in a city/teaching hospital (in association with the Swiss Foundation for Comprehensive Hospital Drug Monitoring--CHDM), 4 probably allergic reactions to i.m. iron dextran were found, one with acute severe dyspnea, cyanosis and flush, 3 with slight generalized, probably allergic reactions. Data from the USA on i.v. iron dextran do not show marked differences in the frequency of ADRs as compared with our data with i.m. administration. 2. A group of 400 otherwise healthy patients of the obstetric department of Zurich University Hospital were treated with i.v. iron sucrose for anemia due to iron loss during pregnancy or following childbirth. Seven generalized skin reactions, 4 in the form of flush and 3 of common exanthema, occurred. 3. In a retrospective study on patients on maintenance hemodialysis with chronic renal insufficiency and anemia, a questionnaire was answered by the medical heads of 17 selected hemodialysis units in Switzerland. Response was 100%. During around 8100 patient-years with approximately 160,000 ampoules of iron sucrose (with 100 mg elementary iron), not a single life threatening reaction was observed; only 5-7 situations of rapidly reversible blood pressure fall occurred, some 10 with flush, and one each with urticaria and vomiting/diarrhea. 4. The relatively good tolerance of i.v. iron sucrose in patients with chronic renal failure may be due either to reduced immune competence in patients with chronic renal insufficiency and/or to the use of the preparation itself, or probably both. 5. In ADRs of allergic appearance to iron sucrose, the 7 generalized skin reactions occurred on the first day of the injections, as did those under iron dextran. Preexisting hypersensitivity must be taken into consideration. 6. If our experience is confirmed, preventive measures with i.v. iron sucrose, mainly in patients with chronic renal insufficiency, could be reduced.
 ...
PMID:[Parenteral iron therapy: problems and possible solutions]. 959 94

Mizolastine, a new H1-receptor antagonist, is highly selective for histamine H1 receptors and has no anticholinergic, antiadrenergic, or antiserotonin activity. It is rapidly absorbed after oral ingestion, with peak plasma concentrations occurring at 1.5 h. The distribution and terminal elimination half-life values are 2 and 13 h, respectively, in healthy young adult volunteers. Half-life values are longer in the elderly and in subjects with chronic renal insufficiency; however, the differences are not large enough to be clinically relevant or to necessitate a dose adjustment in these populations. Mizolastine produces prompt, sustained, peripheral blockade of histamine H1 receptors in the skin. Suppression of the histamine-induced wheal and flare begins 40-60 min after ingestion of a 10-mg dose, peaks at 3-4 h, lasts for at least 24 h, and does not decrease during regular once-daily dosing. The amount of wheal suppression is comparable to that produced by other leading new H1-receptor antagonists. These pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of mizolastine provide its clinical pharmacology 'signature'. They also provide the scientific rationale for recommending a once-daily 10-mg dose and suggest that the efficacy and effectiveness of mizolastine will be widely confirmed in allergic disorders, especially rhinitis and urticaria.
 ...
PMID:Mizolastine: antihistaminic activity from preclinical data to clinical evaluation. 1020 99

Mizolastine is a new histamine H1 receptor antagonist. Mizolastine 10 mg/day is effective in allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. In young healthy volunteers, absorption of mizolastine is rapid with time (tmax) to peak concentration (Cmax) of about 1 hour. The absolute bioavailability of mizolastine 10mg tablets is about 65%. Distribution is rapid with a mean distribution half-life of 1.5 to 1.9 hours. Mizolastine is >98% bound to serum albumin and the apparent volume of distribution is between I and 1.4 L/kg. Mizolastine is extensively metabolised by hepatic glucuronidation and sulphation, with no major active metabolite, and excreted in faeces. The terminal elimination half-life (t1/2beta) is 7.3 to 17.1 hours. The apparent oral clearance after a repeated oral dose of 10mg is 6.02 L/h, with steady state reached from day 3 and no accumulation between days 1 and 7. Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) are linearly related to dose. Mizolastine appears in vivo to be a relatively weak inhibitor of cytochrome P450 2E1, 2C9, 2D6 and 3A4. In vivo, no interactions were observed between mizolastine and lorazepam or ethanol. A significant increase in Cmax and trough plasma concentration (Cmin) of digoxin occurred after coadministration with mizolastine, without change in AUC, tmax or clinical parameters. Significant increases in theophylline Cmin and AUC were observed after coadministration with mizolastine. Mizolastine Cmax and AUC were increased when coadministered with erythromycin, with no change in t1/2beta. Concomitant administration of mizolastine and ketoconazole increased mizolastine AUC values with no change in t1/2beta. In a population analysis of the pharmacokinetics of mizolastine in patients with allergies, parameter values were close to those in healthy volunteers, except for duration of absorption, which was almost doubled in the patients. Bodyweight and creatinine clearance were found to have little influence on oral clearance, and no influence of liver transaminases was found on clearance and distribution. Pharmacokinetic parameters of mizolastine in elderly individuals were similar to those observed in healthy young volunteers. In patients with chronic renal insufficiency, t1/2beta was prolonged by 47% compared with young healthy volunteers. In patients with cirrhosis, tmax was longer, Cmax was lower, distribution half-life was prolonged and AUC was 50% higher than in healthy volunteers. In pharmacodynamic-pharmacokinetic trials, the percentage of wheal and flare inhibition was found to correlate with mizolastine Cmin values. No direct relationship was found between drug concentrations in skin blister fluid and antihistamine activity.
 ...
PMID:Clinical pharmacokinetics of mizolastine. 1151 Jun 27