Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0036690 (sepsis)
 59,461 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a randomized prospective study, two different regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis have been tested: four-day cefazolin prophylaxis (Kefzol 0.5 gr every 6 h) compared with two-day cefuroxime administration (Zinacef 1.5 gr every 12 h). A total of 569 patients in the two groups were studied in a 10 month period. Haematological, liver function, serum creatinine and urea measurement were made preoperatively and repeated daily for the first four days and after one week. At least five chest X-rays were taken during the hospitalisation. Body temperature was measured regularly every two hours in the ICU and a least twice a day thereafter. The wounds were examined daily and the patients were carefully observed for other infections. Bacteriological examinations of the tips of all inserted catheters and pacemaker wires were undertaken on removal in the first four months of the trial. Swabs of any tracheal or wound secretion or pus taken for bacteriological examinations as also blood cultures in any suspected septicaemia. Of the 569 patients three had to be withdrawn from the study. Of the assessable ones 285 received cefuroxime and 281 were given cefazolin. Seven patients (1.2%) died postoperatively. The total infection rate was 5.5%: 5.7% in the cefazolin group and 5.3% in the cefuroxime group. The overall wound infection rate was 1.8%: 2.5% in the cefazolin group and 1.1% in the cefuroxime group. Septicaemia occurred in 0.5% of the cases. Pneumonia occurred in 11 (1.9%) patients; 1.5% in the cefazolin and 2.5% in the cefuroxime group. Seven patients (1.2%) developed a urinary tract infection; 1.4% in the cefazolin group and 1.1% in the cefuroxime group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery. A prospective randomized trial comparing two day cefuroxime prophylaxis with four day cefazolin prophylaxis. 351 30

In a randomized, prospective study a 2-day course of cefuroxime prophylaxis (Zinacef, 1.5g every 12 h) was compared with 2-day ceftriaxone prophylaxis (Rocephin, 2g i.v. plus 1g i.v. after 24 h). To date 512 patients undergoing cardiac (n = 418) and major vascular surgery (n = 94) entered the study: 258 in the cefuroxime and 254 in the ceftriaxone group. The one-month lethality rate was 1.0%. The total infection rate was 4.7% (12 patients in the cefuroxime and 12 in the cefuroxime group. Septicaemia occurred in 1-4% (cefuroxime n = 4; ceftriaxone n = 3); pneumonia in 2% (5 vs 5 patients). One patient developed diarrhoea due to Clostridium difficile. Plasma concentrations of ceftriaxone were measured (HPLC method) over the first 24 h in 110 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Plasma concentrations 24 h post-injection were 25.4 +/- 12.7 micrograms/ml. Prophylaxis with either cefuroxime or ceftriaxone was highly effective. The mean plasma levels of ceftriaxone achieved are far in excess of the MICs for the microorganisms commonly associated with infection following cardiovascular surgery, with the exception of Bacteroides and Pseudomonas. A single dose of ceftriaxone should therefore provide adequate prophylaxis for most patients undergoing major cardiovascular surgery.
 ...
PMID:Cefuroxime versus ceftriaxone prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery. 391 87

In a randomized prospective study, two different regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis have been tested: 4-day cefazolin prophylaxis (Kefzol, 0.5 g every 6 h) compared with 2-day cefuroxime administration (Zinacef, 1.5 g every 12 h). A total of 569 patients in the two groups were studied over a 10 months' period. Hematological, liver-function, serum creatinine and urea measurements were performed preoperatively and repeated daily for the first four days and after one week. At least five chest X-rays were taken during the hospitalization. Body temperature was measured regularly every two hours in the ICU and at least twice daily thereafter. The wounds were examined daily and the patients were carefully observed for other infections. Bacteriological examinations of the tips of all inserted catheters and pacemaker wires were undertaken on removal in the first four months of the trial. Swabs of any tracheal or wound secretion or pus were taken for bacteriological examinations, and blood cultures were performed for any suspected septicemia. Of the 569 patients, 3 had to be withdrawn from the study. Of the assessable patients, 285 received cefuroxime and 281 were given cefazolin. Seven patients (1.2%) died intra- or postoperatively. The total infection rate was 5.5%; 5.7% in the cefazolin group and 5.3% in the cefuroxime group. The overall wound infection rate was 1.8%; 2.5% in the cefazolin group and 1.1% in the cefuroxime group. Septicemia occurred in 0.5%, pneumonia in 11 patients (1.9%); 1.5% in the cefazolin and 2.5% in the cefuroxime group. Seven patients (1.2%) developed a urinary tract infection; 1.4% on the cefazolin group and 1.1% in the cefuroxime group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[A prospective, randomized comparative study between cefazolin and cefuroxime as perioperative antibiotic prevention in cardiovascular surgery]. 636 32