Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0038362 (stomatitis)
8,852 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

An investigation was made of the use of EM therapy which began in 1986 or earlier in 31 cases with chronic lower respiratory tract infections. 1) Of the 20 cases in which EM (Erythromycin stearate) administration (600-1200 mg/day) was continued for 3 years or more and its usefulness could be evaluated, treatment with this agent was judged markedly effective in three, effective in 14, somewhat effective in two, and ineffective in one. This amounted to an effectiveness rate (effective or better) of 85%. 2) Improved QOL was observed in 15 of the 20 cases. 3) In the Pseudomonas infected cases, a discrepancy was seen between the effectiveness rate of 87.5% and the disappearance rate of the organism (12.5%), while in the Haemophilus cases no such discrepancy was found (75%). 4) EM administration was stopped in 11 cases because of side effects in two (stomatitis, gastrointestinal disorder) death in five, desire of the patient in three, and transfer to another hospital in one. The cause of death cases had no connection with administration of EM. 5) In the three patients who stopped EM on their own, the agent was again administered because of exacerbation of symptoms, although this readministration proved ineffective in two of the cases. The above results suggest that long term EM therapy is useful and that its continued administration is important.
...
PMID:[The long-term chemotherapy with erythromycin (EM) in chronic lower respiratory tract infections--third report: clinical study of cases administered EM over 3 years]. 140 88

The recent successes being achieved with combination chemotherapy regimens, such as FAMTX (fluorouracil [5-FU], doxorubicin, methotrexate), EAP (etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin), and ELF (etoposide, leucovorin, 5-FU), strongly indicate that gastric cancer is chemosensitive. With these regimens, objective remission rates of more than 50% were recorded, including approximately 10% complete remissions (CRs). Moreover, some of these CRs were histopathologically confirmed. The finding that locally advanced disease (LAD) and technically unresectable disease could be rendered resectable by preoperative chemotherapy (EAP) was important. Thirty-six patients with LAD had been treated in a phase II trial with preoperative EAP, inducing 24 (70%) overall remissions (two clinical CRs, six pathologic CRs, 16 partial remissions [PRs] in 35 evaluable patients. Twenty-one patients were disease-free after chemotherapy with or without second-look surgery. The median survival time was 18 months for all patients and 24 months for disease-free patients. At 30+ months, 21% of all patients are still living disease-free. The expected survival of patients with unresectable LAD is approximately 4 to 6 months without any treatment and 6 to 9 months with standard chemotherapy. Compared with the latter results, the preoperative use of effective regimens (eg, EAP) seems to improve prognosis of patients with LAD. Moreover, such a multimodal approach may increase the number of long-term survivors among patients with resectable gastric cancer, especially those whose stage indicates a high risk of relapse (stages IIIa or IIIb). However, partly because of the severe toxicities (myelosuppression, nausea/vomiting), a considerable number of patients cannot be treated with these new regimens for the following reasons: Two of three patients with gastrointestinal disease are older than 60 years. Nontumorous diseases of the cardiovascular system, kidney, and others are frequent in this age group and may complicate or even prevent treatment with aggressive regimens. Considering the predominantly palliative treatment intentions in far advanced (metastasized) gastric cancer, regimens with low toxicities and acceptable activity should be preferred. For these reasons, we developed and investigated the combination ELF in a phase II trial in elderly patients (greater than 65 years) and in patients with cardiac risks who could not be treated with anthracyclines. The overall response rate in 51 evaluable patients was 53% (27 of 51) including six clinical CRs (12%). The median remission duration was 9.5 months and the median survival time was 11 months. Tolerability was excellent. Only 16% and 4% of patients, respectively, experienced WHO grades 3 and 4 leukopenia. Nausea/vomiting and mucositis/stomatitis were mild.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
...
PMID:New developments in the treatment of gastric carcinoma. 230 69

Temsirolimus is a targeted therapy that inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a central regulator of tumor cell responses to growth stimuli. Temsirolimus has a broad anticancer activity profile that impacts tumor cell growth, proliferation, and survival through its specific inhibition of mTOR. In a randomized phase III trial that enrolled previously untreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and poor prognostic features, temsirolimus significantly prolonged overall survival compared with interferon-alpha, a standard therapy (p = 0.008). Because of the results, temsirolimus was approved by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment and is considered a first-line treatment for patients with advanced RCC with poor prognostic features. Temsirolimus is administered at a flat weekly IV dose of 25 mg given over 30-60 minutes. Gastrointestinal disorders (stomatitis, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting), rash, fatigue, edema, infections, and dyspnea, as well as hematologic and metabolic laboratory abnormalities occur in patients receiving temsirolimus. Metabolic side effects include hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypophosphatemia. Most adverse reactions associated with temsirolimus can be managed medically or addressed by supportive measures. Nurses can improve patient outcomes through early recognition of side effects and prompt interventions.
...
PMID:Temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor for treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. 1867 30