Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0038454 (stroke)
 147,016 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase and other agents reduces mortality and is now well accepted as the mainstay of revascularisation options for most patients after an acute myocardial infarction. Streptokinase is as efficacious as alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; rt-PA) when given as a 3-hour infusion, anistreplase, reteplase and saruplase in reducing mortality. However, in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) trial, an accelerated alteplase regimen (1.5-hour infusion) plus intravenous heparin demonstrated a statistically significant 1% absolute mortality reduction compared with streptokinase plus heparin. Treatment with streptokinase is consistently clinically superior to conventional treatment and is cost effective: the marginal cost per year of life saved (cost/YLS) is less than $US/$Can20,000 (1990 or 1991 currency) assuming 5-year survival. In addition, streptokinase treatment is associated with fewer intensive care days and total days spent in hospital and a decrease in the use of intensive care services compared with conventional therapy. Importantly, the cost/YLS of treating older patients (70 to 80 years) with streptokinase is similar to that in younger patients (approximately $US22,000, 1990 currency). In 1 study, the cost of in-hospital treatment and associated 1-year follow-up costs did not differ significantly regardless of whether patients received streptokinase or anistreplase. In the most comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis to date, GUSTO investigators determined that the incremental cost/YLS in patients who received the accelerated alteplase regimen instead of streptokinase was $US32,678 (1993 currency); the projected life expectancy was about 15 years. Thrombolytic therapy is generally more cost effective in patients at high risk than in those at low risk. The cost effectiveness of streptokinase is dependent on infarct location and time to treatment, but is more favorable in patients with anterior than inferior infarctions and those treated as soon as possible after symptom onset. There are as yet no comparative data to indicate a clinical benefit for one thrombolytic agent over another in patients treated more than 6 hours after symptom onset; therefore, in all likelihood, streptokinase will be preferred on the basis of cost minimisation. Streptokinase is associated with a slightly higher rate of severe bleeding than alteplase but a lower incidence of stroke. Although quality-of-life information comparing thrombolytics is unavailable, most patients who received streptokinase or alteplase rated their quality of life as high on the basis of results from time trade-off assessments and health surveys. In summary, streptokinase is undeniably cost effective compared with conventional treatment. It is up to individual healthcare systems to determine whether the mortality advantage and cost differential of the accelerated alteplase regimen over streptokinase, as seen in the GUSTO trial, are affordable and justifiable. However, it is important to realise that treatment options may be limited by healthcare resources; thus, streptokinase can be regarded as a cost-effective thrombolytic strategy which is both efficacious and affordable within the constraints of most healthcare budgets.
 ...
PMID:Streptokinase. A pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in the management of acute myocardial infarction. 1016 75

Alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; rt-PA) is a thrombolytic agent that when given in an accelerated regimen with intravenous heparin has survival advantages compared with streptokinase in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, as shown by the results of the Global Utilisation of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) trial. Although alteplase is more fibrin-specific than streptokinase, alteplase therapy is associated with a small relative increase in the incidence of haemorrhagic stroke, but appears to cause a small relative decrease in the incidence of major bleeding. Because alteplase has a higher acquisition cost than alternative thrombolytic agents, analyses have been undertaken to assess whether administration of alteplase after myocardial infarction is a cost-effective use of healthcare resources. In retrospective analyses undertaken before completion of the GUSTO trial, it was generally assumed, on the basis of better 90-minute patency rates, that alteplase would provide survival advantages compared with streptokinase or conventional nonthrombolytic therapy. Alteplase had acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios compared with conventional therapy and streptokinase therapy from both third-party payer and hospital perspectives. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that alteplase was more cost effective when given early after symptom onset and when given to patients with large infarcts. Prospective evaluations of the cost effectiveness of alteplase in 3-hour and accelerated regimens have similarly demonstrated that alteplase therapy after myocardial infarction improves survival at an 'acceptable' cost. The largest prospective evaluation undertaken to date was performed in conjunction with the GUSTO trial. Primary analysis, on the basis of the clinical findings of the GUSTO trial and prospective collection of cost data from US patients, revealed that the cost-effectiveness ratio for accelerated alteplase therapy compared with streptokinase was $US32,687 (1993 dollars) per year of life saved (YLS). This value is most relevant for US patients and lies within the definition of 'cost effective' if $US50,000/YLS is the benchmark for acceptable use of resources. The cost-effectiveness ratio for alteplase was most sensitive to assumptions regarding long term survival and cost differences after the first year following treatment. In subgroup analyses, alteplase was a cost-effective treatment option for all elderly patients (> 60 years of age) and all patients > 40 years of age with anterior infarction. Alteplase therapy appears to have in-hospital costs/charges similar to those for primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), mainly because PTCA appears to have a favourable effect on duration of hospitalisation. Given the technical expertise and facilities required for PTCA, it is likely that thrombolytic therapy will remain the management option of choice in most centres. In conclusion, under the conditions of the GUSTO study, accelerated alteplase in combination with intravenous heparin confers survival advantages compared with streptokinase therapy. While decision-makers must choose how best to use their available healthcare resources, pharmacoeconomic evaluations have confirmed that, on the basis of accepted benchmark values, alteplase therapy is a cost-effective therapeutic option for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, especially in elderly patients with either anterior or inferior infarcts and nearly all patients with anterior myocardial infarction. Thus, on the basis of clinical and economic data, predominantly provided by the GUSTO trial, alteplase is a cost-effective first-line management option for acute myocardial infarction.
 ...
PMID:Alteplase: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the management of myocardial infarction. 1017 69

Two commonly used thrombolytic agents are streptokinase (SK) and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), which have different impacts on the incidence of mortality and thrombolysis-related acute intracranial hemorrhage. A decision-analytic model was developed to compare the use of SK and t-PA in the treatment of a patient with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The outcome was health-related quality of life as quantified in a measure of utility from the patient's point of view. The model included three outcome states: death, nonfatal yet disabling stroke, and survival with no disabling stroke. The utility for disabling stroke was determined relative to the reference states of no disabling stroke (1.00) and death (0.00) by means of the time trade-off estimation technique. Probabilities were derived from the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Artery trial, which revealed that although administering t-PA results in a lower percentage of deaths compared to SK, it may lead to a higher percentage of strokes. A decision tree was constructed to model the options and outcomes. The tree was analyzed by standard decision analytic techniques using SMLTREE software, and the stability of the results was examined as values of parameters were varied systematically in a sensitivity analysis. In the baseline analysis, SK yielded 0.9235, whereas t-PA yielded 0.9329. The sensitivity analysis revealed that if the probability of a disabling stroke attributable to t-PA were greater than 2.08%, SK would yield the higher expected utility. This threshold value, however, was much greater than the probability established in major trials. The administration of t-PA leads to a slightly better outcome than does the administration of SK in a patient with suspected AMI.
 ...
PMID:Thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator in a patient with suspected acute myocardial infarction: A decision analysis. 1054 80

Thrombolysis increases case fatality but reduces the proportion of disabled survivors in recent trials in acute ischaemic stroke, although some trials show much higher mortality rates than others. One possible explanation for the different outcomes between trials is that the treatment effect with thrombolysis varies with baseline prognostic factors such as stroke severity. We examined the interaction between baseline risk and thrombolysis on outcome using individual patient data from the Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial-Italy (MAST-I). A multiple logistic regression of the MAST-I data was performed to identify which factors, identifiable at randomisation, most strongly predict a poor functional outcome. We then stratified the patients into those with severe strokes and those with mild strokes and examined the effect of thrombolysis on (a) case fatality and (b) dependency at 6 months after the stroke in the 157 patients who received streptokinase alone and the 156 controls. Streptokinase was found to cause an absolute increase of about 3% in case fatality in both "severe" and "mild" strokes; however, there was a 12% reduction in the number of dead or dependent "mild" strokes but a 6% increase in "severe" strokes. The number of patients was small, and therefore neither finding was statistically significant. In this exploratory analysis, the hazard with streptokinase appears similar in "severe" and "mild" strokes, but the benefit may be greater in "mild" strokes. Thrombolysis may be more effective in patients with "mild" strokes, but more information is required to confirm this hypothesis.
 ...
PMID:The influence of baseline prognostic variables on outcome after thrombolysis. MAST-Italy Collaborative Group. 1063 38

Clinical trials in the 1990s of intravenous thrombolysis for ischaemic stroke have involved over 3000 patients. Alteplase given within 3 hours of onset significantly reduces the combined end-point of death and disability. Although alteplase appears safe when given up to 6 hours after onset, individual trials have failed to confirm efficacy beyond 3 hours. Meta-analysis indicates that intravenous alteplase given up to 6 hours after stroke onset significantly reduces death or dependence 3 months after stroke. Two trials of intra-arterial pro-urokinase confirm benefits of treatment up to 6 hours in highly selected patients with angiographically confirmed proximal middle cerebral occlusion. Streptokinase increased the risk of early death significantly in 3 trials, with no overall reduction in eventual death and disability. Patients over 80 years have been excluded from most trials of alteplase, and experience in this age group is minimal. Increased incidence and poorer functional outcome in the elderly mean that thrombolysis may have greater absolute benefit in this group than in the young, but there is also a higher prevalence of absolute or relative potential contraindications to treatment (ranging from increased use of anticoagulant drugs to higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation). Further trials are necessary to address age restrictions and other important issues in the use of alteplase. Thrombolysis is likely to remain feasible for a minority of stroke patients of all ages, and there is a need for other acute treatment options.
 ...
PMID:Thrombolytic therapy for stroke: a review with particular reference to elderly patients. 1073 63

Stroke is a heterogeneous disease, but about 85% of strokes are as a result of cerebral ischaemia due to arterial occlusion. It seems logical to assume that, as in myocardial infarction, treatment designed to dissolve clots should be helpful. We now have a substantial amount of data on the use of aspirin, heparin and thrombolytic drugs in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Aspirin 300 mg daily has a modest effect in reducing mortality and handicap when used within 48 hours of stroke onset. The beneficial effects of low dose, medium dose subcutaneous unfractionated heparin, and various low molecular weight heparins in reducing early recurrent ischaemic stroke seem to be outweighed by haemorrhagic side effects. Streptokinase used within six hours of stroke onset results in excess mortality with some reduction in handicap in survivors, while in carefully selected patients recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-TPA) may be less hazardous. At the moment it is unclear which stroke patients will benefit from the use of r-TPA, and the use of criteria, as outlined by the NINDS group, means that only a very small proportion of stroke victims are suitable for thrombolytic therapy. Further research is necessary, while the concept of a 'Brain Attack' with appropriate urgency being used in the assessment of possible stroke needs development.
 ...
PMID:Reperfusion therapy for stroke. 1086 20

Streptokinase is an extensively used thrombolytic agent. However, different preparations cause severe hypotension during therapy, partially related to the complement cascade activation. In four ischaemic stroke patients treated with Streptase, an increased level of soluble terminal complement complex (SC5b-9) was measured. In the sera of normal subjects, the increase in SC5b-9 induced by Streptase, Kabikinase and Calbiochem streptokinases was highly significant (P < 0.005). Sigma streptokinase did not activate the complement system. Sigma streptokinase analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed a homogeneous band. The other three preparations were contaminated with albumin and other proteins. Based on our in vivo and in vitro data, we conclude that complement activation is related to contamination of different streptokinase products rather than the streptokinase itself.
 ...
PMID:Streptokinase does not activate the complement system. 1108 81

Available evidence of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke comes from a series of recent trials conducted in patients with acute stroke, and from a meta-analysis published in the Cochrane Library. The objective of this paper is to review the literature on tolerability and efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke, to find out what the level of evidence is for each thrombolytic drug, and what should consequently be done in the routine practice. This review is based on a bibliographic search of published meta-analyses of randomized trials, published randomized trials, and ongoing randomized trials, with the outcomes of disability, death, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages (fatal or non-fatal). Our primary end-point is a combination of death and disability, in terms of "death or dependency", with dependency defined as a modified Rankin Score (mRS) of >/=3. The level of evidence for the efficacy of a thrombolytic treatment is considered sufficient if there is both a statistically significant effect in the meta-analysis of all randomized trials, without statistically significant heterogeneity, together with one adequately powered and designed conclusive trial. Streptokinase has a clearly harmful effect, without any demonstrated benefit and must not be used in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The level of evidence of an effect of intra-arterial pro-urokinase to reduce death or dependency is low, available data are sparse (only 220 patients), the estimation of its real efficacy and tolerability remains unclear, and its use in clinical practice is not presently justified. The efficacy of alteplase has been incompletely demonstrated because the results vary across trials and type of outcomes (death, death or dependency), and the cut-off of the disability scale. There is a significant heterogeneity in the effect on death or dependency. However, we can conclude that there is a beneficial effect, but its clinical application is limited because of the absence of adequate criteria to identify patients most likely to benefit from treatment. Overall the use of alteplase in patients with acute stroke was associated with some benefit, but it significantly increased total mortality in two trials. Given the observed confidence interval (CI), the results are compatible with, in the best situtation, 203 advoided death or dependency and 61 avoided death per 1000 treated patients, and at worst 77 avoided death or dependency and 38 extra deaths per 1000 treated patients. Further trials aimed at validating more discriminant selection criteria are mandatory.
 ...
PMID:Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. 1472 27

Of 592 patients in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and tPA for Occluded Arteries-I trial who had a stroke during initial hospitalization, the risk for intracranial hemorrhage was significantly greater in those with recent facial or head trauma (odds ratio 13.0, 95% confidence interval 3.4 to 85.5); dementia was additionally associated with an increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 10.2). Because facial or head trauma may greatly influence treatment decisions, this risk factor should be incorporated into models designed to estimate the risks and benefits of fibrinolytic therapy.
 ...
PMID:Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage and nonhemorrhagic stroke after fibrinolytic therapy (from the GUSTO-i trial). 1496 23

Intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator is the only proven acute therapy for ischemic stroke. This therapy has not been translated into clinical practice in the developing world primarily due to economic constraints. Streptokinase, a lower cost alternative thrombolytic agent, is widely available in developing countries where it is utilized to treat patients with acute coronary syndromes. Although this drug has previously been found to be ineffective in ischemic stroke, the lack of benefit may have been related to a number of factors related to trial design rather than the drug itself. Specific features of prior trial designs that may have adversely affected outcomes include a prolonged treatment window, inclusion of patients with established infarction on computed tomography scan, failure to treat excessive arterial pressures, a fixed dose of streptokinase, and concomitant use of antithrombotic medications. Given the lack of therapeutic alternatives in developing countries, a new trial of streptokinase in acute stroke, utilizing stricter inclusion criteria similar to those in more recent thrombolytic studies, appears warranted.
Int J Stroke 2013 Oct
PMID:Thrombolysis in the developing world: is there a role for streptokinase? 2333 90


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>