Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0036341 (schizophrenia)
 60,220 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The authors prospectively assessed symptoms induced by the interruption of antidepressants in 16 patients (11 women and 5 men), aged from 33 to 85 years (mean = 52.4 +/- 16.4), treated with antidepressants since at least two weeks. All patients were free of alcohol abuse or dependence disorder and of other dependence to psychoactive substances. None of them presented medical illness. Diagnosis were made by separate evaluations by two authors and confirmed with a semistructered assessment instrument: the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (Lifetime Version). All patients were submitted to a brutal discontinuation of their antidepressant agent. Patients were assessed twice, before the interruption of the antidepressant, and 72 hours later. Effects of antidepressant interruption were assessed by several means. Modification of anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Symptoms of withdrawal were assessed with Cassano and al.'s scale SESSH including an evaluation of anxiety, agitation, irritability, anergy, difficulty on concentrating, depersonalization, sleep and appetite disorders, muscle pains, nausea, tremor, sweating, altered taste, hyperosmia, paresthesias, photophobia, motor incoordination, dizziness, hyperacousia pain, delirium. Fourteen of the 16 patients (87.5%) presented modifications of their somatic or psychic state 3 days after the interruption of the antidepressant treatment. Most frequent symptoms were: increase in anxiety (31%), increase in irritability (25%), sleep disorders (19%), decrease of anergia and fatigue (19%). Mean scores of anxiety and depression were not significantly modified by the withdrawal. Following TCAs interruption (7 patients) most frequent symptoms were sleep disorders; increase in anxiety, nausea. Among patients withdrawn from SSRIs (6 patients), most frequent symptoms were increase in anxiety, increase in irritability, headache. Patients also presented a decrease of nausea, and of anorexia.
 ...
PMID:[Prospective evaluation of antidepressant discontinuation]. 969 14

In this double-blind study, patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomized to receive either ziprasidone 80 mg/day (n = 106) or 160 mg/day (n = 104) or placebo (n = 92), for 6 weeks. Both doses of ziprasidone were statistically significantly more effective than placebo in improving the PANSS total, BPRS total, BPRS core items, CGI-S, and PANSS negative subscale scores (p < .05). Ziprasidone 160 mg/day significantly improved depressive symptoms in patients with clinically significant depression at baseline (MADRS > or = 14, over-all mean 23.5) (p < .05) as compared with placebo. The percentage of patients experiencing adverse events was similar in each treatment group, and resultant discontinuation was rare. The most frequent adverse events associated with ziprasidone were generally mild dyspepsia, nausea, dizziness, and transient somnolence. Ziprasidone was shown to have a very low liability for inducing movement disorders and weight gain. The results indicate that ziprasidone is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of the positive, negative, and depressive symptoms of an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
 ...
PMID:Ziprasidone 80 mg/day and 160 mg/day in the acute exacerbation of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a 6-week placebo-controlled trial. Ziprasidone Study Group. 1019 29

The efficacy and safety of quetiapine fumurate in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia were evaluated in an 8-week, multicenter, open-label study. The results of this study which included a total of 54 patients showed good efficacy and safety profile for quetiapine fumarate as seen by the improvement rate (moderate or above in the final global improvement rating) of 49.1% and safety rate (no problem in overall safety rating) of 66.0%. The mean BPRS total score decreased significantly from 55.5 +/- 10.9 points at baseline to 45.4 +/- 13.0 points at the completion of administration. The PANSS scores also showed significant improvement on all scales; the mean scores decreased from 20.7 +/- 6.3 points at baseline to 17.7 +/- 6.9 points at withdrawal or completion of administration on the positive scale, from 27.8 +/- 5.8 points to 24.0 +/- 7.3 points on the negative scale, and from 51.4 +/- 10.1 points to 44.7 +/- 12.4 points on the general psychopathology scale. Although the most frequent adverse reactions were somnolence (18.9%), insomnia (17.0%), nervousness (13.2%), dizziness (13.2%), malaise (13.2%), postural hypotension (11.3%), tachycardia (9.4%), and constipation (9.4%), the incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms was low (11.3%). From these results, quetiapine fumarate was suggested to be highly effective and safe for the treatment of schizophrenia.
 ...
PMID:[Early phase II study of quetiapine fumarate on schizophrenia]. 1046 76

Quetiapine fumarate is a recently marketed atypical antipsychotic medication proved to be effective in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in the younger population. There is a paucity of studies of this drug in the elderly and more data are needed on the effects of quetiapine in this population, especially those with comorbid medical illnesses. Quetiapine was used to treat seven elderly hospitalized patients between 61 and 72 years of age who manifested signs of psychosis related to schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder. All patients had been treated previously with conventional antipsychotics or other atypical antipsychotics. Response was assessed by observation of patient's behavior. Four patients responded to treatment; three did not respond. Positive symptoms decreased markedly in all four responders. Negative symptoms showed marked decrease in two patients and moderate decrease in one patient. Preexisting extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) diminished in three patients. Transient hypotension, dizziness, and somnolence occurred in two patients. No other side effects were noted. No adverse consequences occurred when lithium, carbamazepine, valproic acid, or venlafaxine was given concurrently. The reduction of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia and lack of significant EPS and minimal sedative, hypotensive, and anticholinergic side effects indicate that quetiapine may be a safe and effective medication for the elderly.
 ...
PMID:Clinical experience with quetiapine in elderly patients with psychotic disorders. 1075 4

Conventional antipsychotic agents can induce extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) that may be alleviated by switching patients to novel agents such as olanzapine. Patients with schizophrenia and related disorders (ICD-10) who were taking haloperidol (N = 94; mean dose = 12.7 mg/day) and had EPS (Simpson-Angus Scale [SAS] > 3) were directly switched to 6 weeks of open-label olanzapine treatment (mean dose = 11.4 mg/day). There were significant mean improvements (p <0.001 for all measurements) from baseline to endpoint on the SAS (-9.69+/-5.33; percentage change, 87.2%), the Barnes Akathisia Scale (-1.00+/-1.19; percentage change, 82.5%), and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (-1.48+/-2.89; percentage change, 81.1%), and anticholinergic use decreased from 47.9% to 12.8% (mean baseline to endpoint change: -1.52+/-1.91-mg equivalents of benztropine; p < 0.001). Significant mean baseline to endpoint improvements (p < 0.001 for all measurements) were observed on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS; -25.28+/-18.67; percentage change, 30.3%), the PANSS-extracted Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (0-6 scale, -13.41+/-10.16; percentage change, 54.4%), and the Clinical Global Impressions Severity scale (-1.16+/-1.19; percentage change, 26.4%). Spontaneously reported treatment- emergent adverse events with a greater than 5% incidence were somnolence (16.0%), increased appetite (14.9%), weight gain (11.7%), headache (8.5%), anxiety (7.4%), dizziness (6.4%), and insomnia (5.3%). Criteria for a successful switch were met by 90.5% of patients. Psychotic symptom exacerbation was experienced by 30.9% of patients at any time during the study and by 11.7% of patients at endpoint. Results suggest that a direct switch to olanzapine is a therapeutic option when patients with haloperidol-induced EPS are unable to tolerate a more gradual switch.
 ...
PMID:Olanzapine as alternative therapy for patients with haloperidol-induced extrapyramidal symptoms: results of a multicenter, collaborative trial in Latin America. 1147 21

There is scant literature on anxiety symptoms induced during respiratory challenges developed to induce panic symptoms and attacks. Here we report on the prevalence of Acute Panic Inventory (API) symptoms during three consecutive respiratory challenges to patients with panic disorder (PD) and normal controls (NC). The challenges performed using a closed canopy system included voluntary room air hyperventilation (RAH), inhalation of 5% CO(2), and 7% CO(2)-enriched air. The PD patients were 41 men and 53 women whose mean age was 33.4 (SD = 8.55). The normal comparison group consisted of 35 men and 27 women with a mean age of 31.3 (SD = 9.21). The diagnosis of panic disorder was made using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. All potential normal controls underwent structured clinical interview using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version Modified for the Study of Anxiety Disorders (SADS-LA), and must have been free of a lifetime history of anxiety disorders, affective disorders, substance use disorders, and schizophrenia. All participants also had a complete medical evaluation and were in good health. The experiment consisted of seven experimental epochs: three baseline/recovery periods each followed by a respiratory challenge, and then a final recovery epoch. The API was administered at the end of each epoch. Clinical staff trained and experienced in rating panic attacks rated participants' response during each challenge as panic or no panic. Three groups were defined for analysis: PD patients who panicked, PD patients who did not panic, and NC who did not panic. Staff ratings indicated that the 7% CO(2) challenge was the most panicogenic, followed by the 5% CO(2), and the RAH challenges. Conventional statistics (analysis of variance and partial correlations) indicated that many baseline symptoms as well as symptom increments differed across groups, and were associated with the outcome of panic/no panic during each challenge. However, logistic regression analysis indicated that only a few symptoms independently predicted the panic/no panic outcome because many symptoms were redundant. The symptom cluster of fear in general, dizziness, difficulties with concentrating, and doing one's job predicted panic to RAH. The cluster of fear in general, confusion, dyspnea, and twitching/trembling predicted the response to 5% CO(2). Finally, fear in general, confusion, twitching/ trembling and dizziness predicted the response to 7% CO(2). While univariate analyses indicated that many symptoms distinguished between panic and no panic outcome, logistic regression revealed that group differences were subsumed under a few prominent symptoms, namely, fear in general, confusion, dizziness, twitching/trembling, and dyspnea. The results are discussed in the context of patient (having a diagnosis of PD) and panic effects (rated as panicking to a challenge).
 ...
PMID:Acute panic inventory symptoms during CO(2) inhalation and room-air hyperventilation among panic disorder patients and normal controls. 1166 65

The effects of haloperidol, risperidone, and thioridazine on the pharmacokinetics and side-effect profile of quetiapine were investigated in 36 patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder in a single-center, two-period, multiple-dose, open-label, randomized trial. Over a one-to two-week period, quetiapine doses were escalated to 300 mg twice daily (bid). Patients were then treated for at least 7 days at the target quetiapine dose and subsequently entered into the combination therapy period, receiving haloperidol (7.5 mg, bid), risperidone (3 mg, bid), or thioridazine (200 mg, bid) for 8.5 days (after 3 days of dose escalation). Key assessments included the pharmacokinetics of quetiapine at steady state (area under the curve within a dosing interval [AUCtSS], maximum [CmaxSS], and minimum [CminSS] observed plasma concentrations, and oral clearance [Cl/f]), as well as the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale scores and safety evaluations. Neither risperidone nor haloperidol had significant effects on quetiapine pharmacokinetics. However, thioridazine produced statistically significant changes, decreasing the least squares means values of the AUCtSS, CmaxSS, and CminSS by 40%, 47%, and 31%, respectively, and increasing Cl/f by 68%. Increases in the following adverse events were noted during coadministration: somnolence (risperidone), insomnia and dry mouth (all three coadministered therapies), and dizziness (thioridazine). UKU side effect items that became worse in >or= 25% of patients during each coadministration period included sedation and increased sleep duration. Results of laboratory tests, electrocardiograms, and vital sign measurements revealed few clinically important changes. Clinical stability can be maintained with good tolerability during the transition from quetiapine monotherapy to periods of coadministration with haloperidol, risperidone, or thioridazine. Coadministration of either haloperidol or risperidone did not have any important effects on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of quetiapine. Thioridazine significantly increased the oral clearance of quetiapine. Increased doses of quetiapine may be necessary to control psychotic symptoms when thioridazine is coadministered with quetiapine.
 ...
PMID:The safety and pharmacokinetics of quetiapine when coadministered with haloperidol, risperidone, or thioridazine. 1191 Feb 56

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of newer atypical antipsychotic drugs in comparison to clozapine for schizophrenia. Publications in all languages were searched from all relevant databases and all randomized controlled trials comparing clozapine with newer atypical drugs were included. The review and meta-analysis includes eight studies, most of them short in duration. Newer atypical drugs were broadly similar to clozapine when improvement was measured using a psychosis symptom rating scale or a global index. There was a trend for clozapine to be more effective than the others for positive symptoms, and less effective for the negative symptoms. The adverse effect profile of clozapine and newer atypical drugs was dissimilar: while clozapine produced more fatigue, hypersalivation, and orthostatic dizziness, new atypical drugs, with the exception of olanzapine, produced more extrapyramidal symptoms. As these results were obtained from few studies and a relatively small amount of patients, the equal effectiveness and tolerability of new atypical drugs in comparison with clozapine is not yet demonstrated. More trials of sufficient power, with longer duration, and measuring clinically important outcomes are urgently needed.
 ...
PMID:Newer atypical antipsychotic medication in comparison to clozapine: a systematic review of randomized trials. 1208 13

Compliance is the degree of adherence to medical advice. Therapeutic success, especially in long-term therapy, largely depends on the patient's compliance. Advances in psychopharmacology have led to the production of medications with substantial efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia. The tolerability profile of these atypical antipsychotic drugs shows a lower incidence of extrapyramidal motor side effects. However, other, perhaps more trivial, side effects impair their good tolerability and may severely reduce compliance. We assessed the acceptance of these side effects in 99 patients under neuroleptic long term treatment. Difficulties to concentrate, weight gain, dizziness, vision impairment, and headache were found to be the subjectively most distressing side effects. Female patients may be at particular risk of discontinuing medication due to side effects (especially weight gain). Our results suggest that non-compliance as a clinical problem should lead to an individualized treatment, which is best developed in the context of an ongoing physician-patient relationship. Furthermore the assessment of other neuroleptic side effects besides motor disturbances seems to be of outstanding importance.
 ...
PMID:[Non-extrapyramidal motor side-effects in long-term therapy with neuroleptics: an analysis of 99 patients]. 1240 34

The prevalence of schizophrenia is about 1% worldwide. Individuals with schizophrenia are at increased risk for osteoporosis and fractures for several reasons, including poor diet, lack of exercise, cigarette smoking, and polydipsia. Some antipsychotic medications may further increase the risk of fractures by causing dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, and falls. Studies in women with hyperprolactinemia resulting from pituitary tumors have demonstrated high rates of osteoporosis believed to result from hypoestrogenism. Similarly, hyperprolactinemia in men results in hypogonadism and bone loss. Preliminary surveys have indicated that schizophrenia patients also may have elevated rates of osteoporosis and pathological fractures, possibly resulting in part from the long-term administration of antipsychotic agents that produce hyperprolactinemia and secondarily lower estrogen and testosterone levels. This potential complication of treatment with certain antipsychotic agents requires careful study and could represent a serious public health problem.
 ...
PMID:Hyperprolactinemia and bone mineral density: the potential impact of antipsychotic agents. 1265 Jun 84


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>