Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0038358 (gastric ulcer)
 5,179 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a two center open uncontrolled clinical trial, the efficacy of a single evening dose of 40 mg famotidine (Ulcusan) was studied in a total of 37 patients (20 with chronic duodenal ulcers, 9 with recurring and 8 with acute gastric ulcers). 35 patients completed the study. In all 35 cases, endoscopic examination confirmed that ulcers had healed. All but one gastric ulcer healed within 4 weeks (80%) or 8 weeks (94.3%) of therapy. The cumulative rate of recovery for gastric ulcers was 87.5% and for duodenal ulcers 100%. During the first 4 weeks of therapy, vanishing of symptoms occurred and additional intake of antacids diminished progressively. Day-time symptoms tended to disappear earlier than nocturnal symptoms during the course of treatment. No objective or subjective side-effects were reported. A temporary exanthema appeared in 1 case after 4 weeks of treatment but could not be identified as causally related to famotidine. In this study famotidine turned out to be very effective in ulcer healing and was free of side effects. Thus, this preparation may be recommended also for "low-dose long-term prophylaxis" of chronic peptic ulcers.
 ...
PMID:[Therapy of peptic ulcers with famotidine. Report of experiences with an open clinical study]. 147 86

Twenty-four patients with gastric ulcer and 18 with duodenal ulcer diagnosed by endoscopy were treated with ranitidine, 300 mg day-1, for 8 consecutive weeks, or until the ulcer was found endoscopically healed. Of the 24 with gastric ulcer, 50% were healed within 4 weeks, and 83% within 8 weeks. Of 18 cases with duodenal ulcer, 50% were healed within 2 weeks and 94% within 4 weeks. Therapeutic effect of ranitidine was statistically significant compared with placebo. Side effects due to ranitidine administration were few and consisted of a rash in one case and slight increase of transaminase in a few patients.
 ...
PMID:Ranitidine: a pilot study in Japan. 611 76

Eighty consecutive patients with endoscopically proven gastric ulcer were randomly assigned to treatment with sucralfate, 1 g four times daily, or cimetidine, 200 mg three times daily and 400 mg at night. The patients were endoscoped after four and eight weeks by an examiner who was unaware of the treatment in use. Of the 40 patients assigned to each treatment group, 2 in the sucralfate and 4 in the cimetidine group were withdrawn due to the finding of gastric cancer in the biopsies. Two patients in the sucralfate and 3 patients in the cimetidine group interrupted treatment. Complete ulcer healing was found after four weeks of treatment in 17 of the 36 patients (47%) in the sucralfate and in 16 of the 33 patients (48%) in the cimetidine group. The cumulative healing rate after 8 weeks of treatment was 80% in the sucralfate group and 73% in the cimetidine group. There were no serious side effects, but it was necessary to discontinue treatment with cimetidine in two subjects because of rash in one and dizziness in the other. The results suggest that sucralfate is an effective and safe drug for the treatment of gastric ulcer and that its efficacy is equivalent to that of cimetidine.
 ...
PMID:Sucralfate, and cimetidine for gastric ulcer. 635 21

Roxatidine (150 mg, 312 patients) was compared with ranitidine (300 mg, 308 patients) in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 6-week therapeutic study for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated, benign gastric ulcer disease. The study end points (verified by using endoscopy results) were fully healed ulcers at 4 or 6 weeks. The results of roxatidine therapy were comparable to those of ranitidine therapy: healing rates of 52% and 54% at week 4 and 77% and 76% at week 6 were recorded for roxatidine and ranitidine, respectively. The drugs produced comparable reductions in ulcer diameters and decreases in abdominal pain. Adverse events associated with both roxatidine (27%) and ranitidine (28%) were headache, diarrhea, and dizziness; rash was associated in 6 of 8 cases and in only 1 case with roxatidine. In this trial, roxatidine 150 mg once daily was as efficacious and safe as ranitidine 300 mg once daily for treatment of patients with uncomplicated, benign gastric ulcer disease.
 ...
PMID:A multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparison of roxatidine with ranitidine in the treatment of patients with uncomplicated benign gastric ulcer disease. The Multicenter Roxatidine Cooperative Study Group. 758 51

Pantoprazole is an irreversible proton pump inhibitor which, at the therapeutic dose of 40mg, effectively reduces gastric acid secretion. In controlled clinical trials, pantoprazole (40mg once daily) has proved superior to ranitidine (300mg once daily or 150mg twice daily) and equivalent to omeprazole (20mg once daily) in the short term (< or = 8 weeks) treatment of acute peptic ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. Gastric and duodenal ulcer healing proceeded significantly faster with pantoprazole than with ranitidine, and at similar rates with pantoprazole and omeprazole. The time course of gastric ulcer pain relief was similar with pantoprazole, ranitidine and omeprazole, whereas duodenal ulcer pain was alleviated more rapidly with pantoprazole than ranitidine. Pantoprazole (40mg once daily) showed superior efficacy to famotidine (40mg once daily) in ulcer healing and pain relief after 2 weeks in patients with duodenal ulcer in a large multicentre nonblinded study. In mild to moderate acute reflux oesophagitis, significantly greater healing was obtained with pantoprazole than with ranitidine and famotidine, whereas similar healing rates were seen with pantoprazole and omeprazole. Pantoprazole showed a significant advantage over ranitidine in relieving symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation. Reflux symptoms were similarly alleviated by pantoprazole and omeprazole. Preliminary results indicate that triple therapy with pantoprazole, clarithromycin and either metronidazole or tinidazole is effective in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated disease; however, these findings require confirmation in large well-controlled studies. Pantoprazole appears to be well tolerated during short term oral administration, with diarrhoea (1.5%), headache (1.3%), dizziness (0.7%), pruritus (0.5%) and skin rash (0.4%) representing the most frequent adverse events. The drug has lower affinity than omeprazole or lansoprazole for hepatic cytochrome P450 and shows no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions at therapeutic doses with a wide range of drug substrates for this isoenzyme system. In conclusion, pantoprazole is superior to ranitidine and as effective as omeprazole in the short term treatment of peptic ulcer and reflux oesophagitis, has shown efficacy when combined with antibacterial agents in H. pylori eradication, is apparently well tolerated and offers the potential advantage of minimal risk of drug interaction.
 ...
PMID:Pantoprazole. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders. 888 82

Rabeprazole is an inhibitor of the gastric proton pump. It causes dose-dependent inhibition of acid secretion and has a more rapid onset of action than omeprazole. Duodenal ulcers healed faster after treatment with rabeprazole 20 or 40 mg/day than placebo or ranitidine 150 mg 4 times daily and at a generally similar rate to omeprazole 20 mg/day in patients with duodenal ulcers; rabeprazole was similar or superior to these agents in relieving symptoms. Rabeprazole 20 and 40 mg/day healed gastric ulcers faster than placebo, and rabeprazole 20 mg/day healed ulcers at a similar healing rate, to omeprazole 20 mg/day in well controlled 6-week studies. Gastric ulcer symptom relief with rabeprazole was similar or superior to that provided by omeprazole or placebo. In 8-week studies in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), rabeprazole 10, 20 and 40 mg/day were more effective than placebo, rabeprazole 20 mg/day was more effective than ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, and rabeprazole 20 mg/day was similar in efficacy to omeprazole 20 mg/day. Symptom relief with rabeprazole in 8-week trials in patients with GERD was superior to that provided by placebo, and similar to ranitidine or omeprazole. Rabeprazole was similar to omeprazole and superior to placebo in both maintenance of healing and prevention of symptoms in patients with healed GERD in 1-year studies. One-week triple therapy with rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily plus 2 antibacterial agents achieved > or = 90% Helicobacter pylori eradication, but, as would be expected, a regimen of rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily plus 1 antibacterial agent was less successful. The drug was as effective as omeprazole and lansoprazole as part of triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. Rabeprazole successfully reduced acid output to target levels and prevented further pathological changes in 10 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Usual dosages of rabeprazole are 20 mg/day for 4 weeks to treat duodenal ulcers, 6 weeks for gastric ulcers and 8 weeks for GERD, although some patients with duodenal ulcer may respond to a 10 mg/day dosage. For long term maintenance of GERD healing, 10 or 20 mg daily doses are adequate. Patients with hypersecretory states may need individualised dosages starting at 60 mg/day. The drug was well tolerated in clinical trials, with headache, rash, infection, diarrhoea and flu syndrome as the most common adverse events. In conclusion, rabeprazole appears to be a well tolerated proton pump inhibitor with a rapid onset of action and a low potential for drug interactions. The drug may be used to achieve healing and the relief of symptoms of duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and GERD, maintain GERD healing, and can form part of effective regimens to eradicate H. pylori.
 ...
PMID:Rabeprazole: a review of its use in acid-related gastrointestinal disorders. 1055 40

The association between Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori) infection and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) has been reported by several groups. We investigated the prevalence of H. pylori infection and the effectiveness of its eradication in Japanese patients with ITP. H. pylori infection was found in 21 of 30 patients (70.0%) by (13)C urea breath test and presence of serum antibodies to H. pylori. H. pylori was eradicated in 18 of the 21 infected patients (85.7%) by administration of a proton pump inhibitor and two kinds of antibiotics. In only one patient was medication discontinued due to skin rash on the 4th day of treatment. Platelet recovery was obtained in ten patients (55.6%). In two patients with treatment failure, platelet recovery was obtained after successful re-eradication. In three patients without H. pylori infection, platelet counts did not significantly increase with the same treatment. On the other hand, eradication therapy did not affect platelet counts in patients with gastric ulcer. In conclusion, H. pylori eradication can be used for initial treatment with tolerable adverse effects in some ITP patients.
 ...
PMID:Platelet recovery after eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. 1257 61

Background: The safety and effectiveness of vonoprazan-based Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy in routine clinical practice, and patient characteristics that influence safety and effectiveness, have not been well investigated.Methods: H. pylori-positive patients with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, history of endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer, and gastritis were enrolled. Patients received vonoprazan 20 mg, amoxicillin (AMPC) 750 mg, and clarithromycin (CAM) 200-400 mg twice daily for 7 days for the first-line eradication. For the second-line eradication, vonoprazan, AMPC, and metronidazole (MTZ) 250 mg were administered. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and eradication rates were evaluated.Results: The incidences of ADRs with vonoprazan/AMPC/CAM and vonoprazan/AMPC/MTZ were 3.22% (16/497) and 1.89% (1/53), respectively. Commonly reported ADRs were diarrhea, nausea, dysgeusia, feces soft, and rash. The eradication rates of the first-line therapy and the second-line therapy were 91.24% (427/468) and 95.45% (42/44), respectively. No notable differences in ADRs and eradication rates were observed when stratified by patient demographic characteristics.Conclusion: No new safety concerns were observed, and the effectiveness of vonoprazan-based triple therapy was confirmed in routine clinical practice.Trial registration: This study is registered at the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center Clinical Trials Information (JapicCTI-153003).
 ...
PMID:The safety and effectiveness of vonoprazan-based Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy; a prospective post-marketing surveillance. 3164 20