Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0038379 (
strabismus
)
9,317
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The antiemetic effects and side-effects of P6 acupuncture and droperidol pre-treatment were evaluated in a randomized, patient- and observer-blinded study. Ninety unpremedicated children of
ASA
physical status I or II undergoing outpatient
strabismus
repair, and aged over one year, were studied. All patients received intravenous thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1, atropine 0.02 mg.kg-1 and succinylcholine 1.5 mg.kg-1, and the trachea was intubated. Patients then received either intravenous droperidol 0.075 mg.kg-1, droperidol plus five minutes' P6 acupuncture, or acupuncture alone. Anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide 66% and halothane 1.5-2.0% in oxygen with spontaneous ventilation. There was no difference in the incidence of vomiting in the droperidol group (17% before discharge from hospital and 41% up to 48 hours after discharge), combined treatment group (17% and 34% respectively) and acupuncture group (27% and 45% respectively). Corresponding figures for the incidence of vomiting before discharge were 17%, 17% and 27% respectively; these values were also not different. The incidence of restlessness was significantly greater in children receiving droperidol (63%) or both treatments (67%) than in those receiving acupuncture alone (30%; P = 0.007). P6 acupuncture and droperidol are equally ineffective in preventing vomiting within 48 hours of paediatric
strabismus
repair. Droperidol is associated with increased incidence of postoperative restlessness.
...
PMID:Ineffectiveness of acupuncture and droperidol in preventing vomiting following strabismus repair in children. 154 95
Forty-four children,
ASA
physical status I or II, aged 1.5-14 years and admitted for
strabismus
surgery, were studied. The study compared the postoperative condition after two different anesthesia methods. All children were premedicated with midazolam rectally, received glycopyrrolate i.v. and were then randomised to one of two anesthetic methods: 1) induction with thiopental, maintenance with halothane or 2) induction with propofol supplemented with fentanyl, maintenance with propofol infusion. In both groups, tracheal intubation was performed after vecuronium i.v. and the children were ventilated manually. Peroperatively, patients receiving propofol/fentanyl had more episodes of bradycardia (P less than 0.001). Times to spontaneous breathing and extubation were shorter in the propofol/fentanyl group (P less than 0.05) and there was also a lesser degree of sedation during the first 2 h postoperatively (P less than 0.01). Fewer children in the propofol/fentanyl group vomited postoperatively (P less than 0.05). The apprehension score was higher in the propofol/fentanyl group compared to the thiopental/halothane group (P less than 0.05). We conclude that children undergoing
strabismus
surgery anesthetized with propofol/fentanyl had more episodes of peroperative bradycardia, a lower incidence of postoperative vomiting and a shorter recovery time, and were more apprehensive during the initial postoperative period than children anesthetized with thiopental/halothane.
...
PMID:Propofol-fentanyl anesthesia compared to thiopental-halothane with special reference to recovery and vomiting after pediatric strabismus surgery. 154 40
Vomiting after
strabismus
surgery is a major problem that remains as yet unsolved, especially in children. Droperidol and metoclopramide, both known as powerful antiemetic drugs, were compared in this study. METHODS. One hundred
ASA
class I and II children ranging from 3 to 10 years of age were studied in a double-blind, randomised fashion. They were assigned to three groups: group D (n = 33) received 0.075 mg/kg droperidol, group M (n = 33) 0.15 mg/kg metoclopramide, and group N (n = 34) 0.1 ml/kg NaCl i.v. upon arrival in the post-anaesthesia recovery room (PARR). After oral premedication with 0.4 mg/kg midazolam, anaesthesia was induced via a face mask by inhalation of halothane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen. Barbiturates, atropine, and succinylcholine were not used; 0.05 mg/kg vecuronium was given to facilitate intubation. Gastric contents were aspirated by a gastric tube at the end of the operation. Vomiting and retching were recorded for 24 h; recovery from anaesthesia was assessed by a modified Steward score. RESULTS. The three groups were comparable regarding age, body weight, duration of anaesthesia, number of repaired eye muscles, and occurrence of the oculocardiac reflex (OCR). During the first 24 h postoperatively 21/33 (64%) patients of group D vomited, 24/33 (73%) of group M, and 33/34 (97%) of group N. The differences between groups D and N and between M and N were significant (P less than 0.01); comparison of groups D and M showed no statistical significance. Droperidol was more effective in reducing severe vomiting. Of the group N children, 47% vomited more than 6 times in 24 h compared to 18% of group M and 0% of group D. Age, sex, duration of anaesthesia, number of repaired eye muscles, and occurrence of the OCR had no influence on postoperative vomiting. Despite being administered at the end of the operation, droperidol did not prolong the patients' stay in the PARR. The post-anaesthetic scores for group D children were only slightly lower compared to groups M and N. CONCLUSIONS. Droperidol (0.075 mg/kg) and metoclopramide (0.15 mg/kg) both reduce postoperative vomiting after
strabismus
surgery. Droperidol seems to be more effective in reducing severe vomiting. Postoperative sedation after droperidol was not a major problem in our experience.
...
PMID:[Droperidol versus metoclopramide. Prevention of emesis following strabismus surgery in children]. 161 15
Vomiting is a common problem after
strabismus
surgery in pediatric outpatients. We compared the effects of propofol with and without N2O and droperidol to the effects of a conventional regimen consisting of halothane-N2O-droperidol on the recovery characteristics and the incidence of postoperative emesis after
strabismus
surgery in 120
ASA
physical status 1 or 2 children. After induction of anesthesia with halothane-N2O, patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Group A (control) received halothane, 66% N2O, and droperidol 75 micrograms.kg-1; group B, propofol 2 mg.kg-1 bolus followed by infusion of 160 microgram.kg-1.min-1; group C, propofol (as in group B) and 66% N2O; and group D, propofol (as in group B), 66% N2O (as in group C), and droperidol 75 micrograms.kg-1. Patients in group B had more episodes of intraoperative oculocardiac reflex responses than patients in group A, but had shorter times to extubation, oral intake, ambulation, and discharge, as well as a lower incidence of postoperative emesis (P less than 0.05). The addition of N2O to the propofol anesthetic regimen (group C) was associated with an increased incidence of emesis (P less than 0.05), whereas the addition of droperidol to the propofol-N2O regimen (group D) did not affect the incidence of emesis compared to the other three groups. We conclude that maintenance of anesthesia with a total intravenous regimen using propofol results in a more rapid recovery and less postoperative emesis than with a halothane-N2O-droperidol regimen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Effect of propofol on the incidence of postoperative vomiting after strabismus surgery in pediatric outpatients. 185 8
This randomized, double-blind study evaluated the antiemetic efficacy and the side-effects of promethazine pretreatment (0.5 mg.kg-1 IV + 0.5 mg.kg-1 IM) versus droperidol + placebo pretreatment (droperidol, 0.075 mg.kg-1 IV + physiological saline, 0.02 ml.kg-1 IM). One hundred unpremedicated
ASA
physical status I children ranging from two to ten years, and undergoing outpatient
strabismus
surgery were studied. All children received inhalational anaesthesia with halothane, nitrous oxide and oxygen. Neither opioids nor muscle relaxants were used. The incidence of vomiting and/or retching and the incidence of side-effects were determined in the post-anaesthesia recovery room (PARR), in the short-stay surgical unit (SSSU), and after discharge from the hospital (including the journey and the stay at home during the first postoperative day). Promethazine and droperidol were equally effective in reducing the incidence of vomiting before discharge to two and eight per cent respectively. On the contrary, the incidence of vomiting after discharge and overall were significantly less with promethazine (ten and ten per cent) than with droperidol pretreatment (54 and 56 per cent) (P less than 0.0001). Promethazine permitted the time to discharge from the hospital to be reduced to an average of three hours, without increasing the incidence of vomiting postdischarge. Promethazine pretreatment is much less expensive than droperidol pretreatment. The incidence of restlessness was significantly less with droperidol (eight per cent) than with promethazine (36 per cent) (P less than 0.001). Promethazine pretreatment demands the use of an analgesic like acetaminophen in order to reduce the incidence of postoperative pain and restlessness.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Antiemetic prophylaxis with promethazine or droperidol in paediatric outpatient strabismus surgery. 198 40
The purpose of this study is an investigation of two protocols using propofol as induction and maintenance agent in 100 children scheduled for
strabismus
surgery (4-8 year,
ASA
I, NYHA I). Protocol I; Propofol 6 mg.kg-1 in 60 s with fentanyl 2 micrograms.kg-1 and vecuronium bromide 0.08 mg.kg-1 for induction, followed by propofol 11 mg.kg-1 for maintenance; Protocol II; Propofol 3 mg.kg-1 in 20 s with fentanyl 3 micrograms.kg-1 for induction, followed by propofol 12 mg.kg-1.h-1 for maintenance. It appears that the use of protocol I offers significant advantages compared with protocol II: a better quality of induction with a lesser incidence of pain during injection of propofol; a better quality of maintenance with very infrequent bradycardia from oculocardiac reflectivity; and a better recovery with a greatly reduced frequency of nausea and vomiting.
...
PMID:[Anesthesia using propofol during surgery of strabismus in children. A comparison of two different protocols of induction and maintenance]. 225 60
Sixty-one children,
ASA
physical status I, aged 2-14 years, admitted for
strabismus
surgery were studied. All were premedicated with diazepam and atropin rectally. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental or with halothane on a facemask, and succinylcholine was given to facilitate tracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with halothane and nitrous oxide. Each child was randomly assigned to receive either no antiemetic prophylaxis (control), droperidol 0.075 mg/kg, or dixyrazine 0.25 mg/kg. The drugs were injected intravenously at the end of surgery. The incidence of vomiting during the following 24 h was 65% in the control group, 48% in the droperidol group, and 25% in the dixyrazine group (P less than 0.05 as compared to the control group). Four hours after the operation, six children in the droperidol group and none in the dixyrazine group (P less than 0.05) were difficult to arouse. It is concluded that dixyrazine reduces the incidence of postoperative vomiting without causing heavy sedation.
...
PMID:Postoperative emesis after pediatric strabismus surgery: the effect of dixyrazine compared to droperidol. 234 22
This randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy of metoclopramide administered at the completion of surgery as an antiemetic agent in pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory
strabismus
surgery; 126 unpremedicated
ASA
Physical Status 1 and 2 children ranging in age from 2 to 18 yr served as subjects. All received general anesthesia with halothane, N2O, and O2; tracheal intubation was facilitated with intravenous (iv) atracurium 0.5 mg/kg. Intravenous atropine 0.02 mg/kg and lactated Ringer's solution with 5% dextrose equivalent to 4 h of maintenance fluids were administered during surgery. Neither opioids nor droperidol were given intraoperatively. At the completion of surgery, residual muscle paralysis was reversed with atropine 0.02 mg/kg (maximum dose 1.0 mg) and neostigmine 0.07 mg/kg (maximum dose 5.0 mg), and the stomach was decompressed prior to tracheal extubation. After the patient had been transferred to the postanesthesia recovery room (PARR) either metoclopramide 0.15 mg/kg or normal saline was administered intravenously to the children over a 1-min period. A research associate monitored the children for the incidence of post-operative vomiting and the time required for each child to meet discharge criteria from Short Stay Recovery Unit (SSRU). If a child vomited more than three times in both the PARR and SSRU, the vomiting was construed to be severe and the patient was offered further antiemetic treatment with iv droperidol 70 micrograms/kg. The incidence of postoperative vomiting in the metoclopramide group was 37% versus 59% in the placebo group (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Metoclopramide reduces the incidence of vomiting following strabismus surgery in children. 240 36
The authors sought to compare the antiemetic and sedative postanesthetic effects of droperidol versus lidocaine given intravenously. One hundred and fifty children,
ASA
physical status I or II, ages 2-15 yr, were studied. Each child was randomly assigned to receive either droperidol, 0.075 mg/kg; lidocaine, 1.5 mg/kg; or a combination of lidocaine, 1.5 mg/kg, and a reduced dose of droperidol, 0.025 mg/kg, immediately after induction of anesthesia, which was with thiopental, atropine, and succinylcholine. Anesthesia was maintained with halothane and nitrous oxide. The incidence of postanesthetic vomiting was 22% in the droperidol-alone group, which was significantly less than the lidocaine-alone group (50%). The incidence of vomiting in the combination group (30%) was not significantly different from either the droperidol- or lidocaine-alone groups. The time in the recovery room was significantly shorter for patients given lidocaine alone than those given droperidol alone or the combination. However, the mean time intervals from completion of surgery to recovery of full alertness and to discharge from the hospital did not differ significantly among the three groups. In summary, the authors found that intravenous droperidol is significantly more effective than lidocaine in reducing the incidence of vomiting in unpremedicated children after
strabismus
surgery. Furthermore, droperidol did not delay either the time to recovery of full alertness or the time to discharge from hospital compared to lidocaine.
...
PMID:Incidence of emesis and postanesthetic recovery after strabismus surgery in children: a comparison of droperidol and lidocaine. 264 94
In children, the use of a continuous infusion of propofol has not yet been reported. A study was therefore designed to compare the characteristics of anaesthesia and recovery when either propofol or enflurance was used as the main anaesthetic agent. All 42 children (14 girls, 28 boys),
ASA
I and scheduled for corrective
squint
surgery under general anaesthesia, received 350 micrograms.kg-1 midazolam and 40 micrograms.kg-1 atropine intrarectally 20 min before induction, which was carried out with 3 mg.kg-1 propofol intravenously in 20 s. The patients were then randomly assigned to two groups, according to the drug used for maintenance: group P (n = 21) received a continuous intravenous infusion of propofol, 18 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the first 30 min and 15 mg.kg-1.h-1 thereafter; group E (n = 21) received 2.5%, then, after 30 min, 2% enflurane. Both groups were given 15 micrograms.kg-1 dextromoramide and 0.09 mg.kg-1 vecuronium. During anaesthesia, the following parameters were monitored: systolic (Pasys), diastolic (Padia) and mean arterial (Pa) pressures, heart rate (fc), the presence or not of an oculocardiac reflex with or without a 20% fall in fc which responded to 10-15 micrograms.kg-1 atropine, the appearance of a cardiac dysrhythmia, duration of anaesthesia and the delay before extubation. Recovery was assessed 1, 2, 4 and 6 h postoperatively by using both clinical and psychomotor criteria, the latter being adapted to children having one or both eyes occluded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:[Continuous propofol infusion versus enflurane in children operated on for strabismus. Comparison of the quality of anesthesia and recovery conditions]. 278 55
1
2
3
4
Next >>