Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0036690 (sepsis)
 59,461 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Restorative proctocolectomy is now established as the procedure of choice in many patients with ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis coli as well as in some patients with multiple colorectal tumors, ischemia, trauma, or congenital abnormalities. Some patients, however, may have had previous pelvic, abdominal, or perineal surgery, which might be considered a contraindication to restorative proctocolectomy. In a consecutive series of 73 private patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy under one surgeon, we have reviewed in detail 13 who had had previous "significant" abdominal, pelvic, or anal surgery. Eight patients had previously had surgery for fistula-in-ano or fissure-in-ano, two had had an anal sphincter repair, and three had undergone possibly compromising abdominal or pelvic surgery prior to restorative proctocolectomy. Twelve of the 13 made an uncomplicated recovery from restorative proctocolectomy, although one has since died from carcinomatosis. One patient died after closure of an ileostomy from a combination of enterocutaneous fistula, infection, bleeding, and a perforated duodenal ulcer. One patient developed sepsis, necessitating removal of the pouch, and is classified as a failure. Two of the remaining 11 have had minor long-term functional problems with nocturnal fecal incontinence, and one patient needs to catheterize the pouch to evacuate, but all three patients prefer a pouch to an ileostomy. Restorative proctocolectomy can be performed successfully even after previous pelvic, abdominal, or anal surgery with an acceptable complication rate when compared with pouch surgery in the uncompromised patient.
 ...
PMID:Restorative proctocolectomy in patients after previous intestinal or anal surgery. 161 57

Surgical intervention after vascular surgery usually occurs as a result of bleeding or thrombosis, whereas general surgical problems requiring operation after vascular surgery are unusual. The purpose of this study was to review the results of operations for general surgical problems done soon after major vascular surgery. From January 1985 to December 1989, 1,236 major vascular procedures were performed, and 15 patients developed significant postoperative general surgical problems including perforated duodenal ulcer (2), perforated diverticular disease (2), evisceration and dehiscence (2), liver infarct (1), gangrenous cholecystitis (2), clostridial myonecrosis (1), pseudomembranous colitis (1), and small bowel obstruction (4). The overall mortality was very high (47%), and the chance of dying was significantly higher (p less than 0.05) if the initial vascular procedure was an emergency (100% mortality). All the patients who died (n = 7) succumbed to sepsis. There was a long delay in diagnosis in all groups; however, the delay did not correlate with mortality. Although this is a study of a small group of patients with a very heterogenous group of complications, several observations can be made: (1) a general surgical problem after vascular surgery carries a very high mortality; (2) general surgical complications in postoperative vascular patients in whom the initial procedure was an emergency are very poorly tolerated and almost uniformly lethal; and (3) these elderly patients have multiple medical problems and seem unlikely to tolerate any septic insult.
 ...
PMID:General surgical problems requiring operation in postoperative vascular surgery patients. 192 85

Twenty-three surgeons at three McGill University hospitals were interviewed about their treatment of intra-abdominal sepsis. They described their use of antibiotics, operative practices and other treatment of generalized peritonitis and intra-abdominal abscesses. If more than 75% of respondents used a given method, its use was considered "uniform" unless substantial interhospital variation existed for that method. Treatment was variable in 18 situations. Only four of these involved systemic antibiotic use--drug regimens in appendicitis and intra-abdominal abscess, and duration of antibiotic therapy following appendicitis and perforated duodenal ulcer. The other 14 examples of variation were in operative management. In generalized peritonitis, they were: use of diagnostic paracentesis; abdominal lavage with saline alone versus saline plus antibiotic use; whether the peritoneum should ever be left open; the use or avoidance of drains; primary versus delayed wound closure in appendicitis, bowel perforation and trauma with gastrointestinal perforation and, finally, wound lavage with saline alone or with antibiotics. Treatment of intra-abdominal abscesses varied in regard to the diagnostic and therapeutic roles of percutaneous needle aspiration, the preferred route of drainage of a pelvic abscess, the use of an extra- or trans-serosal approach to a subphrenic abscess, local versus full abdominal exploration for a single abscess and the type of drain used. The authors conclude that operative management of intra-abdominal sepsis varies widely among surgeons. This fact invalidates many "controlled" trials of antibiotics and should focus attention less on drugs and more on surgical treatment.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of intra-abdominal sepsis. 672 70

We prospectively analyzed a homogeneous group of 65 patients with perforated duodenal ulcer whose medical condition (no perioperative shock, no associated disease, underwent laparotomy within 12 hours after perforation, and an APACHE II score below 11) would have little effect on the outcome of surgery to study the influence of the surgical procedure (suture closure, vagotomy, or gastrectomy) on the morbidity and mortality rate. Thirty-three patients (51%) underwent vagotomy, 25 (38%) simple suture closure, and seven (11%) gastrectomy. Five patients (8%) suffered postoperative complications, two (3%) required further operation, and one (1.5%) died of pulmonary sepsis. Statistical analyses revealed that "vagotomy" presented significantly better results than did "simple suture" and "gastrectomy" that had similar results. The type of surgery, however, was not a significant risk factor in predicting complications in this sample. This study points out the need to stratify the perforated duodenal ulcer patients for accurate investigations. It also shows that definitive operations (gastrectomy or vagotomy) do not increase surgical risk in this group of patients, and, considering the poorer results with simple suture closure compared to vagotomy, the latter is an attractive option because it also treats the underlying ulcer disease.
 ...
PMID:Risk of complication in perforated duodenal ulcer operations according to the surgical technique employed. 848 1

Laparoscopic closure of an acutely perforated duodenal ulcer is an alternative procedure to open surgery. With proper training and experience this procedure might overtake laparotomy and simple closure thereby reducing the post operative morbidity in terms of reduced wound pain, short hospital stay, likely reduced wound sepsis and hernia occurrence and post operative chest complications. This article describes four patients with acute perforation of duodenal ulcer who were submitted to an emergency laparoscopic repair.
 ...
PMID:Laparoscopic closure of acutely perforated duodenal ulcer--an early experience. 856 36

Retroperitoneal extravasation is an extremely uncommon complication of duodenal ulcer perforation. The preoperative diagnosis is difficult and may even by missed at operation. There were 25 cases reported in the literature. Only one patient was correctly diagnosed preoperatively and only seven patients survived. We describe the first case of retroperitoneal extravasation from perforated duodenal ulcer presenting as scrotal sepsis.
 ...
PMID:Retroperitoneal perforation of duodenal ulcer presenting as scrotal sepsis. 953 74

Laparoscopic closure of an acutely perforated duodenal ulcer is an alternative procedure to open surgery. With proper training and experience this procedure might overtake laparotomy and simple closure thereby reducing the post operative morbidity in terms of reduced wound pain, short hospital stay, likely reduced wound sepsis and hernia occurrence and post operative chest complications. We report a 63-year old man with acute perforation of duodenal ulcer who were submitted to an emergency laparoscopic repair, first time done on the Department of Surgery, Univerisity Clinical Center of Tuzla.
 ...
PMID:Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. 1564 39

Post-operative fever is common following emergency surgery. Investigation and management of post-operative fever can be challenging when a clear source of sepsis is not evident or the underlying source of infection is not recognised. We herein report a case of secondary pulmonary tuberculosis presenting as post-operative fever following emergency laparotomy for a perforated duodenal ulcer. This case of tuberculosis was diagnosed on day 41 post-operatively and prior inconclusive results meant that we relied mainly on re-visiting history and examination in order to identify 3 targeted investigations: plain chest X-ray, sputum sample and blood test. Accordingly, the co-management of this complex patient achieved a good outcome.
 ...
PMID:Pulmonary tuberculosis presenting as post-operative fever of unknown origin. 2806 17