Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0036572 (
seizures
)
80,221
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Lafora's disease (LD; OMIM 254780) is an autosomal recessive form of progressive myoclonus epilepsy characterized by
seizures
and cumulative neurological deterioration. Onset occurs during late childhood and usually results in death within ten years of the first symptoms. With few exceptions, patients follow a homogeneous clinical course despite the existence of genetic heterogeneity. Biopsy of various tissues, including brain, revealed characteristic polyglucosan inclusions called Lafora bodies, which suggested LD might be a generalized storage disease. Using a positional cloning approach, we have identified at chromosome 6q24 a novel gene, EPM2A, that encodes a protein with consensus amino acid sequence indicative of a protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP). mRNA transcripts representing alternatively spliced forms of EPM2A were found in every tissue examined, including brain. Six distinct DNA sequence variations in EPM2A in nine families, and one homozygous microdeletion in another family, have been found to cosegregate with LD. These mutations are predicted to cause deleterious effects in the putative protein product, named
laforin
, resulting in LD.
...
PMID:Mutations in a gene encoding a novel protein tyrosine phosphatase cause progressive myoclonus epilepsy. 977 10
Lafora's disease is one of five inherited progressive myoclonus epilepsy syndromes. It is an autosomal-recessive disorder with onset in late childhood or adolescence. Characteristic
seizures
include myoclonic and occipital lobe
seizures
with visual hallucinations, scotomata, and photoconvulsions. The course of the disease consists of worsening
seizures
and an inexorable decline in mental and other neurologic functions that result in dementia and death within 10 years of onset. Pathology reveals pathognomonic polyglucosan inclusions that are not seen in any other progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Lafora's disease is one of several neurologic conditions associated with brain polyglucosan bodies. Why Lafora's polyglucosan bodies alone are associated with epilepsy is unknown and is discussed in this article. Up to 80% of patients with Lafora's disease have mutations in the EPM2A gene. Although common mutations are rare, simple genetic tests to identify most mutations have been established. At least one other still-unknown gene causes Lafora's disease. The EPM2A gene codes for the protein
laforin
, which localizes at the plasma membrane and the rough endoplasmic reticulum and functions as a dual-specificity phosphatase. Work toward establishing the connection between
laforin
and Lafora's disease polyglucosans is underway, as are attempts to replace it into the central nervous system of patients with Lafora's disease.
...
PMID:Lafora's disease: towards a clinical, pathologic, and molecular synthesis. 1148 92
Mutations in the EPM2A gene encoding a dual-specificity phosphatase (
laforin
) cause Lafora disease (LD), a progressive and invariably fatal epilepsy with periodic acid-Schiff-positive (PAS+) cytoplasmic inclusions (Lafora bodies) in the central nervous system. To study the pathology of LD and the functions of
laforin
, we disrupted the Epm2a gene in mice. At two months of age, homozygous null mutants developed widespread degeneration of neurons, most of which occurred in the absence of Lafora bodies. Dying neurons characteristically exhibit swelling in the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi networks and mitochondria in the absence of apoptotic bodies or fragmentation of DNA. As Lafora bodies become more prominent at 4-12 months, organelles and nuclei are disrupted. The Lafora bodies, present both in neuronal and non-neural tissues, are positive for ubiquitin and advanced glycation end-products only in neurons, suggesting different pathological consequence for Lafora inclusions in neuronal tissues. Neuronal degeneration and Lafora inclusion bodies predate the onset of impaired behavioral responses, ataxia, spontaneous myoclonic
seizures
and EEG epileptiform activity. Our results suggest that LD is a primary neurodegenerative disorder that may utilize a non-apoptotic mechanism of cell death.
...
PMID:Targeted disruption of the Epm2a gene causes formation of Lafora inclusion bodies, neurodegeneration, ataxia, myoclonus epilepsy and impaired behavioral response in mice. 1201 6
Mutations in the EPM2A gene encoding a dual-specificity phosphatase (
laforin
) cause an autosomal recessive fatal disorder called Lafora's disease (LD) classically described as an adolescent-onset stimulus-sensitive myoclonus, epilepsy and neurologic deterioration. Here we related mutations in EPM2A with phenotypes of 22 patients (14 families) and identified two subsyndromes: (i) classical LD with adolescent-onset stimulus-sensitive grand mal, absence and myoclonic
seizures
followed by dementia and neurologic deterioration, and associated mainly with mutations in exon 4 (P = 0.0007); (ii) atypical LD with childhood-onset dyslexia and learning disorder followed by epilepsy and neurologic deterioration, and associated mainly with mutations in exon 1 (P = 0.0015). To understand the two subsyndromes better, we investigated the effect of five missense mutations in the carbohydrate-binding domain (CBD-4; coded by exon 1) and three missense mutations in the dual phosphatase domain (DSPD; coded by exons 3 and 4) on
laforin
's intracellular localization in HeLa cells. Expression of three mutant proteins (T194I, G279S and Y294N) in DSPD formed ubiquitin-positive cytoplasmic aggregates, suggesting that they were folding mutants set for degradation. In contrast, none of the three CBD-4 mutants showed cytoplasmic clumping. However, CBD-4 mutants W32G and R108C targeted both cytoplasm and nucleus, suggesting that
laforin
had diminished its usual affinity for polysomes. Our data, thus, represent the first report of a novel childhood syndrome for LD. Our results also provide clues for distinct roles for the CBD-4 and DSP domains of
laforin
in the etiology of two subsyndromes of LD.
...
PMID:Genotype-phenotype correlations for EPM2A mutations in Lafora's progressive myoclonus epilepsy: exon 1 mutations associate with an early-onset cognitive deficit subphenotype. 1201 7
Recent identifications of genes responsible for epilepsies are now contributing to diagnosis and treatment. Mutations of voltage-gated sodium channel genes SCN1A and SCN2A have been reported in epilepsies with a variety of phenotypes including generalized epilepsy with febrile
seizures
plus (GEFS +), severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy (SMEI), intractable childhood epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic
seizures
(ICEGTC), and benign familial neonatal-infantile
seizures
(BFNIS). We also identified a sporadic nonsense mutation of SCN2A in a patient with intractable epilepsy with severe mental decline. Lafora's disease (LD) is a fatal autosomal recessive epilepsy characterized by stimuli sensitive myoclonus, grand mal seizures, and progressive intellectual and neurological deterioration. The EPM2A gene has been reported to be responsible for LD. We found multiple disease mutations of EPM2A in LD patients, and also identified a subclass of LD who shows an early onset cognitive defect and correlated with EPM2A exon 1 mutations. We reported that the
laforin
protein encoded by the EPM2A gene has a dual-specificity phosphatase activity, associates with polyribosome, and interacts with the HIRIP5 protein with NifU-like domain. We recently generated and reported the EPM2A KO mice those develop neurodegeneration and other features similar to those of LD patients.
...
PMID:[Molecular genetics of epilepsy]. 1565 14
Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy (PME) of the Lafora type is an autosomal recessive disease, which presents in teenage years with myoclonia and generalized
seizures
leading to death within a decade of onset. It is characterized by pathognomonic inclusions, Lafora bodies (LB), in neurons and other cell types. Two genes causing Lafora disease (LD), EPM2A on chromosome 6q24 and NHLRC1 (EPM2B) on chromosome 6p22.3 have been identified, and our recent results indicate there is at least one other gene causing the disease. The EPM2A gene product,
laforin
, is a protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) with a carbohydrate-binding domain (CBD) in the N-terminus. NHLRC1 encodes a protein named malin, containing a zinc finger of the RING type in the N-terminal half and 6 NHL-repeat domains in the C-terminal direction. To date 43 different variations in EPM2A and 23 in NHLRC1 are known, including missense, nonsense, frameshift, and deletions. We have developed a human LD mutation database using a new generic biological database cross-referencing platform. The database, which currently contains 66 entries is accessible on the World Wide Web (http://projects.tcag.ca/lafora). Entries can be submitted via the curator of the database or via a web-based form.
...
PMID:Lafora progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy mutation database-EPM2A and NHLRC1 (EPM2B) genes. 1613 45
Lafora disease (LD) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by
seizures
and progressive neurologic deterioration, and is usually fatal within 10 years of onset. LD is a member of the family of progressive myoclonic epilepsies, which are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by myoclonic epilepsy, developmental regression, and associated neurologic symptoms. The following is a report and discussion of a 20-year-old man with no relevant past medical history until the age of 16 years when he had his first generalized tonic-clonic seizure. At a recent medical evaluation, he reported having clusters of generalized tonic-clonic seizure activity 2 to 3 times per week, had recently developed status epilepticus, and was having progressive impairment of cognitive function. The unique clinical elements of LD, including later onset of disease, the excellent initial response to anticonvulsants, and the neurophysiologic clues to the diagnosis are discussed and detailed in relation to this man. Additional research is required to discover a third, unknown locus for LD and to further elucidate the features of the
laforin
and malin complex-associated pathway. No preventative or curative treatment is currently available for LD and treatment focuses on palliation.
...
PMID:Lafora disease. 1704 80
Lafora's disease (LD) is a comparatively frequent and particularly severe type of progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Prevalence varies, LD is seen everywhere but is more common in geographic isolates and areas with high degree of inbreeding. Onset occurs during adolescence, with generalized tonic-clonic, clonic-tonic-clonic
seizures
, action and resting myoclonus, negative myoclonus, and focal occipital
seizures
with transient amaurosis. The course is marked by prominent cognitive deterioration, which can precede
seizures
and myoclonus, and by the progressive, relentless increase of
seizures
and myoclonus. Transmission is autosomal recessive. LD is genetically heterogeneous. Mutations/deletions of the EPM2A gene, localized in 1995 on 6q24, are found in 80p.cent (product:
laforin
), the less common EPM2B variant is on 6p22 (product: malin), but these two localizations do not account for all cases of LD. The diagnosis of LD may be suspected on the basis of the family history, age at onset, typical appearance of symptoms, rapid worsening of cognitive function, evaluation of fairly typical EEG aspects, and can easily be confirmed by axillar skin biopsy with proof of Lafora bodies (polyglucosan aggregates) in the sweat duct cells. Other biopsies, like brain biopsy, are generally not necessary. Genetic testing is useful for diagnosis but the genetic heterogeneity cannot rule out LD when none of the known mutations are detected. Genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis are theoretically possible when the genetic anomaly has been documented in an affected member of the family. The treatment of LD remains purely symptomatic. Drugs that may aggravate myoclonus must be avoided. Psychological and social management is of utmost importance in LD. Death occurs 4 to 10 years after onset in typical forms.
...
PMID:[Lafora's disease (EPM2)]. 1730 72
Lafora's disease is a progressive myoclonus epilepsy and must be evocated if myoclonus, occipital
seizures
and progressive cognitive impairment are present. We report the case of a 14-year-old boy who suffered from several occipital
seizures
and two generalised
seizures
. The diagnosis of Lafora's disease was made six years after these inaugural symptoms because of occurrence of myoclonus, aggravation of the epilepsy with paharmacoresistance and psychic deterioration. Axila sweat gland duct biopsy was performed to conclude to the disease. A mutation was found on the gene EPM2A. Lafora's disease is a genetic autosomal-recessive pathology. Two genes have been recently identified. They code for two proteins, malin and
laforin
, involved in glycogen metabolism in the cellular endoplasmic reticulum. Mutations of these genes are responsible for intracytoplasmic polyglucosan inclusions called Lafora bodies and pathognomonic of the disease.
...
PMID:[Lafora's disease presenting with progressive myoclonus epilepsy]. 1803 35
PRO: In the past decade, genotyping has started to help the neurologic practitioner treat patients with three types of epilepsy causing mutations, namely (1) SCN1A, a sodium channel gene mutated in Dravet's sporadic severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEI and SMEB); (2)
laforin
(dual specificity protein phosphatase) and malin (ubiquitin E3 ligase) in Lafora progressive myoclonic epilepsy (PME); and (3) cystatin B in Unverricht-Lundborg type of PME. Laforin, malin, and cystatin B are non-ion channel gene mutations that cause PME. Genotyping ensures accurate diagnosis, helps treatment and genetic counseling, psychological and social help for patients and families, and directs families to organizations devoted to finding cures for specific epilepsy diseases. In SCN1A and cystatin B mutations, treatment with sodium channel blockers (phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine) should be avoided. Because of early and correct diagnosis by genotyping of SCN1A mutations, the avoidance of sodium channel blockers, and aggressive treatment of prolonged convulsive status, there is hope that Dravet's syndrome may not be as severe as observed in all past reports. Genotyping also identifies nonsense mutations in Lafora PME. Nonsense mutations can be corrected by premature stop codon readthrough drugs such as gentamicin. The community practitioner together with epilepsy specialists in PME can work together and acquire gentamicin (Barton-Davis et al., 1999) for "compassionate use" in Lafora PME, a generalized lysosome multiorgan storage disorder that is invariably fatal. In Unverricht-Lundborg PME, new cohorts with genotyped cystatin B mutations have led to the chronic use of antioxidant N-acetylcysteine and combination valproate clobazam or clonazepam plus antimyoclonic drugs topiramate, zonisamide, piracetam, levetiracetam, or brivaracetam. These cohorts have minimal ataxia and no dementia, questioning whether the syndrome is truly progressive. In conclusion, not only is genotyping a prerequisite in the diagnosis of Dravet's syndrome and the progressive myoclonus epilepsies, but it also helps us choose the correct antiepileptic drugs to treat
seizures
in Dravet's syndrome and Unverricht-Lundborg PME. Genotyping also portends a brighter future, helping us to reassess the true course, severity, and progressive nature of Dravet's syndrome and Unverricht-Lundborg PME and helping us craft a future curative treatment for Dravet's syndrome and Lafora disease. Without the genotyping diagnosis of epilepsy causing mutations we are stuck with imprecise diagnosis and symptomatic treatment of
seizures
. CON: Genotyping of epilepsy may help to better understand the genetics of epilepsy, to establish an etiology in a patient with epilepsy, to provide genetic counseling, and to confirm a clinical diagnosis. However, critical analysis reveals that genotyping does not contribute to an improved treatment for the patients. In order to improve treatment, genotyping would have to (1) improve our ability to select the drug of choice for a given epilepsy or epileptic syndrome; (2) improve our ability to predict the individual risk of adverse reactions to certain drugs; (3) improve our ability to avoid unnecessary treatments or treatments that could aggravate
seizures
. Many example illustrate the lack of impact of genetic information on the treatment outcome: we do not treat Dravet syndrome more successfully since SCN1A testing became available; we do not treat Lafora disease more successfully since testing for
laforin
and malin became available; we do not need to know the genetic nature of Unverricht-Lundborg disease or test for the cystatin B mutation in order to select or avoid certain drugs; we do not treat Rett syndrome more successfully since MECP2 testing became available; we do not treat JME more successfully since we know its genetic origin; we do not treat autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy more successfully since we know its genetic origin and can test for its mutation. The clinical characteristics as well as the response to treatment of these epilepsy syndromes have been well established before genotyping became available. It can not be argued that genotyping is necessary for establishing a diagnosis or ensure accurate diagnosis. Since not all individuals with given syndromes have been shown to have the corresponding mutation, the clinical diagnosis must have been based on well-established clinical criteria. In addition, the presence or absence of the mutation in a given patient has never been shown to specifically predict the response to any form of treatment, positive or negative. Finally, the appropriate psychological and social help in a given patient will not depend on the identification of a mutation. This does not leave any role for genotyping in epilepsy for the sole reason of improving treatment of the patient. Claiming that the result of genotyping predicts optimal treatment in certain epilepsies is equivalent to stating that genotyping for diabetes has become available and that, based on this breakthrough, insulin can now be selected as the treatment of choice in those who test positive.
...
PMID:Debate: Does genetic information in humans help us treat patients? PRO--genetic information in humans helps us treat patients. CON--genetic information does not help at all. 1908 13
1
2
3
Next >>