Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0040425 (
tonsillitis
)
1,594
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
In a randomized investigator-blinded study, 506 children ages 6 months to 12 years with positive rapid direct antigen tests for Group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus (GABHS) received treatment with either clarithromycin suspension, 7.5 mg/kg twice daily, or penicillin VK suspension, 13.3 mg/kg three times per day for 10 days. Signs and symptoms of pharyngitis or
tonsillitis
were evaluated and throat cultures were obtained before treatment, once during treatment and 4 to 6 days and 19 to 25 days posttreatment. All GABHS isolates were susceptible in vitro to clarithromycin. Successful clinical responses at the end of treatment were demonstrated in 169 of 176 (96%) evaluable clarithromycin-treated patients and 179 of 191 (94%) evaluable penicillin-treated patients. GABHS was successfully eradicated at end of treatment in 168 of 183 (92%) evaluable clarithromycin-treated patients compared with 162 of 199 (81%) evaluable penicillin-treated patients (P = 0.004). There were no significant changes in hematologic or serum chemistry parameters in either group. Both drugs were well-tolerated. The incidence and nature of adverse events were similar in the clarithromycin and penicillin groups, except for gastrointestinal complaints reported in 35 of 250 (14%) clarithromycin recipients compared with 12 of 256 (5%) penicillin recipients (P < or = 0.001). The results indicate that twice daily clarithromycin was as safe and effective as three times daily penicillin VK in the treatment of children with
streptococcal pharyngitis
or
tonsillitis
. Clarithromycin was statistically superior to penicillin VK in the eradication of GABHS.
...
PMID:Comparison of clarithromycin and penicillin VK suspensions in the treatment of children with streptococcal pharyngitis and review of currently available alternative antibiotic therapies. 763 24
The efficacy and safety of azithromycin and clarithromycin were compared in an open multicentre study involving 380 adult patients with acute otitis media, acute sinusitis, or acute
streptococcal pharyngitis
or
tonsillitis
. Patients were assigned randomly to receive azithromycin as a single dose of 500 mg daily for three days, or clarithromycin 250 mg bid for ten days. Overall clinical efficacy was found to be similar in each treatment group at day 10-14, with a satisfactory outcome (cured or improved) in 95% of azithromycin and 96% of clarithromycin patients. Bacteriological efficacy was also similar, with eradication of the pathogen in 94% and 95% of isolates, respectively, in the azithromycin and clarithromycin groups. In otitis media, a satisfactory clinical response was seen in 97% of patients in each treatment group. Azithromycin therapy resulted in a clinical response rate of 93% in sinusitis patients, with bacteriological eradication in 93% of patients. Two patients (who were cured clinically) had persistent pathogens. Similarly, clarithromycin achieved clinical response and bacteriological eradication in 95% and 92% of sinusitis patients, respectively. Pathogens persisted in two patients with clinical cure, and in one case of clinical failure. In pharyngitis or
tonsillitis
, Streptococcus pyogenes was eradicated successfully in 95% of patients in both groups, and the clinical success rates were 96% and 97% for azithromycin and clarithromycin, respectively. No case of clinical failure was associated with persistence of S. pyogenes infection. At the follow-up assessment of this diagnosis group, reinfection had occurred in three (8%) azithromycin patients and one (3%) clarithromycin patient, and all but one patient remained asymptomatic. Both drugs were well-tolerated, with 8.4% of patients on azithromycin and 7.4% on clarithromycin reporting adverse events, mainly gastrointestinal. It was concluded that a three-day course of azithromycin was as effective and well-tolerated as a ten-day course of clarithromycin in adults with acute upper respiratory tract infections.
...
PMID:Comparison of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with upper respiratory tract infections. 839 85
A single-blind, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of dirithromycin with miocamycin in the treatment of
streptococcal pharyngitis
/
tonsillitis
caused by Group A streptococci. The study population consisted of 60 patients: 30 were randomized to receive 500 mg dirithromycin od and 30 to receive 600 mg miocamycin bd. All 30 dirithromycin-treated patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. A favourable clinical response was observed in 100% of these patients at the post-therapy visit. In the miocamycin-treated group, 28 of 30 (93.3%) patients were eligible for efficacy analysis; a favourable clinical response was observed in 100%. Bacteriological cure of evaluable dirithromycin- and miocamycin-treated patients was 96.7% and 92.9%, respectively. No statistically significant post-therapy differences in clinical or bacteriological response rates were noted between the two groups. Adverse event analysis showed no significant differences between treatment groups. There were no serious adverse events during the study. Two miocamycin-treated patients were prematurely withdrawn from the study due to adverse events (diarrhoea). Analysis of clinical laboratory data revealed no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups that were considered to be drug related. The results of this study suggest that dirithromycin has comparable safety and efficacy to miocamycin in the treatment of
streptococcal pharyngitis
/
tonsillitis
infections caused by Group A streptococci.
...
PMID:Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin versus miocamycin in tonsillopharyngitis. 847
A total of 193 patients with
streptococcal pharyngitis
/
tonsillitis
received 500 mg dirithromycin once daily and 196 patients 250 mg erythromycin four times daily for ten days in a double-blind, parallel-group multicentre study. In the dirithromycin treatment group, 97 (50.3%) patients completed the study and were evaluated for efficacy analysis, and 99/196 (50.5%) erythromycin-treated were evaluated for efficacy of treatment. Favourable clinical responses to treatment (cure or improvement of symptoms) at the post-therapy visit (three to five days after therapy completion) occurred in 89 (91.7%) dirithromycin- and 93 (93.9%) erythromycin-treated patients. Bacteriological response was favourable (pathogen eliminated in 81 (83.5%) dirithromycin- and 87 (87.9%) erythromycin-treated patients. At late post-therapy (three to five weeks after treatment) 82/89 (92.1%) dirithromycin- and 90/93 (96.8%) erythromycin-treated patients had a favourable clinical response. Bacteriological response at late post-therapy was favourable in 77 (86.5%) dirithromycin- and 85 (94.4%) erythromycin-treated patients. No deaths occurred during or after treatment, and the serious events experienced by three dirithromycin- and one erythromycin-treated patients were unrelated to treatment. Five patients taking dirithromycin and seven taking erythromycin discontinued treatment prematurely, mainly due to gastrointestinal disturbances. Adverse events that occurred in 2% or more of patients in each treatment group were mainly gastrointestinal (diarrhoea, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting); headache and rash were also reported. No significant differences in clinical laboratory data were detected that were considered to be drug-related.
...
PMID:Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin in pharyngitis and tonsillitis. 847 16
This multicenter, randomized, parallel treatment, observer-blinded study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cefpodoxime proxetil (5 mg/kg twice daily for 10 days) compared with penicillin V (13.4 mg/kg three times daily for 10 days) for treatment of Group A
streptococcal pharyngitis
and
tonsillitis
in pediatric patients. Clinical and microbiologic results were evaluated before therapy, during therapy (Study Days 3 to 5), at the end of therapy (Study Days 14 to 18) and at long term follow-up (Study Days 30 to 32). Both drugs were well-tolerated in 578 patients evaluable for safety. Mild gastrointestinal complaints were noted in 6.7% of 386 cefpodoxime-treated patients and in 5.2% of 192 penicillin-treated patients. In 413 patients evaluable for efficacy, both treatment regimens resulted in comparably favorable clinical outcome; cure rates were 83.8% for 275 cefpodoxime-treated patients and 77.5% for 138 penicillin-treated patients. However, eradication of S. pyogenes at end of therapy was significantly higher with cefpodoxime (93.1%) than with penicillin (81.2%) (P < 0.01). Cefpodoxime proxetil provides an effective alternative to penicillin V for the treatment of
streptococcal pharyngitis
and
tonsillitis
.
...
PMID:Cefpodoxime proxetil vs. penicillin V in pediatric streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis. 848 20
Failure of treatment of group A
streptococcal pharyngitis
and
tonsillitis
is well documented. One of the possible explanations for treatment failure is penicillin tolerance in group A streptococci. Reports on the prevalence of penicillin tolerance among group A streptococci (0-100%) and the presumed relationship with therapeutic failure vary considerably. Therefore, it appears worthwhile to review pharyngotonsillitis studies, devoting special attention to the variables of MIC-MBC laboratory determinations such as inoculum preparation, composition and volume of test medium, and the criteria used to define penicillin tolerance. Alternative methods (gradient-replica plate method, beta-lactamase disk test, time-kill assay, and cell-lysis assay) are discussed. It is concluded that technical factors and the definitions used influenced the reported rates of penicillin tolerance. The epidemiological data suggest that tolerance is not limited to a single streptococcal serotype. Furthermore, there is not sufficient data to support a correlation between in vitro penicillin tolerance of group A streptococci and treatment failure, either in clinical cases or in animal studies. On the other hand, evidence to exclude penicillin tolerance as a cause of treatment failure is also not available. Therefore, at present penicillin tolerance cannot be ruled out as a cause of penicillin treatment failures.
...
PMID:Penicillin tolerance and treatment failure in group A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis. 880 Oct 81
Azithromycin and cefaclor were compared for the treatment of acute otitis media,
streptococcal pharyngitis
/
tonsillitis
, or sinusitis in an open multicentre study conducted in 530 adults. At the end of therapy (day 11-15), 228/245 (93%) patients treated with azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days and 233/241 (97%) treated with cefaclor 250 mg given three times daily for 10 days were considered to have responded satisfactorily (cured or improved). In bacteriologically evaluable patients with pharyngitis/
tonsillitis
, Streptococcus pyogenes was eradicated in 116/117 (99%) azithromycin- and in 115/119 (97%) cefaclor-treated patients at day 11-15; one patient in each group had become reinfected after initial eradication of the pathogen. When followed up on day 25-30, S. pyogenes infection had recurred in 5/105 (5%) azithromycin and 4/108 (3%) cefaclor patients who had responded satisfactorily at day 11-15, and whose baseline pathogen had been eradicated. Of these patients, two in the azithromycin and one in the cefaclor group also relapsed clinically; the others remained asymptomatic. Patients tolerated both treatments well; treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 11% of the 267 azithromycin- and 10% of the 263 cefaclor-treated patients assessed for safety. One azithromycin patient and five cefaclor patients withdrew because of adverse events. The results of the study show that a 3-day regimen of azithromycin, given once daily, is as effective and well tolerated as a multiple-daily, 10-day cefaclor regimen for the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections in adults.
...
PMID:An open comparative study of azithromycin versus cefaclor in the treatment of patients with upper respiratory tract infections. 881 48
An open, multicentre study was undertaken in order to evaluate the efficacies and safety profiles of azithromycin and roxithromycin in 440 adults with acute otitis media, sinusitis or acute beta-haemiolytic
streptococcal pharyngitis
/
tonsillitis
. Treatment with 500 mg azithromycin, administered orally once daily for 3 days, produced a satisfactory clinical outcome (cure or improvement) in 51/52 (98%) patients with otitis media, 91/91 (100%) patients with pharyngitis/
tonsillitis
and 64/68 (94%) patients with sinusitis. Treatment with 150 mg roxithromycin, given orally twice daily for 10 days, produced satisfactory clinical responses in 54/55 (98%), 91/92 (99%) and 69/73 (94%) patients with otitis media, pharyngitis/
tonsillitis
and sinusitis respectively. Of the 17 azithromycin-treated patients with sinusitis who were clinically and bacteriologically evaluable, Staphylococcus aureus persisted in two and Streptococcus pneumoniae in one. S. aureus also persisted in 1/12 clinically and bacteriologically-evaluable patient treated with roxithromycin. Of the 58 and 64 patients with pharyngitis/
tonsillitis
treated with azithromycin and roxithromycin, respectively, who were clinically and bacteriologically evaluable, Streptococcus pyogenes persisted at the end of treatment in 7/58 (12%) in the azithromycin group and in 13/64 (20%) in the roxithromycin group. At follow-up, there was no evidence of S. pyogenes reinfection in patients treated with azithromycin. Three episodes of reinfection occurred in the roxithromycin treatment group. Also, three patients showed evidence of clinical relapse at follow-up, although no pathogens were isolated. Azithromycin was associated with a lower incidence of adverse events. No azithromycin-treated patient was withdrawn prematurely because of a treatment-related event. Three roxithromycin-treated patients were withdrawn from treatment because of severe headache, thyroiditis or fatigue. In conclusion, for adults with acute upper respiratory tract infections, a 3-day course of once-daily azithromycin was found to be as effective and as well tolerated as a 10-day course of twice-daily roxithromycin.
...
PMID:An open comparative study of azithromycin and roxithromycin in the treatment of acute upper respiratory tract infections. 881 49
The efficacy and safety of azithromycin and penicillin V in the treatment of acute
streptococcal pharyngitis
/
tonsillitis
in paediatric patients were compared in a double-blind, double-dummy prospective study. A total of 489 children (age range, 2-13 years) were randomized to receive treatment with penicillin V (125-250 mg 4 x daily for 10 days) or azithromycin in an oral suspension (10 or 20 mg/kg 1 x daily for 3 days). Only patients with baseline cultures positive for Streptococcus pyogenes and complete clinical and microbiological assessments at the end of the therapy and follow-up one month later were included in the efficacy analysis. A satisfactory clinical response (cure or improvement) was recorded in 99% of the 10 mg/kg azithromycin group, 100% of the 20 mg/kg azithromycin group, and 97% of the penicillin V group at the end of therapy (day 12-14). At the follow-up evaluation (day 28-30), relapse rates in patients cured or improved at the end of therapy were 6%, 5%, and 2%, respectively. Bacteriological eradication rates at the end of therapy were 98% in both azithromycin groups and 92% in patients who received penicillin V (p = 0.011); pathogen recurrence was recorded at follow-up in 4% of the 20 mg/kg azithromycin group and in 6% of both the 10 mg/kg azithromycin and penicillin V groups. Treatment-related adverse events, the majority of mild to moderate severity, occurred in 13% of patients in the 20 mg/kg azithromycin group, 9% in the 10 mg/kg azithromycin group, and 5% in the penicillin V group. Azithromycin in a dosage of 10 or 20 mg/kg/day one daily for three days was as safe and effective as penicillin V administered four times daily in the treatment of paediatric patients with acute pharyngitis/
tonsillitis
.
...
PMID:Azithromycin versus penicillin V in the treatment of paediatric patients with acute streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis. Paediatric Azithromycin Study Group. 892 71
Cellular immune mechanisms are important in the pathogenesis of acute glomerulonephritis, as underlined by recent demonstrations of cytokine activity in the urine and in the renal tissue of some of these patients. Therefore, we decided to study circulating levels of IL-6, TNF alpha and PDGF measured by ELISA in 12 patients with acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis (PSGN) on admission, at the time of discharge from the hospital, 45 days and 3 months later. We also studied 9 patients with acute
streptococcal pharyngitis
without nephritis, during acute infection, 8 and 21 days later and 20 normal children (control group). On admission, patients with PSGN had increased IL-6 levels (12.4 +/- 4 pg/ml vs control = 2.57 +/- 0.34 pg/ml, p < 0.05) which returned to normal at the time of discharge from the hospital, 8 to 17 days later. TNF alpha was also elevated in the acute phase (8.11 +/- 1.19 pg/ml vs 3.74 +/- 1.4 pg/ml in controls, p < 0.005) but significant individual variation was detected in serial determinations. Levels of PDGF were always normal. In acute streptococcal
tonsillitis
without nephritis, IL-6 and TNF alpha were increased at the time of active infection, but levels of IL-6 fell to the normal range after 1 week while the increase observed in association with PSGN develops 2 to 3 weeks after infection and followed the clinical course of the disease.
...
PMID:Circulating levels of cytokines in poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis. 902 Dec 34
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
Next >>