Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0038362 (stomatitis)
 8,852 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

One sorting mechanism of apical and basolateral proteins in epithelial cells is based on their solubility profiles with Triton X-100. Nevertheless, apical proteins themselves are also segregated beyond the trans-Golgi network by virtue of their association or nonassociation with cholesterol/sphingolipid-rich microdomains (Jacob, R., and Naim, H. Y. (2001) Curr. Biol. 11, 1444-1450). Therefore, extractability with Triton X-100 does not constitute an absolute criterion of protein sorting. Here, we investigate the solubility patterns of apical and basolateral proteins with other detergents and demonstrate that the mild detergent Tween 20 is adequate to discriminate between apical and basolateral proteins during early stages in their biosynthesis. Although the mannose-rich forms of the apical proteins sucrase-isomaltase, lactase-phlorizin hydrolase, aminopeptidase N, and dipeptidylpeptidase IV reveal similar solubility profiles comprising soluble and nonsoluble fractions, the basolateral proteins, vesicular stomatitis virus G protein, major histocompatibility complex class I, and CD46 are entirely soluble with this detergent. The insoluble Tween 20 membranes are enriched in phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylglycerol compatible with their synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum and the existence of a novel class of detergent-resistant membranes. The association of the mannose-rich biosynthetic forms of the apical proteins, sucraseisomaltase, lactase-phlorizin hydrolase, aminopeptidase N, and dipeptidylpeptidase IV with the Tween 20-resistant membranes suggests an early polarized sorting mechanism prior to maturation in the Golgi apparatus.
 ...
PMID:A novel type of detergent-resistant membranes may contribute to an early protein sorting event in epithelial cells. 1623 Mar 59

Bats (Chiroptera) host major human pathogenic viruses including corona-, paramyxo, rhabdo- and filoviruses. We analyzed six different cell lines from either Yinpterochiroptera (including African flying foxes and a rhinolophid bat) or Yangochiroptera (genera Carollia and Tadarida) for susceptibility to infection by different enveloped RNA viruses. None of the cells were sensitive to infection by transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), a porcine coronavirus, or to infection mediated by the Spike (S) protein of SARS-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) incorporated into pseudotypes based on vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). The resistance to infection was overcome if cells were transfected to express the respective cellular receptor, porcine aminopeptidase N for TGEV or angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 for SARS-CoV. VSV pseudotypes containing the S proteins of two bat SARS-related CoV (Bg08 and Rp3) were unable to infect any of the six tested bat cell lines. By contrast, viral pseudotypes containing the surface protein GP of Marburg virus from the family Filoviridae infected all six cell lines though at different efficiency. Notably, all cells were sensitive to infection by two paramyxoviruses (Sendai virus and bovine respiratory syncytial virus) and three influenza viruses from different subtypes. These results indicate that bat cells are more resistant to infection by coronaviruses than to infection by paramyxoviruses, filoviruses and influenza viruses. Furthermore, these results show a receptor-dependent restriction of the infection of bat cells by CoV. The implications for the isolation of coronaviruses from bats are discussed.
...
PMID:Differential sensitivity of bat cells to infection by enveloped RNA viruses: coronaviruses, paramyxoviruses, filoviruses, and influenza viruses. 2402 59