Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0038454 (stroke)
 147,016 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) stimulates the fibrinolysis of blood clots by converting plasminogen to plasmin. The efficacy of intravenous alteplase in the early treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction has been unequivocally proven, and recent results from the GUSTO trial indicate a significant advantage in 30-day survival for alteplase in an accelerated dosage regimen (< or = 100mg infused over 90 minutes rather than 3 hours) over streptokinase. The advantage of the accelerated alteplase dosage regimen seems to be maintained for at least 1 year. The role of heparin as adjunctive therapy to thrombolysis remains to be fully defined but heparin administration appears to be more important in conjunction with alteplase than with streptokinase. Ideally, patients should receive alteplase as soon as possible after the onset of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction and, while therapy is most beneficial when administered early, survival is improved when the drug is administered up to 12 hours after symptom onset. The accelerated regimen of alteplase used in the GUSTO trial demonstrated a survival advantage in patients < or = 75 as well as those > 75 years of age which was at least as great as that seen with streptokinase. Similarly, alteplase reduces mortality in patients with both anterior and inferior infarctions; however, those with anterior wall infarctions show an improved outcome over those with inferior infarcts. On the basis of pharmacoeconomic analysis of GUSTO data, the accelerated alteplase regimen cost an estimated additional $US32,678 per year of life saved compared with a conventional streptokinase regimen. Cumulative 1-year costs were greater in patients who received the accelerated alteplase regimen but survival was significantly greater than in patients who received streptokinase. No difference in quality of life was evident in patients who received either treatment. The incidence of major haemorrhage associated with alteplase therapy appears to be similar to that seen with other fibrinolytic agents, increasing with increasing dose; however, the risk of stroke, particularly haemorrhagic stroke, is higher with alteplase than with streptokinase. Thus, alteplase has become firmly established as a first-line option in the management of acute myocardial infarction. On the basis of accumulated evidence, the greatest risk reduction with alteplase therapy may be in certain high risk groups, such as those with anterior infarcts, selected elderly patients and those who present late after symptom onset.
 ...
PMID:Alteplase. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in acute myocardial infarction. 758 83

Streptokinase and alteplase are established therapies in acute myocardial infarction. Reteplase is a new thrombolytic agent that can be given as a double bolus. This trial was designed to determine whether the effect of reteplase on survival was at least equivalent (within 1% of fatality rate) to that of a standard streptokinase regimen. Patients from 208 centres in nine countries (n = 6010) with symptoms and electrocardiographic criteria consistent with acute myocardial infarction were randomised to receive double-blind either streptokinase 1.5 MU intravenously over 60 min or reteplase two boluses of 10 MU given 30 min apart. Treatment could be started up to 12 h from onset of symptoms. All patients received intravenous heparin for at least 24 h. The primary endpoint was 35-day outcome. There were 270 deaths (9.02%) in the reteplase and 285 deaths (9.53%) in the streptokinase group, a non-significant difference (95% CI -1.98% to 0.96%). Among patients who received treatment (98.8%) there were 263 deaths (8.90%) in the reteplase compared with 279 deaths (9.43%) in the streptokinase group (a difference of -0.53%). Because the upper limit of the 90% CI for this difference is 0.71%, this result shows that reteplase is at least as effective as streptokinase. In-hospital stroke rates were 1.23% for reteplase and 1.00% for streptokinase. Bleeding events were similar in the two treatment groups (0.7% reteplase, 1.0% streptokinase). The incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction was similar, but there were significantly fewer cases of atrial fibrillation, asystole, cardiac shock, heart failure, and hypotension in the reteplase group. We conclude that reteplase is an effective drug in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. It is clinically safe, its administration is simple, and it will be a useful addition to the range of thrombolytic agents available.
 ...
PMID:Randomised, double-blind comparison of reteplase double-bolus administration with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (INJECT): trial to investigate equivalence. International Joint Efficacy Comparison of Thrombolytics. 1111 34

Alteplase is the product of recombinant DNA technology and is chemically identical to endogenous tissue-type plasminogen activator: Plasminogen is converted to plasmin by alteplase, and fibrinolysis of blood thrombi is subsequently stimulated. Alteplase is now firmly established as a treatment of choice in the management of acute myocardial infarction. The efficacy of intravenous alteplase in the treatment of pulmonary thromboembolism has also been established and appears to be similar to that of streptokinase and urokinase in this indication and in arterial thrombotic occlusion. However, its use in this latter indication and in other vascular disorders has not been as extensively documented. Although trials demonstrating the efficacy of intravenous alteplase in patients with deep vein thrombosis and intra-arterial alteplase in patients with arterial thrombotic occlusion exist, reliable data on the efficacy of the fibrinolytic in ischaemic stroke and intracranial haemorrhage are scarce. Little clinical benefit is apparent in patients with unstable angina, although careful use may be warranted in those with definite pretreatment coronary thrombi. Of concern, there is a suggestion that general use of alteplase in patients with unstable angina may be associated with increased incidence of myocardial infarction. The incidence of major haemorrhage associated with alteplase therapy increases with increasing dose and appears to be similar to that seen with other fibrinolytic agents. Thus, further well-designed studies of the use of alteplase in ischaemic stroke and cerebral haemorrhage are required. However, a small subset of patients with unstable angina and definite pretreatment coronary thrombi may benefit from alteplase therapy. Further, preliminary data suggest efficacy in the therapy of deep vein thrombosis and arterial thrombotic occlusion, and alteplase has a proven place in the fibrinolytic treatment of pulmonary thromboembolism.
 ...
PMID:Alteplase. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in vascular disorders other than acute myocardial infarction. 852 60

Reteplase (BM 06.022; r-PA) is a recombinant peptide which consists of the kringle 2 and protease domains of human tissue-type plasminogen activator. It has been developed as a thrombolytic treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The half-life of reteplase allows administration as a double-bolus injection (second injection given 30 minutes after the first) rather than by the prolonged and, in some cases, more complex intravenous infusion regimens that are required for most other thrombolytic agents. Reteplase produced rapid and effective coronary artery thrombolysis in a number of dose-finding and comparative studies. Double-bolus administration of reteplase 10U + 10U produced significantly higher coronary artery patency rates than accelerated alteplase (100mg as a 1.5-hour infusion) in patients with AMI in the RAPID-II study. The 10U + 10U reteplase regimen produced a 35-day survival rate at least equivalent to that seen with a 1-hour infusion of streptokinase 1.5 million units in 5986 patients in the INJECT study, which was designed to demonstrate equivalence between treatments. As with other thrombolytics, bleeding was the most common adverse event seen in reteplase recipients. No significant differences in the overall risk of haemorrhage were observed between reteplase and either accelerated alteplase or standard streptokinase treatment in clinical trials. The risk of stroke in reteplase recipients appears to be similar to that for other thrombolytic agents [1.2% incidence in 3288 patients treated with reteplase 10U + 10U in clinical trials (0.76% for haemorrhagic stroke)], although accurate statistical assessment of the relative risk is not possible for the data available to date. Thus, reteplase is an effective thrombolytic agent which can be administered as a double-bolus injection regimen rather than as a prolonged infusion. Together with acquisition cost and general pharmacoeconomic data (which are not yet available), the results of GUSTO-III (a trial comparing double-bolus reteplase with accelerated alteplase in 15 000 patients) will have a major influence on the pattern of use of reteplase. In the meantime, data from the available clinical trials suggest that reteplase is a fast-acting and effective thrombolytic treatment for patients with AMI.
 ...
PMID:Reteplase. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of acute myocardial infarction. 889 69

Thrombolytic therapy has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity after acute myocardial infarction. Therapeutic benefit seems to be directly correlated with completeness of reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 3 flow) of the infarct-related coronary artery, as well as the timeliness of reperfusion. To determine which regimen of reteplase (r-PA), a deletion mutant of wild-type tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), is most effective for clinical thrombolysis, several reteplase regimens were compared with the most successful standard regimens of recombinant t-PA (alteplase) in 2 large-scale, randomized studies. All patients received aspirin and intravenous heparin. In the Reteplase Angiographic Phase II International Dose Finding Trial (RAPID-1), results in 606 randomized patients showed that a 10 + 10 U double bolus of reteplase was more effective than a 15 U single bolus, a 10 + 5 double bolus, or conventional alteplase (100 mg over 3 hours). In the Reteplase versus Alteplase Patency Investigation During Acute Myocardial Infarction (RAPID-2) trial, results in 324 patients showed that significantly more patients achieved patency of the infarct-related artery (TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow) at 90 minutes with reteplase (10 + 10 U double bolus) than with accelerated alteplase (100 mg over 90 minutes): 83.4% versus 73.3%, respectively (p = 0.03). The incidence of complete patency (TIMI grade 3 flow) at 90 minutes was likewise greater with reteplase than with accelerated alteplase (59.9% vs 45.2%, respectively; p = 0.01). At 60 minutes, the incidence of TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow was also significantly higher with reteplase than with alteplase (81.8% vs 66.1%, respectively; p = 0.01), as was the incidence of TIMI grade 3 flow (51.2% vs 37.4%, respectively; p < 0.031). The 35-day mortality rate was 4.1% for reteplase and 8.4% for alteplase (p = not significant). Reteplase and alteplase did not differ significantly with regard to the occurrence of severe bleeding (12.4% vs 9.7%, respectively) or hemorrhagic stroke (1.2% vs 1.9%, respectively). The results of these trials show that reteplase, given as a 10 + 10 U double bolus, achieves significantly higher rates of early reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery and is associated with significantly fewer acute coronary interventions when compared with front-loaded alteplase. The benefits of reteplase are achieved without any apparent increased risk of complications.
 ...
PMID:Patency trials with reteplase (r-PA): what do they tell us? 899 Apr 6

The method of administration of alteplase has evolved since its introduction to clinical practice in the late 1980s. The initial dosage regimen of a graded administration of 100 mg was replaced by the front-loaded weight adjusted regimen, the efficacy of which was demonstrated in the GUSTO 1 trial. Double bolus administration was shown to achieve superior TIMI 3 patency of the infarct related artery in a small angiographic study, but the COBALT trial failed to show equivalence and indeed showed a slightly higher mortality and incidence of stroke, so cannot be recommended. Reteplase, a deletion mutant of alteplase, also showed superior efficacy in achieving coronary patency but no clinical superiority in outcomes in the 15,000 patient GUSTO 3 trial. The case of administration of reteplase, however, has some attraction as an alternative to alteplase. Trials of newer agents based on further modifications of alteplase are ongoing, but at present the front-loaded alteplase regimen remains the standard for clinical practice.
 ...
PMID:Can we improve on front-loaded alteplase (r-TPA)? 977 30

Alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; rt-PA) is a thrombolytic agent that when given in an accelerated regimen with intravenous heparin has survival advantages compared with streptokinase in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, as shown by the results of the Global Utilisation of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) trial. Although alteplase is more fibrin-specific than streptokinase, alteplase therapy is associated with a small relative increase in the incidence of haemorrhagic stroke, but appears to cause a small relative decrease in the incidence of major bleeding. Because alteplase has a higher acquisition cost than alternative thrombolytic agents, analyses have been undertaken to assess whether administration of alteplase after myocardial infarction is a cost-effective use of healthcare resources. In retrospective analyses undertaken before completion of the GUSTO trial, it was generally assumed, on the basis of better 90-minute patency rates, that alteplase would provide survival advantages compared with streptokinase or conventional nonthrombolytic therapy. Alteplase had acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios compared with conventional therapy and streptokinase therapy from both third-party payer and hospital perspectives. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that alteplase was more cost effective when given early after symptom onset and when given to patients with large infarcts. Prospective evaluations of the cost effectiveness of alteplase in 3-hour and accelerated regimens have similarly demonstrated that alteplase therapy after myocardial infarction improves survival at an 'acceptable' cost. The largest prospective evaluation undertaken to date was performed in conjunction with the GUSTO trial. Primary analysis, on the basis of the clinical findings of the GUSTO trial and prospective collection of cost data from US patients, revealed that the cost-effectiveness ratio for accelerated alteplase therapy compared with streptokinase was $US32,687 (1993 dollars) per year of life saved (YLS). This value is most relevant for US patients and lies within the definition of 'cost effective' if $US50,000/YLS is the benchmark for acceptable use of resources. The cost-effectiveness ratio for alteplase was most sensitive to assumptions regarding long term survival and cost differences after the first year following treatment. In subgroup analyses, alteplase was a cost-effective treatment option for all elderly patients (> 60 years of age) and all patients > 40 years of age with anterior infarction. Alteplase therapy appears to have in-hospital costs/charges similar to those for primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), mainly because PTCA appears to have a favourable effect on duration of hospitalisation. Given the technical expertise and facilities required for PTCA, it is likely that thrombolytic therapy will remain the management option of choice in most centres. In conclusion, under the conditions of the GUSTO study, accelerated alteplase in combination with intravenous heparin confers survival advantages compared with streptokinase therapy. While decision-makers must choose how best to use their available healthcare resources, pharmacoeconomic evaluations have confirmed that, on the basis of accepted benchmark values, alteplase therapy is a cost-effective therapeutic option for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, especially in elderly patients with either anterior or inferior infarcts and nearly all patients with anterior myocardial infarction. Thus, on the basis of clinical and economic data, predominantly provided by the GUSTO trial, alteplase is a cost-effective first-line management option for acute myocardial infarction.
 ...
PMID:Alteplase: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the management of myocardial infarction. 1017 69

Two trials of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction are contrasted and compared using a systematic approach developed for the interpretation of studies where equivalence is claimed. Reteplase has been compared with streptokinase in a true equivalence trial (International Joint Efficacy Comparison of Thrombolytics [INJECT] trial) and with tissue plasminogen activator in a failed superiority trial (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries [GUSTO] III). Important methodological distinctions and economic insights are highlighted. Using this approach one can conclude that the INJECT investigators have shown that reteplase is at least as effective as streptokinase and that the test for equivalence was satisfied. The point estimate of the treatment effect for the primary outcome event favours reteplase over streptokinase, and the confidence intervals essentially eliminate the possibility of streptokinase superiority. The GUSTO III primary outcome event, 30-day mortality, provides no convincing evidence that reteplase is equivalent to tissue plasminogen activator. Selective emphasis on one or two post hoc outcome event clusters, such as death and nonfatal stroke, or death and disabling stroke, provides some suggestive, but not conclusive, evidence for equivalence. Moreover, for some of the outcome events, and in particular the primary outcome event, the point estimate suggests that reteplase is, in fact, slightly less effective than tissue plasminogen activator.
 ...
PMID:Evidence-based medicine and reteplase: inductive arguments over deductive reasoning. 1050 81

Clinical trials in the 1990s of intravenous thrombolysis for ischaemic stroke have involved over 3000 patients. Alteplase given within 3 hours of onset significantly reduces the combined end-point of death and disability. Although alteplase appears safe when given up to 6 hours after onset, individual trials have failed to confirm efficacy beyond 3 hours. Meta-analysis indicates that intravenous alteplase given up to 6 hours after stroke onset significantly reduces death or dependence 3 months after stroke. Two trials of intra-arterial pro-urokinase confirm benefits of treatment up to 6 hours in highly selected patients with angiographically confirmed proximal middle cerebral occlusion. Streptokinase increased the risk of early death significantly in 3 trials, with no overall reduction in eventual death and disability. Patients over 80 years have been excluded from most trials of alteplase, and experience in this age group is minimal. Increased incidence and poorer functional outcome in the elderly mean that thrombolysis may have greater absolute benefit in this group than in the young, but there is also a higher prevalence of absolute or relative potential contraindications to treatment (ranging from increased use of anticoagulant drugs to higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation). Further trials are necessary to address age restrictions and other important issues in the use of alteplase. Thrombolysis is likely to remain feasible for a minority of stroke patients of all ages, and there is a need for other acute treatment options.
 ...
PMID:Thrombolytic therapy for stroke: a review with particular reference to elderly patients. 1073 63

Alteplase for acute ischemic stroke may be the first stroke intervention to have a significant public health impact. In February 1999, this therapy was conditionally licensed in Canada for acute ischemic stroke within three hours of symptom onset. However, considerable controversy exists regarding its safety, its wider applicability outside clinical trials, and its ultimate availability. In this article we review the thrombolytic literature, attempt to answer many of the concerns, provide new guidelines for its use, and cite the need for more information about whom we should and should not be treating with this therapy.
 ...
PMID:Doubts, fears and misconceptions. What is the future of thrombolysis in acute stroke? 1109 16


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>