Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0038362 (stomatitis)
 8,852 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) held a consensus conference which recommended 5-FU and levamisole as adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer MAC (Modified Astler Coller) stage C. From 1991-1994, 37 such patients diagnosed here were treated with 5-FU (intravenous dose of 450/mg/m2/d for 5 days and from day 29, once a week for 48 weeks) and oral levamisole (50 mg 3 times/d. for 3 days, every 2 weeks for a year), as suggested by NIH guidelines. 16 patients were males and 21 were females, mean age was 62 years and median 64. Cancer locations were: right colon (in 16, 43%), left colon (19, 51%), multiple colon primaries (2, 1%). 25 (68%) had 1-3 positive lymph nodes and 12 (32%) had 4 or more positive lymph nodes. Only 20 (54%) finished treatment as prescribed. In the others, 1 or both drugs caused side-effects for which the drugs had to be stopped. 6 patients relapsed while on treatment. The most common side-effects were diarrhea, stomatitis and bone marrow suppression. 3 were hospitalized due to neutropenic fever. 5-year actuarial survival of all patients was 61%; 5-year relapse-free survival was 61%; 5-year relapse-free survival of right versus left colon was 41% and 82%, respectively (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in 5-year survival of those with 1-3 positive lymph nodes as compared to those with 4 or more (62% and 56%, respectively). 5-year survival in those who finished or did not finish treatment (excluding those who stopped treatment because of progressive disease) was 83% and 70%, respectively (NS). The 5-year survival of our series was similar to that of patients treated similarly elsewhere. The 5-FU and levamisole treatment was not tolerated well by our study population. It has recently been replaced in our service by a 5-FU and leucovorin regimen given for 6 months.
 ...
PMID:[Adjuvant therapy of colon cancer stage C MAC. Adverse effects and efficacy in the Department of Oncology, Soroka Medical Center in the years 1991-1994]. 1095 48

Effects of variations in agent, dose, and route of treatment administration on patient reported quality of life (QOL) were examined for 279 patients enrolled on a seven-arm randomized clinical trial (S8905) of 5-FU and its modulation for advanced colorectal cancer. Patients completed QOL questionnaires at randomization and weeks 6, 11, and 21 post-randomization with five QOL endpoints considered primary: three treatment-specific symptoms (stomatitis, diarrhea, and hand/foot sensitivity); physical functioning; and emotional functioning. Patient compliance with the QOL assessment schedule was good, supporting the feasibility of including QOL measures in cooperative group trials. However, death and deteriorating health produced substantial missing data. Cross-sectional analyses indicated that the seven therapeutic arms did not differ in their impact on QOL. Unfortunately, longitudinal analyses of the QOL data were inappropriate given non-random missing data. Graphical presentation of non-random missing data identified the seriousness of this problem and its effect on potential conclusions about QOL during treatment. This problem appears to be particularly challenging in the context of advanced-stage disease. Failure to recognize the presence of non-random missing data can lead to serious overestimates of patient QOL over time.
 ...
PMID:Challenges posed by non-random missing quality of life data in an advanced-stage colorectal cancer clinical trial. 1096 Sep 31

The conventional concept in cancer chemotherapy considers that no efficacy can be attained without provoking adverse reactions. We presented concrete descriptions based on a novel concept allowing us to emerge from the old one. Relief of adverse reactions, e.g., diarrhea, stomatitis, anorexia, and H&F syndrome, not only improves QOL of the patient but also allows prolongation of the treatment period without lowering patient compliance. We describe in this paper a therapeutic modality which is based on SRC (self-rescuing concept) featuring dual activity, i.e., effect-enhancing activity and adverse reaction-reducing activity. We present the theory and practice of S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer agent designed to enhance anticancer activity and reduce gastrointestinal toxicity through the deliberate combination of the following components: an oral fluoropyrimidine agent tegafur; a DPD inhibitor (CDHP) which is more potent than uracil used in UFT; and an ORTC inhibitor (Oxo) which localizes in the gastrointestinal tract. Furthermore, we refer to combination therapy with 5-FU (CIV) and low-dose consecutive CDDP in which CDDP was used as a modulator of 5-FU and to the theory and practice of combination therapy with 5-FU (CVI) intermittent (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) administration and low-dose CDDP consecutive administration in which a difference in cell cycle between gastrointestinal mucosal cell and tumor cell or between bone marrow cell and tumor cell was utilized. We intend in future to combine the abovementioned therapeutic modalities provoking less adverse reactions and being gentle to patients with cancer in an effort to further increase their life expectancy.
 ...
PMID:Conceptual changes in cancer chemotherapy: from an oral fluoropyrimidine prodrug, UFT, to a novel oral fluoropyrimidine prodrug, S-1, and low-dose FP therapy in Japan. 1108 68

Combination chemotherapy with 5-FU, LV, ETP and CDDP (FLEP) for advanced gastric cancer uses a combination of regional and systemic delivery for the control of both local and disseminated disease in the intra- and extra-abdominal regions. We performed this regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Fifteen patients with unresectable primary advanced gastric cancer underwent FLEP. The treatment regimen was 5-FU at 370 mg/m2, LV at 30 mg/body (days 1 to 5, i.v. 24 h) and ETP and CDDP each at 70 mg/m2 (days 7 and 21, ia 2 h). This regimen was repeated every four weeks. The overall response rate was 46.7% (7/15), and the 50% and median survival times were 11.43 and 12.35 months, respectively. The adverse events were Grade 3 leukocytopenia, Grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and Grade 3 stomatitis in 20.0%, 13.3%, and 6.7% of the patients, respectively. The 50% and median survival time overall were 11.43 and 12.35 months, respectively. Of the 15 NAC patients, curability B patients showed a statistically higher survival rate than curability C and unresected patients. In conclusion, FLEP was effective for unresectable advanced gastric cancer.
 ...
PMID:[Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer using FLEP therapy]. 1108 18

In this study, we analyzed the effectiveness of anti-cancer chemotherapy at the outpatient clinic. We administered CDDP 5 mg/day every 5 days for a week with continuous systemic chemotherapy by 5-FU 500 mg/day for 3 weeks in the hospital, and in the outpatient clinic CDDP 5 mg/day every two days for a week with UFT 300 mg/day orally every day to 145 patients with unresectable recurrence of colorectal cancer. The 50% survival duration after beginning of this chemotherapy was 310.0 days. One-year and 2-year survival rates were 44.4% and 11.7%. One hundred and nine cases were evaluated. The total response rate was 19.3%, and the highest response rate was seen in metastatic lymph nodes (37.5%). The mean duration of continuation of this chemotherapy and the mean duration of staying at home was 188.2 days and 237.8 days. The mean rate of home stays was 68.6%. The group of performance status (PS) 0 or improving PS, accounted for 74.5% of all cases. The occurrence rate of adverse effects was as follows; stomatitis: 17.9%, diarrhea: 11.7% and bone marrow suppression: 13.1%. However, the occurrence rate for cases of grade 3 or 4 was only 1-4%. According to these results, this was an excellent chemotherapy to maintain the patient's QOL from the outpatient clinic.
 ...
PMID:[The prospects of the outpatient clinic or home anti-cancer chemotherapy for unresectable recurrence of colorectal cancer]. 1119 Mar 2

Despite the long clinical history of 5-FU in gastrointestinal cancer, the development of oral agents has been a productive endeavor, and oral fluoropyrimidine agents are likely to play an important role in the management of colorectal cancer. Results of recent trials in advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer have shown equivalence of response rates, time to disease progression, and median survival and reduced rates of neutropenia and stomatitis with oral capecitabine (Xeloda) or UFT/leucovorin compared with standard fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin regimens. Evaluation of these oral agents in adjuvant therapy, in combination chemotherapy, and in combination with radiation therapy is ongoing.
 ...
PMID:Role of oral chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. 1119 16

Standard therapy for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer consists of 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) administered intravenously (i.v.). Capecitabine (Xeloda), an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate which is preferentially activated by thymidine phosphorylase in tumour cells, mimics continuous 5-FU and is a recently developed alternative to i.v. 5-FU/LV. The choice of oral rather than intravenous treatment may affect medical resource use because the two regimens do not require the same intensity of medical intervention for drug administration, and have different toxicity profiles. Here we examine medical resource use in the first-line treatment of colorectal cancer patients with capecitabine compared with those receiving the Mayo Clinic regimen of 5-FU/LV. In a prospective, randomised phase III clinical trial, 602 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer recruited from 59 centres worldwide were randomised to treatment with either capecitabine or the Mayo regimen of 5-FU/LV. In addition to clinical efficacy and safety endpoints, data were collected on hospital visits required for drug administration, hospital admissions, and drugs and unscheduled consultations with physicians required for the treatment of adverse events. Capecitabine treatment in comparison to 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal carcinoma resulted in superior response rates (26.6% versus 17.9%, P=0.013) and improved safety including less stomatitis and myelosuppression. Capecitabine patients required substantially fewer hospital visits for drug administration than 5-FU/LV patients. Medical resource use analysis showed that patients treated with capecitabine spent fewer days in hospital for the management of treatment related adverse events than did patients treated with 5-FU/LV. In addition, capecitabine reduced the requirement for expensive drugs, in particular antimicrobials fluconazole and 5-HT3-antagonists to manage adverse events. As anticipated with an oral home-based therapy patients receiving capecitabine needed more frequent unscheduled home, day care, office and telephone consultations with physicians. In the light of clinical results from the phase III trial demonstrating increased efficacy in terms of response rate, equivalent time to progression (TTP) and survival (OS), and a superior safety profile, the results from this medical resource assessment indicate that capecitabine treatment of colorectal cancer patients results in a substantial resource use saving relative to the Mayo Clinic regimen of 5-FU/LV. This benefit is derived principally from the avoidance of hospital visits for i.v. drug administration, less expensive drug therapy for the treatment of toxic side-effects, and fewer treatment-related hospitalisations required during the course of therapy for adverse drug reactions in comparison to patients treated with 5-FU/LV.
 ...
PMID:Capecitabine (Xeloda) improves medical resource use compared with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in a phase III trial conducted in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. 1129 Apr 35

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of both oxaliplatin as a single agent and oxaliplatin in combination with dailyx5 bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (5-FU/FA, Mayo clinic regimen) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. 73 advanced CRC patients were randomised to receive either oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks (35 patients), or the same treatment combined with 5-FU 425 mg/m(2)/day and FA 20 mg/m(2)/dayx5 days every 4 weeks (38 patients). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients had documented inoperable disease and no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease. Based on the investigators' assessment of best response, objective response rate was 9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2-24%) in the oxaliplatin arm, and 45% (95% CI 27-64%) in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 months (95% CI 1.7-2.4 months) in the oxaliplatin arm and 3.9 months (95% CI 2.9-5 months) in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. Severe neutropenia was seen in 23% of patients in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm, and none in the oxaliplatin arm. There were two treatment-related deaths, both in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. In the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm, severe diarrhoea, vomiting and stomatitis were seen in 34, 14 and 14% of the patients, respectively. In conclusion, oxaliplatin at a dose of 85 mg/m(2) given every 2 weeks was well tolerated and has limited activity in metastatic CRC, while the combination of this treatment with the full-dose Mayo clinic regimen (5-FU bolus 425 mg/m(2)/day+FA 20 mg/m(2)/dayx5 days every 4 weeks), although active, was unfeasible due to a high level of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Alternative lower dosing or other regimens are to be explored to ascertain the value of bolus 5-FU/FA combined with oxaliplatin.
 ...
PMID:A randomised phase II study of oxaliplatin alone versus oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (Mayo Clinic regimen) in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. 1133 26

We describe in this paper a therapeutic modality which is based on a self-rescuing concept (SRC) featuring dual activity, i.e., effect-enhancing activity and adverse reaction-reducing activity. We present the theory and practice of S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer agent designed to enhance anticancer activity and reduce gastrointestinal toxicity through the deliberate combination of the following components: an oral fluoropyrimidine agent, tegafur (FT); a DPD inhibitor (CDHP: 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine) which is about 200-fold more potent than uracil used in UFT; and an ORTC inhibitor (Oxo: potassium oxonate) which is localized in the gastrointestinal tract. We devised a novel oral anticancer agent, S-1, as a combination drug with a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1 for FT, CDHP, and Oxo, respectively. To compare S-1, FT, and UFT in terms of their anticancer activity and adverse reactions, a colon cancer implantation model in rats was used for 4-week consecutive oral administration from the time when the postimplantation tumor weight become about 2 g. The tumor disappeared on day 16 at a given dose of S-1 (as 22.5 mg/kg FT), and the tumor did not reappear for at least three months. Antitumor activity was more marked with S-1 than FT and UFT. Adverse reaction, i.e., stomatitis, depilation, and weight loss, were less frequent in the S-1 group than in the other groups. A clinical pharmacology study examined blood concentrations of 5-FU after twice-a-day administration after meals of S-1 at a dose of 40 mg/m2. Blood concentrations of 5-FU were 60 to 200 ng/ml in all twelve patients examined. Late phase II clinical trials of S-1 were conducted in patients with advanced and recurrent stomach cancers, in the same regimen as for the clinical pharmacology study. It basically consisted in four cycles, each of which comprised 4-week, twice-a-day, consecutive oral administration with a 2-week withdrawal. The overall response rate was 44.6% (45/101). Median survival time (MST) was 224 days. S-1 was given manufacturing approval by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan after a priority review, with indications for advanced and recurrent stomach cancers. A late phase II clinical study of S-1 in patients with advanced/recurrent head and neck cancer was conducted in 59 eligible patients. Objective responses were 4 complete response (CR) and 13 partial response (PR), for a response rate of 28.8% (17/59). MST was 344 days. Grade 4 hemoglobin decrease was observed in one case; however, this returned to normal after the termination of drug administration and blood transfusion. Therefore, this event was confirmed to be reversible. A late phase II clinical trial of S-1 was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Sixty-three patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma were enrolled in this clinical trial. The overall response rate was 35.5% (22/62), and the MST was 378 days. The main adverse reactions were myelosuppression and GI toxicities. The incidence of neutropenia (Grade 3 or 4) was 13%, while the incidence of other adverse reactions was 10% or below. None of 53 outpatients required to be hospitalization due to adverse reactions. Late phase II clinical trials of S-1 are in progress for colorectal cancer, breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. To establish the standard therapeutic modality for cancers, including gastrointestinal cancers, in Japan, the conduction of clinical trials combining S-1 and other anticancer drugs holds promise for the future.
 ...
PMID:[New oral anticancer drug, TS-1 (S-1)--from bench to clinic]. 1143 58

Nedaplatin (cis-diammine-glycolato platinum: CDGP) is a platinum compound with a molecular weight of 303.18 that was recently developed in Japan. There have been reports of the antineoplastic effects of Nedaplatin on cancers in the cranio-cervical region, lung, esophagus, urinary bladder, testis, ovary, and uterus. In this study, we performed combined therapy of CDGP and fluorouracil (5-FU) for 8 patients with oral cancers, and evaluated the results to elucidate the clinical effect and adverse side effects. The subjects were 8 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (5 males and 3 females aged 33-65 years). The primary carcinoma regions were the tongue in 5 patients, oral floor in 2 patients, and mandibular gingiva in 1 patient. The T-classification was T2 in 6 patients and T4 in 2 patients, and the clinical staging was Stage II in 5 patients, Stage III in 1 patient and Stage IV in 2 patients. We first administered 700 mg/m2 5-FU per day from day 1 to day 5 (total dose 3,500 mg/m2), then 90 mg/m2 CDGP on day 5. The clinical effect was evaluated as a partial response in all cases, showing a 100% success rate. The histopathological findings of resected tumors were evaluated by Ohboshi and Shimozato's classification. One patient was Grade IIA, 5 patients Grade IIB, and 2 patients Grade III. The adverse side effects were slight myelotoxicity, gagging, nausea, alopecia, and stomatitis less than Grade II. Although the oral cancers in this study were extroverted superficial ulcerative cancers, and the number of patients was low at 8, this combined therapy is considered useful and worth evaluating in further accumulated cases.
 ...
PMID:[Evaluation of a combination chemotherapy with nedaplatin and 5-FU for oral cancers]. 1152 27


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10