Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0038362 (stomatitis)
 8,852 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Because etoposide is a cell-cycle phase-specific drug, its degree of cytotoxicity likely relies on duration of cell exposure to a specific concentration. We investigated the maximum tolerated duration of oral etoposide treatment at doses of 100, 75, and 50 mg/d in previously treated patients with biopsy-proven, advanced cancer. "Maximum tolerated" was defined as tumor progression or hematologic toxicity (World Health Organization [WHO] grade > or = 2). The maximum tolerated duration in 19 patients given 100 mg/d was > or = 21 days, since this was the predetermined cutoff point; 3 patients discontinued etoposide because of early tumor progression, and 6 others had developed leukopenia or thrombocytopenia (WHO grade > 2) by day 21. The maximum tolerated duration in 13 patients given 75 mg/d was a median of 11 weeks (range, 2 to 19); 6 patients developed tumor progression and 6 others leukopenia (WHO grade > or = 2) requiring discontinuation of treatment. Ten patients given 50 mg/d tolerated therapy for a median of 13 weeks (range, 3 to 26 weeks); treatment was halted in seven patients because of tumor progression, two because of leukopenia (WHO grade > or = 2), and one because of stomatitis. The data from this study and others suggest that above a certain minimal plasma level, etoposide induces concentration-dependent cumulative toxicity. What remains to be determined is the minimal plasma level per tumor type. It will also be interesting to see whether myelopoiesis, thrombocytopoiesis, and erythropoiesis have differential sensitivity to etoposide, since thrombocytopenia did not occur using daily etoposide doses of 50 and 75 mg, whereas at the same doses 10 of 23 patients required erythrocyte transfusion.
 ...
PMID:What is the optimal dose and duration of treatment with etoposide? I. Maximum tolerated duration of daily treatment with 50, 75, and 100 mg of oral etoposide. 148 50

The Mayo Clinic and the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) conducted a randomized clinical trial comparing five different combination chemotherapeutic regimens to single-agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), given by intravenous bolus technique (500 mg/m2 for 5 days) as a control, in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. This report summarizes the results of treatment in 208 patients who were randomized to 5-FU alone or 5-FU with leucovorin in either a high-dose (200 mg/m2) or a low-dose regimen (20 mg/m2) intravenously for 5 days. Both of the 5-FU with leucovorin regimens were associated with improved survival compared with single-agent 5-FU (P less than 0.03). The interval to tumor progression, measurable tumor response rates, and measures of quality of life (performance status, weight gain, and symptomatic relief) were also improved significantly with the addition of leucovorin. There was no therapeutic advantage associated with the use of high-dose compared with low-dose leucovorin. The dose-limiting toxicity of 5-FU/leucovorin was stomatitis. There was one treatment-related fatality (due to sepsis) among the 138 patient receiving 5-FU/leucovorin (0.7%). The most favorable regimen in this trial was 5-FU with low-dose leucovorin, based upon considerations of therapeutic effectiveness, toxicity, and cost. A national intergroup trial is being coordinated by the National Cancer Institute that will test the efficacy of low-dose leucovorin with 5-FU as one approach to adjuvant therapy after a curative surgical resection in selected patients with Dukes' Stage B2 or C colon cancer.
 ...
PMID:A phase III trial of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. A Mayo Clinic/North Central Cancer Treatment Group study. 246 76

Bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) is a radiosensitizer that can be incorporated into cellular DNA as a substitute for thymidine at the time of DNA synthesis. As the steady-state arterial concentration of BUdR given by means of intravenous infusion was recently presented, the possibility of revival of BUdR as a radiosensitizer administered by the intravenous route was suggested. Based on the experience of BAR therapy and phase-I studies by NIH and UCSF, 12 hours of BUdR at a dose of 800-1,000 mg/m2 for five days a week was given to 23 patients with primary and secondary malignant brain tumors during radiation therapy. Radiation therapy was planned at a weekly dose of 10 Gy for five to six weeks. Fifteen patients received 1,000 mg/m2 of BUdR; six of them tolerated more than three weeks of treatment. In eight patients given doses of 800 mg/m2, five patients tolerated more than three weeks. The most remarkable toxic effects were myelosuppression and stomatitis, which were major obstacles to maintaining the schedule. More than 50% reduction of tumor volume was obtained in five of 12 cases of evaluated gliomas (42%) and three of four cases of metastatic tumors (75%). The median time to tumor progression in seven patients with glioblastoma was 37 weeks.
 ...
PMID:Clinical trial of intravenous infusion of bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) for radiosensitization of malignant brain tumors. 304 98

One-hundred-twenty patients with advanced lung cancer were treated by the MACC (methotrexate, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), cyclophosphamide and CCNU) regimen. Ninety-eight patients were evaluated. Objective complete response occurred in one case for 27+ months. Partial response was observed in 20 patients lasting for a median of 4.7 months. The overall objective response rate was 21% and the median duration of response was 5.5 months. Stable disease was noted in 44 patients with a median time to progression of 4.7 months from the start of treatment. Tumor progression occurred in 33 cases. There was a significant prolongation of median actuarial survival of responders (11.2 months) vs. stable disease (6.2 months) or vs. non-responders (3.8 months, P less than 0.05). The median actuarial survival for the whole group was 7.3 months. Bone marrow toxicity including thrombocytopenia (less than 100,000 cells/mm3) occurred in 16 patients and leukopenia (less than 3000 cells/mm3) in 24 patients. Forty-seven patients had no hematologic toxicity. Other adverse reactions were nausea and vomiting (50%), stomatitis (16%), alopecia (5%), cardiotoxicity (1%) and fever during leukopenia (1%).
 ...
PMID:Four-drug combination chemotherapy in advanced lung cancer: methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and CCNU. 702 45

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximally tolerated dose of doxorubicin administered during two cycles of intensive chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin without stem cell support in patients with advanced cancer and to assess the cumulative cardiac toxicity of the regimen by noninvasive radionuclide imaging and by pre-and postchemotherapy endomyocardial biopsies. Thirty-eight patients (thirty-six with high risk or metastatic breast cancer) were treated in a dose-escalation trial using a fixed dose of i.v. cyclophosphamide (4.2 g/m2) administered over 2 h on day 5 and escalating doses of doxorubicin (50-175 mg/m2) given as a 96-h continuous i.v. infusion on days 1-4, using Filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) for hematological support beginning on day 6. All patients underwent pretreatment, and 28 patients underwent postchemotherapy endomyocardial biopsies. Twenty-nine of 38 patients received two cycles of treatment (median number of days between cycles, 44; range, 34-62). Twenty-one patients had received doxorubicin previously at cumulative dose levels </=150 mg/m2; all patients had pretreatment endomyocardial biopsy scores less than 1. One patient treated at the highest dose level of doxorubicin (175 mg/m2) developed symptoms of mild congestive heart failure following two cycles of chemotherapy. Pre- and posttreatment radionuclide ejection fractions were 65 and 45%, respectively; this patient had a posttreatment endomyocardial biopsy score of 1 (damage to <5% of myocytes). One additional patient at this dose level had an asymptomatic biopsy score of 1, with a decrease in ejection fraction from 62 to 43%; this recovered to 58% 5 months after completion of chemotherapy. Six additional patients treated at lower dose levels had abnormal posttreatment endomyocardial biopsies without abnormal posttreatment ejection fractions. Nine patients received only one cycle of chemotherapy: five patients due to decreased cardiac ejection fraction following cycle 1 (two of these patients had normal endomyocardial biopsies, and two patients had biopsy scores of 1); one patient secondary to tumor progression following cycle one; one patient due to persistently detectable Clostridium difficile toxin in the stool; one patient refused cycle two; and one patient died following cycle one of complications related to sepsis. A single patient experienced a grand mal seizure associated with orthostatic hypotension, which was considered the dose-limiting toxicity. The median duration (over two cycles) of granulocytopenia (absolute granulocyte count <500/microliter) at the maximally tolerated dose level of 150 mg/m2 was 8.5 days (range, 5-13 days), and the median duration of thrombocytopenia (platelets <20,000/microliter) was 2.5 days (range, 0-9 days). The median duration of hospitalization including chemotherapy administration was 23 days (range, 19-36 days). Other toxicities included stomatitis, fever, diarrhea, and emesis. One patient developed acute leukemia 54 months posttreatment. We conclude that two courses of high-dose cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor are feasible and safe with tolerable myocardial toxicity as evidenced by serial endomyocardial biopsies. The dose-limiting toxicity encountered was a grand mal seizure. The recommended Phase II dose is doxorubicin 150 mg/m2 administered as a 96-h infusion on days 1-4, with cyclophosphamide 4. 2 g/m2 on day 5 and G-CSF 5 microgram/kg/day started on day 6 and administered until the total WBC is above 10,000/microliter for three consecutive days.
 ...
PMID:High-dose infusional doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: a feasibility study of tandem high-dose chemotherapy cycles without stem cell support. 981 32

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with recombinant human interferon (IFN)-alpha 2a in 10 previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. 5-FU was administered as a continuous i.v. infusion, 750 mg/m2/day for 5 days during week 1. One s.c. injection of IFN-alpha 2a, 9 x 10(6) IU, was administered during week 2. Beginning with week 3, a continuous i.v. infusion of 5-FU 750 mg/m2/day for 5 days was administered in combination with IFN-alpha 2a, 9 x 10(6) IU s.c. three times per week. The combination of 5-FU and IFN-alpha 2a was continued every other week until either 3 months after complete remission or tumor progression. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. Granulocytopenia (two patients), leukopenia (one patient), thrombocytopenia (one patient), stomatitis (two patients), fatigue (one patient) and hand-foot syndrome (one patient) were the major (grade 3) toxic reactions encountered. Overall, one complete and six partial responses were noted. The results of the paired t-test showed no statistically significant differences between the means of the two treatments, 5-FU and 5-FU plus IFN-alpha 2a, with respect to the steady-state plasma concentration, area under the concentration-time curve, total body clearance, or steady-state volume of distribution of 5-FU, or the serum concentration of IFN. We conclude that 5-FU and IFN-alpha 2a do not interact pharmacokinetically at the doses and schedules in the regimen studied.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human interferon-alpha 2a combined with 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. 982 27

This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of a regimen of combined chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. An analysis was undertaken on 27 patients from January 1992 to May 1996. Patients had a median age of 70 years (range, 40-78) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0-2. Eighteen patients had locoregional disease (T2-T3, N0-N1, M0), and nine had metastatic disease. Chemotherapy consisted of four cycles of 5-fluorouracil 1 gm/m2/day as a continuous infusion over 110 hours, streptozotocin 300 mg/m2/day over 30 minutes on days 2-4, and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 over 2 hours on day 4 only, followed by a maintenance regimen of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin every 2 weeks. The radiotherapy was administered as a split course concurrently with chemotherapy to a total dose of 6000 cGy. Toxicity was frequent, but there were no treatment-related deaths. Grade III and IV toxicity was primarily limited to myelosuppression, stomatitis, and gastrointestinal side effects. Fifteen patients (56%) were able to complete either three or four cycles of chemoradiotherapy. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, response, and survival. Nine patients (33%) had an objective response (four complete response 5 partial response), two remained stable, and 16 (59%) had disease progression. Median survival for the entire group was 19 weeks (2-139), and the median survival for overall responders was 56 weeks (15-139). No patient with localized disease underwent subsequent surgical resection. The authors conclude that those patients who are able to tolerate the entire treatment regimen may achieve a useful prolongation of time to tumor progression.
 ...
PMID:Combined chemoradiotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer. 1036 44

A Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of the alkylating cytotoxic agent treosulfan was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities in patients with advanced malignancies rescued by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Twenty-two patients (15 ovarian and 7 other carcinomas/lymphomas) with a median age of 48 years were treated with 28 high-dose courses. Treosulfan was infused over 2 h at escalating doses from 20 to 56 g/m2, and pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed. At 56 g/m2, three of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities: diarrhea grade III/IV in three patients; mucositis/stomatitis grade III in one patient; toxic epidermal necrolysis in one patient; and grade III acidosis in one patient. Other low-grade side effects, including erythema, pain, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting, were recorded. Two patients died within 4 weeks after treatment because of rapid tumor progression and fungal infection, respectively. Plasma half-life, distribution volume, and renal elimination of treosulfan were independent of dose, whereas the increase in area under the curve was linear up to 56 g/m2 treosulfan. The maximum tolerated dose of high-dose treosulfan is 47 g/m2. A split-dose or continuous infusion regimen is recommended for future high-dose trials. In consideration of antineoplastic activity and limited organ toxicity, inclusion of high-dose treosulfan in combination protocols with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation seems worthwhile.
 ...
PMID:Clinical phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of high-dose chemotherapy with treosulfan and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with advanced malignancies. 1110 34

Capecitabine (Xeloda) is an oral prodrug that is enzymatically converted to fluorouracil (5-FU) within cancer cells. Data from two large phase III trials performed in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer showed that capecitabine yielded higher objective response rates and equivalent median time to tumor progression and overall survival rates as 5-FU/leucovorin. In these studies, capecitabine demonstrated lower rates of diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea, and severe neutropenia than bolus 5-FU/leucovorin, but a higher rate of hand-foot syndrome and hyperbilirubinemia. The natural extension of this work has been to evaluate substitution of capecitabine for 5-FU/leucovorin in combination chemotherapy trials with irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) or oxaliplatin (Eloxatin). This is especially important due to concerns regarding toxicities observed with regimens that combine bolus 5-FU/leucovorin with irinotecan or oxaliplatin. Phase I/II and phase II trials of capecitabine in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in patients with advanced disease indicate that the combinations are well tolerated and produce response rates that are in the range of those that would be expected with infusional 5-FU/leucovorin combined with irinotecan or oxaliplatin. Phase III trials have been initiated in the advanced disease and adjuvant settings and should help determine the efficacy, toxicity, and tolerability of the capecitabine/irinotecan or capecitabine/oxaliplatin combination in direct comparison to intravenous 5-FU/leucovorin and irinotecan or oxaliplatin.
 ...
PMID:Current status of capecitabine in the treatment of colorectal cancer. 1252 Jun 35

The purpose of this report is to summarize information on oxaliplatin, a drug recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information provided includes regulatory history, study design, efficacy and safety results, and pertinent literature references. A single, multicenter, randomized trial, enrolling 463 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma whose disease had recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of therapy with the combination of bolus 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan, was submitted. Study arms included infusional 5-FU/LV alone (arm A), oxaliplatin alone (arm B), and the combination of oxaliplatin and infusional 5-FU/LV(arm C). Oxaliplatin, at a dose of 85 mg/m2, was administered to patients in arms B and C intravenously over 2 hours in 250-500 ml of dextrose 5% in water (D5W) on day 1 only. A 200-mg/m2 dose of LV was administered simultaneously to arm C patients, in a separate bag using a Y-line, or alone to arm A patients, by i.v. infusion, over 2 hours. 5-FU was then administered to arms A and C patients, first as a bolus injection over 2-4 minutes at a dose of 400 mg/m2, then as a continuous infusion in 500 ml of D5W over 22 hours at a dose of 600 mg/m2. LV was repeated on day 2 of the cycle (arms A and C) followed by a 400-mg/m2 5-FU bolus and a 600-mg/m2 22-hour infusion. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. Response rate was the prespecified end point for accelerated approval. Time to progression (TTP) was a secondary end point. The prespecified primary comparison was between the 5-FU/LV regimen and the 5-FU/LV/ oxaliplatin combination regimen. The three arms were well balanced for patient prognostic factors. There were no complete responders. The partial response rates were 0%, 1%, and 9% for the 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV treatments, respectively (p = 0.0002, arm C versus arm A). The median times to radiographic tumor progression, based on available radiographs, were 2.7 months, 1.6 months, and 4.6 months, respectively (p < 0.0001, arm C versus arm A). Common adverse events associated with the combination treatment included peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and abdominal pain. Neutropenia was the major hematologic toxicity. Adverse events were similar in men and women and in patients <65 and > or =65 years of age, but older patients may have been more susceptible to dehydration, diarrhea, hypokalemia, and fatigue. Oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-FU/LV was approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum whose disease has recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of first-line therapy with the combination of bolus 5-FU/LV and irinotecan. Approval was based on response rate and on an interim analysis of TTP. No results are available, at this time, that demonstrate a clinical benefit, such as improvement in disease-related symptoms or survival.
 ...
PMID:FDA drug approval summaries: oxaliplatin. 1475 10


1 2 Next >>