Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0036341 (schizophrenia)
 60,220 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The introduction of atypical antipsychotics represents an important advance in the treatment of schizophrenia. As their therapeutic efficacy, tolerability and safety profiles are clearly superior to classical neuroleptics, atypical antipsychotic agents are considered to be the treatment of choice in first episode patients. In addition, an increasing number of patients are being switched from classical to atypical antipsychotic agents. Switching is especially relevant in patients with a poor therapeutic response to classical neuroleptics and persistent symptoms (positive symptoms, negative symptoms, depressive syndromes, cognitive deficit); in patients with a psychotic relapse despite compliance; in patients with important side-effects (not only acute and tardive extrapyramidal symptoms [EPS] and general side-effects, but also dysphoria or neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome [NIDS]); and in patients who are non-compliant due to side-effects. Switching to atypical antipsychotics should be performed with extreme care in stabilised patients; or in patients who present a danger to themselves or others at relapse; or in patients who are on depot neuroleptics who were non-compliant to previous oral treatment. Switching requires careful planning to reduce the risk of withdrawal effects (neuroleptic withdrawal syndrome, cholinergic rebound, exacerbation of symptoms or relapse, rebound of parkinsonism, dystonia, akathisia, dyskinesia), which may mask the beneficial effects and lead to early discontinuation of the new treatment. Patients, family and carers should be actively involved at all stages, and educated about the possible benefits and problems associated with switching therapy. Cross-tapering old and new treatment is the preferred method for switching and this involves tapering off the previous antipsychotic agent and any adjunctive treatment (sedatives, anticholinergic medication), while gradually titrating the new atypical antipsychotic agent to the established therapeutic dose. Switching patients to amisulpride treatment offers effective antipsychotic therapy, with a positive effect on negative and depressive symptoms. Amisulpride treatment also results in improved quality of life and social functioning in addition to fewer relapses and days of hospitalisation during long-term follow-up.
 ...
PMID:Switching to amisulpride. 1241 9

The purported advantages of second-generation or "atypical" antipsychotics relative to first-generation antipsychotics have not been examined in patients with a first episode of schizophrenia. This flexible-dose study examined efficacy and safety in a randomized, double-blind, 52-week trial, comparing chlorpromazine (CPZ) and clozapine (CLZ) in treatment naive patients experiencing their first episode of schizophrenia. In all, 160 inpatients with first-episode schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder were randomized to CPZ or CLZ and followed them for 52 weeks or until dropout. The primary efficacy measure was time to first remission and proportion of time remaining in remission. The analysis was supplemented by comparisons on a profile of clinical symptoms and side effects. Of these first-episode patients, 80% achieved remission within 1 year (79% CPZ, 81% CLZ). The Kaplan-Meier estimated median time to first remission was 8 weeks for CLZ vs 12 weeks for CPZ (chi(2)(1)=5.56, p=0.02). Both the rate of first achieving remission and the odds for being in remission during the trial were almost doubled for the CLZ group in comparison with the CPZ group. At 12 weeks, CLZ was superior on many rating scale measures of symptom severity while CPZ was not superior on any. These symptom differences remained significant when controlling for EPS differences. By 52 weeks many of the symptom differences between groups were no longer significantly different. Generally, CLZ produced fewer side effects than CPZ, particularly extrapyramidal side effects. There was no significant difference between treatments in weight change or glucose metabolism. For each prior year of untreated psychosis, there was a 15% decrease in the odds of achieving remission (OR=0.85; CI 0.75-0.95). A high proportion of first-episode patients remitted within 1 year. We detected no difference in the proportion of first-episode patients receiving CLZ or CPZ that achieved remission. However, first-episode patients receiving CLZ remitted significantly faster and remained in remission longer than subjects receiving CPZ. While the CLZ group showed significantly less symptomatology on some measures and fewer side effects at 12 weeks, the two treatment groups seemed to converge by 1 year. Longer duration of untreated psychosis was associated with lower odds of achieving remission.
 ...
PMID:Atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs in treatment-naive first-episode schizophrenia: a 52-week randomized trial of clozapine vs chlorpromazine. 1656 2

Aripiprazole is a novel antipsychotic with a unique mechanism of action. Presented here is a pooled analysis of safety and tolerability data from all completed short-term, placebo-controlled trials in schizophrenia from the aripiprazole clinical development program. Data were analyzed from five 4- to 6-week double-blind multicenter studies of patients hospitalized with acute relapse of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder randomized to aripiprazole (n=932), placebo (n=416), or haloperidol (n=201). Daily aripiprazole doses ranged from 2 to 30 mg. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) reports, EPS scales, ECGs, weight, and prolactin, glucose and cholesterol levels. Aripiprazole was well tolerated, with similar AE incidence rates to placebo, and lower rates than haloperidol for akathisia, extrapyramidal syndrome and somnolence. Objective EPS assessments demonstrated no significant differences between aripiprazole and placebo on Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) scores, no dose-dependent effects on Barnes Akathisia scores, and significant reductions in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) scores from baseline vs. placebo (p</=0.01). Haloperidol showed increased SAS and Barnes Akathisia scores over placebo (p</=0.01). There was minimal mean weight change with aripiprazole (+0.71 kg) and haloperidol (+0.56 kg), and a lack of QT(c) prolongation. Serum prolactin increased with haloperidol, but not aripiprazole. In conclusion, aripiprazole shows a favorable safety and tolerability profile with low potential for EPS, weight gain, prolactin elevation, QT(c) prolongation, and sedation. Aripiprazole's safety profile may offer benefits in schizophrenia treatment.
 ...
PMID:Aripiprazole in the treatment of schizophrenia: safety and tolerability in short-term, placebo-controlled trials. 1272 64

With the use of chlorpromazine and other traditional antipsychotics for psychosis, it was soon discovered that the antipsychotic efficacy of this class of medications was closely associated with their ability to block dopamine D(2) receptors in the brain. This prompted the hypothesis that the etiology of schizophrenia and other psychotic illnesses might be caused by a dysregulation of dopamine. This hypothesis, that the dopamine system explains schizophrenia symptoms, however, is far from complete and the treatment with conventional antipsychotic medications is far from ideal. There has been a great deal of speculation regarding the role of serotonin receptor antagonism in regards to antipsychotic effects. The second generation antipsychotics (SGAs), clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone all have relatively high serotonin to dopamine binding ratios. Serotonin receptor binding may be important to these drugs' actions, possibly by stimulating dopamine activity in mesocortical pathways. Yet, while the mechanism of action of SGAs as a group remain unsolved, it is important to note that the SGAs offer many clinical benefits to treatment as compared to traditional antipsychotics and are quickly emerging as first-line therapy for schizophrenia. In addition to lower rates of EPS and tardive dyskinesia, other benefits to treatment with this class of antipsychotics include better treatment of negative symptoms, better compliance, possible benefits for cognitive impairments, lower rates of relapse and rehospitalization, and more cost-effective therapy. Within the class of SGAs, however, differences exist both in efficacy and side effects and these will be described. Optimization of treatment and understanding the exact mechanism of action of current antipsychotic medications will help pave the way for new drug targets in the future.
 ...
PMID:Current status of antipsychotic treatment. 1276 30

Numerous studies compare side effects or adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of the various typical and newer atypical neuroleptics in patients with schizophrenia. However, these studies, as controlled randomized trials, represent an artificial setting of drug administration and do not easily relate to the "real-life" setting of psychiatric treatment. In contrast, the AMSP drug safety program allows the monitoring of ADRs of all types of psychopharmacological agents in the naturalistic setting of routine clinical practice. In the present study, the data on neuroleptics acquired in the AMSP program from 1993 to 2000 are analyzed. In this period, 86,439 patients treated with at least one neuroleptic agent were monitored. In 1.1 % of the patients severe ADRs occurred. In contrast to the results from controlled trials, atypical neuroleptics caused more severe ADRs than did typical neuroleptics. This result was mainly caused by the high number of severe ADRs in patients treated with clozapine and concerned delirium and non-EPS neurological, gastrointestinal, hepatic, dermatological, hematological, and endocrinological ADRs. Atypical neuroleptics were found to be superior in EPS and urological ADRs. Excluding the data on clozapine, we found typical and atypical neuroleptics to be similar in the occurrence of severe ADRs, although the profiles differ between these two groups as well as between the single substances. Our findings provide valuable information on the type and frequency of ADRs in psychiatric practice, thus enabling differential indication of neuroleptics based not only on the efficacy and tolerability data of controlled trials but also on their differential ADR profile occurring in the "real-life" setting of routine clinical treatment.
 ...
PMID:Severe adverse drug reactions in psychiatric inpatients treated with neuroleptics. 1505 14

Weight gain is a serious problem with recently introduced atypical antipsychotic agents. Nizatidine, a histamine2 (H2)-receptor antagonist, may help reduce this weight gain. To our knowledge, no adverse effects have been reported when nizatidine is given at recommended doses with atypical antipyschotic agents. We describe, however, an adolescent who was receiving quetiapine and paroxetine for schizophrenia and depression, and developed extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS; parkinsonism and akathisia) after taking nizatidine for weight loss. Based on a report of another patient who developed EPS after taking higher-than-recommended doses of nizatidine, we reviewed the literature on treatment with H2-receptor antagonists for weight gain and on central nervous system adverse effects of nizatidine. Nizatidine may be effective for reducing weight gain associated with both medical and psychiatric conditions. Its safety profile is usually benign, although some patients may develop serious adverse effects, such as EPS and delirium. Therefore, the drug is recommended for short-term management of weight gain associated with atypical antipsychotic agents. Patients receiving nizatidine therapy should be monitored closely for development of EPS, particularly when high doses are prescribed.
 ...
PMID:Extrapyramidal symptoms related to adjunctive nizatidine therapy in an adolescent receiving quetiapine and paroxetine. 1530 55

This short-term, single-blind, pilot trial was initiated to investigate the usefulness of quetiapine therapy in the treatment of schizophrenic patients refractory to first-generation antipsychotics. Following a neuroleptic-free period prior to study entry (at least 1 week for oral formulations and 6 weeks for depot formulations), quetiapine was started at 50 mg/day and titrated up to 500 mg/day by Day 6. This 500 mg daily dose was then maintained or increased up to a maximum of 750 mg/day, at the discretion of the treating physician, who was aware of the antipsychotic prescribed. Efficacy measures were represented by changes in total and component PANSS score from baseline to different intervals. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring the spontaneously referred moderate-to-severe adverse events, changes from baseline in SAS, BARS, and AIMS scores, supplementary use of flurazepam, lorazepam, and benztropine, clinically relevant physical changes, abnormalities in vital signs, blood chemistry, and hematology, and modifications in QTc interval and body weight. Rating scale assessments, categorization of adverse events, determination of physical examination, vital signs, and body weight were performed by a qualified physician blind to the particular antipsychotic under investigation and the aims of the study. All 12 patients completed the 4-week quetiapine treatment course. Mean total PANSS scores were significantly reduced between baseline and study endpoint (p=0.006). Five out of six PANSS subcomponent scores also showed significant decreases (p < 0.05). Six patients showed a reduction of > or = 20% in PANSS total score by the final day of quetiapine treatment, so were classified as responders. There were responders in all schizophrenia diagnostic subgroups (undifferentiated, paranoid, and disorganized). Two patients reported moderate adverse events. One patient received 3 days of benztropine therapy for EPS and five received flurazepam for insomnia. Weight change was minimal and mean SAS, BARS, and AIMS scores all showed nonsignificant decreases between baseline and endpoint. The 50% quetiapine response rate reported here in refractory patients is comparable with those previously reported for other atypical antipsychotics in populations of both refractory and intolerant patients.
 ...
PMID:Quetiapine in hospitalized patients with schizophrenia refractory to treatment with first-generation antipsychotics: a 4-week, flexible-dose, single-blind, exploratory, pilot trial. 1546 4

Clozapine was one of the major advances in the treatment of schizophrenia since the introduction of the classic antipsychotic agent chlorpromazine in the 1950s. Over the past 10 years, clozapine has become the reference compound for the development of new antipsychotics, and new drugs have been developed which have also claimed atypical status. The indications of clozapine were recently extended to Psychosis in Parkinson's disease and harmonized in the European Union. This provides the opportunity to update the data on clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia. In this article we review current clinical evidence in schizophrenia to address the following issues: 1) Efficacy in refractory/positive symptoms: a systematic and critical analysis of 14 double-blind clinical trials in comparison with both standard and novel antipsychotics show consistent findings in favour of clozapine, with all but three of the reports demonstrating superiority. The review of studies allow us to say little about the predictors of treatment response, time to clozapine response and about the impact of clozapine on the quality of patients'life and longer-term outcome. Treatment options for clozapine non-responders are reviewed. 2) Risk of EPS: clozapine is considered to have a minimal risk of EPS and in all studies where a valid methodology was used, a clear superiority over the other neuroleptics is demonstrated. It is pointed out that, if the prevalence and incidence of EPS with clozapine is low, it is not zero. All the studies assessing clozapine treatment for TD have major methodological limitations, so no final conclusion can be drawn. 3) Efficacy for primary and secondary negative symptoms and neurocognitive effects: the data of clinical studies where negative symptoms scales were used favour clozapine in terms of improvement. However most of the studies were carried out in populations with predominantly positive symptoms. With regard to the need to distinguish primary and secondary symptoms, data are conflicting regarding the benefit of clozapine. Due to the lack of studies with a valid methodology, no definitive conclusion can be drawn about the efficacy on clozapine on the deficit syndrome and on neurocognitive disorders. 4) Impact on suicide risk: 4 out of 6 retrospective studies provide evidence for the ability of clozapine therapy to reduce suicidal behaviour. The results of a recent randomized, parallel-group study designed to compare clozapine versus olanzapine in preventing suicide attempts seems to confirm this hypothesis. We also address the tolerability and safety data, especially haematologic, comitial, cardiovascular and metabolic side-effects. The effectiveness of blood monitoring for the management of neutropenia and agranulocytosis demands that the recommendations are strictly followed. The use of clozapine at doses higher than 600 mg daily should follow published recommendations, in order to minimize the risk of seizures; these include anticonvulsant regimens based on blood levels. With regard to the cardiovascular mortality, if clozapine therapy has negligible effects on QT interval, its association with potential fatal myocarditis cannot be excluded in young patients who should be investigated if they develop cardiac symptoms in the first weeks of treatment. Available data support the notion that the frequency of bodyweight gain is high with several new antipsychotics, including clozapine. Potential long term effects of bodyweight gain on mortality and morbidity have to be taken into consideration. The pharmacological mechanisms underlying the "unique clozapine profile" is discussed. Clozapine remains the only antipsychotic with efficacy at relatively low D2 receptor occupancy. The pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic aspects are also reviewed. Finally, the place of clozapine in the current treatment of schizophrenia is highlighted to inform the development of guidelines for clinical management.
 ...
PMID:[Leponex, 10 years after -- a clinical review]. 1562 52

Using PET with (15)O water, we characterized the time course of functional brain changes following the acute administration of a first- and a second-generation antipsychotic. Volunteers with schizophrenia were scanned while drug-free (baseline) and after single dose administration of haloperidol (n=6) or olanzapine (n=6) during a time course adapted to their plasma kinetics. To obtain brain location information, we contrasted each post-drug scan to baseline-acquired scans. We plotted the regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) extracted in these locations and calculated the kinetic characteristics of the curves. Further, we compared and contrasted the rCBF changes induced by the drugs over the first 4 h post-drug administration. Dorsal and ventral striatum, thalamus and anterior cingulate cortex were activated with haloperidol, while frontal, temporal and cerebellum regions evidenced reduced flow. With olanzapine, ventral striatum, anterior cingulate and temporal cortices evidenced increases, and thalamus and lingual cortex decreases, in rCBF. Both drugs activated the caudate nucleus. Haloperidol induced greater activation of the dorsal striatum than did olanzapine. These data reveal important differences in patterns of brain activation between the drugs. Differences in the involvement in basal ganglia parallel known differences between the drugs in the emergence of acute EPS upon emergency administration.
 ...
PMID:Functional effects of single dose first- and second-generation antipsychotic administration in subjects with schizophrenia. 1595 Apr 42

Amoxapine is marketed as an antidepressant. However, its in-vitro profile, receptor occupancy and preclinical effects are very similar to atypical antipsychotics. Amoxapine has also shown efficacy as an atypical antipsychotic in open trials. The objective of this study was to compare the antipsychotic and side effect profile of amoxapine and risperidone in a randomised assignment, standardized dosing, double-blind trial of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia. A total of 48 schizophrenic patients were enrolled and randomized in a double-blind 6-week trial to receive either risperidone (up to 5 mg/day) or amoxapine (up to 250 mg/day). Positive, negative, affective symptoms and motor side effects were measured using standardized weekly assessments. Prolactin levels were also determined at baseline and at the end of the study. A total of 39 patients (amoxapine, n=22; risperidone, n=21) completed the trial. Both pharmacological treatments, amoxapine 228.0 mg/day (SD=34.6) and risperidone 4.5 mg/day (SD=0.7), showed equivalent improvement in positive, negative, and depressive symptoms. Amoxapine was associated with less EPS and less prolactin elevation than risperidone. These data support previous reports about the efficacy of amoxapine as an atypical antipsychotic. Since amoxapine is off-patent, it may be a valuable low-cost alternative to new atypical antipsychotics, particularly in low-income countries where the majority of the patients are still treated with typical antipsychotics.
 ...
PMID:Amoxapine as an atypical antipsychotic: a comparative study vs risperidone. 1595 84


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>