Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0036341 (schizophrenia)
 60,220 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Sixty-one patients with acute schizophrenia received either remoxipride (75-375 mg daily) or thioridazine (150-750 mg daily) for 6 weeks. There was no statistically significant between-drug difference in improvement in mental state, as measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, although the trend favoured thioridazine; global assessment of illness severity at the last rating also favoured thioridazine. Sedation, anticholinergic effects, autonomic dysfunction, and weight gain were significantly more common in patients receiving thioridazine. Both drugs produced few extrapyramidal effects, but both were associated with cardiovascular changes in two patients; neither drug produced significant abnormalities in laboratory tests.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind comparative study of remoxipride and thioridazine in the acute phase of schizophrenia. 197 73

This is the first comparative double blind study of remoxipride. Sixty-one patients with acute schizophrenia received either remoxipride (75-375 mg daily) or thioridazine (150-750 mg daily) for 6 weeks. There was no statistically significant between-drug difference in improvement in mental state, as measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, although the trend favoured thioridazine; global assessment of illness severity at the last rating also favoured thioridazine. Sedation, anticholinergic effects, autonomic dysfunction and weight gain were significantly more common in patients receiving thioridazine. Both drugs produced few extrapyramidal effects, but both produced cardiovascular changes in two patients; neither drug produced significant abnormalities in laboratory tests.
 ...
PMID:A double blind comparative study of remoxipride and thioridazine in the acute phase of schizophrenia. 297 65

We carried out a 9-day double-blind clinical trial comparing intramuscular zuclopenthixol acetate with liquid oral haloperidol in the treatment of 40 newly admitted schizophrenic patients with acute exacerbation. A parallel-group design was used with stratification by sex. Zuclopenthixol acetate (50 to 150 mg) was given intramuscularly every 3 days, whereas liquid haloperidol (10 to 30 mg daily) was given orally three times a day, with supplementary doses of each medication given under double-blind conditions when needed for agitation. No other sedative drugs, including benzodiazepines, were administered. The mean daily dose was 18.9 mg for haloperidol as compared with a mean dose per 3 days of 117.6 mg for zuclopenthixol. The two treatments were found to be equally efficacious on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impression Scale. Both drugs induced similar extrapyramidal side effects. However, more tremors were associated with zuclopenthixol as was a tendency for tardive dyskinesia to be unmasked at the end of the injection interval. Sedation was higher with zuclopenthixol acetate than with haloperidol. Serum creatinine phosphokinase levels were not significantly increased after zuclopenthixol injections. The results of this trial suggest that zuclopenthixol acetate given intramuscularly every second to third day offers an alternative to conventional liquid oral haloperidol in the management of acute schizophrenia.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind controlled study of intramuscular zuclopenthixol acetate and liquid oral haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenic patients with acute exacerbation. 788 17

The first central pharmacodynamic action of chlorpromazine to be described was sedation without narcosis. The antipsychotic action and extrapyramidal symptoms were observed later. Sedation can be separated into nonspecific sedation (drowsiness, somnolence) and specific sedation (psychomotor inhibition and psychic indifference). Both types are parts of the clinical profiles of classical neuroleptics. The sedative properties of neuroleptics may contribute to the overall efficacy in the treatment of psychotic patients, depending on the clinical situation. In most patients, however, sedation is only needed for a short period, or not at all. The drug induced sedation may adversely affect the patients' well-being and functional capabilities. The term neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome (NIDS) has been coined to focus attention on the adverse mental effects of neuroleptics. NIDS still needs to be properly defined and to be differentiated from the deficit syndrome of schizophrenia and postpsychotic depression. Assessment methods are needed to establish the incidence and prevalence of NIDS, to evaluate the importance of NIDS in the overall treatment outcome in psychoses and to facilitate development of better antipsychotic agents.
 ...
PMID:Neuroleptics and the neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome. 791 56

Agitation is a nonspecific constellation of symptoms seen in a variety of psychiatric disorders, ranging from psychotic exacerbations in patients with schizophrenia to behavioral disturbances associated with organic factors. Its treatment must be individualized and based on the etiology of the psychomotor disturbance. Certain categories of drugs are broadly effective. Sedation and control of disruptive and dangerous behavior are the initial goals in stabilizing acutely agitated patients. Sedation is necessary during the lag period before antipsychotic and mood-stabilizing drugs take effect. Barbiturates and chlorpromazine, initially given to control agitated behavior, are largely supplanted by higher-potency antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and, recently, a combination of these two agents. Agitation is generally controlled within hours to days, whereas remission of affective or psychotic symptoms often requires weeks to months. Once remission is obtained, sedation is no longer desired and may be a barrier to optimal patient function and compliance. Thus, for long-term treatment, strategies are used to minimize sedation, such as reducing dosages, changing administration to bedtime, or adding antidepressants or stimulants where appropriate.
 ...
PMID:Sedation in acute and chronic agitation. 894 99

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the objective and subjective efficacy as well as tolerability of olanzapine in acute treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders under naturalistic non-selective conditions. Inpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, consecutively admitted over an 18-month period, treated with olanzapine, were included. Diagnoses were made according to ICD-10 criteria based on repeated clinical assessments. Efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine were assessed at baseline and at the end of inpatient acute treatment including Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression, subjective assessments, UKU and biological investigations. One hundred and twenty non-selected patients who met ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia (73%), schizophreniform disorder (14%) or schizoaffective disorder (13%) were treated with olanzapine 15.3+/-5.2 mg/day. Baseline severity (PANSS total mean score 102.2) was higher compared to various admittance studies (PANSS total mean score 86-90). In 32% of patients (n=38), olanzapine treatment was discontinued, mainly because of inefficacy for positive (89%, n=34) and/or negative (95%, n=36) symptoms and/or because of adverse events (37%, n=14). Response rates as improvement in PANSS total score (after > or =3 weeks of treatment) of > or =20%, 30% or 40% were 68%, 55% and 35%, respectively. Response rates in post-hoc defined treatment resistant patients were not significantly different from non-refractory patients. Sedation (26%) was the most common side-effect, followed by weight gain (22%). With regards to subjective efficacy, 30% of the patients were not satisfied with the efficacy of olanzapine, while only 6% of the patients reported a not satisfying subjective tolerability. According to duration of olanzapine treatment, the results for patients, who remained in hospital, revealed a faster increase of weight compared to admittance studies (7 kg in 14 weeks versus 7 kg in 38 weeks). Olanzapine has been found to be effective and tolerable, also under naturalistic acute treatment conditions. Compared to previous double-blind admittance studies, patients had a higher severity of illness at entry and a lower > or =40% PANSS total score response rate. By contrast to previous results, mean dose of olanzapine was similar for multiple- and first-episode patients, and weight gain was more severe. The results underline the need of Phase IV studies for the assessment of clinical antipsychotic efficacy and tolerability.
 ...
PMID:Objective and subjective efficacy as well as tolerability of olanzapine in the acute treatment of 120 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. 1292 Mar 85

Patients with schizophrenia often suffer from sleep disturbances such as excessive sleeping and insomnia. Common medications for schizophrenia can have a sedative effect on patients. Not all antipsychotic medications have the same sedative effect, which is related to dosage and affinity for histamine H1 receptors. Studies have shown that, compared with conventional antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics such as risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone generally cause less sedation yet are as effective in controlling psychosis and agitation. Sedation can be troublesome to patients who are trying to become re-integrated into society and interfere with their treatment regimen. Both persistent sedation and chronic insomnia can be managed by the physician.
 ...
PMID:Atypical antipsychotics: sleep, sedation, and efficacy. 1600 Oct 94

Atypical antipsychotics will continue to be prescribed for the behavioral symptoms of dementia in the absence of more effective, better tolerated, and safer alternatives. The evidence base, although incomplete, suggests that modest treatment effect sizes are offset by risk of considerable adverse effects. How might this information be best applied to clinical practice? Non-pharmacologic strategies should be implemented in routine clinical practice. Placebo-controlled clinical trials of individual antipsychotic agents have historically reported high placebo response rates; CATIE-AD reported that the sum total of the risk/benefit equation of atypical antipsychotic therapy was no greater than that achieved by placebo. CATIE-AD was designed to study the effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic treatment in community dwelling patients with AD. It is uncertain whether the results can be generalized to the populations of dementia patients residing in nursing homes with more severe cognitive and behavioral impairment. There is some suggestion that nursing home patients with dementia complicated by severe behavioral symptoms, particularly agitation and aggression without accompanying psychosis, might achieve greater benefit from atypical antipsychotic treatment than patients with milder behavioral symptoms. The finding that dementia patients without psychosis may respond more robustly to antipsychotic treatment seems counterintuitive, but may support the hypothesis that the neurobiology of the "psychosis of AD" differs from the psychosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disease. Adverse effects associated with antipsychotic therapy should be aggressively monitored throughout therapy. Treatment-emergent sedation was associated with all of the atypical antipsychotics in CATIE-AD and is probably an important mediator of mortality risk in patients with dementia. Sedation exacerbates pre-existing cognitive impairment and increases the risk of complications such as aspiration pneumonia, so concomitant use of benzodiazepines should be discouraged or limited to short periods with careful observation.' Once initiated, the effectiveness and tolerability of antipsychotic therapy should be evaluated routinely. In Alzheimer's disease, the severity and frequency of behavioral symptoms often decreases as illness progresses. In a stable patient, it is prudent to attempt to taper and discontinue the antipsychotic after 2-8 months of therapy. Better understanding of the potential adverse effects of antipsychotic therapy has increased interest in the effects of the dementia-specific medications on behavioral symptoms. Reductions in neuropsychiatric symptoms have been reported from trials of individual cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine monotherapy, and memantine combined with donepezil in AD patients. Studies of small numbers of patients in open trials of cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) and one double-blind placebo controlled trial (rivastigmine) have reported varying degrees of improvement of behavioral symptoms and psychosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Delusions, hallucinations, apathy, and agitation/aggression are cited as the symptom categories most likely to show significant improvement. Since few of these studies were prospectively designed to study behavioral symptoms, results must be interpreted cautiously. Treatment of behavioral symptoms in AD and other dementias is challenging. The limitations of current approaches drive the search for effective, well tolerated therapies.
 ...
PMID:Atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of dementia-related behaviors: an update. 1763 94

Antipsychotic drugs can be of great benefit in a range of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, but all are associated with a wide range of potential adverse effects. These can impair quality of life, cause stigma, lead to poor adherence with medication, cause physical morbidity and, in extreme cases, be fatal. A comprehensive overview of tolerability requires a review of all available data, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies and postmarketing surveillance studies. Assessing the relative tolerability of atypical antipsychotics is hampered by the paucity of RCTs that compare these drugs head-to-head, and limited and inconsistent reporting of adverse effect data that makes cross-study comparisons difficult. Despite methodological problems in assessment and interpretation of tolerability data, important differences exist between the atypical antipsychotics in the relative risk of acute extrapyramidal symptoms (highest risk: higher doses of risperidone), hyperglycaemia and dyslipidaemia (highest risk: clozapine and olanzapine), hyperprolactinaemia (highest risk: amisulpride and risperidone), prolongation of heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) [highest risk: ziprasidone and sertindole] and weight gain (highest risk: clozapine and olanzapine). Sedation, antimuscarinic symptoms, postural hypotension, agranulocytosis and seizures are more common with clozapine than with other atypical antipsychotics. The variation in their tolerability suggests that it is misleading to regard the atypical antipsychotics as a uniform drug class, and also means that the term 'atypical antipsychotic' has only limited usefulness. Differences between the atypical agents in terms of efficacy and pharmacodynamic profiles also support this view. As tolerability differs between specific conventional and atypical drugs, we conclude that broad statements comparing the relative risk of specific adverse effects between 'atypical' and 'conventional' antipsychotics are largely meaningless; rather, comparisons should be made between specific atypical and specific conventional drugs. Adverse effects are usually dose dependent and can be influenced by patient characteristics, including age and gender. These confounding factors should be considered in clinical practice and in the interpretation of research data. Selection of an antipsychotic should be on an individual patient basis. Patients should be involved in prescribing decisions and this should involve discussion about adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:Adverse effects of atypical antipsychotics : differential risk and clinical implications. 1792 96

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that, in addition to its use in adults, is now indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia, and manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adolescents aged 13-17 years. In a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, 6-week trial in adolescents aged 13-17 years with schizophrenia, the least squares mean reduction from baseline to 6 weeks in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (BPRS-C) total score (primary endpoint) was significantly greater with olanzapine than with placebo. In a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, 3-week trial in adolescents, aged 13-17 years, with manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder, the mean reduction from baseline to 3 weeks in the Adolescent Structured Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score (primary endpoint) was significantly greater with olanzapine than with placebo. In extensions of each of the pivotal placebo-controlled trials in schizophrenia and bipolar mania, open-label treatment with olanzapine for up to 26 weeks produced significant reductions from baseline to endpoint in BPRS-C and YMRS total scores, respectively. Oral olanzapine was generally well tolerated in adolescents with schizophrenia or bipolar mania. Sedation and weight gain were the most common adverse events in placebo-controlled trials. Extrapyramidal symptoms were reported by 10% of olanzapine recipients compared with 6% of placebo recipients. Olanzapine-treated adolescents were likely to experience greater increases in bodyweight, sedation, blood lipids, serum prolactin and liver transaminase levels than olanzapine-treated adults. Therefore, careful consideration of risk-benefit is recommended before using olanzapine in adolescents.
 ...
PMID:Olanzapine: in adolescents with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder. 2036 8


1 2 Next >>